It seems to me that the most significant revelations from the massive WikiLeaks document dump is the apparent extent of Iran’s nefarious role in Iraq. Remember how we were always being told that the Bush administration was exaggerating the extent of Iranian influence with the Shia militia groups in order to push along a neocon plot to attack Iran? Well, an initial reading of the documents conducted by the New York Times indicates there wasn’t much exaggeration at all.Will Barack Obama admit extent of Iran's role in Iraq, laid bare by WikiLeaks?
Come to think of it, None other than Vice President Joe Biden said as recently as August:Iranian influence in Iraq is minimal. It’s been greatly exaggerated.So exactly how does that statement square with this from the NYT?The reports make it clear that the lethal contest between Iranian-backed militias and American forces continued after President Obama sought to open a diplomatic dialogue with Iran’s leaders and reaffirmed the agreement between the United States and Iraq to withdraw American troops from Iraq by the end of 2011.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Busted: Obama and Biden lying about Iran
Toby Harnden, Daily Telegraph's US Editor, based in Washington DC (who spent much of 2004 and 2005 reporting from Iraq):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment