Showing posts with label federal government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal government. Show all posts
Thursday, April 12, 2018
The left likes to believe that it can close Pandora's Box whenever it pleases. History tells us differently.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.
In the early seventies, political operatives disguised as delivery men broke into a Washington D.C. office. These efforts to spy on the political opposition would culminate in what we know as Watergate.
In the late teens, political operatives disguised as FBI agents, NSA personnel and other employees of the Federal government eavesdropped, harassed and raided the offices of the political opposition.
The raids of Michael Cohen’s hotel room, home and office are just this week’s Watergate.
Labels:
2016,
Daniel Greenfield,
DOJ,
Donald Trump,
election,
FBI,
federal government,
James Comey,
NSA,
President,
revolution,
Robert Mueller,
totalitarianism,
Watergate
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Lies, lies, and more lies
“The power of federal judges to review the conduct of the executive branch, both in FOIA cases and in others, hangs in the balance.”
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/should-government-be-punished-when-it-lies-courts
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/should-government-be-punished-when-it-lies-courts
Judge Napolitano: “The Supreme Court has ruled over and over and over again: the government can lie to us…the remedy is not legal, it is political.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yJA86j2UUo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yJA86j2UUo
“In what legal experts characterized as a rare finding, Judge Christensen concluded that the Government, as the defendant in the case, had ”perpetrated a fraud upon the court.” As a result of ”convoluted actions,” the judge said, ”the processes of the court were manipulated to the improper and unacceptable advantage of the defendants.””
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/05/us/judge-says-us-lied-in-fallout-case.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/05/us/judge-says-us-lied-in-fallout-case.html
“Federal Appeals Court Lets FBI off the Hook after It Lied to a Judge”
http://www.allgov.com/news/controversies/federal-appeals-court-lets-fbi-off-the-hook-after-it-lied-to-a-judge-130812?news=850840
http://www.allgov.com/news/controversies/federal-appeals-court-lets-fbi-off-the-hook-after-it-lied-to-a-judge-130812?news=850840
“Court: Federal Law Allows Lying in TSA-Related FOIA Requests”
http://tsaoutofourpants.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/court-federal-law-allows-lying-in-tsa-related-foia-requests/
http://tsaoutofourpants.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/court-federal-law-allows-lying-in-tsa-related-foia-requests/
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Main Core is the code name of a database maintained since the 1980s by the federal government of the United States
Are you on the list?
Main Core: A List Of Millions Of Americans That Will Be Subject To Detention During Martial Law
Main Core: A List Of Millions Of Americans That Will Be Subject To Detention During Martial Law
Labels:
federal government,
government tyranny,
Main Core,
martial law,
NSA,
United States
Monday, October 14, 2013
BREAKING: HOUSE REPUBLICANS SCHEDULE OBAMA IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS
Republicans in the House of Representatives have scheduled impeachment proceedings against President Obama, claiming his inability to halt the federal government shutdown makes him unfit for office.READ MORE
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann introduced a resolution to impeach Obama this morning and referred the matter to the House Judiciary Committee. Senior aides close to judiciary chairman Bob Goodlatte say hearings will begin Thursday.
Sunday, May 06, 2012
Growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy
By Nick Dranias
Learn more:The City of Tombstone, Arizona is no longer the only one fighting the federal government for water rights. The latest move by the Federal Bureau of Land Management appears to herald a bigger and much more comprehensive effort to seize water and access rights on federal lands throughout the western states.
Just last week, the Bureau of Land Management declared to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that the federal government holds senior water rights across much of Arizona’s San Pedro River riparian watershed. The BLM’s objection to the “Designation of Adequate Water Supply” issued by ADWR to Sierra Vista’s Pueblo del Sol Water Company stakes the claim that water sources in the area cannot be used without the federal government’s permission. This new federal policy not only defies decades of deference to and accommodation of state sovereignty over water law, but it throws a noose around Arizona’s neck, for which water is life.The growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy. There is perhaps no better way for the federal government to quell restive western states, like Arizona, that dare to resist federal immigration, healthcare, and unionization policies.More than ever before, the BLM’s actions show that it is essential for the Goldwater Institute to prevail in our efforts to vindicate Tombstone, Arizona’s 130-year-old water rights, which the federal government is challenging. If Tombstone fails in its effort to preserve its municipal water supply, which is essential to its existence, the floodgates of federal overreach will wash away what little sovereignty the western states still enjoy.Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.
Sierra Vista Herald: Warning on water issued by Babbitt in ’94
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Bureau of Land Management letter (PDF)
Goldwater Institute: Tombstone v. United States
Labels:
Arizona,
big government,
federal government,
tyranny,
water
Growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy
By Nick Dranias
The City of Tombstone, Arizona is no longer the only one fighting the federal government for water rights. The latest move by the Federal Bureau of Land Management appears to herald a bigger and much more comprehensive effort to seize water and access rights on federal lands throughout the western states.
Just last week, the Bureau of Land Management declared to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that the federal government holds senior water rights across much of Arizona’s San Pedro River riparian watershed. The BLM’s objection to the “Designation of Adequate Water Supply” issued by ADWR to Sierra Vista’s Pueblo del Sol Water Company stakes the claim that water sources in the area cannot be used without the federal government’s permission. This new federal policy not only defies decades of deference to and accommodation of state sovereignty over water law, but it throws a noose around Arizona’s neck, for which water is life.
The growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy. There is perhaps no better way for the federal government to quell restive western states, like Arizona, that dare to resist federal immigration, healthcare, and unionization policies.
More than ever before, the BLM’s actions show that it is essential for the Goldwater Institute to prevail in our efforts to vindicate Tombstone, Arizona’s 130-year-old water rights, which the federal government is challenging. If Tombstone fails in its effort to preserve its municipal water supply, which is essential to its existence, the floodgates of federal overreach will wash away what little sovereignty the western states still enjoy.
Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.
http://sonoranalliance.com/2012/05/03/the-feds-are-coming-for-our-water/
Learn more:
Sierra Vista Herald: Warning on water issued by Babbitt in ’94
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Bureau of Land Management letter (PDF)
Goldwater Institute: Tombstone v. United States
Thursday, August 11, 2011
The Catastrophe of Public Education
What H.G. Wells says in his famous statement above is quite true. History is a race between education and catastrophe. Unfortunately, the manner in which education is delivered in the United States, and in other countries of the Western World, through public institutitions, now is itself the catastrophe. Rather than preventing a larger historical catastrophe, public education is now promoting and contributing to just such a thing.Read more
This is not exactly news. It was already realized early in the 1980's (the federal report, "A Nation at Risk," 1983) that students were graduating from high school, and often from college, without knowing much of anything. Sometimes they were functionally illiterate, especially from inner city schools. Alarms were continually sounded through the 1990's, such as with Thomas Sowell's splendid Inside American Education, The Decline, The Deception, the Dogmas [The Free Press, 1993]. But now, after a good thirty years, and with some marginal improvements in some places, the general problem is just as bad, if not in certain respects worse. With some regularity, polls seem to show that graduates know little about history, government, literature, science, economics, geography, etc.
In the 80's, it was easily recognized that one problem with the schools was just the "dumbing down" of the curriculum. Less and less was expected of students, often deliberately, so as not to damage their self-esteem; and, indeed, international surveys showed that American students felt better about themselves, even when their performance was dismal in international comparisons. Students from say, Korea, felt worse about themselves but accomplished much more. This was a trend that should have been reversed just as easily as it was recognized. But it wasn't. In 1988, E.D. Hirsch published a book, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, talking about the essential general knowledge that education should be conveying; but the educational Establishment ignored this.
Nor is this just an American phenomenon. Theodore Dalrymple, a British psychiatrist practicing at a public hospital and a prison, in his marvelous Life at the Bottom: The Worldview That Makes the Underclass [Ivan R. Dee, 2003], remarks that he didn't know what disturbed him more, that the young toughs of his experience were tatooing themselves with swastikas, or that they actually didn't know, thanks to British education, who had actually used the swastika (the Nazis) and what they had done (dictatorship, war, mass murder). His regular experience with the young patients he saw was that they knew little about anything.
Why this has all happened is not all that mysterious, nor why it has proven so difficult to reverse the trend. There has just not been the political will, or perhaps even the political means, to accomplish reform -- with a smokescreen of lies and deceptions confusing the matter. Indeed, I believe that the system is simply unreformable, and the only solution is to allow students and parents to escape it.
The root of the problem can be summarized in three terms: (1) teachers' unions, (2) education schools, and (3) the federal government. Each of these has become its own rent-seeking and bureaucratic institution, following a dynamic, well described by Public Choice Economics, that serves themselves as institutions but bears little relation to what most people would think of as the purposes of education, let alone public education. The most disturbing feature of this dynamic is the extent to which ignorance promotes the control and purposes of the educational establishment better than the successful dissemination of knowledge would. . .
Labels:
big government,
education,
federal government,
Kelley Ross,
Professor,
schools,
student,
teachers,
unions
Saturday, August 06, 2011
Monday, July 18, 2011
When did it become the primary function of the federal government to send millions of Americans checks?
For this, in essence, is what the debt-ceiling fight is all about -- the inexorable and ultimately fatal growth of the welfare state. If you don't believe it, just look at President Obama's veiled threat to withhold Grandma's Social Security benefits if Congress doesn't let him borrow another $2 trillion or so to get himself safely past the 2012 election.Uncle Sam, sugar daddy
Labels:
2012,
debt ceiling,
election,
federal government,
Obama,
President,
social security,
welfare state
Monday, June 13, 2011
Transparency: White House to cut access to half of federal websites
...because Obama has compassion for all of us dummies out here in his kingdom: The White House said there are nearly 2,000 websites operated by the federal government, which it said confuses people.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Austerity In America: 22 Signs That It Is Already Here And That It Is Going To Be Very Painful
Glenn Beck has been warning about this for quite awhile now: Most Americans tend to think of "government debt" as only a problem of the federal government. But that is simply not accurate. The truth is that there are thousands of "government debt problems" from coast to coast...
HAT TIP: CA POLITICAL NEWS & VIEWS
HAT TIP: CA POLITICAL NEWS & VIEWS
Labels:
debt,
debt crisis,
economic crisis,
federal government,
states,
U.S. economy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
