Monday, September 26, 2016

Cruz’s entire career has been a calculation

ALLAHPUNDIT - HOT AIR:
Cruz’s entire career has been a calculation, and I say that as someone who voted for him this spring. He became a populist outsider running against Washington only after his attempt to join the establishment failed. He staged his ObamaCare filibuster in 2013 with no hope of stopping the law from being implemented but knowing that it would be great for his insurrectionist brand in the 2016 primaries. During the Gang of Eight debate, he offered an amendment that would have expanded guest workers while removing the path to citizenship knowing that that would let him argue the amendment both ways during his presidential run. During the GOP primaries, he’d claim it was a poison pill to sink the bill; during the general election, had he made it that far, he’d be pointing to the guest-workers part as proof that he’s not a radical restrictionist. Cruz dodged questions on legalizing illegals literally for years, in fact, until pressure from Trump finally forced him to rule it out late last year.
His “bromance” with Trump was itself a giant calculation designed to build goodwill among Trump’s populist voters in hopes that Cruz would inherit them once Trump collapsed. Then he made his boldest calculation yet at the convention, betting that a non-endorsement would make him look good after Trump inevitably melted down on the trail this fall and ended up being crushed by Clinton. Now that that hasn’t panned out, he’s re-calculating and reluctantly endorsing him so as not to be blamed for a narrow Trump defeat (or frozen out by the White House next year if Trump pulls off the upset). All he does is calculate, and his calculations are always to his personal political advantage. That’s why it was easy to predict that he’d cave to Trump eventually. The moment standing on principle began to hurt rather than help his presidential aspirations, principle went out the window. That’s Cruz.
READ MORE

Saturday, September 17, 2016

THE TURNING OF THE TIDES

THE TURNING OF THE TIDES connects all the dots between what was and is being done in education in order to change society now... including tearing down the family, and womens' roles, in order to make the children wards of the state. It even talks about the UN's perpetual war under the guise of peace, and why and how the country will be bankrupted in order to finally give it up to the totalitarian one-world system.

You may read The Long House, Inc. Publishers 1962 .pdf here: DOWNLOAD .PDF
THE TURNING OF THE TIDES

The text of this volume has been divided into four parts. The first three describe a movement-how it started, what became its objectives, and to what extent those objectives were reached . These three parts are entitled : Currents, Tides, and-The Flood. The fourth part tells of the rising waters of a more recent stream, whose mounting effect gives the title to the book . Parts I, III and IV are by John Howland Snow . Part II is by the Hon . Paul W . Shafer of Michigan, Member of Congress from 1937 until his death in 1954 . The original text was delivered in the House of Representatives on March 21, 1952. Approximately two years were required for the preparation and publication.

PART I - CURRENTS - The Early Movement

On the 12th of September 1905 a group of young men met together in lower Manhattan, New York . Conditions in America were not ideal . These young men had an ideal. Consciously or not, it had been borrowed from the social structures of the Old World . The meeting took place in a loft above Peck's Restaurant, at 140 Fulton Street. Among the group were some who in later years were to become widely known for views which at that time were the catalyst bringing them together . On that day nearly sixty years ago was organized the Intercollegiate Socialist Society.



Friday, September 16, 2016

Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs

ORLY TAITZ:

My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs

Posted on | September 16, 2016 | 


Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.

All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.

Here is the response that I gave.

Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.

See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs

At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of  cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.

My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times   all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.

I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.

I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.

1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.

Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number?
I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.

2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?

3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?

4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia.
    
5.  Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate

6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording  eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?

7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.

8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? 
When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.

For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later.
By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
(named by the media, the Birther Queen)
09.16.16


Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs

ORLY TAITZ:

My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs

Posted on | September 16, 2016 | 


Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.

All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.
Here is the response that I gave.

Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.

See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs

At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of  cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.

My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times   all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.

I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.

I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.

1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.

Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number?
I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.

2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?

3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?

4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia.
    
5.  Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate

6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording  eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?

7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.

8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? 
When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.

For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later.
By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
(named by the media, the Birther Queen)
09.16.16


Tuesday, September 13, 2016

UNDOING OBAMA’S DAMAGE TO AMERICA

Fifteen years ago this Sunday [9/11/2001], nearly 3,000 Americans were killed in the deadliest attack on the U.S. homeland in our history. A decade and a half later, we remain at war with Islamic terrorists. Winning this war will require an effort of greater scale and commitment than anything we have seen since World War II, calling on every element of our national power.
Defeating our enemies has been made significantly more difficult by the policies of Barack Obama. No American president has done more to weaken the U.S., hobble our defenses or aid our adversaries.
President Obama has been more dedicated to reducing America’s power than to defeating our enemies. He has enhanced the abilities, reach and finances of our adversaries, including the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, at the expense of our allies and our own national security. He has overseen a decline of our own military capabilities as our adversaries strength has grown.
Our Air Force today is the oldest and smallest it has ever been. In January 2015, then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno testified that the Army was as unready as it had been at any other time in its history. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert testified similarly that, “Navy readiness is at its lowest point in many years.”
Nearly half of the Marine Corp’s non-deployed units, the ones that respond to unforeseen contingencies are suffering shortfalls, according to the commandant of the Corps, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. For the first time in decades, American supremacy in key areas can no longer be assured.
The president who came into office promising to end wars has made war more likely by diminishing America’s strength and deterrence ability.
He doesn’t seem to understand that the credible threat of military force gives substance and meaning to our diplomacy. By reducing the size and strength of our forces, he has ensured that future wars will be longer, and put more American lives at risk.
Meanwhile, the threat from global terrorist organizations has grown. Nicholas Rasmussen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told the House Homeland Security Committee in July that, “As we approach 15 years since 9/11, the array of terrorist actors around the globe is broader, wider and deeper than it has been at any time since that day.”
Despite Mr. Obama’s claim that ISIS has been diminished, John Brennan, Mr. Obama’s CIA director, told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June that, “Our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability or global reach.”
The president’s policies have contributed to our enemies’ advance. In his first days in office, Mr. Obama moved to take the nation off a war footing and return to the failed policies of the 1990s when terrorism was treated as a law-enforcement matter.
It didn’t matter that the Enhanced Interrogation Program produced information that prevented attacks, saved American lives and, we now know, contributed to the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden. Mr. Obama ended the program, publicly revealed its techniques, and failed to put any effective terrorist-interrogation program in its place.
We are no longer interrogating terrorists in part because we are no longer capturing terrorists.
Since taking office, the president has recklessly pursued his objective of closing the detention facility at Guantanamo by releasing current detainees — regardless of the likelihood they will return to the field of battle against us. Until recently, the head of recruitment for ISIS in Afghanistan and Pakistan was a former Guantanamo detainee, as is one of al Qaeda’s most senior leaders in the Arabian Peninsula.
As he released terrorists to return to the field of battle, Mr. Obama was simultaneously withdrawing American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Mr. Obama calls this policy “ending wars.” Most reasonable people recognize this approach as losing wars.
When Mr. Obama took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2009, Iraq was stable. Following the surge ordered by President Bush, al Qaeda in Iraq had largely been defeated, as had the Shiite militias. The situation was so good that Vice President Joe Biden predicted, “Iraq will be one of the great achievements of this administration.”
Today, Iraq’s border with Syria has been erased by the most successful and dangerous terrorist organization in history. ISIS has established its “caliphate” across a large swath of territory in the heart of Syria and Iraq, from which it trains, recruits, plots and launches attacks.
On Aug. 20, 2012, Mr. Obama drew a red line making clear he would take military action if Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons. A year later, Mr. Assad launched a sarin-gas attack on his own people in the suburbs of Damascus.
Mr. Obama did nothing, a failure that destroyed America’s credibility and strengthened the hand of our adversaries.
We now know that the president’s refusal to act came as the Iranians and the U.S. were engaged in secret talks about Iran’s nuclear program. In his new book, The Iran Wars, Wall Street Journal correspondent Jay Solomon writes that according to Iranian sources, “Tehran made it clear to the American delegation that the nuclear negotiations would be halted if the U.S. went ahead with its attack on Assad.”
The Iranians were now in the driver’s seat, not just regarding their own policy in the Middle East, but in determining America’s.
President Obama and Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were so concerned with pleasing Iran’s ruling mullahs that they were willing to overlook the American blood on Iranian hands and decades of Iran’s activities as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. In pursuit of the nuclear deal, they made concession after dangerous concession.
Every promise made to the American people about the Obama nuclear agreement has been broken. We were promised a “world-class” verification process. Instead, the Iranians are allowed in key instances to verify themselves.
We were promised the agreement would “block every pathway” to an Iranian nuclear weapon. Instead, the Obama-Clinton agreement virtually guarantees an Iranian nuclear weapon, gives them access to the latest in centrifuge technology and will likely usher in a nuclear arms race across the Middle East.
We were promised that non-nuclear sanctions, including those that block Iran’s access to hard currency and our financial systems, would remain in place. Instead, the Obama administration has paid the mullahs at least $1.7 billion in cash, which includes at least $1.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer money, the first installment of which was ransom for the release of American hostages.
In case there is any doubt that the regime will use these funds to support terror, Iran’s parliament recently passed Article 22 of its 2016-2017 budget, mandating that all such funds be transferred directly to the Iranian military.
Fifteen years after 3,000 Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists, America’s commander in chief has become the money launderer in chief for the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.
Iran isn’t the only adversary benefiting from the age of Obama. Russia is threatening NATO, invading sovereign territory, selling air-defense systems to the Iranians, using its military to defend the Assad regime, bombing American-backed rebels in Syria, and playing a larger role in the Middle East than at any time since Anwar Sadat expelled his Soviet advisers from Egypt in 1972.
Across the region, nations that previously were strong American allies are making different calculations. Russia is seen as a reliable ally standing with Mr. Assad, while the U.S. walks away from its friends. The steady stream of visitors from the Middle East to Moscow, including most recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is evidence of Moscow’s growing role in the region.
Neither Russia nor Vladmir Putin share America’s interests.
China is also ascendant, threatening freedom of navigation through the South China Sea and developing weapons systems that directly threaten American military superiority. North Korea represents a growing nuclear threat to the U.S. homeland. Mr. Obama’s announced pivot to Asia turned out to be hollow, further alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies in the region.
Undoing this damage will require an effort of historic proportions.
Our next president must abandon Mr. Obama’s fantasy that unilaterally disarming, retreating and abandoning our allies will bring peace and security.
We must begin at once to rebuild our military. This means ending sequestration and returning to a Defense Department budget built around defeating the threats to our nation.
We must remedy readiness shortfalls, modernize and upgrade our nuclear arsenal, develop and build a robust missile-defense system, and invest in technologies necessary to maintain our military superiority, particularly against advances by adversaries like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.
Among the most important lessons of 9/11 was that terrorists must be denied safe havens from which to plan and launch attacks against us. On President Obama’s watch, terrorist safe havens have expanded around the globe.
Our next president must recognize that Islamic terrorists pose an existential threat to the U.S., and must instruct the military to provide plans necessary to defeat them and deny them safe havens. These should include expanding the pace of our air campaign against ISIS, removing the onerous rules of engagement, and dedicating additional special operators and other American forces as necessary to defeat our enemies.
Winning the war against Islamic terrorists will also require that we rebuild our intelligence capabilities. Our next president should reinstate the Enhanced Interrogation Program, ensure that Guantanamo remains open so we have a facility to hold enemy combatants, and increase our intelligence activities so we can identify and disrupt plots before they are carried out.
We must make clear that we will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon or become nuclear capable.
Our next president should renounce the Obama-Clinton nuclear agreement, develop a strategy in consultation with our allies in the region to address Iran’s state sponsorship of terror, and make clear that all options are on the table where Iran’s nuclear program is concerned.
We must also rebuild our relationships with allies across the globe so that we can build the coalitions necessary to defeat Islamic terrorism and restore our strength and power. This includes reinvigorating NATO and affirming America’s unshakable commitment to the most effective military alliance in history.
Generations before have met and defeated grave threats to our nation. American strength, leadership and ideals were crucial to the Allied victory in World War II and the defeat of Soviet Communism during the Cold War. It will be up to today’s generation to restore American pre-eminence so that we can defend our freedom and defeat Islamic terror.
Since World War II, America has been freedom’s defender — for ourselves and for millions around the world. We do this because our security depends upon it and because there is no other nation that can.
As Americans calculate the costs of leadership, we must remember that the costs of failing to lead, or of inaction are much higher.
Imagine a world where Russia, Iran, China and North Korea set the rules; where militant Islam spreads its evil ideology unchallenged across the globe; where parts of Europe are once again enslaved by Russia, our NATO alliance impotent; and where China achieves military superiority over the U.S. and dominates Asia and beyond.
Finally, imagine a world where the terrorists and their leading state sponsor have nuclear weapons. Fifteen years after 9/11, we can say with certainty that this is the world that will be created by withdrawal and retreat by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s policies if we don’t reverse course.

Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney
[This essay by former Vice-President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney, Republican candidate for the Wyoming Congressional seat, was published in the Wall Street Journal on Friday, September 9.  We are republishing it in full as a public service.]

http://www.tothepointnews.com/2016/09/undoing-obamas-damage-to-america/

Monday, September 12, 2016

THE MUSLIM POPULATION TIMELINE

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in Bangladesh — Muslim 83%, Egypt — Muslim 90%, Gaza — Muslim 98.7%, Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%, Iran — Muslim 98%, Iraq — Muslim 97%, Jordan — Muslim 92%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in: Afghanistan — Muslim 100%, Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%, SomaliaMuslim 100%, Yemen ---Muslim 100%.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

9/11 anniversary -- 15 years of strategic defeat, dishonesty and humiliation

Newt Gingrich:
“I will begin by saying what everybody would like to ignore or forget but which must nevertheless be stated, namely, that we have sustained a total and unmitigated defeat.” -- That was Winston Churchill’s description of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's surrender to Hitler in the Munich Agreement of 1938.

Yet Churchill's words also apply to where the United States is today.
READ MORE

Saturday, September 10, 2016

CLINTON SCANDAL: The Takeaways...The Players...The Timeline.

The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of FBI Report on Hillary Clinton Email by Sharyl Attkisson:
Since this article refers to both President and Mrs. Clinton, they are sometimes referred to by their first names for clarity.

Most of the information is from the FBI report. Some contextual facts and dates have been added.
The Takeaways. The Players. The Timeline

Wednesday, September 07, 2016

Now THIS is how it feels to be an AMERICAN!!!



Tuesday, September 06, 2016

A government in exile...

Somewhere along the way the Clinton White House had become a permanent institution. It could change shape, but it wouldn’t go away. It could morph into the Clinton Foundation and wear a number of disguises before it was ready to shed its chrysalis and become the Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign.

And yet they’re all the same thing.

After leaving the White House, the Clintons became a government in exile. Like the warlords or former kings living in Brussels or London, they maintained the structure of the old government. They sought out supporters who would help finance their return to power in exchange for future favors.

The Clinton Foundation is something alien to Americans, but quite familiar in certain settings. The Clintons and those around them treated term limits as a temporary setback to be overcome. And then the restoration of the Clinton Empire could commence. At the center were two corrupt, but not particularly bright royals, surrounded by a bevy of courtiers with extremely dubious agendas.

Some only wanted money. Others, like Huma Abedin, had more complex loyalties.

What all this amounted to was a coup. The Clintons were determined to become a perverse monarchy. And they were willing to take money from anyone and promise them anything to make it happen.
READ MORE

Monday, September 05, 2016

Blackmail...coercion...what difference does it make?



Sunday, September 04, 2016

KC Kerrie - YOU Move!! #YOUMove



Tuesday, August 30, 2016

New movie added

Top right (at the moment) is a category that started out as "Full Length Documentaries" and has now been changed to "Full Length Documentaries/Movies".

The movie I just added is a hysterically politically-incorrect film that could NEVER be made today. But you will die laughing. You may wonder why people are trying to suck all the humor out of life and why people are excoriated for saying something like "All Lives Matter".

Marxism, Maoism, socialism, statism, totalitarianism, and false religions all engage in stifling humor and joy from life because that is how they exercise control over their subjects. And besides, while they are torturing, beheading, demeaning everyone and stealing the fruits of your labor, you won't feel like laughing anyway.

So please, if you can--and while you can--still laugh, please do watch our newest edition BLAZING SADDLES!

Monday, August 29, 2016

When people escape...


...although more people gave up their citizenship after Obama was elected than ever before in history.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

1860 (Civil War): ONLY DEMOCRATS OWNED SLAVES

First female candidate for President of the United States...NOT Hillary Clinton!

Victoria Claflin Woodhull, later Victoria Woodhull Martin was an American leader of the woman's suffrage movement. In 1872, Woodhull ran for President of the United States.

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Why All The Jihadi Attacks? Why Now?

"Violent jihad is as an individual duty obligatory upon every Muslim."
READ MORE

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

8/16/16: Full text: Donald Trump campaign speech in Wisconsin

“The violence, riots and destruction that have taken place in Milwaukee is an assault on the right of all citizens to live in security and peace. The main victims of these riots are law-abiding African-American citizens living in these neighborhoods. It is their jobs, their homes, their schools and communities which will suffer as a result.

There is no compassion in tolerating lawless conduct. Crime and violence is an attack on the poor, and will never be accepted in a Trump Administration.

Just like Hillary Clinton is against the miners, she is against the police. You know it, and I know it. Her war on our police is a war on all peaceful citizens who want to be able to work and live and send their kids to school in safety.

Our job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, the violent disruptor. Our job is to make life more comfortable for the African-American parent who wants their kids to be able to safely walk the streets. Or the senior citizen waiting for a bus. Or the young child walking home from school.

For every one violent protestor, there are a hundred moms and dads and kids on that same city block who just want to be able to sleep safely at night. My opponent would rather protect the offender than the victim.

Hillary Clinton-backed policies are responsible for the problems in the inner cities today, and a vote for her is a vote for another generation of poverty, high crime, and lost opportunities. The Hillary Clinton agenda hurts poor people the most.

There is no compassion in allowing drug dealers, gang members, and felons to prey on innocent people. It is the first duty of government to keep the innocent safe, and when I am President I will fight for the safety of every American – and especially those Americans who have not known safety for a very, very long time.

It is time for our society to address some honest and very difficult truths.

The Democrat Party has failed and betrayed the African-American community. Democrat crime policies, education policies, and economic policies have produced only more crime, more broken homes, and more poverty.

To every voter in Milwaukee, to every voter living in every inner city, or every forgotten stretch of our society, I am running to offer you a better future. I am running to listen to your voice, to hear your cries for help. The quiet voices in our society, not the loudest demonstrators, need to have their demands heard.

We reject the bigotry of Hillary Clinton which panders to and talks down to communities of color and sees them only as votes, not as individual human beings worthy of a better future. She doesn’t care at all about the hurting people of this country, or the suffering she has caused them.

The Democrat Party has run nearly every inner city in this country for 50 years, and run them into financial ruin. They’ve ruined the schools. They’ve driven out the jobs. They’ve tolerated a level of crime no American should consider acceptable.

Violent crime has risen 17% in America’s 50 largest cities last year. Killings of police officers this year is up nearly 50 percent. Homicides are up more than 60% in Baltimore. They are up more than 50% in Washington, D.C.

This is the future offered by Hillary Clinton. More poverty, more crime, and more of the same. The future she offers is the most pessimistic thing I can possibly imagine. It is time for a different future.”
READ MORE

8/15/16: Full text: Donald Trump's speech on fighting terrorism

“We will defeat Radical Islamic Terrorism, just as we have defeated every threat we have faced in every age before. But we will not defeat it with closed eyes, or silenced voices.

Anyone who cannot name our enemy, is not fit to lead this country. Anyone who cannot condemn the hatred, oppression and violence of Radical Islam lacks the moral clarity to serve as our President.

With one episode of bad judgment after another, Hillary Clinton’s policies launched ISIS onto the world. Yet, as she threw the Middle East into violent turmoil, things turned out well for her. The Clintons made almost $60 million in gross income while she was Secretary of State.

Incident after incident proves again and again: Hillary Clinton lacks the judgment, the temperament and the moral character to lead this nation.

Importantly, she also lacks the mental and physical stamina to take on ISIS, and all the many adversaries we face – not only in terrorism, but in trade and every other challenge we must confront to turn this country around.

Hillary Clinton wants to be America’s Angela Merkel, and you know what a disaster this massive immigration has been to Germany and the people of Germany – crime has risen to levels that no one thought they would ever see.

Just like we couldn’t defeat communism without acknowledging that communism exists – or explaining its evils – we can’t defeat Radical Islamic Terrorism unless we do the same.

This also means we have to promote the exceptional virtues of our own way of life – and expecting that newcomers to our society do the same. Pride in our institutions, our history and our values should be taught by parents and teachers, and impressed upon all who join our society.

Assimilation is not an act of hostility, but an expression of compassion. Our system of government, and our American culture, is the best in the world and will produce the best outcomes for all who adopt it.”
READ MORE

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Birthright Not The Law, Never Has Been

It should not take a Constitutional Attorney to explain to us that babies born in the U.S. to foreign parents, under the Fourteenth Amendment, do not have ‘birthright,’ the right to U.S. natural-born citizenship. But so many judges and courts have been in this fight that the lines are terribly and dangerously blurred. Ken Klukowski, a practicing constitutional attorney, and the legal editor at Breitbart offers his answer.
READ MORE

Don't Ignore These Warning Signs of Pet Abuse

Dr. Becker:
If you’ve witnessed an act of animal abuse, it’s important to report the incident to your local law enforcement agency, animal control agency, humane society or taxpayer-funded animal shelter.
The ASPCA has compiled top signs to help you recognize animal cruelty, below.

READ MORE


Friday, August 19, 2016

Prophetic end times-- 4 years ago and today

Thursday, August 18, 2016
Prophetic end times-- 4 years ago and today
Four years ago on August 20, World Net Daily reported that Muslim Brotherhood operatives began crucifying those who oppose the newly elected Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, also a Muslim Brotherhood leader. The United States, at the behest of the "president", aided the Muslim Brotherhood in taking over Egypt in the name of "democracy." Morsi then dismissed all of the pro-American military leadership and replaced them with Muslim Brotherhood commanders; he moved to improve ties to the terrorist group Hezbollah; and held a summit in Iran --the first official visit to Iran by an Egyptian president since 1979. Since then, American foreign policy has also embraced Iran.
Four months earlier in April 2014 White House officials were meeting with Muslim Brotherhood (MB) representatives. By then, it was well known that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's top aide Huma Abedin had close ties to the MB, and that several appointees to Homeland Security and the Pentagon were associated in some way with the terrorist organization. The MB creed is as follows: "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope." The White House admitted that it was meeting with representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood, and sponsoring meetings at the National Security Council with the MB.
Fast forward to today. MB sympathizers run deep in the Clinton circle of influence. Breitbart reports of Clinton's Vice Presidential running mate, Tim Kaine: "He appointed a Hamas supporter to a state immigration commission; spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect; and received donations from well-known Islamist groups.". Clinton's right hand woman remains Huma Abedin. Abedin's brother, mother, and deceased father are all confirmed to have leadership ties to the MB. This assists in connecting the dots between the current Administration's assistance of the MB in government takeovers in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Yeman, and now Syria.
There are many verses in the Koran that instruct Muslims to kill Christians and Jews. Islam is not a peaceful religion. It is an antichrist system. 2 John 7 says, "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist." The Koran specifically says that Allah has no son. Koran Sura 23:91 says, "Never has Allah begotten a son, nor is there any other god besides Him." America's foreign policy is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. This administration and the one that wishes to replace it are advancing the Islamic agenda and have close ties to the terrorist group with a stated goal of Jihad to do it. Those ties have only deepened over the past four years.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson [DailyJot.com]
NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

The Past Six Presidents Have All Used The Executive Power To Block Certain Classes Of Immigrants

THE DAILY CALLER:
Donald Trump has received much flak from Democrats and Republicans alike for his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S through executive authority. However, the past six presidents have all used the executive power to bar different classes of immigrants.
READ MORE

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Hillary Medical Records Revealed! “Dementia; Seizures, Black-Outs” We Have The Report

PROGNOSIS: BD (Binswanger’s Disease) is a progressive disease; there is no cure. Changes may be sudden or gradual and then progress in a stepwise manner. BD can often coexist with Alzheimer’s disease.
READ MORE

Friday, August 05, 2016

3 mysterious deaths this summer...each victim had evidence against HIllary Clinton and the DNC - UPDATE

List provided by GATEWAY PUNDIT
On July 3, 2016, Shawn Lucas and filmmaker Ricardo Villaba served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., in the fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters. . .This was before Wikileaks released documents proving the DNC was working against the Sanders campaign during the 2016 primary.

This follows the death of 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich who was murdered in Washington DC on July 8. The killer or killers appear to have taken nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone. Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

And on June 22, 2016, former UN official John Ashe “accidentally” crushed his own throat and died a week before he was scheduled to testify against the Clintons and Democrat Party.

For those who haven't heard (or are too young to remember), the Clintons are no strangers to mysterious deaths of people who threaten their power:

90 SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF INDIVIDUALS CLOSE TO BILL CLINTON, 81 WHILE PRESIDENT

If you work with Clinton and deal with any of his scandals, or if you attempt to investigate them or accidentaly come across them, you will likely die in a plane crash, a murder or suicide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER DEATHS THAT CAN BE LAID AT THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION'S FEET, OR ARE VERY SUSPISOUS INCLUDE, AND AMOUNT TO A REIGN OF DEATH AMD TERROR:

80+ Near Waco in the Assault on the Branch Davidian Compound.
170+ In Oklahoma City where tech. and eye witness do not match government story of bomb.
1100+ In Chicago and surrounding area from a supposed 2 day "heat" wave.
120+ In Value Jet crash where Chuck Hays, a CIA operative w/info on Foster was supposed to fly.
270+ In TWA crash. Eye witness accounts (incl. Air Nat'l Guard Pilot) do'nt match fed's story.

With the 90 above, this totals over 1830 individuals !!!

(The Value jet and TWA disasters are ominous when you consider the other plane crashes that have killed Clinton associates, potential threats or enemies. Who was on that TWA aircraft?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

... and these are only the ones we know about !!!

UPDATE:

This new, really well done Townhall article also lists three MORE suspicious deaths: Victor Thorn, Joe Montano, and Larry Nichols! (Plus it makes a great point about Snopes...)

Clinton Body Count or Left-Wing Conspiracy? Three With Ties to DNC Mysteriously Die


Thursday, August 04, 2016

Wednesday, August 03, 2016

VIDEO: The US Marines Crucible Challenge Full Length

The Crucible is the final challenge in the US Marines boot camp that recruits must complete in order to become a Marine. It is the culmination of 12 weeks of physical, marksmanship, firing range, and combat water survival training. The Crucible consists of drills and training with 60 lbs. of gear over 48 miles within 54 hours, given only two meals and six hours total of sleep. It’s a brutal mental and physical challenge that marks a young man’s transformation into a Marine.

As part of the Midwest Marines Educator Workshop in February, WGN Radio was given rare, unbridled access to the emotional Eagle, Globe and Anchor pinning ceremony atop the Reaper, the steep 700 ft-tall mountain that signifies the accomplishment of the Crucible.
READ MORE / WATCH VIDEO

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

Why the U.S.-Israeli Alliance Is Good for America

THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE (2012):
The bilateral relationship is based on tangible, steadily increasing security and economic interests, not just shared values.
READ MORE

Saturday, July 30, 2016

No, the Constitution Does Not Bar ‘Religious Tests’ in Immigration Law

Andrew C. McCarthy -- NATIONAL REVIEW:
The United States government’s first obligation is to shield the American people from foreign threats, not to shield foreign threats and render the American people defenseless.
READ MORE

13th-century scholar Thomas Aquinas warned us about Islam 750 years ago

[Thomas} Aquinas contrasts the spread of Christianity with that of Islam, arguing that much of Christianity’s early success stemmed from widespread belief in the miracles of Jesus, whereas the spread of Islam was worked through the promise of sensual pleasures and the violence of the sword.
READ MORE

Friday, July 29, 2016

THE CLINTON CHRONICLES: FULL LENGTH DOCUMENTARY



BILL CLINTON'S LOVING WIFE

By Dick Morris, former political advisor to President Bill Clinton

If you happen to see the Bill Clinton five minute TV ad for Hillary in which he introduces the commercial by saying he wants to share some things we may not know about Hillary's background, beware as I was there for most of their presidency and know them better than just about anyone. I offer a few corrections:

Bill says: "In law school Hillary worked on legal services for the poor."

Facts are: Hillary's main extra-curricular activity in 'Law School' was helping the Black Panthers, on trial in Connecticut for torturing and killing a 'Federal Agent.' She went to Court every day as part of a Law student monitoring committee trying to spot civil rights violations and develop grounds for appeal.

Bill says: "Hillary spent a year after graduation working on a Children's rights project for poor kids."

Facts are: Hillary interned with Bob Truehaft, the head of the California Communist Party. She met Bob when he represented the Panthers and traveled all the way to San Francisco to take an internship with him.

Bill says: "Hillary could have written her own job ticket, but she turned down all the lucrative job offers."

Facts are: She flunked the D.C. bar exam, 'Yes', flunked it, it is a matter of record, and only passed the Arkansas bar. She had no job offers in Arkansas, 'None', and only got hired by the University of Arkansas Law School at Fayetteville because Bill was already teaching there. She did not join the prestigious Rose Law Firm until Bill became Arkansas Attorney General and was made a partner only after he was elected Arkansas Governor.

Bill says: "President Carter appointed Hillary to the Legal Services Board of Directors and she became its Chairman."

Facts are: The appointment was in exchange for Bill's support for Carter in his 1980 primary against Ted Kennedy. Hillary then became chairman in a coup in which she won a majority away from Carter's choice to be chairman.

Bill says: "She served on the board of the Arkansas Children's Hospital."

Facts are: Yes she did. But her main board activity, not mentioned by Bill, was to sit on the Wal-Mart Board of Directors, for a substantial fee. She was silent about their labor and health care practices.

Bill says: "Hillary didn't succeed at getting health care for all Americans in 1994 but she kept working at it and helped to create the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) that provides five million children with health insurance."

Facts are: Hillary had nothing to do with creating CHIP. It was included in the budget deal between Clinton and Republican Majority Leader Senator Trent Lott. I know; I helped to negotiate the deal. The money came half from the budget deal and half from the Attorney Generals' tobacco settlement. Hillary had nothing to do with either source of funds.

Bill says: "Hillary was the face of America all over the World." (LOL)

Facts are: Her visits were part of a program to get her out of town so that Bill would not appear weak by feeding stories that Hillary was running the White House. Her visits abroad were entirely touristic and symbolic and there was no substantive diplomacy on any of them.

Bill says: "Hillary was an excellent Senator who kept fighting for Children's and Women's issues."

Facts are: Other than totally meaningless legislation like changing the names on courthouses and post offices, she has passed only four substantive pieces of legislation. One set up a national park in Puerto Rico. A second provided respite care for family members helping their relatives through Alzheimer's or other conditions. And two were routine bills to aid 911 victims and responders which were sponsored by the entire N.Y. delegation. Presently she is trying to have the US memorialize Woodstock.

Here is what bothers me more than anything else about Hillary Clinton. She has done everything possible to weaken the President and our Country (that's you and me) when it comes to the 'War on Terror'.

1. She wants to close GITMO and move the combatants to the USA where they would have access to our legal system.
2. She wants to eliminate the monitoring of suspected Al Qaeda phone calls to/from the USA.
3. She wants to grant constitutional rights to enemy combatants captured on the battlefield.
4. She wants to eliminate the monitoring of money transfers between suspected Al Qaeda cells and supporters in the USA.
5. She wants to eliminate the type of interrogation tactics used by the Military & CIA where coercion might be used when questioning known terrorists even though such tactics might save American lives.

One cannot think of a single 'Bill', Hillary has introduced or a single comment she has made that would tend to strengthen our Country in the 'War on Terror'. But, one can think of a lot of comments she has made that weaken our Country and makes it a more dangerous situation for all of us. Bottom line: She goes hand in hand with the ACLU on far too many issues where common sense is abandoned.

Share this with everyone you know, ask them to prove Dick Morris wrong. Think about it - he's (Dick Morris) said all of this openly, thus if he were not truthful he'd be liable for 'Defamation of Character' !
And you better believe Hillary would sue him.

Her winning in 2016 means the final death knell for America! Her whole public life has been a LIE.

Free full-length documentary based on the New York Times bestseller "Clinton Cash": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM

THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE UNAWARE OF THESE FACTS.