Showing posts with label socialized medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialized medicine. Show all posts

Sunday, November 04, 2018

The United Kingdom’s National Health Service, which celebrated its 70th anniversary on July 5, is imploding

U.K.'s Healthcare Horror Stories Ought To Curb Dems' Enthusiasm for Single-Payer


READ MORE

Thursday, May 04, 2017

Government intervention dramatically increases the cost of medical care

1995: “Medicare provides a good example. It was created in 1965 to make it easier for the elderly to get health care. But by reducing the patient’s out-of-pocket costs, it increased the demand for doctors and hospitals. And it reduced the supply of those services by requiring doctors and other medical personnel to use their time and attention handling paperwork and complying with regulations — and looking for ways to circumvent these things. So the price of medical care rose sharply as the demand soared and the supply diminished. As a result, the elderly now pay from their own pockets over twice as much for health care (after adjusting for inflation) than they did before Medicare began. And most older people now find it harder to get adequate medical service. Naturally, the government points to the higher costs and shortages as proof that the elderly would be lost without Medicare — and that government should be even more deeply involved.4 When Medicare was set up in 1965, the politicians projected its cost in 1990 to be $3 billion — which is equivalent to $12 billion when adjusted for inflation to 1990 dollars. The actual cost in 1990 was $98 billion — eight times as much.”

Friday, October 04, 2013

Doctors point out that you CAN'T quit Obamacare, ever

The success of the [ACA] hinges on the successful fleecing of the young people. This is the same immoral basis for Medicare and Social Security, “programs” that are still alive because participation in these Ponzi schemes is involuntary.
Definition of Tyranny: You can’t quit Obamacare

Tuesday, October 01, 2013

100 UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF OBAMACARE

Read it and weep, America!
100 Unintended Consequences of Obamacare
Companies, workers, retirees, students, and spouses all suffer from the law’s inflexible mandates.
By  Andrew Johnson
READ MORE

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Public health care...YIKES

Another little reminder from an Australian friend's newsletter:
...years ago I refused to take out family private health insurance because [my daughter] was born with PKU so the ‘family’ insurance wouldn’t cover her.

So I opted to use the public hospital system for my hernia op only to be told the waiting list is between 2 and 4 years.

Quickly changing my mind about the public system I saw a consultant surgeon within 24 hours and I’m being carved open this coming Thursday. Then recovering in an $840 per night hospital bed. At that price I hope breakfast is included :)
This is going to be our future here in the United States [and there are a million stories out there like this one and worse] unless Mitt Romney gets elected and repeals Obamacare.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

The Ugly Realities Of Socialized Medicine Are Not Going Away

FORBES:
The worldwide recession has forced countries around the world to curb public spending — or risk defaulting on their debt.

The United Kingdom is the latest to tighten its belt. The National Health Service (NHS) — the centralized public agency that runs Britain’s government healthcare system — is being forced to shave $31 billion from its budget by 2015.

These cuts are leading to a precipitous drop in the quality of care patients receive. The NHS has been living well beyond its means for quite awhile. And now brutal government-enforced cost controls are exacting a heavy human toll.

Thanks to Obamacare, America will soon face the same sort of reckoning.
READ MORE

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Obamacare preview: Swedish man forced to have his penis amputated after waiting more than a year to learn he had cancer.

Man's penis amputated following misdiagnosis

There've been scores of warnings about the horror stories of socialized healthcare -- see some of them in the health care article archives at the bottom of this blog -- and the only chance we have left is for the repeal and defunding of the coming Obamacare disaster.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

BEFORE YOU VOTE NOVEMBER 2nd

LISTEN TO DR. DAVID JANDA - HEALTH CARE ANALYST - OCTOBER 13, 2010:

OBAMACARE (passed March, 2010) was actually created in two parts: The first part was hidden 600 pages deep inside the stimulus bill and provides for a Federal Coordinating Council for COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (which determines the cost of treatments divided by the number of expected remaining life years) and was funded for 1.1 billion taxpayer dollars. It also provided for 15-members of a rationing board to be appointed by President Obama...which he did within three days of passing the stimulus bill.

To facilitate and cement the implementation of OBAMACARE, a multi-billion dollar center was created to implement decisions out of a coordinating council supervised by the National Coordinator for Health which will determine your treatment at the time and place of care (think: operating room for example).

Starting January 1, 2013, your doctor's nurse/assistant will send diagnoses via a handheld device in the operating room and any doctor not determined to be a "meaningful user of system over time" will face the following penalties.

1st offense (implementing a treatment not approved by the government): $100,000.00 fine.

2nd offense: jail.

Given that there will now be 32 million more patients flooding into the health care system, and given the above new rules whereby the government and not your doctor will determine (based in part on how long you have left to live) your treatment, surveys by the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Medical Journal report that approximately 46% physicians are going quit to quit the practise of medicine in the United States.



YOU MUST PASS THIS INFORMATION ON TO ANYONE WHO WILL LISTEN!!!

Thursday, September 02, 2010

Real hope in the fight against Obamacare

This is not pie-in-the-sky stuff, this is about serious people with very serious ideas:

First, this is about a candidate running in the Republican primary for Congress in the 3rd District of Massachusetts:
Stopa is not your typical candidate. Stopa is a Physicist specializing in computation and nanoscience in the Physics Department at Harvard University, and director of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network Computation Project. So let's just say the guy pays attention to details.

One of the details on which Stopa has focused is the repeal of Obamacare, using Massachusetts' experience with Dukakiscare as a model...
The Massachusetts Model For Dismantling Obamacare

Secondly, on August 25th in the Wall Street Journal, Grace-Marie Turner (president of the Galen Institute) explained the specifics of how a Republican Congress could begin the process of repealing Obamacare in Putting the Brakes on Obamacare

And third: Yesterday, Dr. Hal Scherz (a pediatric urological surgeon at Georgia Urology and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta who also serves on the faculty of Emory University Medical School) explains how he and his colleagues at http://docs4patientcare.org/ are enlisting thousands of doctors in an unorthodox and unprecendented action! (Hint: this will drive Obama and his cohorts absolutely CRAZY :-)

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Starner Jones, MD: "Our Congress expects me to pay for this woman's health care?"

Starner Jones, MD is a seventh generation Mississippian and wanted to come back to Mississippi after going somewhere else for college and medical school. His extracurricular interests are golf, hunting, fishing and college football.

This was his "letter to the editor" in August 29th Jackson, MS newspaper.
Dear Sirs:

During my last night's shift in the ER, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient with a shiny new gold tooth, multiple elaborate tattoos, a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and a new cellular telephone equipped with her favorite R&B tune for a ringtone. Glancing over the chart, one could not help noticing her payer status: MEDICAID. She smokes more than one costly pack of cigarettes every day and, somehow, still has money to buy beer.

And our Congress expects me to pay for this woman's health care? Our nation's health care crisis is not a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. It is a crisis of culture - a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. A culture that thinks "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me". Life is really not that hard. Most of us reap what we sow.

Don't you agree?

STARNER JONES, MD Jackson , MS

Sunday, August 02, 2009

RONALD REAGAN SPEAKS OUT AGAINST SOCIALIZED MEDECINE



HAT TIP: Theodore's World

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Top Obama Health Advisor Supports Ethanasia: Wants Health Care For Non-Disabled "Participating" Citizens

There's more proof today that the Democrat's health bill promotes euthenasia. Democratic Leaders, including House Speaker Pelosi and Cap-&-Tax author Henry Waxman, are excited about their socialized health care plan that rewards the "participating" members of society. The top health advisors believe medical care should be reserved for non-disabled "participating" members of society.
Read more

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Canada Free Press: How much sense does it make to put healthcare decisions into the hands of government bureaucrats?

...Canada, who along with Cuba and North Korea, is one of the world’s only three countries where private, for profit healthcare is illegal.
[see Pages 16-17 of the current healthcare legislation from the Obama administration...if passed, we will join this elite group]
Canada outlawed all private medical care with the passage of the Canada Health Act of 1984. Within the first decade governments were forced to control their healthcare expenses by rationing care. Rationing was achieved by limiting enrollments in medical schools, which served to reduce the number of healthcare professionals dramatically and, of course created huge shortages in the healthcare system. Twenty-five years after the enactment of the Canada Health Act, Canada’s healthcare expenditures are among the highest of all countries offering universal access to healthcare. In fact the only country out of 28 that spends more on healthcare than Canada is Iceland.
Be careful what you wish for:
So what does healthcare in Canada look like in tangible terms? For openers, access to medical specialists is so curtailed that it routinely takes upward of two months from the time a patient is referred to a specialist before the patient is even called back with an appointment. A four to six-month wait for an appointment with a specialist is the rule, not the exception, with some procedures, such as joint replacements, taking in excess of three years from initially being seen by a general practitioner to having the procedure completed.

As was predicted by many researchers back in 1984 when the Canada Health Act was first passed, the single payer healthcare model would end up with large percentages of the population having no access to primary care physicians at all. In fact in Canada it’s common for there to be doctor lotteries as new physicians entering practice are bombarded with “applications” by people desperate to acquire a family doctor. While 15% of the US population currently doesn’t have health insurance, 20% of the Canadian population does not have ready access to a family doctor.
Change. You asked for it!

Barack Obama's diabolical scheme to "save money" and fix social security at the same time!

Looks like Obama and his cohorts have taken a page right out of the famous 1970's science fiction movie Logan's Run described as: "An idyllic sci-fi future has one major drawback: life must end at 30."

How?

They're going to begin with denying specific procedures and medications to "people over 65," but if you understand how socialized medicine works, that age limit will soon slip to 55, probably to 50 and will surely include ALL of the seriously infirm (regardless of age), children and fetuses with defects. Shades of the Nazi Party! In other words, they only want "quality health care" for the already healthy (who don't need health care). The "savings" will come from cutting short the lives of millions of utterly defenseless sick, weak and elderly Americans. Clever way to (1) save money on healthcare (after, of course, spending trillions to nationalize it), and (2) thin out that pesky herd of useless old folks to save Social Security.

Don’t believe me? Listen to one of experts:

Betsy McCaughey, Patient Advocate and Founder of the Committee to Reduce Invectious Deaths:

Interview July 16, 2009

(If you can't connect here, go to www.marklevinshow.com and click on "AUDIO" on the top toolbar, then click on Friday, July 17...Betsy's segment starts immediately.)

Here’s some of what she says (and here are a couple of Obama's fellow travelers):

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel
Head of the Department of Bioethics
The Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health

Dr. Emanuel, the brother of white house chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, has written extensively of the benefits of "comparative effectiveness research." This concept is keystone in socialized health care policies, such as those in Canada and the UK. In essence, comparative effectiveness research promotes devoting health care resources to those who have the most time left to benefit from them. To put it another way, those who are considered too old or too sick to truly reap the benefits from expensive treatments would be denied such care. Can this be where medicine is heading? (Dr. Emanuel has also recommended against treating such diseases as dementia and other incurable or irreversible diseases!)

Dr. David Blumenthal
Department of Health and Human Services
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Dr. Blumenthal has been given the responsibility of developing a nation-wide medical monitoring system, which will "oversee" the choices your doctor makes when it comes to your health. Diagnoses, treatments, and recommendations will all be recorded in this system and analyzed by the government. If you doctor refuses to be a "meaningful user" of the system, he or she can expect to be penalized starting in 2014.

Find out more:

Betsy McCaughey’s website:
www.defendyourhealthcare.us

Saturday, July 11, 2009

How Barack Obama is going to endanger stem cell research...and other medical research and innovation

The truth is, despite the great promise of new medical technology out there now, in terms of new cancer treatments, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and more, the potential marvels of the next twenty years will never be developed unless some developer thinks there's a market.

And with bureaucrats in charge of deciding what treatments to pay for, the existence of such markets will be much less certain. Oh, sure, federally-funded medical research will still go on at the NSF, NIH, etc. But turning that research into actual products is a different story.

My family benefited from innovative treatments that probably wouldn't be around if the United States had adopted socialized medicine when that was first proposed over half a century ago. In 20 years from now, a lot more treatments -- and, probably, dramatically better treatments -- won't be around if we adopt a national healthcare program now.

It's ironic that the same Democrats who were pushing the medical prospects for stem-cell research during the last election are now pushing a program that will make such progress far less likely.
Glenn Reynolds on the hidden cost of national health care