
Showing posts with label hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hypocrisy. Show all posts
Sunday, October 20, 2019
Friday, October 14, 2016
Ann Coulter: “The SAME MEDIA gasping in horror at “P*ssy” sure didn’t mind my being called a C*nt repeatedly”
If you have trouble viewing the links within Ann's article below, just read it online here
READ MORE
*Please note graphic language throughout the column.*
Donald Trump
is the only hope to save America, so the media have gone to war to stop him.
They don’t care about being exposed as lying, hypocritical swine — I’d describe them more fully, but it would require locker room talk. They’ll win the public back later. Right now, all that matters is stopping Trump.
The same media that are pretending to consider the use of a bad word equivalent to rape don’t give a fig about real rape, real sexual assault, real whoring, even real homicide, depending on who did it.
JFK was an STD-infected drug addict who cavorted with whores at the White House, but the media ferociously hid all this from the public, publishing fairy-tale versions of his presidency as “Camelot.”
And what happened to the 11-year rule? Trump said the word “p*ssy” 11 years ago, in a secretly recorded conversation. Eleven years before Sen. Teddy Kennedy ran for president, he killed a girl — but he ran, not only without apology, but, indeed, as the Conscience of the Democratic Party.
Throughout 2009, good, decent Americans who happened to oppose Obamacare were called the name of a gay sex act hundreds of times on TV — and that was just on MSNBC. CNN’s Anderson Cooper made the reference explicit when he giggled, “It’s hard to talk when you’re tea-bagging.”
Among the people using this sexual slur were distinguished members of Congress such as U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez and Rep. Barney Frank. Were they fit to hold office?
Going way, way, way back to a few weeks ago, the same media gasping in horror at “p*ssy” sure didn’t mind my being called a c*nt repeatedly on a Comedy Central broadcast. And when I say “didn’t mind,” I mean they thought it was awesome.
But saying “p*ssy” 11 years ago is over the line.
Cut the crap, media.
A few years ago, Sen. Al Franken joked on a Comedy Central roast about producer Rob Reiner butt-f*cking his children. Does Hillary think he’s fit to be a U.S. senator? Is he fit enough for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, but not the Senate Finance Committee?
None of these were leaks of secretly recorded conversations — considered a hanging offense in the Clinton years. These vulgarities were intentionally, publicly broadcast by the same media that, today, pretend to need smelling salts after hearing “p*ssy.”
At least this new puritanical standard explains why rappers like Jay Z are banned from the White House. Wait — what?
Perhaps realizing their Victorian virgin act wasn’t cutting it, the media turned to their Pretend We Don’t Understand English method of argument, and claimed that Trump was confessing to having committed a “sexual assault”!
Trump said: “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do any of that. (Laughter.)” Journalists turned this into “sexual assault” by being literal on the “grab” part, non-figurative on the “you” part — and on the “they let you do it” part? Stone, cold deaf.
If “they let you do it,” it’s not an assault.
Like most of Trump’s bragging, his loutish boast was not intended to be taken seriously, nor was it. Far from whipping out his pencil and carefully taking notes, “Access Hollywood”‘s Billy Bush laughed. The gist of what Trump was saying is that — hold onto your hats! — women like to sleep with celebrities! I don’t know if you’ve heard that before.
At least we’re back to the media pretending to care about sexual assault — until further notice.
This is the same media that ran interference for an actual sexual predator
in the White House, ignoring Bill Clinton’s serial pants-dropping, groping and raping for nearly a decade, while gleefully vilifying his accusers, and would have been happy to continue if Bill Richardson had become president. Clinton talking about p*ssy was one of his more dignified moments, proudly attested to by his friend Vernon Jordan in a nationally broadcast interview with Mike Wallace.
In the pages of The New York Times, feminist icon Gloria Steinem announced the “one-free grope” rule, specially developed forthe Clinton era
.
Former Time magazine correspondent Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, “I would be happy to give him a bl*w job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”
Time magazine’s Margaret Carlson said Linda Tripp had “lost membership in the family of man” for secretly tape-recording Monica Lewinsky. Tripp kept the recordings not for something so exalted as stopping Trump, but to protect herself from a charge of perjury.
Even when the law began to close in on the horny hick — midway through the second term he won because of the media’s heroic self-censorship — the rest of us had to spend a year listening to liberals say “Guys like bl*w jobs,” “Everybody does it” and “Let’s move on.”
When Clinton was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick, NBC strategically held the story — until a week after the Senate had voted in the rapist’s impeachment trial. All the public could do was helplessly sport “Free Lisa Myers” buttons, referring to the investigative reporter who got the interview.
Explaining NBC’s incomprehensible decision to hold its own investigative report, Myers told Broaddrick: “The good news is you’re credible. The bad news is that you’re very credible.”
At least NBC ran the story eventually. The name “Juanita Broaddrick” never crossed the lips of “CBS Evening News” anchor Dan Rather.
Asked by FNC’s Bill O’Reilly why he never got around to mentioning that the commander in chief was, more likely than not, a rapist, Rather said, “When the charge has something to do with somebody’s private sex life, I would prefer not to run any of it.”
So according to our media, committing a rape is “somebody’s private sex life,” but using a bad word is rape.
Poor Billy Bush has to be fired from NBC’s “Today” show so the media can pretend that Trump’s using bawdy language is a very, very serious offense.
Meanwhile, Billy’s ex-president uncle and cousin openly fraternize with the rapist. The second President Bush calls Bill Clinton his “brother from another mother” and praises Clinton’s “character” — something even Clinton’s defenders never did with a straight face.
Now the networks are holding casting calls for some loon willing to falsely accuse Trump of sexual assault, so they can hype it like the Duke lacrosse case, Mattress Girl and Rolling Stone’s fraternity rape. Unfortunately — for us, fortunately for the media — by the time the truth comes out, the election will be over.
H/T – AnnCoulter.com
READ MORE
Labels:
2016,
Ann Coulter,
candidate,
Donald Trump,
election,
hypocrisy,
liberal,
President of the United States,
sex,
women
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Donkey love busts Muslims
Weasel Zippers points out Muslim hypocrisy:
British Jihadists: Non-Muslims Have “Sex Like Donkeys” And Deserve To Be Blown-Up. . .
On the other hand: Man mounts his donkey in Iraq. U.S. soldiers get it on tape with night vision.
British Jihadists: Non-Muslims Have “Sex Like Donkeys” And Deserve To Be Blown-Up. . .
On the other hand: Man mounts his donkey in Iraq. U.S. soldiers get it on tape with night vision.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz caught doing what she accuses others of doing
Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies, and the State Bank of India
Disclosure forms reveal that Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a member of Congress from Florida, previously held funds with investments in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, and the state bank of India. This revelation comes mere days after the Democratic chair attacked presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for holding money in Swiss bank accounts in the past.READ MORE
Labels:
2012,
Chairman,
Congress,
Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
Democratic Party,
DNC,
election,
Florida,
hypocrisy,
investments
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Monday, March 26, 2012
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Monday, March 05, 2012
Where’s the outrage at misogynistic liberal men?
Because Maher and Olbermann and Taibbi are, ahem, “pro-woman” on policy, they can be as personally nasty as they want and it’s not a window onto anything. The quintessential example of this is of course Ted Kennedy, whose career stands for the proposition that you can allegedly assault women and even leave a woman to die and be reelected for eternity so long as you vote the right way.READ MORE
VIDEO: THE MISOGYNIST LEFT MASH-UP
Labels:
Bill Maher,
hypocrisy,
Keith Olbermann,
left wing,
liberals,
media bias,
misogyny,
politics,
right wing,
Rush Limbaugh,
Ted Kennedy,
video,
women
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Huh? Republican candidates using "egregious signals" and "dog whistles"
Remember the "beer summit" and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.? He founded "The Root" -- "news and commentary from an African-American perspective" -- in 2008.
Listen to what the venerable professor thinks about our Republican candidates: Colorblind Racism: The New Norm
Allen West to Obama: MLK would be ‘devastated’
And, finally, Gates can't resist this one:
O’Reilly: Dems, outraged over GOP debate on MLK Day, held own debate on previous MLK Day
THE HYPOCRISY IS ASTOUNDING!!!
Democrats have had one political strategy since Obama was elected: accuse ANYONE who disagrees with him of racism. This is a very convenient way to completely avoid discussing real issues for which they obviously have either no answers or the wrong answers judging from the REAL State of the Union.
Listen to what the venerable professor thinks about our Republican candidates: Colorblind Racism: The New Norm
Colorblind racism is the new normal in American conservative political thought. Well after the election of the nation's first African-American president, in 2012 Republican candidates are using egregious signals and dog whistles to incite racial divisiveness as an effective tool for political gain. But when confronted about the nature of their offensive rhetoric, the answer is either an innocuous denial or dismissive retort.Not like President Obama has EVER used "racial divisiveness" for political gain..oh wait, that's what he's been doing ever since he got elected!
It is curious that people bold enough to make outlandish racial claims never admit guilt or receive a proverbial trial and conviction by the greater populace.Why, yes, it is, President Obama:
Allen West to Obama: MLK would be ‘devastated’
And, finally, Gates can't resist this one:
Last week's Fox News debate prior to the South Carolina Republican primary was an excellent example of the hubris inherent in today's racially charged, conservative environmentDesperate...or just ignorant?
All the more offensive was the fact that this debate took place on the national holiday celebrating Martin Luther King Jr.
O’Reilly: Dems, outraged over GOP debate on MLK Day, held own debate on previous MLK Day
THE HYPOCRISY IS ASTOUNDING!!!
Democrats have had one political strategy since Obama was elected: accuse ANYONE who disagrees with him of racism. This is a very convenient way to completely avoid discussing real issues for which they obviously have either no answers or the wrong answers judging from the REAL State of the Union.
Monday, October 24, 2011
It turns out that the top 10 CEOs have an average salary of $43 million, which pales in comparison with America's top 10 celebrities, who earn an average salary of $100 million
Walter E. Williams: Pitting Us Against Each Other
Don't you wonder why so many celebrities cozy up to Obama?
Don't you wonder why so many celebrities cozy up to Obama?
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Democrats have raised $1 million from foreign-affiliated PACs
Democratic leaders in the House and Senate criticizing GOP groups for allegedly funneling foreign money into campaign ads have seen their party raise more than $1 million from political action committees affiliated with foreign companies.Read more
House and Senate Democrats have received approximately $1.02 million this cycle from such PACs, according to an analysis compiled for The Hill by the Center for Responsive Politics. House and Senate GOP leaders have taken almost $510,000 from PACs on the same list.
Labels:
2010,
campaign contributions,
Democrats,
election,
foreign companies,
hypocrisy,
PAC
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Whack a mole
So, let’s sum this up, shall we?Democrats Are Funding Their Campaigns With Money Taken From Foreign Nationals
1.We have unions that contribute money to hundreds of Democrat candidates.
2.Those same unions take money from illegal immigrants (aka ‘foreign nationals’)
3.Those same unions then give Democrats money taken from foreign nationals
And, just to take this a step further:
Since Axlerod and Biden want the U.S. Chamber to prove them wrong by opening up the list of who their donors are, how asking the same of them? How about having the unions open up who their list of members are to determine which ones are legal U.S. residents?
Do you really want to go down this road, Democrats?
Saturday, October 09, 2010
Michelle Obama has no shame
Apparently, Michelle Obama knows no shame. Just coming back from a whirlwind summer of elegant soirées, a sumptuous vacation abroad, and a jet-setting Martha's Vineyard junket on a multimillion-dollar estate, first lady Michelle Obama has sent a mass mailing panhandling America's poor to stuff the campaign coffers of the rich Democrat pols, the same pols whose legislation has impoverished the people and left them jobless.Michelle Obama Panhandles Poor for Rich Democrat Pols
This, my fellow Americans, is the stuff of wretched regurgitation.
It simply does not get any more vulgar than this. Begging handouts from the unemployed and struggling masses while treating yourself to profligate parties and trips is typical of the wives of third-world dictators. Imelda Marcos, anyone?
Labels:
2010,
campaign,
Democrats,
hypocrisy,
Michelle Obama
Monday, June 01, 2009
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Doubts about Obama's abilities growing
Which brings us to the heart of the matter: the doubts about Obama himself. His famous eloquence is wearing thin through daily exposure and because his actions are often disconnected from his words. His lack of administrative experience is showing. His promises and policies contradict each other often enough that evidence of hypocrisy is ceasing to be news. Remember the pledges about bipartisanship and high ethics? They're so last year.Read the whole thing!
The beat goes on. Last week, Obama brazenly gave a speech about earmark reform just after he quietly signed a $410 billion spending bill that had about 9,000 earmarks in it. He denounced Bush's habit of disregarding pieces of laws he didn't like, so-called signing statements, then issued one himself.
And in an absolute jaw-dropper, he told business leaders, "I don't like the idea of spending more government money, nor am I interested in expanding government's role."
No wonder Americans are confused. Our President is, too.
Monday, May 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







