Tuesday, March 20, 2018

The untold story of the HIV retrovirus

My name is Clark Baker and I'm an investigator by profession (LAPD 1980-2000 and PI 1997-current). It's a long story, but I was hired in 2008 to investigate claims against UC Berkeley Prof. Peter Duesberg, who was admitted into the National Academy of Sciences after mapping the retrovirus genome during the 1970s. (HIV is a retrovirus) You can look up the allegations, but I distilled my inquiry into this one question: WHEN, WHERE, WHY, WHAT, and WHO proved that HIV 1) attacks cells and 2) causes AIDS? When I didn't get a straight answer from the NIH and CDC, I set out to compel answers.

By 2009, 38 states had laws that made it a crime to expose victims to HIV without informing them. Hundreds of Americans have been criminally charged and several are serving life sentences. As new defendants were charged, they provided me with a venue to compel infectious disease (ID) experts to testify under oath about the issues that the NIH and CDC refused to discuss.

I formed a team that included an MD, an attorney (w/5 years of post-doctoral human biology), and two pharmaceutical chemists - including the patent holder of the viral load test.

When I examined medical records, it became clear that none of the MDs had ever diagnosed their patients properly. Patients were typically asymptomatic and the docs relied entirely on HIV tests that admittedly (in the package insert) do not detect HIV. During cross-examinations, top ID experts admitted in trial and depositions that they knew little about the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV. 

After we prevailed in several dozen cases, we began to use the electron microscopy (EM) lab at U. Mass to see if HIV could be seen in blood samples. Despite high "viral load" counts, we found NOTHING with EM. When Walter Reed Army Hospital (which partners with Big Pharma) declared that HIV cannot be seen in human blood, I drew 20ml from my arm and spiked it with cultured HIV from the NIH. According to the head of the EM lab, he'd photographed HIV hundreds of times since the 1980s but this was the first time he actually observed HIV in human blood. Walter Reed got pissed and accused me of using EM for "diagnostic purposes". I countered that, as a licensed private investigator, I am permitted to use any optical devices of my choosing to establish whether evidence (including retroviruses) is present or not.

With that, Walter Reed falsely claimed that I was using a non-accredited lab (I'm allowed to) to "diagnose" our criminal defendants. The prosecutor used their affidavit to threaten U. Mass with a criminal investigation and the potential loss of the $150 million that U. Mass receives annually in NIH funding. With that, prosecutors successfully threatened and silenced our EM expert. We won that case anyway.

We eventually won a landmark case US v. Gutierrez and changed the definition of assault with a deadly weapon with regard to HIV, which began the end of all criminal HIV cases across the US.

After this nine-year investigation, my partner and I tried to get EM labs to assist us with additional virology investigations. EVERY university lab across the US refused. We eventually set up labs at incubators in California and NC, but before we could start our operations, the landlords evicted us with no explanation.

It is now my belief that much of virology is a complete scam - a pseudoscientific pretext to support the billion vaccine and AIDS, HPV and HCV industries. With the use of EM, I expect to prove that scary pathogens like Ebola and HPV are non-pathogenic pretexts that cannot stand up to Koch's postulates - which is why documents that prove that bugs like HPV and HCV are harmless. All of this may seem academic, except when you consider that innocent men and women continue to serve time for a disease they never had, and millions of people around the world are being unnecessarily vaccinated and treated for diseases they never had.

Based on our work, I commissioned my former partner, Nancy Banks MD to write a book about our discoveries related to cancer and immune-deficiency diseases. 


So you must understand that your industry has been lying for decades about much of what you think you know. Virology and infectious disease is largely an ideology, and the practitioners are too busy and invested in the ideology to share the intellectual curiosity that influenced my investigation and success, which conflicts directly with the enforced "scientific consensus" that your industry relies on.

“(T)he work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus… There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
- Michael Crichton MD

I was tasked to investigate the controversy between Duesberg and the medical establishment. Eight years later (2015) I had confirmed all of Duesberg's skepticism and refuted virtually ALL of the establishment's position.

Duesberg's book is probably still the best indictment of HIV. I simply added to his position by forcing government experts to testify and winning 50+ criminal, civil, and military cases proving it. 


--Clark Baker

No comments: