200 top economists, including two former directors of the CBO, sent a letter to lawmakers urging them to repeal Obamacare. The said the democrat’s bill is a jobRead the whole thingkillerdestroyer...
The letter includes the signatures of Douglas Holtz-Eakin and June O’Neil, both former directors of the Congressional Budget Office; Arthur Laffer, the first chief economist for the Office of Management and Budget, Brian Wesbury, former chief economist of the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress; and William Niskanan, former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors and chairman emeritus of the libertarian CATO Institute.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
200 Top Economists Urge Congress to Repeal Job Destroying Obamacare Bill
GatewayPundit:
Nearly two-thirds of U.S. doctors surveyed fear healthcare reform could worsen care for patients
"When asked about the quality of healthcare in the U.S. over the next five years, 65 percent of the doctors believed it would deteriorate with only 18 percent predicting it would improve," Thomson Reuters, parent company of Reuters, said in a statement.Survey: US Doctors Fear Healthcare Reform
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Regulations: That phrase is uttered like an incantation, the magical answer...
...there is nothing simplistic about proposing the market as a solution to an economic problem. It’s short way of saying: let the multitude of knowledgeable people seeking profit, risking their own money, and responding to incentives find a solution based on persuasion not force. Translated that way, it sounds like a promising approach.The Pretense of Regulatory Knowledge
Ironically, those who don’t appreciate markets are in fact the ones who offer a simplistic, even empty alleged solution to economic problems: government regulation. That phrase is uttered like an incantation, the magical answer to all doubts about how, in the absence of fully free markets, problems would be solved. The irony is that while “let the market handle it” can be unpacked and made specific, “regulation” cannot. It can only be interpreted this way: Appoint a czar or a committee to somehow watch over things, and all will be well.
We’re hearing this idea a lot these days...
Hmmm...Hawaii guv can't find Obama birth certificate!
(Gee, what a surprise.)
After much ado (about nothing apparently), new Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie comes up empty!
Suggests controversy could hurt president's re-election chances
Good!
After much ado (about nothing apparently), new Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie comes up empty!
Suggests controversy could hurt president's re-election chances
Good!
Austerity In America: 22 Signs That It Is Already Here And That It Is Going To Be Very Painful
Glenn Beck has been warning about this for quite awhile now: Most Americans tend to think of "government debt" as only a problem of the federal government. But that is simply not accurate. The truth is that there are thousands of "government debt problems" from coast to coast...
HAT TIP: CA POLITICAL NEWS & VIEWS
HAT TIP: CA POLITICAL NEWS & VIEWS
Labels:
debt,
debt crisis,
economic crisis,
federal government,
states,
U.S. economy
Democrats hate Sarah Palin because "she is living proof that everything about the Democrat Party narrative is a lie"
Yes, of course not ALL Democrats hate her. In fact, former mayor of New York City Ed Koch just penned this nice tribute to Sarah Palin.
But friend and comedian Evan Sayet explains just Why the Left Hates Sarah Palin!
I can totally relate to his opening, can you?
Needless to say, I didn't even get that "one thing" but I did hear how Obama is doing "the very best he can" for America. Good thing I saw a brief clip of Andy Rooney the next night saying exactly the same thing: "Obama's doing the very best he can..." from the 60-Minute show that my friend so loves because I realized that she does nothing but parrot things like that without having any personal knowledge or basis for saying the things she believes.
This is truly frightening if you add up just how many people there are who can vote and who vote for liberals based on mythical mental viruses that are passed from one to the other without any real personal knowledge of what they are saying.
God help us all.
But friend and comedian Evan Sayet explains just Why the Left Hates Sarah Palin!
I can totally relate to his opening, can you?
It just happened again.I was getting my hair done last month and asked the British lady who does it (she's lived in the states for many years) to name JUST ONE of the many oh-so-wonderful things she was raving about that Obama has done for this country. She said she didn't follow politics (!@!). I said: I know, but just give me ONE thing, not the whole thing...
I spend a fair amount of time at my local coffee shop. I like to do my writing outside and, besides, it gives me an opportunity to try and initiate political conversations with the people who pass by — my hope always being to begin to enlighten them as to what conservative really believe (and not just what the leftist media tells them.)
Today the conversation turned to Sarah Palin and my new acquaintance blurted out: “Oh I hate her.” Since she did not yet know my politics, and since we were in Los Angeles, it is clear that she expected to hear back what you usually hear back in this city: “Yeah, I hate her, too.” Instead, I asked her why.
At this point I could have predicted her response because it’s the same response you get from Liberals no matter who on the Right you’re talking about, “Because she’s stupid.” I replied: “Being stupid is no reason to hate someone, but tell me, which one of her policies do you disagree with?” It wasn’t hard to predict her response: “All of them!”
I continued to push. “Well, then, if it’s all of them, it should be easy for you to name one.” Her reply? “They’re too many to list.”
“So don’t list them, just give me one,” I said.
This went on for awhile until my new acquaintance finally admitted that she didn’t know any of Ms. Palin’s policies. Before she ran off – Democrats always run off when asked to provide facts behind their hatred for Republicans – I looked her in the eye and said, “If you don’t know any of her policies perhaps you should look into them.” She promised she would. She won’t. If there are two things you can count on with Democrats, they are filled with hate and empty of facts.
Needless to say, I didn't even get that "one thing" but I did hear how Obama is doing "the very best he can" for America. Good thing I saw a brief clip of Andy Rooney the next night saying exactly the same thing: "Obama's doing the very best he can..." from the 60-Minute show that my friend so loves because I realized that she does nothing but parrot things like that without having any personal knowledge or basis for saying the things she believes.
This is truly frightening if you add up just how many people there are who can vote and who vote for liberals based on mythical mental viruses that are passed from one to the other without any real personal knowledge of what they are saying.
God help us all.
Labels:
Andy Rooney,
Ed Koch,
Evan Sayet,
liberals,
mayors,
New York City,
Sarah Palin
Monday, January 17, 2011
Obamacare's authors admit that "reform" could be something of a time bomb that will cause exploding health care costs down the line.
Washington Examiner: David Bowen, former health staff director of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, is one of the Obamacare authors to admit the bill could be a time-bomb...
Date, state, and Dad's identity...any one of these revelations could unravel the yarn that Obama has been spinning
The long form birth certificate could pose a number of problems other than country of origin, including the date of Obama's birth, the state of his birth, and the identity of his father. Any one of these revelations could unravel the yarn that Obama has been spinning.Jack Cashill's new book, Deconstructing Obama, can be pre-ordered here with a special offer for American Thinker readers.
These problems derive from the fact that Ann Dunham enrolled at university on August 19, 1961 and returned to Hawaii only after Obama Sr. had left Hawaii for good. Both of these facts are more firmly established than President Obama's Honolulu birth on August 4, 1961. In my forthcoming book, Deconstructing Obama, I review these possibilities in some detail.
The failure of the mainstream media to even address the inconsistencies in Obama's story is downright shameful. That failure has created a windstorm of curiosity that is becoming increasingly difficult for the media to ignore.
Does one man have the answer for America?
I emailed Al Martinez (The Daily News) twice about my friend Dick McDonald...and look what finally happened today!
Al Martinez: "Does one man have The Answer for America?"
PS: Dick has a free e-book on his website called "Make The Poor Rich and America Wealthier" that is over a hundred pages of specific details that show why his plan will save our country. (Please forward to your lists and spread the word!)
Al Martinez: "Does one man have The Answer for America?"
PS: Dick has a free e-book on his website called "Make The Poor Rich and America Wealthier" that is over a hundred pages of specific details that show why his plan will save our country. (Please forward to your lists and spread the word!)
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Dominate Twitter with this free Twitter application
"Viral Tweet Builder Free".. is a Twitter management application that allows you to get TONS of followers, and to pre-schedule Tweets...and yes it IS free for a limited time here.
If you want to dominate Twitter even more, for a very low one-time cost you can schedule Tweets up to FIVE YEARS in advance, and get more "niche-specific" followers. You can also make money handing this free service out yourself!
IT IS A NO BRAINER EITHER WAY!
Seriously, if you aren't capitalizing on Twitter, this is your chance to get in at zero cost. It's "Viral Tweet Builder Free" - go now and sign up here.
PS: Other companies charge a lot per month for similar Twitter services, take advantage of this introductory offer, or you'll be kicking yourself for months to come!
If you want to dominate Twitter even more, for a very low one-time cost you can schedule Tweets up to FIVE YEARS in advance, and get more "niche-specific" followers. You can also make money handing this free service out yourself!
IT IS A NO BRAINER EITHER WAY!
Seriously, if you aren't capitalizing on Twitter, this is your chance to get in at zero cost. It's "Viral Tweet Builder Free" - go now and sign up here.
PS: Other companies charge a lot per month for similar Twitter services, take advantage of this introductory offer, or you'll be kicking yourself for months to come!
A Rabbi and a cartoon prove how dumb liberals are
WSJ: Rabbi Boteach: Sarah Palin Is Right About 'Blood Libel'
This is brilliant!
Plus, a cartoon proves how just how dumb the liberals really are:
The Sarah Palin, The Glenn Beck and The Rush Limbaugh
This is brilliant!
Plus, a cartoon proves how just how dumb the liberals really are:
The Sarah Palin, The Glenn Beck and The Rush Limbaugh
Labels:
cartoon,
Glenn Beck,
liberals,
Rabbi,
Rush Limbaugh,
Sarah Palin
I do not want civil discourse
by Don Surber
For a decade, from the election of Bush 43 forward, the Left has lied and cheated as it tried to return to power. Al Gore made a mockery out of the American electoral system by being a spoilsport over Florida, which Bush indeed won by 537 votes. Dan Rather forged a document to try to derail Bush’s re-election. Twice Democrats stole U.S. senators from the Republicans. After voting to support the war to get by the 2002 election, many Democrats quickly soured on the war. The profane protests were cheered by liberals who misattributed “dissent is the highest form of patriotism”to Thomas Jefferson; the words belong to the late historian Howard Zinn.
Once in power, liberals were the opposite of gracious.
For two years now, I have been called ignorant, racist, angry and violent by the left. The very foul-mouthed protesters of Bush dare to now label my words as “hate speech.”
Last week, the left quickly blamed the right for the national tragedy of a shooting spree by a madman who never watched Fox News, never listened to Rush Limbaugh and likely did not know who Sarah Palin is.
Fortunately, the American public rejected out of hand that idiotic notion that the right was responsible.
Rather than apologize, the left wants to change the tone of the political debate.
The left suddenly wants civil discourse.
Bite me.
The left wants to play games of semantics.
Bite me.
The left wants us to be civil — after being so uncivil for a decade.
Bite me.
There is grown-up work to do now. Liberals ran up the federal credit card, destroyed the American medical system and undermined the rule of law — which is the foundation of capitalism — with a bunch of unconstitutional fiats from the president and his bureaucracy.
The economy is a mess. The president “inherited” a 7.6% unemployment rate. It’s now 9.4% — after we spent a record $787 billion on a stimulus.
I was not consulted on that stimulus. I had a very good argument against it. I said the money supply was too large and printing more money would fail. I said let the economic downturn run its course.
Lefties were too busy celebrating the 2008 election to listen.
When people protested lefties made vulgar remarks about tea-bagging and giggled.
So screw you and your civil discourse.
I don’t want to hear it.
I have been screamed at for 10 years.
It’s my turn now. I am not going to scream back. But I refuse to allow anyone to dictate what I say or how I say it. I refuse to allow the same foul-mouthed, foul-spirited foul people who dumped on me to now try to tell me what I may or may not say.
My free speech matters more than the feelings of anyone on the left. You don’t like what I say? Tough.
I will not allow people to label my words Hate Speech or try to lecture me on civility. I saw the lefty signs. The left’s definition of civil discourse is surreal.
We have a terribly unfit president who has expanded government control beyond not only what is constitutional but what is healthy for our freedom.
Indeed, this call for civil discourse is itself a direct threat to my free speech.
So screw you.
You don’t like my words? You don’t like my tone? You feel threatened?
Too bad.
No.
Actually, that is what I want. I want the lefties to feel bad. I want them to feel hurt. I want them to cry to their mommies.
That way the field will be cleared so we grown-ups can fix the nation and the economy. If you can’t put up with a little excrement, get the hell out of the barn.
UPDATE: Linked by Ann Althouse. Thanks.
Labels:
conservatives,
Democrats,
left wing,
liberals,
Obama,
partisan politics,
politics,
President,
Republicans,
right wing
Saturday, January 15, 2011
JFK's "break-in" preceded the Watergate "break-in" scandal
The Washington Post:
A half-century of political dirty tricksRead the whole thing...
By Mark Feldstein
Friday, January 14, 2011
Fifty years ago next week, Richard Nixon stood uncomfortably on the Capitol's inaugural platform and watched his rival John F. Kennedy being sworn in as president. "We won" the election, Nixon fumed, "but they stole it from us."
Indeed, the dirty tricks that helped defeat Nixon were more devious than merely the ballot-stuffing of political lore. In one of the least-known chapters of 20th-century political history, Kennedy operatives secretly paid off an informant and set in motion a Watergate-like burglary that sabotaged Nixon's campaign on the eve of the election...
A half-century afterward, Washington still lives with the residue of the Kennedys' little-known dirty trick, which helped unleash our modern scandal culture and continues to influence politics and media today.
Mark Feldstein, a professor of media and public affairs at George Washington University, is the author of "Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washington's Scandal Culture."
Labels:
election fraud,
John Kennedy,
President,
Richard Nixon,
scandal,
Watergate
Evergreen Solar, a leading maker of panels in the United States, is laying off 800 people and shifting production to China.
Thanks, Bama!
Even though Evergreen opened its Devens plant, with all new equipment, only in 2008, it began talks with Chinese companies in early 2009. In September 2010, the company opened its factory in Wuhan, China, and will now rely on that operation.NEW YORK TIMES
Labels:
China,
green jobs,
jobs,
manufacturers,
Massachusetts,
Obama,
President,
solar,
U.S. economy
Eric Fuller, who blamed Palin for shootings, is charged with making threats to Tea Party
From CUBACHI:
During a Town Hall meeting this morning, Fuller took exception to comments by Rep. Terri Proud and Tucson Tea Party spokesman Trent Humphries....According to sheriff’s deputies at the scene, Fuller took a photo of Humphries and said, “You’re Dead.” Deputies immediately escorted Fuller from the room.HAT TIP: RiehlWorldView
Friday, January 14, 2011
Good news: Obama eligibility challenge in the state of Illinois is progressing!
Renowned election attorney Steve Boulton finds the issues in this case to present “intriguing Constitutional questions” and will take up the appeals for Meroni V ISBEAPPEAL FILED AGAINST ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Organizing for America 2/11/08: "What I see in Obama is a chance for a revolution...Together We Thrive!"
Remember the T-Shirts at the eulogy pep rally?
Check it out... before they scrub it!
THIS WAS A CAMPAIGN RALLY FOR OBAMA STRAIGHT UP.
Check it out... before they scrub it!
THIS WAS A CAMPAIGN RALLY FOR OBAMA STRAIGHT UP.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
SAVING OUR ECONOMY
LACA (Los Angeles Conservatives Alliance) interviews Richard McDonald
Reseda, CA 1-11-11
Over the next eleven months, LACA will be featuring a series of articles by the Ownership Society Institute. They will outline a plan the Institute calls Rise Up America (RUA). This plan has been designed to change the way the United States government works in a manner that will substantially increase the material wealth of the nation and each individual as well as their social well-being.
LACA: Our series is authored by Dick McDonald (DM). Dick believes conservatives should adopt RUA to solve many of the economic and social problems the country faces. Please tell us something about yourself and your RUA plan.
DM: I am retired now but I spent my working life as a tax man helping rich people avoid taxes. As a young CPA working for an international accounting firm I did the personal and corporate income taxes for very rich clients like Jimmy Stewart and J. Paul Getty. After ten years there I spent the next 30 years designing and operating tax shelters.
For the last six years I have been perfecting the RUA plan that does for the poor and middle class what Ronald Reagan’s so-called “trickle down” economic theory did for the rich. In other words it creates wealth for the little guy. If adopted it would create enormous wealth for the country as well.
LACA: Dick your background sounds impressive but just how does doing tax work for billionaires equate with creating wealth for poor people?
DM: That is simple. It is so simple that it escapes most people’s radar. I use the same tax shelter for the poor and middle-class people as a tax man uses for the ultra rich – the non-taxability of appreciation in the value of stock. Think about it. Bill Gates is worth $54 Billion in the latest Forbes survey. He didn’t pay income taxes to create after-tax wealth of $54 billion. His wealth is in the stock of Microsoft. He didn’t pay tax on the appreciation in that stock.
LACA: I see where you're going – most people don't think of appreciation as a tax shelter. I see how rich people use it but how can your plan generate wealth for the poor. They don't have the money to invest in stock.
DM: You're right – they don't – and that is where my plan begins. Today the country needs a kick in the economic pants. We need jobs and a better growth rate. But no one is hiring and few are investing in new products and services. So my plan calls for an annual investment (from the private sector) of over a trillion dollars in the stock market. In the first year it should create millions of jobs and jump the country's growth rate towards 10%.
LACA: Dick that's a great idea but where are the poor and middle class going to get new investment capital of a trillion dollars each year.
DM: Here again that is relatively simple – we privatize the Social Security, Disability and Medicare programs, place the 15.3% of payroll taxes in each taxpayer's personal investment account and have it immediately invested at their direction and for their sole benefit into secure index funds for their 40-year working life.
LACA: Wow – that brings up so many questions we don't have time to cover all of them today. But let's take some obvious ones. First there is a great fear of investing in the stock market. How do you overcome that fear.
DM: First of all the average American household makes over $50,000 a year and pays slightly over $7,500 in Federal payroll taxes. Over a 40-year working life they would have invested $300,000 with the government. However such taxes invested weekly in the stock market grow into a $4 million nest egg through accumulation and compounding. The rate of return we use is the same 10% average rate of return the S&P 500 has returned in long-term 40-year investments since 1871.
Now when the recent stock market crashed and the $4 million dropped to $2 million, the taxpayer only had invested $300,000. He was still way ahead of the game. As the stock market has gone from 12,000 on the Dow to 6,000 and returned to 11,500 the taxpayer's account has come almost back to $4 million. The citizens understand simple arithmetic – they just have to be informed.
A $4 million stock account should throw off a $33,000 a month Social Security check which will make a mockery of the $1,300 the government presently pays. On top of that the taxpayer is worth $4 million whereas under our present system they get no nest egg.
LACA: I'm sorry we only have space for one more question. Presently the payroll taxes collected by government are used to pay current retirees. By abandoning these entitlements what happens to current retirees and where will the money come from to pay them.
DM: Our plan will immediately reduce the over $100 trillion unfunded entitlement debt to a manageable $6 to $8 trillion as the growth in each account will eventually eliminate the need to fund retirees. In the meantime we can fund the benefits by privatizing unneeded departments of the government, selling and leasing back government properties such as lands, buildings and rights (oil, airtime) and a myriad of cost cutting steps. We also can borrow a little as we have made such a massive dent in the overall debt of the country.
The increase in economic activity will swell to the point that the private sector will open jobs up to absorb the government workers displaced by privatization. It can be done.
LACA: I'm sorry we'll have to continue next month. Where can the readers presently get more information about RUA.
DM: They can go to www.ownershipsocietyinstitute.com. Your readers should be aware that many benefits emanate from such a plan including cutting the size of the government by 40%.
Reseda, CA 1-11-11
Over the next eleven months, LACA will be featuring a series of articles by the Ownership Society Institute. They will outline a plan the Institute calls Rise Up America (RUA). This plan has been designed to change the way the United States government works in a manner that will substantially increase the material wealth of the nation and each individual as well as their social well-being.
LACA: Our series is authored by Dick McDonald (DM). Dick believes conservatives should adopt RUA to solve many of the economic and social problems the country faces. Please tell us something about yourself and your RUA plan.
DM: I am retired now but I spent my working life as a tax man helping rich people avoid taxes. As a young CPA working for an international accounting firm I did the personal and corporate income taxes for very rich clients like Jimmy Stewart and J. Paul Getty. After ten years there I spent the next 30 years designing and operating tax shelters.
For the last six years I have been perfecting the RUA plan that does for the poor and middle class what Ronald Reagan’s so-called “trickle down” economic theory did for the rich. In other words it creates wealth for the little guy. If adopted it would create enormous wealth for the country as well.
LACA: Dick your background sounds impressive but just how does doing tax work for billionaires equate with creating wealth for poor people?
DM: That is simple. It is so simple that it escapes most people’s radar. I use the same tax shelter for the poor and middle-class people as a tax man uses for the ultra rich – the non-taxability of appreciation in the value of stock. Think about it. Bill Gates is worth $54 Billion in the latest Forbes survey. He didn’t pay income taxes to create after-tax wealth of $54 billion. His wealth is in the stock of Microsoft. He didn’t pay tax on the appreciation in that stock.
LACA: I see where you're going – most people don't think of appreciation as a tax shelter. I see how rich people use it but how can your plan generate wealth for the poor. They don't have the money to invest in stock.
DM: You're right – they don't – and that is where my plan begins. Today the country needs a kick in the economic pants. We need jobs and a better growth rate. But no one is hiring and few are investing in new products and services. So my plan calls for an annual investment (from the private sector) of over a trillion dollars in the stock market. In the first year it should create millions of jobs and jump the country's growth rate towards 10%.
LACA: Dick that's a great idea but where are the poor and middle class going to get new investment capital of a trillion dollars each year.
DM: Here again that is relatively simple – we privatize the Social Security, Disability and Medicare programs, place the 15.3% of payroll taxes in each taxpayer's personal investment account and have it immediately invested at their direction and for their sole benefit into secure index funds for their 40-year working life.
LACA: Wow – that brings up so many questions we don't have time to cover all of them today. But let's take some obvious ones. First there is a great fear of investing in the stock market. How do you overcome that fear.
DM: First of all the average American household makes over $50,000 a year and pays slightly over $7,500 in Federal payroll taxes. Over a 40-year working life they would have invested $300,000 with the government. However such taxes invested weekly in the stock market grow into a $4 million nest egg through accumulation and compounding. The rate of return we use is the same 10% average rate of return the S&P 500 has returned in long-term 40-year investments since 1871.
Now when the recent stock market crashed and the $4 million dropped to $2 million, the taxpayer only had invested $300,000. He was still way ahead of the game. As the stock market has gone from 12,000 on the Dow to 6,000 and returned to 11,500 the taxpayer's account has come almost back to $4 million. The citizens understand simple arithmetic – they just have to be informed.
A $4 million stock account should throw off a $33,000 a month Social Security check which will make a mockery of the $1,300 the government presently pays. On top of that the taxpayer is worth $4 million whereas under our present system they get no nest egg.
LACA: I'm sorry we only have space for one more question. Presently the payroll taxes collected by government are used to pay current retirees. By abandoning these entitlements what happens to current retirees and where will the money come from to pay them.
DM: Our plan will immediately reduce the over $100 trillion unfunded entitlement debt to a manageable $6 to $8 trillion as the growth in each account will eventually eliminate the need to fund retirees. In the meantime we can fund the benefits by privatizing unneeded departments of the government, selling and leasing back government properties such as lands, buildings and rights (oil, airtime) and a myriad of cost cutting steps. We also can borrow a little as we have made such a massive dent in the overall debt of the country.
The increase in economic activity will swell to the point that the private sector will open jobs up to absorb the government workers displaced by privatization. It can be done.
LACA: I'm sorry we'll have to continue next month. Where can the readers presently get more information about RUA.
DM: They can go to www.ownershipsocietyinstitute.com. Your readers should be aware that many benefits emanate from such a plan including cutting the size of the government by 40%.
Who is actually getting death threats?
Isn't this clever?
Now a Tea Party leader is told to stay away from public events for his safety. Didn't the Left get Obama's message about the rhetoric???
And still, now, it appears that the president's peeps aren't listening to him: Anti-Palin Posters Appear in SF
Isn't all of this strange? They're madly in love with a guy they won't listen to...or maybe they all really know he doesn't mean what he says about "healing" and "tone" and "rhetoric"...
What do you think?
Now a Tea Party leader is told to stay away from public events for his safety. Didn't the Left get Obama's message about the rhetoric???
After blaming the tea party for the mass slaughter on Saturday one tea party leader is receiving death threats. The sheriff’s office told Tucson tea party leader Trent Humphries to stay home.When I was growing up in the 1950's, this lady was like my Mom's neighbors. Now she's suddenly like Satan. It's beyond riculous! Didn't these people get Obama's message about toning down that violent rhetoric?
Palin aide: She’s getting death threats at unprecedented levelsWhere were the protests from the left about all THIS violence and hate (oh wait, it was the Left who was actually doing and saying all this stuff):
The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010And don't forget: Death Threats Against Bush at Protests Ignored for Years
On July 11, 2007, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Betty Williams gave the keynote speech to the International Women’s Peace Conference in Dallas, Texas, and said (to laughter and applause from the audience):Meanwhile, in campaign mode (as usual), our opportunistic president seeks to kill (oops) two birds with one stone: They Couldn’t Help It… Team Obama Hands Out T-Shirts at Pep Rally MemorialI mean right now, I could kill George Bush, no problem. No, I don’t mean that. I mean — how could you nonviolently kill somebody? I would love to be able to do that.”Here's a collection of photos and here's a sample:
You can hear the audiotape of her threat on BREITBART.TV
Despite the fact that threatening to kill the president is a crime, the Secret Service refused to question her or detain her...
And still, now, it appears that the president's peeps aren't listening to him: Anti-Palin Posters Appear in SF
Isn't all of this strange? They're madly in love with a guy they won't listen to...or maybe they all really know he doesn't mean what he says about "healing" and "tone" and "rhetoric"...
What do you think?
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Putting a Bullseye on the Constitution
Daniel Greenfield: There is hardly a better way to degrade the entire idea of political speech than by classing everyone who is in any way critical of the government as "anti-government".
The ferocious, relentless attacks on Sarah Palin are a testament to her greatness, proof of how deathly afraid of her they are, like Dracula to the silver cross.
Pamela Geller: A Conspiracy Against the Mind, Against Life, Against Man and
the Virtue of Sarah
William Jacobson: ...as Jim Geraghty of National Review Online documents, the use of the term "blood libel" in political discourse is common both on the left and the right to describe incendiary false accusations which tend to blame a person for inciting violence and making the person a target of violence.
the Virtue of Sarah
William Jacobson: ...as Jim Geraghty of National Review Online documents, the use of the term "blood libel" in political discourse is common both on the left and the right to describe incendiary false accusations which tend to blame a person for inciting violence and making the person a target of violence.
Kids on marriage
1. HOW DO YOU DECIDE WHOM TO MARRY?
You got to find somebody who likes the same stuff. Like, if you like sports, she should like it that you like sports, and she should keep the chips and dip coming.
-- Alan, age 10
No person really decides before they grow up who they're going to marry. God decides it all way before, and you get to find out later who you're stuck with.
-- Kristen, age 10
2. WHAT IS THE RIGHT AGE TO GET MARRIED?
Twenty-three is the best age because you know the person FOREVER by then.
-- Camille, age 10
3. HOW CAN A STRANGER TELL IF TWO PEOPLE ARE MARRIED?
You might have to guess, based on whether they seem to be yelling at the same kids.
-- Derrick, age 8
4. WHAT DO YOU THINK YOUR MOM AND DAD HAVE IN COMMON?
Both don't want any more kids.
-- Lori, age 8
5. WHAT DO MOST PEOPLE DO ON A DATE?
Dates are for having fun, and people should use them to get to know each other. Even boys have something to say if you listen long enough.
-- Lynnette, age 8 (isn't she a treasure)
On the first date, they just tell each other lies and that usually gets them interested enough to go for a second date.
-- Martin, age 10
6. WHEN IS IT OKAY TO KISS SOMEONE?
When they're rich.
-- Pam, age 7
The law says you have to be eighteen, so I wouldn't want to mess with that.
-- Curt, age 7
The rule goes like this: If you kiss someone, then you should marry them and have kids with them. It's the right thing to do.
-- Howard, age 8
7. IS IT BETTER TO BE SINGLE OR MARRIED?
It's better for girls to be single but not for boys. Boys need someone to clean up after them.
-- Anita, age 9 (bless you child)
8. HOW WOULD THE WORLD BE DIFFERENT IF PEOPLE DIDN'T GET MARRIED?
There sure would be a lot of kids to explain, wouldn't there?
-- Kelvin, age 8
And the #1 Favorite is.......
9. HOW WOULD YOU MAKE A MARRIAGE WORK?
Tell your wife that she looks pretty, even if she looks like a dump truck.
-- Ricky, age 10
You got to find somebody who likes the same stuff. Like, if you like sports, she should like it that you like sports, and she should keep the chips and dip coming.
-- Alan, age 10
No person really decides before they grow up who they're going to marry. God decides it all way before, and you get to find out later who you're stuck with.
-- Kristen, age 10
2. WHAT IS THE RIGHT AGE TO GET MARRIED?
Twenty-three is the best age because you know the person FOREVER by then.
-- Camille, age 10
3. HOW CAN A STRANGER TELL IF TWO PEOPLE ARE MARRIED?
You might have to guess, based on whether they seem to be yelling at the same kids.
-- Derrick, age 8
4. WHAT DO YOU THINK YOUR MOM AND DAD HAVE IN COMMON?
Both don't want any more kids.
-- Lori, age 8
5. WHAT DO MOST PEOPLE DO ON A DATE?
Dates are for having fun, and people should use them to get to know each other. Even boys have something to say if you listen long enough.
-- Lynnette, age 8 (isn't she a treasure)
On the first date, they just tell each other lies and that usually gets them interested enough to go for a second date.
-- Martin, age 10
6. WHEN IS IT OKAY TO KISS SOMEONE?
When they're rich.
-- Pam, age 7
The law says you have to be eighteen, so I wouldn't want to mess with that.
-- Curt, age 7
The rule goes like this: If you kiss someone, then you should marry them and have kids with them. It's the right thing to do.
-- Howard, age 8
7. IS IT BETTER TO BE SINGLE OR MARRIED?
It's better for girls to be single but not for boys. Boys need someone to clean up after them.
-- Anita, age 9 (bless you child)
8. HOW WOULD THE WORLD BE DIFFERENT IF PEOPLE DIDN'T GET MARRIED?
There sure would be a lot of kids to explain, wouldn't there?
-- Kelvin, age 8
And the #1 Favorite is.......
9. HOW WOULD YOU MAKE A MARRIAGE WORK?
Tell your wife that she looks pretty, even if she looks like a dump truck.
-- Ricky, age 10
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Appearing on TV in November, former Hillary Clinton campaign adviser and current public relations executive, Mark Penn, suggested that Obama needs a moment “similar” to the tragic terrorist attack in Oklahoma City, in order to “reconnect” with voters.
GatewayPundit: Ex-Clinton Strategist Mark Penn: Obama Needs Event ‘Similar’ to OKC to ‘Reconnect’ With Voters (Video)
Labels:
election,
Gateway Pundit,
Hillary Clinton,
Mark Penn,
Obama,
Oklahoma City,
President,
terrorism,
voters
Monday, January 10, 2011
Guns don’t kill people. Adjectives do.
Michelle Malkin explains the new liberal mantra: Idiocracy: Conservatives who say “job-killing” are spreading hate
Labels:
conservatives,
gun control,
guns,
insanity,
language,
liberals,
Michelle Malkin
The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010
From MICHELLE MALKIN:
The progressive climate of hate: A comprehensive illustrated primer in 8 parts:
I. PALIN HATE
II. BUSH HATE
III. MISC. TEA PARTY/GOP/ANTI-TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE HATE
IV. ANTI-CONSERVATIVE FEMALE HATE
V. LEFT-WING MOB HATE — campus, anti-war radicals, ACORN, eco-extremists, & unions
VI. OPEN-BORDERS HATE
VII. ANTI-MILITARY HATE
VIII. HATE: CRIMES — the ever-growing Unhinged Mugshot Collection
The progressive climate of hate: A comprehensive illustrated primer in 8 parts:
I. PALIN HATE
II. BUSH HATE
III. MISC. TEA PARTY/GOP/ANTI-TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE HATE
IV. ANTI-CONSERVATIVE FEMALE HATE
V. LEFT-WING MOB HATE — campus, anti-war radicals, ACORN, eco-extremists, & unions
VI. OPEN-BORDERS HATE
VII. ANTI-MILITARY HATE
VIII. HATE: CRIMES — the ever-growing Unhinged Mugshot Collection
Labels:
Far Left,
George Bush,
left wing,
President,
progressives,
Sarah Palin,
Tea Party,
U.S. military
Sunday, January 09, 2011
The Left—which has been unable to discover any common feature uniting acts of Islamist violence worldwide—nonetheless instantly noticed a bridge between the Tucson shooting and its own political opponents...
...the Left’s sudden talk about incendiary political rhetoric in the wake of the Arizona shooting isn’t really about political rhetoric at all. It’s about the real-world failure of leftist policies everywhere—the bankrupting of nations and states by greedy unions and unfundable social programs, the destruction of inner cities by identity politics, and the appeasement of Muslim extremists in the face of worldwide jihad, not to mention the frequently fatal effects of delirious environmentalism. Europe is in debt and on fire. American citizens are in political revolt. Even the most left-wing president ever is making desperate overtures to his right.The Hateful Left
But all that might be tolerable to leftists if they weren’t starting to lose control of the one weapon in which they have the most faith: the narrative. The narrative is what leftists believe in instead of the truth. If they can blame George W. Bush for the economic crisis, if they can make Sarah Palin out to be an idiot, if they can call the Tea Party racist until you think it must be true, they might yet retain power in spite of the international disgrace of their ideas. And though they still mostly dominate the narrative on the three broadcast networks, most cable stations, most newspapers, and much of Hollywood, nonetheless Fox News, talk radio, the Internet, and the Wall Street Journal have begun to respond in ways they can’t ignore.
That’s the hateful rhetoric they’re talking about: conservatives interrupting the stream of leftist invective in order to dismantle their arguments with the facts.
Evidence shows that agents, working within the jurisdiction of state law, opened shadowy legal channels enabling Obama an opportunity usurp presidential power and assault the Constitutional sovereignty of the American people...
OCON Docs: Hawaii Ballot Chief...And Grandma...Called Obama To Hawaii In 2008
REVIEWING THE FACTS
1. Electors from each state rely on each party’s state authority in that state to certify the nomination of their candidates and verify their legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
2. Hawaiian election law specifically requires each state’s party authority to file a sworn application (Official Certification of Nomination) with Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer certifying the eligibility of each candidate to serve as President and Vice President of the United States.
3. Hawaii Revised Statute 11-113 (c) specifically requires that this sworn application from each state party authority contains explicit language stating that all candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution in order for the Chief Elections Officer to approve the candidate for placement on the state’s presidential ballot.
4. On August 27th, 2008, by notary attestment, authorities of the Democrat Party of Hawaii (DPH) signed a sworn Official Certification of Nomination and was required to submit the document to Hawaii's Chief Election Officer, Kevin Cronin before 4:30 p.m. on September 5, 2008.
5. The DPH, chaired by Brian Schatz, refused to include legally required language, per HRS 11-113 (c)(1)(B), within the state party’s Official Certification of Nomination stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.
6. The Democrat Party of Hawaii included this legally required language for other Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates in past elections dating to, at least, 2000 and 2004. Therefore, the omission of this language within the DPH’s 2008 OCON of Obama’s candidacy is not a mistake or an oversight. It was done intentionally and with full understanding of Brian Schatz that the Hawaiian CEO, Kevin Cronin, would not be legally permitted to approve Barack Obama as a candidate on the Hawaiian presidential ballot, unless the Democratic National Committee (the national party authority) included this language in its OCON.
7. The Republican Party of Hawaii included the legally required language in its sworn 2008 Official Certification of Nomination for John McCain and Sarah Palin, per HRS 11-113, without reservation or exceptions.
8. The Democrat Party of Hawaii refused to acknowledge that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as president under the provisions of U.S. Constitution and, therefore, the DPH refused to provide legal certification allowing the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer to approve the placement of Barack Obama on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.
9. Since the DPH did not provide legal certification of Barack Obama's constitutional candidacy, Kevin Cronin, was required to send a written notice to Barack Obama informing him that the DPH refused to provide legal certification of his candidacy for approval of his inclusion on the State of Hawaii’s 2008 presidential ballot. Cronin was legally required to send this notification within 10 business days from the time Cronin received the OCON from the DPH. Cronin also had the option, under HRS 11-113, to extend the notification deadline five more business days for a total of 15 days from the day the DPH filed the OCON.
10. The DPH's OCON is dated August 27th, 2008. However, HRS 11-113 provides that OCONs may be filed by 4:30 p.m. on no less than the 60th day prior to the day of the election. In this case, based on the alleged date appearing the DPH's OCON, the DPH still had eight more days to file the OCON and perhaps request verification documentation from Obama. Therefore, Obama received his notification of the Hawaiian CEO's findings no later than September 20, 2008.
11. However, documents provided by the Hawaiian Election Commission show that the Democratic National Committee, chaired by Nancy Pelosi, signed its 2008 Official Certification of Nomination with a date of August 28, 2008. However, documented evidence shows that the DNC also authored a separate version of its OCON at a later time. One version was sent only to Hawaii containing specific wording which directly contradicted that state party’s Constitutional authority to declare that Barack Obama was not constitutionally eligible to serve as President and was, therefore, not approved for inclusion on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.
12. Article IV-Section 4, Article IV-Section 1 and Article II-Section 1 of the Constitution grants sovereignty for certifying a candidate’s nomination and approving a candidate’s inclusion on each state’s presidential ballot to each state. The Democratic National Committee does not have the legal authority to supersede the sovereignty of Hawaii’s appointed authority to conduct election, approve ballot content and certify the nomination of candidates.
13. By intentionally contradicting the findings of Hawaii’s party authority for the purpose of forcing the state of Hawaii to include Obama’s candidacy on its ballot, the Democratic National Committee, headed by Nancy Pelosi, committed election fraud and violated the Constitutional right of the people of the state of Hawaii to an election process in which supreme power is held by the citizens and their entitlement to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.
14. The Official Certification of Nomination sent to Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer by the DNC was not sent to any other state’s CEO.
15. Based on the authority given them by the Constitution, some states’ election laws do not require an explicit statement indicating a candidate’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the Constitution, like Hawaii, but rather a general statement citing documentation that the candidate is qualified under federal law to serve as President and Vice President.
16. The DNC sent a different OCON to every other state omitting the reference to Constitutional eligibility.
17. Cronin sent written notification to Obama stating that Obama was found legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution based on the DNC’s OCON.
18. The Democratic Party of Hawaii and the Democratic National Committee do not agree with one another about the Constitutional qualifications of Barack Obama.
19. Cronin’s notifications have never been revealed to the public.
20. If the notification from Cronin to Obama stated that Obama was found not qualified to be on the Hawaiian ballot, Obama had five business days after the finding to send a written request for a hearing to contest the finding and reconcile his lack of eligibility with the DPH.
21. Upon receiving a request for a hearing from Obama, Cronin was obligated to schedule the hearing within 10 business days of receiving the request.
22. Hearings to contest candidate eligibility findings are conducted under Administrative Procedures governed by HRS AR 91.
23. AR 91 allows a petitioner for a hearing to request reasonable scheduling accommodations in order to attend the hearing based on travel, personal matters and/or financial issues.
24. The hearing would have been conducted around mid to late October, 2008.
25. Barack Obama’s grandmother was reported to have become gravely ill in early to mid October, 2008.
26. Barack Obama was in Hawaii in mid October, 2008. The American public was told that his only business there was to visit with his ill grandmother.
27. Obama went to Hawaii, suddenly, without his wife and children, even though Dunham's condition was reported to have been expectedly declining for several weeks, during which, at any time, Obama could have otherwise scheduled a planned visit. The exclusion of Dunham's great-grandchildren and Michelle Obama during this visit is odd. Madelyn Dunham did not pass away for two more weeks after Obama's visit having never been visited by Obama's family in her final months.
27. HRS 11-113 (b) states: If there is no national party or the national and state parties…do not agree on the presidential and vice presidential candidates, the chief election officer may determine which candidates' names shall be placed on the ballot or may leave the candidates' names off the ballot completely.
28. Barack Obama was included on the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot.
David F. LaRocque
CDR USNR (ret)
THE POST & EMAIL
REVIEWING THE FACTS
1. Electors from each state rely on each party’s state authority in that state to certify the nomination of their candidates and verify their legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
2. Hawaiian election law specifically requires each state’s party authority to file a sworn application (Official Certification of Nomination) with Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer certifying the eligibility of each candidate to serve as President and Vice President of the United States.
3. Hawaii Revised Statute 11-113 (c) specifically requires that this sworn application from each state party authority contains explicit language stating that all candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution in order for the Chief Elections Officer to approve the candidate for placement on the state’s presidential ballot.
4. On August 27th, 2008, by notary attestment, authorities of the Democrat Party of Hawaii (DPH) signed a sworn Official Certification of Nomination and was required to submit the document to Hawaii's Chief Election Officer, Kevin Cronin before 4:30 p.m. on September 5, 2008.
5. The DPH, chaired by Brian Schatz, refused to include legally required language, per HRS 11-113 (c)(1)(B), within the state party’s Official Certification of Nomination stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.
6. The Democrat Party of Hawaii included this legally required language for other Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates in past elections dating to, at least, 2000 and 2004. Therefore, the omission of this language within the DPH’s 2008 OCON of Obama’s candidacy is not a mistake or an oversight. It was done intentionally and with full understanding of Brian Schatz that the Hawaiian CEO, Kevin Cronin, would not be legally permitted to approve Barack Obama as a candidate on the Hawaiian presidential ballot, unless the Democratic National Committee (the national party authority) included this language in its OCON.
7. The Republican Party of Hawaii included the legally required language in its sworn 2008 Official Certification of Nomination for John McCain and Sarah Palin, per HRS 11-113, without reservation or exceptions.
8. The Democrat Party of Hawaii refused to acknowledge that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as president under the provisions of U.S. Constitution and, therefore, the DPH refused to provide legal certification allowing the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer to approve the placement of Barack Obama on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.
9. Since the DPH did not provide legal certification of Barack Obama's constitutional candidacy, Kevin Cronin, was required to send a written notice to Barack Obama informing him that the DPH refused to provide legal certification of his candidacy for approval of his inclusion on the State of Hawaii’s 2008 presidential ballot. Cronin was legally required to send this notification within 10 business days from the time Cronin received the OCON from the DPH. Cronin also had the option, under HRS 11-113, to extend the notification deadline five more business days for a total of 15 days from the day the DPH filed the OCON.
10. The DPH's OCON is dated August 27th, 2008. However, HRS 11-113 provides that OCONs may be filed by 4:30 p.m. on no less than the 60th day prior to the day of the election. In this case, based on the alleged date appearing the DPH's OCON, the DPH still had eight more days to file the OCON and perhaps request verification documentation from Obama. Therefore, Obama received his notification of the Hawaiian CEO's findings no later than September 20, 2008.
11. However, documents provided by the Hawaiian Election Commission show that the Democratic National Committee, chaired by Nancy Pelosi, signed its 2008 Official Certification of Nomination with a date of August 28, 2008. However, documented evidence shows that the DNC also authored a separate version of its OCON at a later time. One version was sent only to Hawaii containing specific wording which directly contradicted that state party’s Constitutional authority to declare that Barack Obama was not constitutionally eligible to serve as President and was, therefore, not approved for inclusion on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.
12. Article IV-Section 4, Article IV-Section 1 and Article II-Section 1 of the Constitution grants sovereignty for certifying a candidate’s nomination and approving a candidate’s inclusion on each state’s presidential ballot to each state. The Democratic National Committee does not have the legal authority to supersede the sovereignty of Hawaii’s appointed authority to conduct election, approve ballot content and certify the nomination of candidates.
13. By intentionally contradicting the findings of Hawaii’s party authority for the purpose of forcing the state of Hawaii to include Obama’s candidacy on its ballot, the Democratic National Committee, headed by Nancy Pelosi, committed election fraud and violated the Constitutional right of the people of the state of Hawaii to an election process in which supreme power is held by the citizens and their entitlement to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.
14. The Official Certification of Nomination sent to Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer by the DNC was not sent to any other state’s CEO.
15. Based on the authority given them by the Constitution, some states’ election laws do not require an explicit statement indicating a candidate’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the Constitution, like Hawaii, but rather a general statement citing documentation that the candidate is qualified under federal law to serve as President and Vice President.
16. The DNC sent a different OCON to every other state omitting the reference to Constitutional eligibility.
17. Cronin sent written notification to Obama stating that Obama was found legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution based on the DNC’s OCON.
18. The Democratic Party of Hawaii and the Democratic National Committee do not agree with one another about the Constitutional qualifications of Barack Obama.
19. Cronin’s notifications have never been revealed to the public.
20. If the notification from Cronin to Obama stated that Obama was found not qualified to be on the Hawaiian ballot, Obama had five business days after the finding to send a written request for a hearing to contest the finding and reconcile his lack of eligibility with the DPH.
21. Upon receiving a request for a hearing from Obama, Cronin was obligated to schedule the hearing within 10 business days of receiving the request.
22. Hearings to contest candidate eligibility findings are conducted under Administrative Procedures governed by HRS AR 91.
23. AR 91 allows a petitioner for a hearing to request reasonable scheduling accommodations in order to attend the hearing based on travel, personal matters and/or financial issues.
24. The hearing would have been conducted around mid to late October, 2008.
25. Barack Obama’s grandmother was reported to have become gravely ill in early to mid October, 2008.
26. Barack Obama was in Hawaii in mid October, 2008. The American public was told that his only business there was to visit with his ill grandmother.
27. Obama went to Hawaii, suddenly, without his wife and children, even though Dunham's condition was reported to have been expectedly declining for several weeks, during which, at any time, Obama could have otherwise scheduled a planned visit. The exclusion of Dunham's great-grandchildren and Michelle Obama during this visit is odd. Madelyn Dunham did not pass away for two more weeks after Obama's visit having never been visited by Obama's family in her final months.
27. HRS 11-113 (b) states: If there is no national party or the national and state parties…do not agree on the presidential and vice presidential candidates, the chief election officer may determine which candidates' names shall be placed on the ballot or may leave the candidates' names off the ballot completely.
28. Barack Obama was included on the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot.
David F. LaRocque
CDR USNR (ret)
THE POST & EMAIL
Top US Federal Judge Assassinated After Threat To Obama Agenda
From THE EUROPEAN UNION TIMES
A Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the top US Federal Judge for the State of Arizona was assassinated barely 72-hours after he made a critical ruling against the Obama administrations plan to begin the confiscation of their citizen’s private retirement and banking accounts in order to stave off their nations imminent economic collapse, and after having the US Marshals protecting him removed...Scary stuff...
VETERAN DEM OPERATIVE INSTRUCTS OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: "They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers...”
...“Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people.”
And that's what Clinton did in spite of court records of evidence and witnesses stating that:
1) A Republican Guard member from Iraq accompanied Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing
2) Terry Nichols went to the Philippines multiple times and met with terrorists connected to Osama bin Laden
3) The conspiracy was funded by Osama bin Laden
And that's what Clinton did in spite of court records of evidence and witnesses stating that:
1) A Republican Guard member from Iraq accompanied Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing
2) Terry Nichols went to the Philippines multiple times and met with terrorists connected to Osama bin Laden
3) The conspiracy was funded by Osama bin Laden
Loughner TARGETED Giffords in 2007...BEFORE Palin and BEFORE Tea Party
And more:
On her youtube page the Congresswoman subscribes to two channels - the first one is her would-be assassin Jared Loughner and the other Rep. Ike Skelton...From Pamela Geller: Read the whole thing
Labels:
2007,
Gabrielle Giffords,
Jared Loughner,
Pamela Geller,
Sarah Palin,
Tea Party,
video
Giffords Jewish; shooter read Mein Kampf & Communist Manifesto
Jewish Telegraphic Agency:
Read the whole thing
Shooter Loughner is currently being held by police and has been described as "unstable." He reportedly listed "Mein Kampf" and the "Communist Manifesto" as two of his favorite books on his MySpace page. Several hours before the shooting he reportedly left a "Goodbye friends" message, which also said "Please don't be mad at me."Also: Giffords staffer Gabe Zimmerman killed in Arizona shooting...
Giffords was elected to Congress in the Democratic sweep in 2006. The first Jewish woman elected to Congress from the state, she made her Jewish identity part of her campaign.
“If you want something done, your best bet is to ask a Jewish woman to do it,” said Giffords, a former state senator, said at the time. “Jewish women — by our tradition and by the way we were raised — have an ability to cut through all the reasons why something should, shouldn’t or can’t be done and pull people together to be successful.”
Giffords, 40, was raised "mixed" by a Christian Scientist mother and Jewish father, but said that after a visit to Israel in 2001, she had decided she was Jewish only. She attended services at a local Reform synagogue.
In one of her last photos, she posed with the new U.S. House of Representatives speaker, Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) at her swearing in; her hand is on the "Five Books of Moses."
Read the whole thing
The unseemly rush to blame Sarah Palin, the Tea Party and Republicans for murder in Arizona
UK TELEGRAPH:
Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona, by all accounts an outstanding public servant and person, is battling for her life in hospital after being shot by a 22-year-old man at close range at a “Congress On Your Corner” event in her home district. Six people are dead, including a judge and a girl of nine, and a dozen others are being treated for their wounds.Read more
It is, as President Barack Obama said, an “unspeakable tragedy”. It is also, as he added, “a senseless and terrible act of violence has no place in a free society”. That much we know and the President wisely did not seek to make political capital out of the carnage or jump to conclusions about the motivations of the gunman, named as Jared Loughner.
That, of course, hasn’t stopped some on the Left clamouring to blame Sarah Palin, the Tea Party or Republicans in general for what happened.
Labels:
Arizona,
Gabrielle Giffords,
Glenn Beck,
Jared Loughner,
Sarah Palin,
shootings,
Tea Party,
U.K.
Saturday, January 08, 2011
AZ SHOOTER: Left-Winger JARED LOUGHNER – He Likes Watching US Flags Burn & Favorite Book is Communist Manifesto
Lest you be fooled by fools (like Paul Krugman):
GatewayPundit sets everyone straight: Jared Loughner was definitely NOT a tea partier!
UPDATE: From THE NEVILLE AWARDS
GatewayPundit sets everyone straight: Jared Loughner was definitely NOT a tea partier!
UPDATE: From THE NEVILLE AWARDS
Friday, January 07, 2011
They mysterious death of Obama's adopted sister "Lia"
Hours prior to her unexpected demise, she was talking to several journalists about Barry’s anticipated arrival to Jakarta, Indonesia. She was sending messages to her husband’s cell phone about those conversations.
Unfortunately for her, Lia didn’t live to see Barack Obama, her “adopted, foster” brother, again. Lia died on Friday, February 26, 2010.
“Lia” Obama’s Adopted Sister Died Suddenly
Unfortunately for her, Lia didn’t live to see Barack Obama, her “adopted, foster” brother, again. Lia died on Friday, February 26, 2010.
“Lia” Obama’s Adopted Sister Died Suddenly
Imagine being attacked by a gang of these
Mount Vernon Man Hospitalized After Brutal Dog Attack
But then, imagine being attacked by a very large gang of these:
Islamists are planning a suicide attack to kill the Christian mother who is “accused” of blasphemy in Pakistan.
I think Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg should move to Pakistan...
But then, imagine being attacked by a very large gang of these:
Islamists are planning a suicide attack to kill the Christian mother who is “accused” of blasphemy in Pakistan.
I think Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg should move to Pakistan...
Thursday, January 06, 2011
The Cure For Procrastination
I really meant to post this sooner...
...but, it does fit in with everyone's New Year's Resolutions!
...but, it does fit in with everyone's New Year's Resolutions!
THE LAST SIX SECONDS
On Nov 13, 2010 Lt General John Kelly, USMC gave a speech to the Semper Fi Society of St. Louis, MO. This was 4 days after his son, Lt Robert Kelly, USMC was killed by an IED while on his 3rd Combat tour. During his speech, General Kelly spoke about the dedication and valor of the young men and women who step forward each and every day to protect us. During the speech, he never mentioned the loss of his own son. He closed the speech with the moving account of the last 6 seconds in the lives of 2 young Marines who died with rifles blazing to protect their brother Marines.
"I will leave you with a story about the kind of people they are...about the quality of the steel in their backs...about the kind of dedication they bring to our country while they serve in uniform and forever after as veterans. Two years ago when I was the Commander of all U.S. and Iraqi forces, in fact, the 22nd of April 2008, two Marine infantry battalions, 1/9 "The Walking Dead," and 2/8 were switching out in Ramadi. One battalion in the closing days of their deployment going home very soon, the other just starting its seven-month combat tour.
Two Marines, Corporal Jonathan Yale and Lance Corporal Jordan Haerter, 22 and 20 years old respectively, one from each battalion, were assuming the watch together at the entrance gate of an outpost that contained a makeshift barracks housing 50 Marines. The same broken down ramshackle building was also home to 100 Iraqi police, also my men and our allies in the fight against the terrorists in Ramadi, a city until recently the most dangerous city on earth and owned by Al Qaeda.
Yale was a dirt poor mixed-race kid from Virginia with a wife and daughter, and a mother and sister who lived with him and he supported as well. He did this on a yearly salary of less than $23,000. Haerter, on the other hand, was a middle class white kid from Long Island. They were from two completely different worlds. Had they not joined the Marines they would never have met each other, or understood that multiple America's exist simultaneously depending on one's race, education level, economic status, and where you might have been born. But they were Marines, combat Marines, forged in the same crucible of Marine training, and, because of this bond, they were brothers as close, or closer, than if they were born of the same woman.
The mission orders they received from the sergeant squad leader I am sure went something like: "Okay you two clowns, stand this post and let no unauthorized personnel or vehicles pass." "You clear?" I am also sure Yale and Haerter then rolled their eyes and said in unison something like: "Yes Sergeant," with just enough attitude that made the point without saying the words, "No kidding sweetheart, we know what we're doing." They then relieved two other Marines on watch and took up their post at the entry control point of Joint Security Station Nasser, in the Sophia section of Ramadi, Al Anbar, Iraq.
A few minutes later a large blue truck turned down the alley way--perhaps 60-70 yards in length--and sped its way through the serpentine of concrete jersey walls. The truck stopped just short of where the two were posted and detonated, killing them both catastrophically.
Twenty-four brick masonry houses were damaged or destroyed. A mosque 100 yards away collapsed. The truck's engine came to rest two hundred yards away knocking most of a house down before it stopped. Our explosive experts reckoned the blast was made of 2,000 pounds of explosives. Two died, and because these two young infantrymen didn't have it in their DNA to run from danger, they saved 150 of their Iraqi and American brothers-in-arms.
When I read the situation report about the incident a few hours after it happened I called the regimental commander for details as something about this struck me as different. Marines dying or being seriously wounded is commonplace in combat. We expect Marines regardless of rank or MOS to stand their ground and do their duty, and even die in the process, if that is what the mission takes. But this just seemed different.
The regimental commander had just returned from the site and he agreed, but reported that there were no American witnesses to the event--just Iraqi police. I figured if there was any chance of finding out what actually happened and then to decorate the two Marines to acknowledge their bravery, I'd have to do it as a combat award that requires two eye-witnesses and we figured the bureaucrats back in Washington would never buy Iraqi statements. If it had any chance at all, it had to come under the signature of a general officer.
I traveled to Ramadi the next day and spoke individually to a half-dozen Iraqi police all of whom told the same story. The blue truck turned down into the alley and immediately sped up as it made its way through the serpentine. They all said, "We knew immediately what was going on as soon as the two Marines began firing." The Iraqi police then related that some of them also fired, and then to a man, ran for safety just prior to the explosion. All survived. Many were injured...some seriously.
One of the Iraqis elaborated and with tears welling up said they'd run like any normal man would to save his life. What he didn't know until then, he said, and what he learned that very instant, was that Marines are not normal. Choking past the emotion he said, "Sir, in the name of God no sane man would have stood there and done what they did. No sane man. They saved us all."
What we didn't know at the time, and only learned a couple of days later after I wrote a summary and submitted both Yale and Haerter for posthumous Navy Crosses, was that one of our security cameras, damaged initially in the blast, recorded some of the suicide attack. It happened exactly as the Iraqis had described it. It took exactly six seconds from when the truck entered the alley until it detonated.
You can watch the last six seconds of their young lives. Putting myself in their heads I supposed it took about a second for the two Marines to separately come to the same conclusion about what was going on once the truck came into their view at the far end of the alley. Exactly no time to talk it over, or call the sergeant to ask what they should do. Only enough time to take half an instant and think about what the sergeant told them to do only a few minutes before: "...let no unauthorized personnel or vehicles pass." The two Marines had about five seconds left to live.
It took maybe another two seconds for them to present their weapons, take aim, and open up. By this time the truck was half-way through the barriers and gaining speed the whole time. Here, the recording shows a number of Iraqi police, some of whom had fired their AKs, now scattering like the normal and rational men they were--some running right past the Marines. They had three seconds left to live.
For about two seconds more, the recording shows the Marines' weapons firing non-stop...the truck's windshield exploding into shards of glass as their rounds take it apart and tore in to the body of the son-of-a-bitch who is trying to get past them to kill their brothers--American and Iraqi--bedded down in the barracks totally unaware of the fact that their lives at that moment depended entirely on two Marines standing their ground. If they had been aware, they would have known they were safe...because two Marines stood between them and a crazed suicide bomber.
The recording shows the truck careening to a stop immediately in front of the two Marines. In all of the instantaneous violence Yale and Haerter never hesitated. By all reports and by the recording, they never stepped back. They never even started to step aside. They never even shifted their weight. With their feet spread shoulder width apart, they leaned into the danger, firing as fast as they could work their weapons. They had only one second left to live.
The truck explodes. The camera goes blank. Two young men go to their God. Six seconds. Not enough time to think about their families, their country, their flag, or about their lives or their deaths, but more than enough time for two very brave young men to do their duty...into eternity. That is the kind of people who are on watch all over the world tonight--for you.
We Marines believe that God gave America the greatest gift he could bestow to man while he lived on this earth--freedom. We also believe he gave us another gift nearly as precious--our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines--to safeguard that gift and guarantee no force on this earth can ever steal it away.
It has been my distinct honor to have been with you here today. Rest assured our America, this experiment in democracy started over two centuries ago, will forever remain the "land of the free and home of the brave" so long as we never run out of tough young Americans who are willing to look beyond their own self-interest and comfortable lives, and go into the darkest and most dangerous places on earth to hunt down, and kill, those who would do us harm.
God Bless America, and....SEMPER FIDELIS!"
"I will leave you with a story about the kind of people they are...about the quality of the steel in their backs...about the kind of dedication they bring to our country while they serve in uniform and forever after as veterans. Two years ago when I was the Commander of all U.S. and Iraqi forces, in fact, the 22nd of April 2008, two Marine infantry battalions, 1/9 "The Walking Dead," and 2/8 were switching out in Ramadi. One battalion in the closing days of their deployment going home very soon, the other just starting its seven-month combat tour.
Two Marines, Corporal Jonathan Yale and Lance Corporal Jordan Haerter, 22 and 20 years old respectively, one from each battalion, were assuming the watch together at the entrance gate of an outpost that contained a makeshift barracks housing 50 Marines. The same broken down ramshackle building was also home to 100 Iraqi police, also my men and our allies in the fight against the terrorists in Ramadi, a city until recently the most dangerous city on earth and owned by Al Qaeda.
Yale was a dirt poor mixed-race kid from Virginia with a wife and daughter, and a mother and sister who lived with him and he supported as well. He did this on a yearly salary of less than $23,000. Haerter, on the other hand, was a middle class white kid from Long Island. They were from two completely different worlds. Had they not joined the Marines they would never have met each other, or understood that multiple America's exist simultaneously depending on one's race, education level, economic status, and where you might have been born. But they were Marines, combat Marines, forged in the same crucible of Marine training, and, because of this bond, they were brothers as close, or closer, than if they were born of the same woman.
The mission orders they received from the sergeant squad leader I am sure went something like: "Okay you two clowns, stand this post and let no unauthorized personnel or vehicles pass." "You clear?" I am also sure Yale and Haerter then rolled their eyes and said in unison something like: "Yes Sergeant," with just enough attitude that made the point without saying the words, "No kidding sweetheart, we know what we're doing." They then relieved two other Marines on watch and took up their post at the entry control point of Joint Security Station Nasser, in the Sophia section of Ramadi, Al Anbar, Iraq.
A few minutes later a large blue truck turned down the alley way--perhaps 60-70 yards in length--and sped its way through the serpentine of concrete jersey walls. The truck stopped just short of where the two were posted and detonated, killing them both catastrophically.
Twenty-four brick masonry houses were damaged or destroyed. A mosque 100 yards away collapsed. The truck's engine came to rest two hundred yards away knocking most of a house down before it stopped. Our explosive experts reckoned the blast was made of 2,000 pounds of explosives. Two died, and because these two young infantrymen didn't have it in their DNA to run from danger, they saved 150 of their Iraqi and American brothers-in-arms.
When I read the situation report about the incident a few hours after it happened I called the regimental commander for details as something about this struck me as different. Marines dying or being seriously wounded is commonplace in combat. We expect Marines regardless of rank or MOS to stand their ground and do their duty, and even die in the process, if that is what the mission takes. But this just seemed different.
The regimental commander had just returned from the site and he agreed, but reported that there were no American witnesses to the event--just Iraqi police. I figured if there was any chance of finding out what actually happened and then to decorate the two Marines to acknowledge their bravery, I'd have to do it as a combat award that requires two eye-witnesses and we figured the bureaucrats back in Washington would never buy Iraqi statements. If it had any chance at all, it had to come under the signature of a general officer.
I traveled to Ramadi the next day and spoke individually to a half-dozen Iraqi police all of whom told the same story. The blue truck turned down into the alley and immediately sped up as it made its way through the serpentine. They all said, "We knew immediately what was going on as soon as the two Marines began firing." The Iraqi police then related that some of them also fired, and then to a man, ran for safety just prior to the explosion. All survived. Many were injured...some seriously.
One of the Iraqis elaborated and with tears welling up said they'd run like any normal man would to save his life. What he didn't know until then, he said, and what he learned that very instant, was that Marines are not normal. Choking past the emotion he said, "Sir, in the name of God no sane man would have stood there and done what they did. No sane man. They saved us all."
What we didn't know at the time, and only learned a couple of days later after I wrote a summary and submitted both Yale and Haerter for posthumous Navy Crosses, was that one of our security cameras, damaged initially in the blast, recorded some of the suicide attack. It happened exactly as the Iraqis had described it. It took exactly six seconds from when the truck entered the alley until it detonated.
You can watch the last six seconds of their young lives. Putting myself in their heads I supposed it took about a second for the two Marines to separately come to the same conclusion about what was going on once the truck came into their view at the far end of the alley. Exactly no time to talk it over, or call the sergeant to ask what they should do. Only enough time to take half an instant and think about what the sergeant told them to do only a few minutes before: "...let no unauthorized personnel or vehicles pass." The two Marines had about five seconds left to live.
It took maybe another two seconds for them to present their weapons, take aim, and open up. By this time the truck was half-way through the barriers and gaining speed the whole time. Here, the recording shows a number of Iraqi police, some of whom had fired their AKs, now scattering like the normal and rational men they were--some running right past the Marines. They had three seconds left to live.
For about two seconds more, the recording shows the Marines' weapons firing non-stop...the truck's windshield exploding into shards of glass as their rounds take it apart and tore in to the body of the son-of-a-bitch who is trying to get past them to kill their brothers--American and Iraqi--bedded down in the barracks totally unaware of the fact that their lives at that moment depended entirely on two Marines standing their ground. If they had been aware, they would have known they were safe...because two Marines stood between them and a crazed suicide bomber.
The recording shows the truck careening to a stop immediately in front of the two Marines. In all of the instantaneous violence Yale and Haerter never hesitated. By all reports and by the recording, they never stepped back. They never even started to step aside. They never even shifted their weight. With their feet spread shoulder width apart, they leaned into the danger, firing as fast as they could work their weapons. They had only one second left to live.
The truck explodes. The camera goes blank. Two young men go to their God. Six seconds. Not enough time to think about their families, their country, their flag, or about their lives or their deaths, but more than enough time for two very brave young men to do their duty...into eternity. That is the kind of people who are on watch all over the world tonight--for you.
We Marines believe that God gave America the greatest gift he could bestow to man while he lived on this earth--freedom. We also believe he gave us another gift nearly as precious--our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines--to safeguard that gift and guarantee no force on this earth can ever steal it away.
It has been my distinct honor to have been with you here today. Rest assured our America, this experiment in democracy started over two centuries ago, will forever remain the "land of the free and home of the brave" so long as we never run out of tough young Americans who are willing to look beyond their own self-interest and comfortable lives, and go into the darkest and most dangerous places on earth to hunt down, and kill, those who would do us harm.
God Bless America, and....SEMPER FIDELIS!"
Wednesday, January 05, 2011
Multiple national databases show Obama’s name connected to a social security number belonging to Lucille Ballantyne (deceased), mother of Harry C Ballantyne (former chief actuary of the Social Security administration who had access to all of SSA databases)
Please, note that ll of the information that I am providing is public knowledge and public domain and is available to every one of you. Documents posted above belong to deceased individuals and therefore available to the public.
What is the significance of these documents? Multiple National databases show Barack Obama’s name connected to the first social security number. This number belongs to deceased Lucille Ballantyne, mother of Harry C Ballantyne, former chief actuary of the Social Security administration, who had access to all of SSA databases.
You can see that the application for Lucille Ballantyne was made in 1959, even though she was born in 1912. Below the actual application is a computer printout, called numident, and you can see correspondent date 8/1959.
Below Lucille Ballantyne’s numident, there is a numident for deceased Thomas Wood. Why his SS-5 is important. His number was 042-68-4424. A number just after it is 042-68-4425. The first digits 042 signify Connecticut. The second number 042-68-4425 was assigned to an elderly individual, born in 1890. Just like Lucille Ballantyne, this individual did not apply until the old age,when there was a need for SS benefits. According to multiple National databases it was obtained in Norfolk CT between 1976-1977. From 1980-1981 this number was assumed by Barack Hussein Obama. It shows in his Selective Service application and it is being used by him today.
There is a clear stonewalling, as SSA was supposed to give us an actual application for Thomas Wood, as he is deceased, they were supposed to give us a legible numident, instead we got this blurry, unreadable numident. It looks like someone at SSa does not want us to pinpoint the date of the application. I have an idea in regards to this date, but I want you to look at this picture and tell me, what number do you think represents the date of the application on this numident for Thomas Wood.
Also, I am trying to find any and all info about this individual, born in 1890. SSA application could have been filled out by the administrator of the hospital or hospice. Please check Danburry hospital, Danburry hospice and John Paul Hospital in CT, as well as retirement homes in the area, mortuaries, cemeteries, doctor’s and dentists offices. dates to remember: DOB 1890, application filled out 1976-1977, date of death 1977-1981. I really need your help in getting to the bottom of this mystery.
What is the significance of these documents? Multiple National databases show Barack Obama’s name connected to the first social security number. This number belongs to deceased Lucille Ballantyne, mother of Harry C Ballantyne, former chief actuary of the Social Security administration, who had access to all of SSA databases.
You can see that the application for Lucille Ballantyne was made in 1959, even though she was born in 1912. Below the actual application is a computer printout, called numident, and you can see correspondent date 8/1959.
Below Lucille Ballantyne’s numident, there is a numident for deceased Thomas Wood. Why his SS-5 is important. His number was 042-68-4424. A number just after it is 042-68-4425. The first digits 042 signify Connecticut. The second number 042-68-4425 was assigned to an elderly individual, born in 1890. Just like Lucille Ballantyne, this individual did not apply until the old age,when there was a need for SS benefits. According to multiple National databases it was obtained in Norfolk CT between 1976-1977. From 1980-1981 this number was assumed by Barack Hussein Obama. It shows in his Selective Service application and it is being used by him today.
There is a clear stonewalling, as SSA was supposed to give us an actual application for Thomas Wood, as he is deceased, they were supposed to give us a legible numident, instead we got this blurry, unreadable numident. It looks like someone at SSa does not want us to pinpoint the date of the application. I have an idea in regards to this date, but I want you to look at this picture and tell me, what number do you think represents the date of the application on this numident for Thomas Wood.
Also, I am trying to find any and all info about this individual, born in 1890. SSA application could have been filled out by the administrator of the hospital or hospice. Please check Danburry hospital, Danburry hospice and John Paul Hospital in CT, as well as retirement homes in the area, mortuaries, cemeteries, doctor’s and dentists offices. dates to remember: DOB 1890, application filled out 1976-1977, date of death 1977-1981. I really need your help in getting to the bottom of this mystery.
Labels:
citizenship,
election fraud,
eligibility,
fraud,
national security,
Obama,
President,
social security,
SSA
Tuesday, January 04, 2011
How to change your life
Yes, we are all still are interested in "change" even after Obama's has basically turned it into a very dirty word (i.e. code for making him King of America).
But few are happy with how 2010 turned out, right? Or maybe even how your life has turned out up until now?
So here are some highly recommended books for those of us still working at changing our lives for the better in 2011:
Power of Full Engagement
:
This was just recently recommended by British internet marketing guru now living in Spain, Andre Chaperon.
Work The System
:
British professional mentor extraordinaire Alex Goodall -- who gives the best and most detailed webinars on every aspect of running an online business -- recommended this book last year to his mentees.
Strategic Acceleration
:
This was recommended last year by another internet marketing guru, Tommy Liantonio (who would probably object to that description and say he's just a very successful businessman). Tommy, who I think actually lives in New Jersey (not that there's anything wrong with that), gets so excited by the ideas he's discussing that he just can't help letting a few "F" words slip out now and again :-)
50 Success Classics
:
The Best Business Books Ever
:
But few are happy with how 2010 turned out, right? Or maybe even how your life has turned out up until now?
So here are some highly recommended books for those of us still working at changing our lives for the better in 2011:
Power of Full Engagement
This was just recently recommended by British internet marketing guru now living in Spain, Andre Chaperon.
QUESTION: What's the #1 priority in business today?
My guess is that you're prob'ly way off base.
It's not what I expected when I heard the answer.
ANSWER: Reducing, minimizing and eliminating
distraction and interruption.
Think about that for a second...
Reducing, minimizing and ELIMINATING distraction
and interruption.
Wow!
I was first exposed to this stuff from Eben Pagan
in 2007 at his GetAltitude seminar.
Eben learned it from Tony Schwartz who was a
guest speaker at the $10,000 per person seminar.
Work The System
British professional mentor extraordinaire Alex Goodall -- who gives the best and most detailed webinars on every aspect of running an online business -- recommended this book last year to his mentees.
Strategic Acceleration
This was recommended last year by another internet marketing guru, Tommy Liantonio (who would probably object to that description and say he's just a very successful businessman). Tommy, who I think actually lives in New Jersey (not that there's anything wrong with that), gets so excited by the ideas he's discussing that he just can't help letting a few "F" words slip out now and again :-)
50 Success Classics
The Best Business Books Ever
Labels:
books,
business,
Internet Marketing,
mentor,
self help,
self improvement,
success
Drink wine, stay married!
Historically, we find a correlation between the shift from polygyny to monogamy and the growth of alcohol consumption. Cross-culturally we also find that monogamous societies consume more alcohol than polygynous societies in the preindustrial world.New study: Monogamy linked to … alcohol?
Monday, January 03, 2011
042-68-4425: At the time this Social Security number was issued in Connecticut, Mr. Obama resided in HI, was nowhere near Connecticut and could not legally obtain this number!
From ORLY TAITZ:
Most troubling is the fact that one such number 042-68-4425 was assumed around 1980-1981 by Barack Hussein Obama, current President of the United States and Commander in Chief. National databases show this number associated with the dates of birth 1890 as well as April 8 1961 (04.08.1961) as well as August 4 1961 (08.04.1961). At the time this number was issued in Connecticut, Mr. Obama resided in HI, was nowhere near Connecticut and could not legally obtain this number. While according to National databases there are multiple SS numbers associated with Mr. Obama’s name, this number was used by him most consistently and is used today, while residing in the White House, though it appears he used a different number, while serving in the Senate.
Clearly, this is an issue of national importance and urgency as national security is at stake.
Labels:
citizenship,
election fraud,
eligibility,
fraud,
national security,
Obama,
President,
social security
Sunday, January 02, 2011
5 Best Arguments Against Sharia in the United States
1. U.S. law is the “supreme law of the land,” no exceptions.
2. Sharia, as “divine revelation,” is inherently undemocratic.
3. Many aspects of Sharia are flagrantly unconstitutional.
4. Sharia is fundamentally religious law, and should be inapplicable to U.S. criminal or civil law.
5. Subjectively, Sharia is a discriminatory and cruel legal system.
Read the whole thing
2. Sharia, as “divine revelation,” is inherently undemocratic.
3. Many aspects of Sharia are flagrantly unconstitutional.
4. Sharia is fundamentally religious law, and should be inapplicable to U.S. criminal or civil law.
5. Subjectively, Sharia is a discriminatory and cruel legal system.
Read the whole thing
ANCHOR BABIES ARE NOT LEGAL CITIZENS!!!
Babies BORN to ILLEGAL ALIEN FEMALES are NOT citizens of the USA. Being American BORN is not the same as being an American BORN CITIZEN. It takes a citizen to MAKE A CITIZEN. These Illegal Alien FEMALES and their illegal alien infants are all ILLEGAL. Dispite the fact that the baby is BORN on American SOIL while the mother is illegally in the USA or drops her bundle of joy at the border!
Now we have these illegal anchor babies MARCHING down our streets in Arizona demanding rights for their parents and FIGHTING against the rule of law! Why you ask? Because THEY KNOW THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY A US CITIZEN. If they were they would not have to FIGHT for their parents.
Show me where in the Constitution it states that an infant or a teenager can pass on citizenship to their adult parent? You won't find it!
A child cannot pass down citizenship! A parent, a legal US parent bestows those rights unto their children.
Wake up folks! Mothers Against Illegal Aliens/Mothers Against Illegal Amnesty has been warning you about these children. They are not American citizens and now they are reacting to violence and threats to stay with their parents in the USA.
The 14th Amendment is critical to protecting our border and our nation and our legal children's VOTE!
Remember every one of these illegal alien anchor babies gets a VOTE in the USA! Imagine that! They will out vote YOU!
MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL AMNESTY
Now we have these illegal anchor babies MARCHING down our streets in Arizona demanding rights for their parents and FIGHTING against the rule of law! Why you ask? Because THEY KNOW THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY A US CITIZEN. If they were they would not have to FIGHT for their parents.
Show me where in the Constitution it states that an infant or a teenager can pass on citizenship to their adult parent? You won't find it!
A child cannot pass down citizenship! A parent, a legal US parent bestows those rights unto their children.
Wake up folks! Mothers Against Illegal Aliens/Mothers Against Illegal Amnesty has been warning you about these children. They are not American citizens and now they are reacting to violence and threats to stay with their parents in the USA.
The 14th Amendment is critical to protecting our border and our nation and our legal children's VOTE!
Remember every one of these illegal alien anchor babies gets a VOTE in the USA! Imagine that! They will out vote YOU!
MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL AMNESTY
The other Barry...
Message from Dr. Jack Wheeler at ToThePointNews.com
Fifty years ago, the other Barry wrote down his dream. Just think of how much greater, how much safer, how much richer, and how much freer we would all be today if Americans had the brains and courage back then to put him in the White House instead of his precise opposite. Here is Barry's Dream:I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom.This was the dream, the pledge to America, of Barry Goldwater (1909-1998). You'll find these words on page 15 of his book, written in 1960, The Conscience of a Conservative
My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution ... or have failed their purpose ... or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden.
I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible.
And if I should be attacked for neglecting my constituents' 'interests,' I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty, and in that cause I am doing the very best I can..
Saturday, January 01, 2011
6 Myths About Oil
The 6 myths about oil all count on the fact that we have not been taught to truly value or understand oil, the oil industry, and the capitalist system that have made them so prominent.Read the whole thing
Myth #1: America’s reliance on oil is an “addiction”—an irrational, self-destructive habit.
Myth #2: There are “green” technologies that are just as good, or better, than oil.
Myth #3: Because oil is finite, it will inevitably run out.
Myth #4: Because oil is mostly in other countries, they can cut us off at will and create an economic catastrophe.
Myth #5: Because oil money funds hostile dictatorships (Iran, Saudi Arabia) by using less oil we can make them poorer and make ourselves more secure.
Myth #6: Because the burning of oil produces CO2, oil is a deadly pollutant that must be severely capped.
Friday, December 31, 2010
2011: The beginning of the end of the great American health care system
WSJ:
New taxes on drug makers, lower prescription-drug costs for seniors and restrictions on tax-free medical spending accounts are among a slate of health-law provisions that kick in Saturday.Big Health-Care Changes Arrive in New Year
The changes show how the law will begin to reshape American health care, even as opponents try to overturn the measure in Congress and the courts.
Although House Republicans are threatening to starve the law of funding and stage a symbolic repeal vote, those actions aren't likely to block any significant pieces of the law aimed at consumers for 2011. That's because the changes generally involve new rules and don't require spending.
"The debate over defunding and repeal is going to be much more of a political story in 2011 than something that actually means something for consumers immediately," said Larry Levitt, vice president at the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.
Over the longer term, however, Republicans could succeed in thwarting funding for staff and grants needed to put the law in place. The biggest changes, including new health-insurance exchanges and subsidies for lower earners, are set to happen in 2014.
New Year Humor
What did a caterpillar do on New Year's Day? – It turns over a new leaf.
What’s once in a minute, twice in a moment, and never in a thousand years? - The letter M!
Did you hear about the three million dollar Redneck Lottery? - The winner gets three dollars a year for a million years.
What do vampires sing on New Year's Eve? - Auld Fang Syne!
Why did the man refuse to eat snails? - He only ate fast food.
Why do dragons sleep during the day? - So they can fight knights.
Why was the queen's room flooded? - Because she reigned for many years!
And,
What does the dentist of the year get? - A little plaque.
FBI Investigation Imminent?
How much more proof does anyone really need?
By the way, I am a 15 year veteran of print graphic design and have a Bachelor’s in Fine Art with a Concentration in Graphic Design and graduated magna cum laude and at the top of my class. I have 15 years of professional experience in dealing with print vendors, paper vendors, paper ordering and 15 years pre-press experience–including ordering embossed materials–and I have designed and ordered custom business letterhead too many times to mention. Six of those years I held the title of Creative Director. You can be certain my opinion is a professional opinion. Thank you again.
Thursday, December 30, 2010
CBS: MEDICARE BUSTED BY 2017!
Starting New Year's Day 10,000 Will Reach Eligibility for Program Every Day for 19 Years, Risking Its Bankruptcy by 2017Medicare Bound to Bust as First Boomers Hit 65
Wickard v. Filburn key to overturning Obamacare
From OBAMACARE CLASS ACTION
Despite all the doom and gloom in the news, 2010 marked a real beginning in America’s fight to take back its Constitution. Pelosi and Reid intended to expand Congressional power through Obamacare. But instead, Obamacare woke America up. For the first time in decades, average Americans are talking about the Constitution. Average Americans know what the “Commerce Clause” is and are actively advocating for a return to Constitutional limits on Congress. For the first time since the 40’s, the Supreme Court’s Wickard v. Filburn case is being discussed by people other than law school students. This is all very good news!
The Wickard v. Filburn case was one of the most important and tragic moments in American history. It changed the role of the Federal government in American life as dramatically as did the so-called Civil War. Yet until this year, most Americans had never even heard of Wickard v. Filburn. Since our Obamacare Class Action’s primary goal is to overturn Wickard, let me take this opportunity to review the facts of Wickard:
Roscoe Filburn was an Ohio farmer growing wheat to feed his chickens, livestock, and family during the great depression. In order to drive up wheat prices the U.S. government had imposed limits on farmers’ wheat production. Roscoe was growing more than the overlords in DC permitted. So, the Department of Agriculture ordered Roscoe to destroy his crops and pay a fine, even though he was producing the excess wheat for his own use and had no intention of selling it.
Rather than pay the fine and destroy food during a food shortage, Roscoe sued the Federal government arguing that the “Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938” was beyond the Constitutional authority of Congress. Filburn argued that because the excess wheat was produced for his private consumption on his own farm, it never entered commerce at all, much less interstate commerce, and therefore was not subject to Federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.
The Federal District Court ruled in favor of Filburn. The government then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, which called District Court's holding against the Department of Agriculture a "manifest error." The court went on to uphold the Act under the Interstate Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court decided that, because Filburn's wheat growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for chicken feed on the open market, and because wheat was traded nationally, Filburn's production of more wheat than he was allotted was affecting interstate commerce, and could be regulated by the federal government.
Now, it must be understood that for the first 150 years after the ratification of the Constitution all three branches of government understood that Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause was very limited. It was well established that this clause was intended to allow Congress to prevent individual states from imposing unfair barriers to commerce between the states, such as tariffs and home-state favorable regulations.
As an example of how central this principal of limited Federal government was to our Republic, we need only consider President James Madison’s 1817 veto of a bill that would have provided Federal funds for construction of roads, canals, and navigable waterways. President Madison wrote a letter to Congress explaining that his reason for vetoing the bill was that Congress had no authority under the enumerated powers of the Constitution to spend public funds on such projects. Madison explained that for the Constitution to survive the Federal government must remain limited to the specific tasks that the States had granted it authority to perform. Think about that for a minute folks. In 1817 a President who had been personally involved in the ratification of the Constitution reminded Congress that the Federal government didn’t have the power to spend public funds on roads. How far we’ve fallen…
It should also be noted that when the Wickard v. Filburn case reached the Supreme Court the Department of Agriculture had asserted a defense that would have caused the case to be thrown out, but then the Department mysteriously waived its defense. You see, the fix was in. For several years before Wickard v. Filburn, the FDR packed Supreme Court had been deciding cases that dramatically increased Congressional authority. I suspect that the Department of Agriculture somehow knew that Wickard v. Filburn would go their way in the Supreme Court. The FDR administration certainly wanted a case that would sweep away any remaining remnants of the old Republic’s Constitutional limitations and empower Congress to do whatever it wanted. With a World War raging, and the outcome of that war uncertain, 1942 was the perfect time to centralize power in DC. Unfortunately this fundamental shift in power went unnoticed. The government of our Founding Fathers was swept away and our history classes never reported it in our government funded schools.
For six decades Congress regulated anything that moved and taxed anything that didn’t. For six decades the Supreme Court upheld Congress’ authority to regulate anything. Many lawsuits were brought challenging Congressional mandates, but all fell to the new logic of Wickard v. Filburn. Finally in 1995 a small ray of hope emerged. United States v. Lopez (1995) was the first decision to invalidate a federal statute on the grounds that it exceeded the power of Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Unfortunately, the Lopez decision was very limited, and has not been expanded upon significantly.
But now, with Obamacare taking Federal authority to an all-time high, with Americans waking up to this problem, we once again have an opportunity to regain our Constitutional Republic by overturning Wickard v. Filburn. We do not want a decision that simply eliminates the individual mandate of Obamacare. We need the Supreme Court to recognize that Wickard v. Filburn left zero limitations on Federal authority. We need the Supreme Court to recognize that Obamacare is a milestone in Congressional abuse and that that abuse arose BECAUSE of Wickard v. Filburn.
This is what Liberty Legal Foundation is fighting to accomplish. This is what you support by being part of the Obamacare Class Action and when you donate to Liberty Legal Foundation. Please tell everyone you know the story of Roscoe Filburn. Tell them about President James Madison’s letter to Congress in 1817. Show them how we lost our Constitution in 1942, and how we can restore it through the OCA lawsuit.
2011 will be a great year, with your help, as we continue to defend the Constitution.
In Liberty,
Van Irion
President, Lead Counsel, Co-Founder
Liberty Legal Foundation
Despite all the doom and gloom in the news, 2010 marked a real beginning in America’s fight to take back its Constitution. Pelosi and Reid intended to expand Congressional power through Obamacare. But instead, Obamacare woke America up. For the first time in decades, average Americans are talking about the Constitution. Average Americans know what the “Commerce Clause” is and are actively advocating for a return to Constitutional limits on Congress. For the first time since the 40’s, the Supreme Court’s Wickard v. Filburn case is being discussed by people other than law school students. This is all very good news!
The Wickard v. Filburn case was one of the most important and tragic moments in American history. It changed the role of the Federal government in American life as dramatically as did the so-called Civil War. Yet until this year, most Americans had never even heard of Wickard v. Filburn. Since our Obamacare Class Action’s primary goal is to overturn Wickard, let me take this opportunity to review the facts of Wickard:
Roscoe Filburn was an Ohio farmer growing wheat to feed his chickens, livestock, and family during the great depression. In order to drive up wheat prices the U.S. government had imposed limits on farmers’ wheat production. Roscoe was growing more than the overlords in DC permitted. So, the Department of Agriculture ordered Roscoe to destroy his crops and pay a fine, even though he was producing the excess wheat for his own use and had no intention of selling it.
Rather than pay the fine and destroy food during a food shortage, Roscoe sued the Federal government arguing that the “Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938” was beyond the Constitutional authority of Congress. Filburn argued that because the excess wheat was produced for his private consumption on his own farm, it never entered commerce at all, much less interstate commerce, and therefore was not subject to Federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.
The Federal District Court ruled in favor of Filburn. The government then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, which called District Court's holding against the Department of Agriculture a "manifest error." The court went on to uphold the Act under the Interstate Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court decided that, because Filburn's wheat growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for chicken feed on the open market, and because wheat was traded nationally, Filburn's production of more wheat than he was allotted was affecting interstate commerce, and could be regulated by the federal government.
Now, it must be understood that for the first 150 years after the ratification of the Constitution all three branches of government understood that Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause was very limited. It was well established that this clause was intended to allow Congress to prevent individual states from imposing unfair barriers to commerce between the states, such as tariffs and home-state favorable regulations.
As an example of how central this principal of limited Federal government was to our Republic, we need only consider President James Madison’s 1817 veto of a bill that would have provided Federal funds for construction of roads, canals, and navigable waterways. President Madison wrote a letter to Congress explaining that his reason for vetoing the bill was that Congress had no authority under the enumerated powers of the Constitution to spend public funds on such projects. Madison explained that for the Constitution to survive the Federal government must remain limited to the specific tasks that the States had granted it authority to perform. Think about that for a minute folks. In 1817 a President who had been personally involved in the ratification of the Constitution reminded Congress that the Federal government didn’t have the power to spend public funds on roads. How far we’ve fallen…
It should also be noted that when the Wickard v. Filburn case reached the Supreme Court the Department of Agriculture had asserted a defense that would have caused the case to be thrown out, but then the Department mysteriously waived its defense. You see, the fix was in. For several years before Wickard v. Filburn, the FDR packed Supreme Court had been deciding cases that dramatically increased Congressional authority. I suspect that the Department of Agriculture somehow knew that Wickard v. Filburn would go their way in the Supreme Court. The FDR administration certainly wanted a case that would sweep away any remaining remnants of the old Republic’s Constitutional limitations and empower Congress to do whatever it wanted. With a World War raging, and the outcome of that war uncertain, 1942 was the perfect time to centralize power in DC. Unfortunately this fundamental shift in power went unnoticed. The government of our Founding Fathers was swept away and our history classes never reported it in our government funded schools.
For six decades Congress regulated anything that moved and taxed anything that didn’t. For six decades the Supreme Court upheld Congress’ authority to regulate anything. Many lawsuits were brought challenging Congressional mandates, but all fell to the new logic of Wickard v. Filburn. Finally in 1995 a small ray of hope emerged. United States v. Lopez (1995) was the first decision to invalidate a federal statute on the grounds that it exceeded the power of Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Unfortunately, the Lopez decision was very limited, and has not been expanded upon significantly.
But now, with Obamacare taking Federal authority to an all-time high, with Americans waking up to this problem, we once again have an opportunity to regain our Constitutional Republic by overturning Wickard v. Filburn. We do not want a decision that simply eliminates the individual mandate of Obamacare. We need the Supreme Court to recognize that Wickard v. Filburn left zero limitations on Federal authority. We need the Supreme Court to recognize that Obamacare is a milestone in Congressional abuse and that that abuse arose BECAUSE of Wickard v. Filburn.
This is what Liberty Legal Foundation is fighting to accomplish. This is what you support by being part of the Obamacare Class Action and when you donate to Liberty Legal Foundation. Please tell everyone you know the story of Roscoe Filburn. Tell them about President James Madison’s letter to Congress in 1817. Show them how we lost our Constitution in 1942, and how we can restore it through the OCA lawsuit.
2011 will be a great year, with your help, as we continue to defend the Constitution.
In Liberty,
Van Irion
President, Lead Counsel, Co-Founder
Liberty Legal Foundation
We are abandoning the rule of law for the rule by bureaucrats
Forbes: Unelected officials have been given the power to fundamentally remake industries based on their political and value judgments...
Here, folks, we see the usual pattern of liberal, big-government demagogues. They proclaim that they — as the protectors of the people — will ensure the public gets many more benefits for much lower costs. When it becomes evident they can’t deliver on their promises, the demagogues turn to price controls, along with more threats and regulations, as the only way to “stem the greed.” As a result, companies that had been participating in the market begin to drop out, reducing competition and choice. The whole market becomes even more dysfunctional, and the government feels justified in stepping in for a full-scale takeover.
Labels:
bureaucrats,
Obama administration,
regulation,
Rule of Law
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
How the Democrats plan on taking over the government on January 5th, 2011
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has been scheming behind closed doors to use his slim majority to vote on January 5 for the most drastic rules changes since 1975...Reid's Rules Scheme To Rewrite Defeat
Labels:
2011,
Chairman,
Chuck Schumer,
Democrats,
Harry Reid,
House Rules Committee,
January,
Republicans,
U.S. Senate
Obamacare preview: Swedish man forced to have his penis amputated after waiting more than a year to learn he had cancer.
Man's penis amputated following misdiagnosis
There've been scores of warnings about the horror stories of socialized healthcare -- see some of them in the health care article archives at the bottom of this blog -- and the only chance we have left is for the repeal and defunding of the coming Obamacare disaster.
There've been scores of warnings about the horror stories of socialized healthcare -- see some of them in the health care article archives at the bottom of this blog -- and the only chance we have left is for the repeal and defunding of the coming Obamacare disaster.
They died; Obama lied
In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1½ months, all three men “conveniently” died...
DONALD YOUNG - LARRY BLAND - NATE SPENCER
Labels:
Chicago,
Democratic Party,
Donald Young,
gay,
homosexuals,
Larry Bland,
Larry Sinclair,
murder,
Nate Spencer,
Obama,
President
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












