Showing posts with label 2010. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010. Show all posts

Monday, July 03, 2017

COMPARE PROPOSALS TO REPLACE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (Interactive)

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
(Interactive)
COMPARE PROPOSALS to REPLACE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress have committed to repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA). How do their replacement proposals compare to the ACA? How do they compare to each other?
Plans available for comparison:
  • The Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (PDF) – Updated 6.26.2017
  • The American Health Care Act, as passed by the House of Representatives on May 4, 2017 (PDF)
  • The Affordable Care Act, 2010 (PDF)
More plans for comparison:
  • Rep. Tom Price’s Empowering Patients First Act, 2015 (PDF)
  • House Speaker Paul Ryan’s A Better Way: Our Vision for a More Confident America, 2016 (PDF)
  • Sen. Bill Cassidy’s Patient Freedom Act, 2017 (PDF)
  • Sen. Rand Paul’s Obamacare Replacement Act, 2017 (PDF)
  • House Discussion Draft, February 10, 2017 (PDF)

Friday, June 10, 2016

Everything Will Be Fine As Soon As The Obamacare Market 'Stabilizes'--Not

FORBES - Robert Laszewski:
Goodness, this family already pays $11,760 a year for a plan with a $13,700 deductible and it could go up to $13,971 in premium next year based upon the 18% rate increase.

This is a “stable” health insurance market and there is no reason to “despair?”

What are these people thinking?
READ MORE

Friday, October 02, 2015

HEALTH FREEDOM VS. OBAMACARE FASCISM

...there are three basic propositions of Health Freedom legislation:

1. Health Care is so incredibly expensive in America because of government intervention into the medical marketplace.

2. Health care costs can only be radically reduced by an equally radical reduction of government regulations and subsidies.

3. Just as health care costs will be radically reduced, both the availability and the quality of health care will be radically increased by such a reduction of government intervention.

Given this, here are:

Ten Specific Legislative Means By Which Health Freedom Can Be Achieved:
READ MORE

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Two New Studies Raise Red Flags on Obamacare

The Fiscal Times:
When the next round of premium increases hits over the summer, and the market for employer-provided health insurance undergoes the same kind of massive disruption as the individual market did over the last six months, the debate over the honesty and integrity of the Obama administration may hit new levels of intensity.
READ MORE

Saturday, April 05, 2014

Supreme Court may invalidate Obamacare sometime before June, 2015

"...an inevitable Supreme Court review in the coming term, with a decision assured no later than June 2015 and possibly earlier given that federal funds are quite possibly being disbursed illegally."
Powerline:
The little case that could, Halbig v. Sebelius, is one of four lawsuits challenging the government’s authority to pay subsidies under Obamacare to anyone enrolled in the federal exchange. The case just took a giant step forward in oral argument last week before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
READ MORE

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Affordable Care Act Scam named Better Business Bureau’s 2013 ‘Scam of the Year’

The Better Business Bureau announced its “Top 10 Scams of 2013.” Leading the pack, believe it or not, was the Affordable Care Act Scam, which most would refer to as the Obamacare scam.
As much as he may want to differ, CBS late night host David Letterman didn’t invent the idea of a “top 10 list” — it’s been around for a long time, and that includes the 102 year-old Better Business Bureau, which has published a top 10 scam report for years.
READ MORE

Friday, February 07, 2014

Social progress?

The old employer sponsored system forced people to stay in jobs they didn’t like because they needed the health insurance coverage. The new Obamacare system will force people to stay out of jobs they do want because they need to maximize their subsidies. And this is social progress?
READ MORE

Wednesday, February 05, 2014

CALIFORNIA: OBAMACARE TURNING CANCER PATIENTS AWAY

There are two reasons patients will be turned away: one that President Barack Obama hid, and one that he lied about.
READ MORE

Monday, February 03, 2014

U.S. intelligence agencies warn Obama administration about new security threat to Obamacare website

U.S. intelligence agencies last week urged the Obama administration to check its new healthcare network for malicious software after learning that developers linked to the Belarus government helped produce the website, raising fresh concerns that private data posted by millions of Americans will be compromised.
READ MORE

NOTICE OF TERMINATION

With a deep sense of sadness, I must inform you that I will no longer serve as a physician for Aetna patients under the terms of our contractual agreement, which you most recently unilaterally changed...
Read this shocking letter here!

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Obamacare, the vision, is now beyond rescue - UPDATE

By Megan McArdle
Jan 21, 2014
Last Wednesday, Scott Gottlieb and I debated Jonathan Chait and Douglas Kamerow on this proposition: “Resolved: Obamacare Is Now Beyond Rescue.” I was feeling a little trepid, for three reasons: First, I’ve never done any formal debate; second, the resolution gave the “for” side a built-in handicap, as the “against” side just had to prove that Obamacare might not be completely beyond rescue; and third, we were debating on the Upper West Side. Now, I grew up on the Upper West Side and love it dearly. But for this particular resolution, it’s about the unfriendliest territory this side of Pyongyang.
Nonetheless, I greatly enjoyed the debate. I’m not ashamed to admit that the other side had a lot of powerful moments. Kamerow, a doctor who is also a former assistant surgeon general, made good points about the problems with the previous status quo. In the other seat, Chait was as passionate, witty and well-reasoned in his arguments as ever. (You can read his account of the debate here.) Given the various difficulties, we went in assuming that we would lose, so we were pretty surprised and pleased when we won.
READ MORE

UPDATE: POWERLINE COVERS THIS DEBATE HERE.

And, it is "Update #17" here.


Monday, January 20, 2014

Death spiral

OBAMACARE:
A death spiral - the insurance pool equivalent of bankruptcy - occurs when too many older and sicker people sign up for insurance relative to the number of younger, healthier people, Goodman explained, forcing everybody’s premiums up. But as premiums rise, even less young people sign up for coverage.
READ MORE

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Under ObamaCare, Seniors to Receive Worse Treatment than Medicaid Patients

So many of us knew this would happen, but we could NOT convince liberals no matter what evidence we provided (just check out the health care article archive at the bottom of this blog!)
On Oct. 1, 2012 the Obama administration started awarding bonus points to hospitals that spend the least on elderly patients.
READ MORE

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Saturday, January 04, 2014

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Wall Street advisor recommends guns, ammo for protection in collapse

A top financial advisor, worried that Obamacare, the NSA spying scandal and spiraling national debt is increasing the chances for a fiscal and social disaster, is recommending that Americans prepare a “bug-out bag” that includes food, a gun and ammo to help them stay alive.
David John Marotta, a Wall Street expert and financial advisor and Forbes contributor, said in a note to investors, “Firearms are the last item on the list, but they are on the list. There are some terrible people in this world. And you are safer when your trusted neighbors have firearms.”
READ MORE

Saturday, December 21, 2013

In the REAL world...

Let’s just take a real-world example. An uninsured 31-year-old male living in Los Angeles and earning a salary of $32,000 would only qualify for $1 per month in subsidies through Obamacare, according to a search on the California exchange. Because he is 31, he wouldn’t be eligible for cheaper catastrophic insurance. Thus, the most inexpensive plan available to him would be a “bronze” L.A. Care plan costing $178 per month, or $2,136 per year, with a $5,000 annual deductible.
If he chooses to remain uninsured, he’ll be subject to the mandate of 1 percent above the tax filing threshold, meaning around $220.
In contrast, let’s say there is a 31-year-old male in California who earns $100,000 per year. He had insurance through United Healthcare, but his plan was canceled once the insurer decided to leave the California market. Under the HHS rule change, he would have the option of purchasing a plan for $148 per month, or about 17 percent less than the lowest option available to the man earning less than a third of his income. Additionally, the higher-income individual would have the option of skipping insurance altogether without being subject to a fine.
***
The way it treats almost everyone else is unfair: 
READ MORE


Friday, December 20, 2013

"This is the first time a government insider has gone on record challenging the administration's insistence that there were no worrisome security concerns."

"Teresa Fryer, the chief information security officer for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), revealed the findings when she was interviewed Tuesday behind closed doors by House Oversight Committee officials..."

Security bombshell #1:
Details are not being made public for security reasons but Fryer testified that one vulnerability in the system was discovered during testing last week related to an incident reported in November. She says that as a result, the government has shut down functionality in the vulnerable part of the system. Fryer said the other high-risk finding was discovered Monday.
Security bombshell #2:
In another security bombshell, Fryer told congressional interviewers that she explicitly recommended denial of the website’s Authority to Operate (ATO), but was overruled by her superiors. The website was rolled out amid warnings Fryer said she gave both verbally and in a briefing that disclosed “high risks” and possible exposure to “attacks”.

Fryer also said that she refused to put her name on a letter recommending a temporary ATO be granted for six months while the issues were sorted out.
READ MORE