A "PS" to Mom for 2010

Update: Health Care Legislation

House and Senate Negotiations:

Senate Passes Reform Bill: At 7:05 a.m. on Christmas Eve, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., along with 59 other Senate members voted to pass reform legislation that would expand health coverage to approximately 31 million people at a cost of $871 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The bill passed on party-lines (60-39), without a single Republican vote. Republicans believe the bill would impose many regulatory and financial burdens on taxpayers and businesses, and would swell government debt.

Reconciliation Poses Difficult Road Ahead: Before lawmakers can present a final health care reform bill to President Obama, the approved Senate bill needs to be merged with the House version passed in Nov. 2009, which extends coverage to 36 million Americans for a cost of about $1 trillion. However, the bills have some major differences that will need to be addressed as lawmakers shape the final package, including:

* Insurance market reform and Exchanges -- Both bills would bar insurers from denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions and from dropping coverage for those who get sick. They both would also create insurance exchanges that would allow small businesses and individuals to shop for insurance. However, the Senate bill would create state-based exchanges, whereas the House bill would create a national exchange with an option for states to run their own programs if they meet certain requirements.

* The government-run plan -- A government-run plan was a central component to the House bill. The Senate bill would instead direct the U.S. Office of Personnel Management to contract with private insurance companies to offer policies on the exchanges. Despite much commotion over the need to include the public option, House leaders conceded Tuesday that they may be willing to agree to a bill without a public option if other parts of the bill fulfill the same goals, and they hope to expand available subsidies.

* Reform financing -- With a price tag of approximately $1 trillion, Members of the House would pay for the reform effort through a 5.4 percent surtax on individuals making more than $500,000 a year and couples making more than $1 million and by imposing a 2.5 percent excise tax on medical devices. Members of the Senate, on the other hand, plan to pay for their $871 billion plan through a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans; an increase in payroll taxes for Medicare on individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples making more than $250,000 per year; fees on insurers, medical device manufacturers and drug companies; and, a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning. On Wednesday, President Obama expressed his preference for the insurance tax contained in the Senate bill, however this provision is strongly opposed by labor unions.

* Coverage Mandates -- Both bills require that individuals obtain health insurance and would impose a penalty on those who do not. The House bill also includes an employer mandate for companies with payrolls above $750,000. The Senate bill, however, does not include this mandate and would require companies with more than 50 employees to pay a fine if employees obtain federally subsidized coverage on the insurance exchange.

* Medicaid expansion -- Both bills expand Medicaid. The Senate bill makes Medicaid available to those with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level, whereas the House allows for coverage for those with incomes up to 150 percent of the poverty level.

* Abortion -- Both bills bar the use of federal funds for abortions; however, the House bill includes stricter language requiring anyone seeking abortion coverage to buy separate insurance riders. The Senate bill would allow states to choose whether or not to include plans with abortion coverage in the insurance exchange and would require those with abortion coverage to write a separate check for this insurance.

President Obama Pushes Swift Action: In a meeting at the White House Tuesday, President Obama encouraged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., as well as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who participated via phone, to bypass the traditional conference committee used to negotiate reconciliation in the interest of time. The move creates a three-way negotiating construct involving top Democrats in the House and Senate and the White House and will exclude Republican lawmakers from the debate and reduce their ability to delay the voting.

Further, President Obama indicated that he would be taking a hands-on approach to the final stages of the negotiations. The President held another meeting with leading Democrats on Wednesday to help iron out the differences between the House and Senate bills. Democrats also held a meeting and conference call on Thursday to discuss how reconciliation will proceed and some of the priorities for the final bill.

HEALTH ACTION NETWORK

From Awful to Worse: Harry Reid's medical malpractice

The Obama administration and congressional Democrats long ago gave up any pretense of working to rationally reform American health care. The exercise now underway in the Senate is a mad dash to get to 60 votes, and nothing more. That's why some Democratic senators who had no idea exactly what is in the "breakthrough deal" announced by majority leader Harry Reid last week immediately hailed it as a milestone. They're for anything that creates a sense of "momentum" and "inevitability."

But the substance does matter. If Congress passes something in the end, ordinary Americans know they will have to live with it. And from those voters' points of view the latest effort to strike a compromise among Senate Democrats would, based on press reports of what it involves, take the horrendous bill offered by Reid earlier this month and make it even worse.

In most ways, the new proposal is as terrible as Reid's original bill. It would spend hundreds of billions on a new entitlement even as our debt is mounting, inflict massive tax increases on a troubled economy, impose costly mandates on employers at a time of high unemployment, squeeze money out of Medicare without fixing the program, insert the government in countless new ways between doctors and patients, and cause millions of middle-class families to lose the employer-based insurance they have today and pay even higher premiums.

But in one crucial respect, the new proposal is far worse than the last one.

Read more

U.S. healthcare spending would rise by about $234 billion over the next decade under the Senate Democrats' overhaul bill and some of the proposed savings might never be achieved, a U.S. agency said in a report released on Friday

It was the latest in a series of reports issued by the agency that oversees Medicare that cast doubt on some of the savings claims made by Democrats about one of President Barack Obama's top domestic priorities.