Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Cartoon postscript
On February 7th, The New York Times announced: "(We) and much of the rest of the nation's media have reported on the cartoons but refrained from showing them."
How sensitive!
On February 8th, The New York Times ran a picture of a so-called piece of art which covers the Holy Virgin Mary in real Elephant feces (along with an article entitled "A Startling New Lesson in the Power of Imagery").
You may smell dung, but I smell hypocrisy.
And for those of you who absolutely adore Big Government, you'll be thrilled to know that your tax dollars (and everyone else's) have previously funded such lovely works of art as a photograph of the crucified Christ submerged in real urine...
In a country where around 84 percent of it's people are of the Christian faith, you just have to wonder about the motives behind the actions.
How sensitive!
On February 8th, The New York Times ran a picture of a so-called piece of art which covers the Holy Virgin Mary in real Elephant feces (along with an article entitled "A Startling New Lesson in the Power of Imagery").
You may smell dung, but I smell hypocrisy.
And for those of you who absolutely adore Big Government, you'll be thrilled to know that your tax dollars (and everyone else's) have previously funded such lovely works of art as a photograph of the crucified Christ submerged in real urine...
In a country where around 84 percent of it's people are of the Christian faith, you just have to wonder about the motives behind the actions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment