The title of this article is correct. After having completed a more thorough review of the relevant US Supreme Court cases discussing the Constitution’s natural-born citizen clause, I have discovered precedent which states that a natural-born citizen is a person born in the jurisdiction of the US to parents who are citizens. Read that again. I said precedent, not dicta. The precedent holds that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States.Read more
Up until the publication of this report today, all discussion of the natural-born citizen issue (from both sides of the argument) agreed there had never been a precedent established by the US Supreme Court, and that the various cases which mentioned the clause did so in “dicta”.
Alias Barack Obama: a lie is born: The greatest identity fraud in history Paperback – July 10, 2012
Trump Warns He Will Take Back the Panama Canal Unless They Stop ‘Ripping
Off’ America and Start Countering China’s Influence
-
In a bold statement, Donald Trump threatens to reclaim the Panama Canal,
citing unfair costs and growing Chinese influence. Discover the
implications of ...
1 comment:
There you have it. The Court stops short of construing the 14th Amendment as to whether the woman in question was a US citizen. The Court made a certain, direct determination that Mrs. Minor was a US citizen before the adoption of the 14th Amendment and that she did not need the 14th Amendment to be a US citizen.
Post a Comment