TIMELINE: For those who are confused about the 14th Amendment (1868) and anchor babies

Clark Baker (former LAPD):

For those who are confused about the 14th Amendment (1868) and anchor babies, I hope that this timeline helps:

* In 1792, the Democrat Party was formed. They are, essentially, the party of slavery.

* In 1808, Congress abolishes the slave trade in America.

* In 1818, the Democrats become the majority in Congress. Using their majority, they begin to undo these anti-slavery decisions.

* In 1820, the Democrat Party passes the Missouri Compromise, institutionalizing slavery in half of the territories.

* For the next thirty years, Democrats passed multiple laws promoting and protecting slavery, culminating in 1850 with the Fugitive Slave Law. This law ended all rights to jury trials, representation, and habeas corpus from any black who was ACCUSED (proof was unnecessary) of being a slave.

* In 1854, Democrats pass the Kansas-Nebraska act, opening up those territories to slavery, thus exceeding even the limits of the Missouri Compromise.

* In 1854, the REPUBLICAN party is formed to end slavery. Six of the nine planks in their fledgling platform statement deal with civil rights issues.

* In 1857, the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sanford that blacks are considered inferior and thus not covered by the phrase “all men” in the Declaration of Independence; that they are property covered by the 5th Amendment; and that no black—not even a free black—could ever become a citizen of the United States. The Democrats support the decision.

* In 1861, Democrat Party waged a war to protect and defend slavery, resulting in countless horrors and 650,000 deaths. White Christian men (like my great-grandfather and his brothers) were the first in human history to fight to free slaves and restore the Union.

* In 1865, REPUBLICANS pass the 13th Amendment, ending slavery. 100% of Republicans vote for it. Even among northern Democrats, it only received the support of 23%. In spite of the 13th Amendment, Southern Democrats continued to deny blacks their citizenship rights. Democrats responded by forming the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) to enforce the Democrat Party platform, control elections, impose segregation and suppress the black vote.

* In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed, establishing citizenship for all in Federal law.

100% of Republicans vote for it.
0% of Democrats vote for it.

In spite of the 14th Amendment, Southern Democrats continue to prevent blacks from enjoying the real fruits of their citizenship, especially the right to vote.

* In 1868, the 15th Amendment is passed, establishing the right to vote for all people, regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

100% of Republicans vote for it.
0% of Democrats vote for it.

* From 1866–1875, the REPUBLICAN Congress passes 19 civil rights laws. Democrats oppose them all.

During the 1960s, bureaucrats misinterpreted the 14th Amendment to include the babies of tourists and illegals. Few Americans questioned it - until now. . .

ANCHORS AWAY

What Did the 14th Amendment Congress Think about “Birthright Citizenship”?

LIBRARY OF LAW AND LIBERTY - Excerpt:

Now, in fairness, other respected commentators take a contrary position, including the conservative attorney James Ho. But a considerable body of scholarship supports the view that the Citizenship Clause does not compel birthright citizenship, and that the current practice could be corrected by legislation, pursuant to Congress’ power under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment and Article I, Section 8, Clause 4. Contrary to the assertions of some (including the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal and Ben Domenech, publisher of The Federalist), amending the 14th Amendment is not required. In fact, such legislation has been introduced in the past—for example, S.1351 (1993), H.R.1567 (2003), H.R.140 (2015)—and supported by Republicans and Democrats. That includes former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), who stated in 1993 that “no sane country” would grant citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants solely because they were born on American soil. In Oforji, Judge Posner stated that “I hope [H.R.1567] passes.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled in favor of birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants. The oft-cited United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) involved the offspring of a Chinese couple present in the United States legally. And the frequently cited language from Plyler v. Doe (1982)—a 5 to 4 decision written by the activist Justice William Brennan, hardly a strong authority—is dicta contained in a footnote! Automatic birthright citizenship for tourists and illegal immigrants is an anomaly; the United States and Canada are the only developed countries in the world to recognize it. No European country does. American voters overwhelmingly oppose birthright citizenship, by almost 2 to 1 according to a recent Rasmussen poll. Regardless whether one supports Donald Trump for President, he has raised an important issue and provoked a long overdue discussion of the subject of birthright citizenship. For that, he deserves credit.

READ MORE

ANCHOR BABIES ARE NOT LEGAL CITIZENS!!!

Babies BORN to ILLEGAL ALIEN FEMALES are NOT citizens of the USA. Being American BORN is not the same as being an American BORN CITIZEN. It takes a citizen to MAKE A CITIZEN. These Illegal Alien FEMALES and their illegal alien infants are all ILLEGAL. Dispite the fact that the baby is BORN on American SOIL while the mother is illegally in the USA or drops her bundle of joy at the border!

Now we have these illegal anchor babies MARCHING down our streets in Arizona demanding rights for their parents and FIGHTING against the rule of law! Why you ask? Because THEY KNOW THEY ARE NOT LEGALLY A US CITIZEN. If they were they would not have to FIGHT for their parents.

Show me where in the Constitution it states that an infant or a teenager can pass on citizenship to their adult parent? You won't find it!

A child cannot pass down citizenship! A parent, a legal US parent bestows those rights unto their children.

Wake up folks! Mothers Against Illegal Aliens/Mothers Against Illegal Amnesty has been warning you about these children. They are not American citizens and now they are reacting to violence and threats to stay with their parents in the USA.

The 14th Amendment is critical to protecting our border and our nation and our legal children's VOTE!

Remember every one of these illegal alien anchor babies gets a VOTE in the USA! Imagine that! They will out vote YOU!

MOTHERS AGAINST ILLEGAL AMNESTY