SURPRISE: "There is one effective way, however, that the Iran deal can be rejected..."

BREITBART:

The Obama administration has sent the Iran nuclear deal to Congress for a 60-day review provided by the Corker bill. However, President Barack Obama has pre-empted Congress by going to the UN Security Council first, which has already voted to end international sanctions and accept the deal. Furthermore, even if Congress rejects the deal, it will struggle to muster a two-thirds majority to override the president’s veto.

There is one effective way, however, that the Iran deal can be rejected: states and local governments can refuse to comply with it.

That may come as a surprise. States and local governments do not play much of a role in foreign policy. However, they cannot be forced to implement an international treaty or agreement that is not self-executing–i.e. one whose implementation requires new congressional laws.

READ MORE

Where did all the yellowcake go?

The answer will really scare you.

Beautiful, undeniably scary time-lapse map of the 2053 nuclear explosions which have taken place between 1945 and 1998...

I was born in between the first two...so I always say that I came into this world with a bang.

Japanese artist Isao Hashimoto has created a beautiful, undeniably scary time-lapse map of the 2053 nuclear explosions which have taken place between 1945 and 1998, beginning with the Manhattan Project’s “Trinity” test near Los Alamos and concluding with Pakistan’s nuclear tests in May of 1998. This leaves out North Korea’s two alleged nuclear tests in this past decade (the legitimacy of both of which is not 100% clear).

Each nation gets a blip and a flashing dot on the map whenever they detonate a nuclear weapon, with a running tally kept on the top and bottom bars of the screen. Hashimoto, who began the project in 2003, says that he created it with the goal of showing”the fear and folly of nuclear weapons.” It starts really slow — if you want to see real action, skip ahead to 1962 or so — but the buildup becomes overwhelming.

Want to see real action? Skip ahead to 1962 or so — but the buildup becomes overwhelming.

A line in the sand

I am sick of the Jews in America who continue to defend this pathetic excuse for a President. At this point, I just feel like "f*ck 'em." I'm "exhausted of" trying to convince people not to willingly walk into another version of a gas chamber (even though, this time, everything'll be "green").

White House declines Netanyahu request to meet with Obama

No American president has ever allowed an international crisis to come so close to the brink

American Thinker: Here Comes Obama's 3 AM Phone Call

Nukes in the air?

Foreign Confidential ™: IS IRAN PREPARING TO NUKE ISRAEL?

The Wizard of O No!

Pie in the sky...lofty rhetoric...and a dime will get you ZERO (which is what some people actually call Obama. I say: three strikes and you're out as far as that damned Nobel Peace Prize goes...Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, and now Barack Obama--enough already.

Obama set expectations high last year in Prague when he declared it was time to end "Cold War thinking" and committed the United States to seeking a nuclear weapons-free world.

He acknowledged it was an achievement he was not likely to see in his lifetime, but his lofty oratory was enough to help him win the Nobel Peace Prize.

N.Korea crisis latest blow to Obama's nuclear agenda

Iran preparing a possible first strike on U.S. targets and Israel?

Find out here!

2010 FORECAST: The Islamist threat--from nuclear-arming Iran and Al Qaeda--will supplant the economy as the lead, front-page story in 2010. The Obama administration's appeasement policy has made war with Iran inevitable--on Tehran's terms...

Obama and Iran: It was a year of spectacularly squandered opportunity

2009: The Year of Living Fecklessly

Obama dumping Israel?

Well, this should finally (as it plays out) settle the question of whether or not Obama is REALLY a Christian or not: EXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardy

HAT TIP:HOT AIR

US Weighing Punishing Israel if it Attacks Iran

Having taken military action against Iran off the table, the Obama administration is considering ways of punishing Israel if it attacks Iran to end its nuclear arms program (and prevent a second Holocaust).

In other words, having failed to contain Iran, the United States is concentrating on restraining Israel.

EDITOR'S NOTE: About Obama's apologizing to the world and bowing to the Saudi King--the left loves it. The more the President apologizes for alleged American arrogance and other supposed sins, the more popular he is with the Democratic Party's left wing. The deeper he bows, the more they appreciate him. The left believes it is high time that America was brought to its knees, forced to submit to the Third World. Like the radical right, the left makes common cause with Islamism in order to cut America down to size and set Israel up for a final solution. Israel is especially despised for its success and power; its defeat is seen as paving the way for the disappearance of the Jews as a people. Like the failed Russian revolutionaries of the late 1800s, the pro-pogrom Norodniki, who sought to ally with Russia's notoriously anti-Semitic peasants, today's left believes that "Jewish blood will oil the wheels of revolution."

Most Jewish Norodniki left the movement because of its anti-Semitism. Will American Jews leave the Democratic Party when the Obama administration's betrayal of Israel becomes too obvious to ignore?

Read the whole thing!

HAT TIP: OBAMA WILL PUNISH ALLY ISRAEL IF SHE ATTEMPTS TO SURVE ATLAS SHRUGS

RELATED: Obama's Stance Worries Israelis (The Age) 4/18/2009