John McCain, who rose to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn't return home

 

McCain and the POW Cover-up

The "war hero" candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam

Research support provided by the Investigative Fund of The Nation Institute. This is an expanded version, with primary documents attached, of a story that appears in the October 6, 2008 issue of The Nation.

By Sydney H. Schanberg

September 18, 2008

John McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn't return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books.

Almost as striking is the manner in which the mainstream press has shied from reporting the POW story and McCain's role in it, even as the Republican Party has made McCain's military service the focus of his presidential campaign. Reporters who had covered the Vietnam War turned their heads and walked in other directions. McCain doesn't talk about the missing men, and the press never asks him about them. . .

THIS IS LONG AND THIS IS GOOD:

https://www.nationalalliance.org/hot-topics/mccain-and-the-pow-cover-up

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ARIZONA RECOUNT [2020 ELECTION] - UPDATE

UPDATE: Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich has begun his investigation into the Arizona audit report, sending letters to both Maricopa County and the Arizona Senate!

Arizona State Senator Kelly Townsend has filed another 1487 request to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office seeking answers to the questions raised by the Arizona audit.

The questions raised over the last six months about the 2020 election remain unanswered and after the most recent audit report, Townsend wants the answers.

Because this is a 1487 request, it is required by law for these questions to be investigated and answered within 30 days. I did ask a multitude of questions, however I believe we already have the answers that were obtained by the audit committee. It should not take the full 30 days, but it if does and takes longer, I will reissue a new 1487 to reset the clock for the more time-consuming issues. I am not satisfied with unanswered questions and unreported issues. I want to know what laws were broken, who broke them, and who will be held accountable.

Please see below a full list of what was asked of the Attorney General today. I look forward to his response.

Appendix A

Ballot Paper Issues –

A.R.S. § 16-468(2) and A.R.S. § 16-502(A).

1. It has come to my attention that there may have been multiple types of paper used that were not authorized. Please provide evidence of all of the various papers that were purchased and used from a company that provides such legally authorized paper.

2. Who were the suppliers of paper for both Runbeck printed ballots and the day of election ballots of an kind?

3. Did Dominion supply any paper for ballots? If so, please provide purchase orders to show where this paper came from and if it met the standards of our statutes.

4. At any time did any precinct need to buy paper that ran out on Election Day? If so, which precincts ran out of paper and where did Maricopa County procure additional paper? Who was responsible for supplying that paper and do we have explanation as to why it ran out?

5. Maricopa County said they used VoteSecure paper by Roland. Please provide purchase orders and which VoteSecure paper that were used and where.

6. If these processes regarding the use of ballot secure paper were not followed correctly and by state law, who would be held accountable for these violations?

7. As a member of the Arizona Senate, I received information regarding irregular ballots that were inserted among the other ballots. These ballots were being logged and tracked in an official log book. Please report back how many of these anomalies were found, and what do the logs say about them. Additionally, what were the vote tallies on those ballots?

8. In the preliminary report, we received information that the ballots had bled through and caused overvotes, despite the Legislature being told that these issues would not happen due to ballot secure paper that was impermeable from Sharpie ink. Please report back any information obtained regarding the county having ballots that had bleed through and what effect that had on adjudication rate.

9. If different types of ballot paper were used for different precincts and voters, and occasionally non ballot secure paper was used creating bleed through and overvote / artifact, leading to adjudication rates being high among some voters and not others, would that constitute an unequal application of policy / election security and a 14th Amendment violation of the voter’s civil rights?

Signature / Envelope Issues

A.R.S.16-550(A)

1. Did Maricopa County fulfill statutory requirements for signature verification on all counted ballots included in the official canvass?

2. Signature issues were reported in the recent Audit conducted by the Senate. They included the following problems:

1. Completely blank signature

2. Nearly blank signature

3. Scribbled signature that did not match

If there are ballots included in the official canvass that were counted without complying with A.R.S.16-550(A), how many were included that did not meet this legal threshold?

3. Who would be responsible for allowing illegal ballots to be counted that did not meet the legal threshold of A.R.S.16-550(A)?

4. Ballot envelopes were reported in the audit with a “Verified and approved” stamp appearing BEHIND the envelope graphic of a triangle. How did these images of the verified and approved stamp print from behind the triangle image on the envelope?

5. How many of these envelopes with irregular printing of the “verified and approved” or other stamp behind the original graphics of the envelope have been uncovered, and were the ballots contained therein counted in the official canvass?

Duplicate ballots

1. In the Dr. Shiva presentation of the Arizona audit, it was reported that there were 17,322 duplicate voter envelopes submitted in the final canvass of the election.

a. What is the party affiliation of those voters? Can we contact them and ask them who they

voted for?

b. Did they knowingly submit too many ballots and will they be held accountable if so?

c. Why were these voters allowed to keep their duplicate ballots / votes as part of the official c

canvass? Who was responsible for removing the duplicates and will they be held accountable?

2.There were 255,326 votes mismatched between the VM55 and EV33 files. Which file matched the hand count?

3. If it is 255k votes over the hand count, does that match with any of the wrong paper usage?

4. If the discrepancy cannot be accounted for, what is the proper and legal course of action?

Chain of Custody 

ARS 16-621.E

1. Please provide evidence that all chain of custody documents required by law were adhered to and preserved for inspection and audit.

2. If these documents do not exist or are not available, who is responsible legally for that failure?

Data Security (Usernames & Passwords) –

2019 Elections Procedures Manual, p. 209 (Section 2, Subsection a., number 2)

1. The elections procedures manual requires that “The application shall provide distinct security roles, with separate usernames and secure passwords for each user or station.” Please provide evidence that this requirement was followed in Maricopa County as it relates to all login and password requirements, systemwide.

2. Who is responsible for ensuring this is maintained, and what consequence/recourse does the state have for such a breach of protocol?

3. Is the master/administrative password that has not been released by Maricopa County or Dominion in compliance with State law?

4. Do anonymous logins of any kind violate the 2019 Elections Procedure Manual?

Internet History

1. Were the EMS Server, EMS Client workstations, REWEB 1601 & 1602 connected to the internet?

2. If they were connected to the internet, is this a violation of A.R.S.16 and the Elections procedure manual?

3. Do the Dominion voting tabulation machines have the capability to connect to the internet?

4. Was at any time the voting machines connected to the internet?

5. Who would be responsible and held accountable if any laws in this section were broken?

Calibration –

52 U.S.C. § 21081(b)(1)

1. In the initial audit report we received information that the machines in some locations were not calibrated and that the ballots were offset significantly. Please report back as to what information is available regarding the miscalibration of the machines that caused the offset reported to us regarding the work by Jovan Pulitzer.

2. Did the calibration problems come from specific voting machines or were they random?

3. If they were specific machines, what precincts had the machines that were grossly mis-calibrated?

4. Have those machines been identified and sent for repair, or will they be replaced by the newly purchased machines?

5.Who is responsible for the calibration of the machines?

6. In order to identify the machines that are grossly mis-calibrated, which ballot on Demand systems or printers were used to print ballots either for early votes, day of, and duplicate votes? Where were they located, and model/registration number and service number of the actual machine.

7. Is there a GPS tracker on each machine, and if so, what is the data on each of those machines?

Adjudicated Ballots

A.R.S.16-621(B)3(a)

1. In the audit, we learned that some of the adjudicated ballots were missing serial numbers, had wrong serial numbers, or had obstructed serial numbers. How many ballots did not meet the requirements of A.R.S.16-621(B)3(a)?

2. Who is responsible for ensuring that this law is abided by, and what is the recourse for voters when this law is not adhered to, yet the illegal ballots were counted in the official canvass?

Deleted files –

52 USC 20701

1. Please investigate all reports of deleted files at Maricopa County for the 2020 General election. The County has explained that these deleted files were regarding a different election and were being archived. Please verify the validity of this information.

2. Please provide proof these files exist in archive.

3. Did the auditors or subcontractors find that there was a program created to specifically remove and purge files of the 2020 election? If so, who implemented it?

4. If we are unable to show that these files were archived and indeed deleted and not related to a different election, does that show intent to tamper with evidence?

5. Is it normal procedure to create a special program to archive files at the Maricopa County Recorder;s office?

6. Please provide a detailed report of this special program used to “archive” or delete files on 02/01/2021 at the Maricopa County Recorder’s office referenced in the audit report, a copy of the program and an explanation of what it is designed to do.

7. Who designed the program?

Unsealed Boxes

A.R.S.16-564(C)

1. Why were the ballot boxes delivered to the Senate auditors unsealed?

2. Who removed the seals off and when? Please provide all documentation available that is required to be kept upon opening boxes.

3. Who is responsible for compliance with this state law, and is it possible to discover who opened the boxes based on video recording?

Ineligible Voters Allowed to Cast Votes –

A.R.S. 16 Articles 1, 1.1, and 2, Elections Procedures Manual

1. Were ineligible voters allowed to cast votes in the Maricopa County 2020 General election?

2. If there are votes included in the official canvass of the 2020 General election, it is to be concluded that the election performed was an illegal election and should be nullified and repeated? Please comment on how to proceed, based on any findings of yours that establish illegal completion of a secure election in Maricopa County.

Redacted Maricopa County Audit Details –

NOTE: This concerns information obtained regarding the actions of the Maricopa County Recorder’s office discovered through the Senate Auditors. If not 100% of the information obtained was released, the public will not receive answers to what information was obtained via an audit that was paid for, in part, by public funds. Therefore, the subsequent questions asked are salient and appropriate for this 1487 complaint to ensure that all the forementioned laws were abided by.

1. Does there exist information about Maricopa County that was discovered via audit this year that has been omitted and not reported to the public and if so, what was that information?

2. Who requested that information to be omitted and why?

3. Were there any threats of cancelation of contract and removal of indemnity should any discovered information be reported to the public?

4. Was there an agreement to settle the debt of the audit expenses with a provision that certain information was omitted? If so who made that requirement?

We need Attorney General Brnovich to follow through again by opening a criminal investigation into potential fraud and upholding the rule of law.

Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich if you would like to see these investigations happen.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/breaking-az-state-senator-kelly-townsend-files-s-b-1487-maricopa-county-unanswered-questions-july-hearing-audit-report/ 

The results of Arizona’s historic audit show numerous discrepancies that were found in the audit. Here are just some of the findings:

 

• Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
•  Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
• Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
• Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
•  Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
• Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
• 2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
• Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
• Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
• There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.

Even without listing all of the issues that were uncovered, there were still too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona’s electoral votes.

Arizona MUST decertify.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-declaration-independence-wendy-rogers-unveils-letter-signed-41-state-legislators-15-states-calling-nationwide-audit-decertification/

I Love You, Arizona performed by The Phoenix Symphony

YOU PROBABLY MISSED THIS!

Excerpt: Last week's most overlooked news was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez revealing herself as a champion of the "Reconquista" war against Europeans. The Mexican Reconquista movement is an openly admitted effort by Hispanic activists to take "back" California (Southern especially), New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas through immigration and activism. This is one of several driving forces behind allowing illegal immigration. . . READ MORE

Another Arizona rancher lays it on the line

Arizona rancher John Chilton’s 50,000-acre spread along the U.S.-Mexico border is allegedly ground zero for human smugglers, drug cartel members and illegal immigrants, and he has videos showing trespassers sneaking through his property.

A fifth-generation cattleman, the 79-year-old Chilton has long warned the government about the dangers of leaving lengthy stretches of the southwest border secured by nothing more than a barbed wire fence. To prove his point, he set up surveillance cameras throughout his property to document the comings and goings of trespassers from south of the border.

Chilton shared hours of video footage with Daily Caller News Foundation reporters, who are in Arizona to document life and crime in the southwest borderlands. Tim Foley, the founder of Arizona Border Recon, also shared his group’s surveillance footage with TheDCNF.

25 STRAIGHT MINUTES OF ILLEGAL ALIENS CROSSING INTO US THROUGH ARIZONA RANCH

Sierra Vista in Cochise County Arizona: Illegal immigrants and drug smugglers are devastating the area and many longtime residents live in fear

Arizona Border Ranchers Live in Fear as Illegal Immigration Crisis Worsens

MAY 17, 2018

More than half a million illegal immigrants of several dozen nationalities have been apprehended on John Ladd’s sprawling cattle ranch in southeastern Arizona. Ladd has also found 14 dead bodies on his 16,500-acre farm, which has been in his family for well over a century and sits between the Mexican border and historic State Route 92. The property shares a 10 ½-mile border with Mexico, making it a popular route for human and drug smugglers evading a meager force of Border Patrol agents in the mountainous region. “As big as that number sounds, many more got away,” said National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd of the hundreds of thousands arrested on Ladd’s parcel. Judd spent a chunk of his decades-long career with the agency patrolling the area and he knows it well. “It’s gotten more violent. It’s gotten worse.”

As part of an ongoing investigation into the critical security issues created by the famously porous southern border, Judicial Watch visited frustrated ranchers and residents in Sierra Vista, a Cochise County town located 75 miles southeast of Tucson with a population of around 44,000. The town sits in the picturesque Sonoran Desert and is surrounded by the scenic Huachuca Mountains. Illegal immigrants and drug smugglers are devastating the area and many longtime residents live in fear. Some are too scared to enjoy a simple pastime—horseback riding on their own land. “I can’t guarantee there’s not a dead body somewhere in my ranch right now,” said Ladd pointing to his property as he stood in front of the U.S. government’s border fence, an area known as the “shit ditch” because illegal immigrants use it as a toilet and trash. Sporting a thick gray mustache and a dapper cowboy hat, Ladd said 200 to 300 illegal aliens are caught daily passing through his property. “We don’t have any control of the border,” he said. “I see it every day.”

READ MORE

The hidden agenda behind Obama's forged Selective Service registration form

THE POST & EMAIL, June 27, 2016:

On Monday, The Post & Email spoke with Zullo [Maricopa County Arizona Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo] about what he believes is a nexus between Obama’s apparent lack of Selective Service registration and the option made available last year to new U.S. citizens to decline to “‘bear arms on behalf of the United States’ and ‘perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States’” when taking the oath of allegiance. . .

Here’s the next legal battle that will come: In a draft situation, are we now going to have to have a legal fight going to the Supreme Court based on the position “I did not take an oath of allegiance to defend the nation so therefore I am exempt from being drafted because I was an immigrant? When I became a citizen, I made no such agreement as a condition upon receiving my citizenship so I don’t have to defend this country. I don’t have to serve in its military; I’m exempt.” Oaths are important and oaths are binding.

READ MORE

Superman: Rep. Trent Franks (R., Ariz.) will save America

I'm so proud to have just become an Arizonian!

To protect the civilian grid against an EMP event, Franks has introduced H.R. 3410, the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, which would enable the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to implement practical steps to protect the electric grid.

Dr. Michael J. Frankel, a senior scientist at Pennsylvania State University, said Franks’ bill is a “necessary first step” for the defense of the electric grid. The bill currently has 19 cosponsors.

READ MORE

Goodbye, California!

Please forgive me, but posting will be very light during this transition from CA to AZ!

I won't have much Internet access for at least a week, because there was not enough time and ability to get things set up in AZ before we moved.

I love everybody for sticking around for this long, and hope my loyal readers will still be reading this blog in the future as I fully intend to still keep posting when I'm able. CA was my home state, and you can't imagine how angry I am at all the liberals who have ruined such a beautiful place to live. I've seen this transition for decades and it's heartbreaking.

Thanks, everybody!

IMPORTANT: If you are/were a donor to Sheriff Joe Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ

From Attorney Orly Taitz, Esq. May 19, 2013:

Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama?

I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the donors for sheriff Arpaio and citizens of Maricopa county, AZ.

Why so? Because Arpaio already announced that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, however he is not willing to file a criminal complaint, as he is supposed to as the chief law enforcement officer of the Maricopa County.

WND, which is a big backer for Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman is talking about an appeal in the Supreme court of AL. first, as WND had a 50/50 split of donations with Kreep there is a high probability that WND and possibly Western journalism connected to WND and possibly PPSimmons got financial compensation from arpaio or his team, either got payment for advertising and fundraising or an outright percentage of donations received. If this is the case, their reporting is highly biased.

Now, as i said before, I really hope that the Supreme Court of AL will rule for the plaintiffs, however even if this appeal is granted in half a year or so, it will not make any difference, as the plaintiffs asked the Secretary of State of Al to ask the Department of Health of HI for a certified copy of Obama’s BC. All HI will do, is certify another copy of the same forgery, of the same computer generated forgery and you are in square one.

On the other hand there is a way to proceed immediately with the criminal complaint.

As I said, for nearly 3 years Arpaio and Zullo were making press conferences saying that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now after 3 years of raising money for their alleged criminal instigation they are refusing to file a criminal complaint, saying that they do not have jurisdiction to file, even though they have 100% proof that Obama’s BC is a forgery.

So, we are seeing the same passing the buck, same kicking the can.

What can be done? People who donated to Arpaio have now all the power and all the leverage. They can demand that Arpaio file his findings or they will file a legal action against Arpaio and seek 2 things:

1. An injunction, an order of specific performance, a writ of mandamus from the court ordering Arpaio to file this criminal complaint with proper prosecutors.

2. refund of all the donations due to lack of performance and due to solicitation of donations under false pretenses.

What is happening now is that Arpaio is afraid of Obama, just like judges are afraid when they claim that they have no jurisdiction, however in this situation Arpaio will be afraid of the donors more than he will be afraid of Obama.

Why so?

Normally law enforcement officer has a prosecutorial discretion, however the discretion is whether there is enough evidence to convict. When Arpaio stated that Obama’s BC ia a 100% forgery, then it is beyond discretion.

In this situation Obama does not have any any cards in his deck, however the people hold all the aces.

Obama will not be a defendant in this case and he will not be able to bring his attorneys to challenge on his behalf. This will be a private action, so Arpaio will have to respond personally. This will give a lot of publicity to the issue of Obama’s forged IDs and Obama will not be able to do anything about it.

I know that Arpaio is afraid that Obama will retaliate against him, however what can Obama do?

1. If Arpaio thinks that Obama might refile his law suit against Arpaio for violation of civil rights of Hispanics this will not happen, as it will be a very obvious retaliation. The feds dismissed their case against Arpaio last August saying that there was not enough evidence. So what will the feds say? Will they say that they had an understanding that they will dismiss their case against Arpaio and Arpaio will never file his criminal complaint against Obama? They can’t say that, they will have to stay quiet.

2. I don’t know if Arpaio received any financial considertion not to file a criminal complaint against Obama, to say that he has no jurisdiction after nearly 3 years of criminal investigation and after receiving millions in donations for this criminal investigation I hope that there was no financial consideration. But if arguendo, one were to believe that there was some type of a consideration, what will Obama do? Do you think he file file a law suit saying “I want my money back?” He can’t.

3. Obama is now weakened and his henchmen in IRS and DOJ are weakened by scandals. We are getting stronger.

So, please, if you are a donor to Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ, demand a meeting and demand that he stop the nonsense. He is a chief law enforcement officer of his county. People turned to him as a law enforcement officer. You do not enforce the law by doing press conferences and just talking to people. You enforce the law by filing a criminal complaint. Please, keep up the pressure and tell Arpaio that after he stated that Obama’s BC is a 100%forgery, he, as a chief law enforcement officer, has a duty to file a criminal complaint that fraud was committed and that Obama ran for office in his jurisdiction using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a proof of his identity. Anybody else would be in prison for that and so should Obama. Tell Arpaio that if he does not file a criminal complaint and show a copy of the signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint, donors will file a complaint against Arpaio for:

1. soliciting and accepting donations under the false pretenses

2. misappropriation of donations.

3. violation of oath of office

4. denial of honest services under the color of authority

5. deprivation of civil right to a lawful law enforcement, redress of grievances, egual protection under the color of authority.

Demand that Arpaio and Zullo file the criminal complaint ASAP. You have the most leverage: use it or lose.

EXAMINER: Obama document fraud case on the move

‘We recently discovered new irrefutable evidence, which confirms, hands down, the document is a fraud’

CAVE CREEK – On Tuesday, Cold Case Posse lead investigator Lt. Mike Zullo told Sonoran News there is a movement underfoot toward prosecution of the Obama document fraud they uncovered during their investigation.

According to Zullo, there is an increased number of people, whom he would only refer to as “VIPs,” that will not only bring the case to the public light, but to prosecution.

Zullo also stated, “We recently discovered new irrefutable evidence, which confirms, hands down, the document [birth certificate] is a fraud.”

“The problem isn’t the evidence,” said Zullo, “It’s getting people who can do something about it to attend an evidence presentation.”

But, he said, that all appears to be changing and there is increased interest in exposing the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, currently has an Obama eligibility case on appeal in the Alabama Supreme Court before Judge Roy Moore.

READ MORE

Arizona man sentenced to 60 days in jail, $12,180 fine and 3 years probation for holding Bible study at home

City officials claim that he’s running an operation that is reminiscent of a home church — but without the required permits.

This is not the America of the Founding Fathers. This is turning into a Soviet gulag.

Why is Obama’s Justice Department, and A.G. Eric Holder getting mixed up in all of this, and why do they care what happens to Mexican drug cartel funds??

What the Media Won’t Tell You About Jared Loughner: (The DEATH CULT of Santa Muerte) By A. True Ott, PhD

The case being ruled on by Judge Roll, is all about bulk cash smuggling into or out of the United States by Mexican drug lords and who exactly has the final right of possession of the funds. It appears that the Obama administration claimed the right to seize large amounts of cash and assets under authority of Presidential Executive Orders, instead of using existing laws. The Obama administration used as support for their claim before Judge Roll the seizing of all American citizens’ gold, in 1933, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s signing of Executive Order 6102, which was ruled at the time to be constitutional. The question that needs to be thoroughly investigated is, why is Obama’s Justice Department, and A.G. Eric Holder getting mixed up in all of this, and why do they care what happens to Mexican drug cartel funds??

But there's more at Cosmic Gnostic:

The hit was to silence Judge Roll on evidence he had as Judge "lost" that would incriminate Janet Nepalitano, former AZ governor, regarding 27 counts of mail fraud and obstruction of Justice.

Say, Just how did Janet Nepalitano become head of DHS? I mean was she qualified, or was she being used by the Obama administartion: federal charges hanging over her head?

As governor, her state was the largest drug corridor in the US. Drug ties and corruption in the Federal government demanded her complicity. She was compromised as governor and is doing their bidding to this day, DHS under her watch becoming an executive branch police force.

It is probable that Judge Roll who collaborated with Nepalitano was showing signs of coming clean. Perhaps he hadn't "lost" the evidence, after all.

Keep in mind, Rep. Giffords is Rham Emmanuel's [sic] protoge [sic]. He was grooming her for the Senate. She was instructed by him to hold the very public "meet and Greet" events in Tucson, which had little or no security.

To cut to the chase, "Jared Loughner" was profiled to DHS by Sheriff Dupnik, a "drug corridor" crony of Nepalitano, as being involved in violent threats and distubances in Tuscon. He was a perfect patsy.

There you have it. Likely it was a Rham Emmanuel operation from the get go.

The reason? To protect illegal Drug profits and to keep the compromised and very useful DHS goon in place for further actions against the state of Arizona should its population get any funny ideas about controlling the most porous border in the USA.

More on the Napolitano/Roll conspiracy here

HAWAII BIRTH DOCUMENTATION ROUTINELY PURCHASED BY FOREIGNERS

WND:

Mike Zullo, a retired New Jersey detective now heading Arpaio’s volunteer investigative team, explained in an interview that at the time of Obama’s birth during the state’s early years, Hawaii birth documentation routinely was purchased by foreigners for children not born in the state.. . .

Zullo’s comments came in an interview with Tea Party Power Hour host Mark Gillar

Gillar described the process in the 1960s: Foreign nationals, primarily from Japan, would fly to Hawaii and buy a birth registration for their son or daughter, not with the goal of one day having them become president, but to obtain the benefits of being a U.S. citizen.

READ MORE

Pamela Geller: "I am glad someone in a position of authority is asking for the long form."

There is something on the vault copy Obama does not want us to see. What is it?

Growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy

By Nick Dranias

The City of Tombstone, Arizona is no longer the only one fighting the federal government for water rights. The latest move by the Federal Bureau of Land Management appears to herald a bigger and much more comprehensive effort to seize water and access rights on federal lands throughout the western states.

Just last week, the Bureau of Land Management declared to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that the federal government holds senior water rights across much of Arizona’s San Pedro River riparian watershed. The BLM’s objection to the “Designation of Adequate Water Supply” issued by ADWR to Sierra Vista’s Pueblo del Sol Water Company stakes the claim that water sources in the area cannot be used without the federal government’s permission. This new federal policy not only defies decades of deference to and accommodation of state sovereignty over water law, but it throws a noose around Arizona’s neck, for which water is life.

The growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy. There is perhaps no better way for the federal government to quell restive western states, like Arizona, that dare to resist federal immigration, healthcare, and unionization policies.

More than ever before, the BLM’s actions show that it is essential for the Goldwater Institute to prevail in our efforts to vindicate Tombstone, Arizona’s 130-year-old water rights, which the federal government is challenging. If Tombstone fails in its effort to preserve its municipal water supply, which is essential to its existence, the floodgates of federal overreach will wash away what little sovereignty the western states still enjoy.

Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Sierra Vista Herald: Warning on water issued by Babbitt in ’94

Arizona Department of Water Resources: Bureau of Land Management letter (PDF)

Goldwater Institute: Tombstone v. United States

Growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy

By Nick Dranias The City of Tombstone, Arizona is no longer the only one fighting the federal government for water rights. The latest move by the Federal Bureau of Land Management appears to herald a bigger and much more comprehensive effort to seize water and access rights on federal lands throughout the western states. Just last week, the Bureau of Land Management declared to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that the federal government holds senior water rights across much of Arizona’s San Pedro River riparian watershed. The BLM’s objection to the “Designation of Adequate Water Supply” issued by ADWR to Sierra Vista’s Pueblo del Sol Water Company stakes the claim that water sources in the area cannot be used without the federal government’s permission. This new federal policy not only defies decades of deference to and accommodation of state sovereignty over water law, but it throws a noose around Arizona’s neck, for which water is life. The growing federal stranglehold over water rights in Arizona is a direct assault on state autonomy. There is perhaps no better way for the federal government to quell restive western states, like Arizona, that dare to resist federal immigration, healthcare, and unionization policies. More than ever before, the BLM’s actions show that it is essential for the Goldwater Institute to prevail in our efforts to vindicate Tombstone, Arizona’s 130-year-old water rights, which the federal government is challenging. If Tombstone fails in its effort to preserve its municipal water supply, which is essential to its existence, the floodgates of federal overreach will wash away what little sovereignty the western states still enjoy. Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute. http://sonoranalliance.com/2012/05/03/the-feds-are-coming-for-our-water/ Learn more: Sierra Vista Herald: Warning on water issued by Babbitt in ’94 Arizona Department of Water Resources: Bureau of Land Management letter (PDF) Goldwater Institute: Tombstone v. United States

Sheriff Joe wants Obama's original draft card

Following up on his investigative team’s finding of probable cause that Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration form is a forgery, Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio has asked Selective Service Director Lawrence Romo in a letter to produce original documentation. . .Arpaio’s investigators concluded that Obama’s Selective Service registration card fit into what was becoming a common narrative for his life: The document was not only forged, it was poorly forged.

READ MORE

Sheriff Joe: 'Tons' more shocking Obama info

WorldNetDaily.com

The lawman from Maricopa County made the comments March 16 on a national radio show hosted by Roger Hedgecock:

“America’s toughest sheriff” says there is “tons” more potentially shocking information on Barack Obama in connection with his probe into the president’s eligibility, and he calls the media’s suppression of his findings of a likely forged presidential birth certificate and Selective Service Card “probably the biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States.”