NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ARIZONA RECOUNT [2020 ELECTION] - UPDATE

UPDATE: Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich has begun his investigation into the Arizona audit report, sending letters to both Maricopa County and the Arizona Senate!

Arizona State Senator Kelly Townsend has filed another 1487 request to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office seeking answers to the questions raised by the Arizona audit.

The questions raised over the last six months about the 2020 election remain unanswered and after the most recent audit report, Townsend wants the answers.

Because this is a 1487 request, it is required by law for these questions to be investigated and answered within 30 days. I did ask a multitude of questions, however I believe we already have the answers that were obtained by the audit committee. It should not take the full 30 days, but it if does and takes longer, I will reissue a new 1487 to reset the clock for the more time-consuming issues. I am not satisfied with unanswered questions and unreported issues. I want to know what laws were broken, who broke them, and who will be held accountable.

Please see below a full list of what was asked of the Attorney General today. I look forward to his response.

Appendix A

Ballot Paper Issues –

A.R.S. § 16-468(2) and A.R.S. § 16-502(A).

1. It has come to my attention that there may have been multiple types of paper used that were not authorized. Please provide evidence of all of the various papers that were purchased and used from a company that provides such legally authorized paper.

2. Who were the suppliers of paper for both Runbeck printed ballots and the day of election ballots of an kind?

3. Did Dominion supply any paper for ballots? If so, please provide purchase orders to show where this paper came from and if it met the standards of our statutes.

4. At any time did any precinct need to buy paper that ran out on Election Day? If so, which precincts ran out of paper and where did Maricopa County procure additional paper? Who was responsible for supplying that paper and do we have explanation as to why it ran out?

5. Maricopa County said they used VoteSecure paper by Roland. Please provide purchase orders and which VoteSecure paper that were used and where.

6. If these processes regarding the use of ballot secure paper were not followed correctly and by state law, who would be held accountable for these violations?

7. As a member of the Arizona Senate, I received information regarding irregular ballots that were inserted among the other ballots. These ballots were being logged and tracked in an official log book. Please report back how many of these anomalies were found, and what do the logs say about them. Additionally, what were the vote tallies on those ballots?

8. In the preliminary report, we received information that the ballots had bled through and caused overvotes, despite the Legislature being told that these issues would not happen due to ballot secure paper that was impermeable from Sharpie ink. Please report back any information obtained regarding the county having ballots that had bleed through and what effect that had on adjudication rate.

9. If different types of ballot paper were used for different precincts and voters, and occasionally non ballot secure paper was used creating bleed through and overvote / artifact, leading to adjudication rates being high among some voters and not others, would that constitute an unequal application of policy / election security and a 14th Amendment violation of the voter’s civil rights?

Signature / Envelope Issues

A.R.S.16-550(A)

1. Did Maricopa County fulfill statutory requirements for signature verification on all counted ballots included in the official canvass?

2. Signature issues were reported in the recent Audit conducted by the Senate. They included the following problems:

1. Completely blank signature

2. Nearly blank signature

3. Scribbled signature that did not match

If there are ballots included in the official canvass that were counted without complying with A.R.S.16-550(A), how many were included that did not meet this legal threshold?

3. Who would be responsible for allowing illegal ballots to be counted that did not meet the legal threshold of A.R.S.16-550(A)?

4. Ballot envelopes were reported in the audit with a “Verified and approved” stamp appearing BEHIND the envelope graphic of a triangle. How did these images of the verified and approved stamp print from behind the triangle image on the envelope?

5. How many of these envelopes with irregular printing of the “verified and approved” or other stamp behind the original graphics of the envelope have been uncovered, and were the ballots contained therein counted in the official canvass?

Duplicate ballots

1. In the Dr. Shiva presentation of the Arizona audit, it was reported that there were 17,322 duplicate voter envelopes submitted in the final canvass of the election.

a. What is the party affiliation of those voters? Can we contact them and ask them who they

voted for?

b. Did they knowingly submit too many ballots and will they be held accountable if so?

c. Why were these voters allowed to keep their duplicate ballots / votes as part of the official c

canvass? Who was responsible for removing the duplicates and will they be held accountable?

2.There were 255,326 votes mismatched between the VM55 and EV33 files. Which file matched the hand count?

3. If it is 255k votes over the hand count, does that match with any of the wrong paper usage?

4. If the discrepancy cannot be accounted for, what is the proper and legal course of action?

Chain of Custody 

ARS 16-621.E

1. Please provide evidence that all chain of custody documents required by law were adhered to and preserved for inspection and audit.

2. If these documents do not exist or are not available, who is responsible legally for that failure?

Data Security (Usernames & Passwords) –

2019 Elections Procedures Manual, p. 209 (Section 2, Subsection a., number 2)

1. The elections procedures manual requires that “The application shall provide distinct security roles, with separate usernames and secure passwords for each user or station.” Please provide evidence that this requirement was followed in Maricopa County as it relates to all login and password requirements, systemwide.

2. Who is responsible for ensuring this is maintained, and what consequence/recourse does the state have for such a breach of protocol?

3. Is the master/administrative password that has not been released by Maricopa County or Dominion in compliance with State law?

4. Do anonymous logins of any kind violate the 2019 Elections Procedure Manual?

Internet History

1. Were the EMS Server, EMS Client workstations, REWEB 1601 & 1602 connected to the internet?

2. If they were connected to the internet, is this a violation of A.R.S.16 and the Elections procedure manual?

3. Do the Dominion voting tabulation machines have the capability to connect to the internet?

4. Was at any time the voting machines connected to the internet?

5. Who would be responsible and held accountable if any laws in this section were broken?

Calibration –

52 U.S.C. § 21081(b)(1)

1. In the initial audit report we received information that the machines in some locations were not calibrated and that the ballots were offset significantly. Please report back as to what information is available regarding the miscalibration of the machines that caused the offset reported to us regarding the work by Jovan Pulitzer.

2. Did the calibration problems come from specific voting machines or were they random?

3. If they were specific machines, what precincts had the machines that were grossly mis-calibrated?

4. Have those machines been identified and sent for repair, or will they be replaced by the newly purchased machines?

5.Who is responsible for the calibration of the machines?

6. In order to identify the machines that are grossly mis-calibrated, which ballot on Demand systems or printers were used to print ballots either for early votes, day of, and duplicate votes? Where were they located, and model/registration number and service number of the actual machine.

7. Is there a GPS tracker on each machine, and if so, what is the data on each of those machines?

Adjudicated Ballots

A.R.S.16-621(B)3(a)

1. In the audit, we learned that some of the adjudicated ballots were missing serial numbers, had wrong serial numbers, or had obstructed serial numbers. How many ballots did not meet the requirements of A.R.S.16-621(B)3(a)?

2. Who is responsible for ensuring that this law is abided by, and what is the recourse for voters when this law is not adhered to, yet the illegal ballots were counted in the official canvass?

Deleted files –

52 USC 20701

1. Please investigate all reports of deleted files at Maricopa County for the 2020 General election. The County has explained that these deleted files were regarding a different election and were being archived. Please verify the validity of this information.

2. Please provide proof these files exist in archive.

3. Did the auditors or subcontractors find that there was a program created to specifically remove and purge files of the 2020 election? If so, who implemented it?

4. If we are unable to show that these files were archived and indeed deleted and not related to a different election, does that show intent to tamper with evidence?

5. Is it normal procedure to create a special program to archive files at the Maricopa County Recorder;s office?

6. Please provide a detailed report of this special program used to “archive” or delete files on 02/01/2021 at the Maricopa County Recorder’s office referenced in the audit report, a copy of the program and an explanation of what it is designed to do.

7. Who designed the program?

Unsealed Boxes

A.R.S.16-564(C)

1. Why were the ballot boxes delivered to the Senate auditors unsealed?

2. Who removed the seals off and when? Please provide all documentation available that is required to be kept upon opening boxes.

3. Who is responsible for compliance with this state law, and is it possible to discover who opened the boxes based on video recording?

Ineligible Voters Allowed to Cast Votes –

A.R.S. 16 Articles 1, 1.1, and 2, Elections Procedures Manual

1. Were ineligible voters allowed to cast votes in the Maricopa County 2020 General election?

2. If there are votes included in the official canvass of the 2020 General election, it is to be concluded that the election performed was an illegal election and should be nullified and repeated? Please comment on how to proceed, based on any findings of yours that establish illegal completion of a secure election in Maricopa County.

Redacted Maricopa County Audit Details –

NOTE: This concerns information obtained regarding the actions of the Maricopa County Recorder’s office discovered through the Senate Auditors. If not 100% of the information obtained was released, the public will not receive answers to what information was obtained via an audit that was paid for, in part, by public funds. Therefore, the subsequent questions asked are salient and appropriate for this 1487 complaint to ensure that all the forementioned laws were abided by.

1. Does there exist information about Maricopa County that was discovered via audit this year that has been omitted and not reported to the public and if so, what was that information?

2. Who requested that information to be omitted and why?

3. Were there any threats of cancelation of contract and removal of indemnity should any discovered information be reported to the public?

4. Was there an agreement to settle the debt of the audit expenses with a provision that certain information was omitted? If so who made that requirement?

We need Attorney General Brnovich to follow through again by opening a criminal investigation into potential fraud and upholding the rule of law.

Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich if you would like to see these investigations happen.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/breaking-az-state-senator-kelly-townsend-files-s-b-1487-maricopa-county-unanswered-questions-july-hearing-audit-report/ 

SPYGATE: INSIDE STORY

This article builds on dozens of congressional testimonies, court documents, and other research to provide an inside look at the actions of Obama administration officials in the scandal that’s become known as Spygate.

To understand this abuse of power, it helps to go back to July 2011, when DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz was appointed.

From the very start, Horowitz found his duties throttled by Attorney General Eric Holder, who placed limitations on the inspector general’s right to have unobstructed access to information. Holder used this tactic to delay Horowitz’s investigation of the failed sting operation known as Operation Fast and Furious. . .

https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-inside-story-behind-the-alleged-plot-to-take-down-trump_2833074.html

Mueller's Weaponized Justice System Should Scare All Americans

Cohen, Flynn, and Manafort were targeted for political reasons, and that should scare the hell out of every American in our country, no matter what color you are, how you vote, or how wealthy you are, and something must be done to stop it.

It’s time for the U.S. Attorney General to stop this madness, and create internal policies to prevent it from happening in the future, and if for some reason, he cannot get the job done, that the president must find someone that can.

As New York City’s 40th Police Commissioner, Bernard Kerik was in command of the NYPD on September 11, 2001, and responsible for the city’s response, rescue, recovery, and the investigative efforts of the most substantial terror attack in world history. His 35-year career has been recognized in more than 100 awards for meritorious and heroic service, including a presidential commendation for heroism by President Ronald Reagan, two Distinguished Service Awards from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, The Ellis Island Medal of Honor, and an appointment as Honorary Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Read Newsmax: Mueller's Weaponized Justice System Should Scare All Americans | Newsmax.com

WHY was lawsuit against Trump's temporary hold on Immigration filed in Washington State? (Hint: George Soros)

FILED it would be appealed to Ninth Circuit Court of Clowns 

Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson has tried to stop President Trump’s executive order, along with other Democrats filing lawsuits for people affected by the ban.

Attorney General Robert Ferguson has received money from George Soros. The Aspen Institute, an organization funded by Soros, counts Ferguson among its members. The attorney also received a fellowship from the organization.

The Aspen Institute has some questionable views — for one, they see America as a nation that is rife with “structural racism.”

They also try to warn the American people that “the circumpolar Arctic region is experiencing significant ecological change due to global climate change,” which they claim is caused by the industrial activity of humans on Earth.

This organization receives money from Soros’s Open Society Institute, which means it is as corrupt as the billionaire himself. All of the lawsuits seem to be connected to Soros in some way, and each use the argument of religious liberty to oppose the ban.

But Trump’s ban does not have anything to do with the religious aspects of the migrants, which the attorneys would know if they read the document. They are ignoring the fact that this ban is in place to keep America safe.

Besides, the liberals don’t care about religious freedom, not really. They will persecute Christians all day long but defend Muslims even when religious persecution against them is not a factor.

Ferguson’s argument for standing against Trump’s order convinced the judge to temporarily block the ban of immigrants from seven countries because it was “separating Washington families, harming thousands of Washington residents, damaging Washington’s economy, hurting Washington-based companies, and undermining Washington’s sovereign interest in remaining a welcoming place for immigrant and refugees,” via LifeZette.

I wonder if Soros told Ferguson to say all these things or if he managed to come up with them by himself. Soros has made it perfectly clear he is an enemy of America and wants nothing more than to see it fall.

Soros is the face of the movement against Donald Trump, a man the American people elected to lead this country. Soros tries to influence anyone he can to protest and riot against Trump, using his money and power to change the tone of America.

I believe he will buy anyone to get his way, from people on the street to our attorneys to the mainstream media. He is brainwashing the people to believe one thing: that Trump is the enemy. He is the puppet master, and his influence over this country needs to end.

===================================

www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org	Date: 2/11/2017 1:24:58 PM
ASPEN INSTITUTE (AI)
One Dupont Circle, NW - Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036	Phone :202.736.5800 Fax :202.467.0790 URL :http://www.aspeninstitute.org/
·  Views the United States as a nation rife with deep-seated “structural racism” ·  Warns that “the circumpolar Arctic region is experiencing significant ecological change due to global climate change” caused by human industrial activity ·  Receives financial support from George Soros's Open Society Institute Founded in 1950 by Chicago industrialist Walter Paepcke, the Aspen Institute (AI) seeks “to foster values-based leadership, encourag[e] individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and ... provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussing and acting on critical issues.” The organization pursues these objectives by way of seminars, public conferences, issue-analysis forums, and young-leader fellowships. Encompassing a broad range of issues, many of AI's policy-work programs are rooted in the belief that the United States is a nation whose history amounts largely to an unbroken narrative of injustice; that government intervention frequently represents the best remedy for social and economic problems; and that America's deep-seated “structural racism,” while “harder to see than its previous incarnations,” is just as likely as its forerunner to “perpetuate racial group inequity.” This latter perspective is consistent with the views of a prominent AI board of trustees member, Henry Louis Gates. Among AI's major programs are the following: The Ascend Program for Family Economic Security contends that nearly 40 percent of all U.S. children “live in low-income families” headed disproportionately by unmarried black women, and seeks “to increase the economic security and educational achievement of [these] vulnerable families.” Toward that end, Ascend has secured philanthropic commitments from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and several private family philanthropists. The Global Health and Development Program supports “innovative strategies for global health and poverty alleviation.” One such strategy is the creation of “government-led” and “community-based” health financing mechanisms that “increase access to equitable and quality health care.” AI's Center for Native American Youth is dedicated to “improving the health, safety and overall well-being” of this allegedly maltreated demographic by means of policy development and advocacy, with special emphasis on suicide prevention. The Commission on No Child Left Behind seeks to “build support for improvements in federal education policy to spur academic achievement and close persistent achievement gaps,” particularly between white students and their black peers. The Economic Opportunities Program focuses on helping low-income individuals and communities “gain access to mainstream financial services,” and providing skills-training to prepare them to eventually succeed in the workplace. The Energy and Environment Program warns that “the circumpolar Arctic region is experiencing significant ecological change due to global climate change” caused by human industrial activity. This program partners with several organizations, including the Natural Resources Defense Center, and the World Wildlife Fund. Among the guest speakers who have appeared at some of AI's annual Environment Forums are Bill McKibben, Carl Pope, Van Jones, and Cathy Zoi. The Middle East Programs (MEP) seek to foster "a peaceful resolution of all Middle East conflicts" and the development of "partnerships between the United States and the Muslim world." One MEP initiative -- rooted in the premise that Palestinian terrorism is caused by poverty -- is the U.S.-Palestinian Partnership (USPP). This program aims to discourage Arab militancy against the West and Israel by “stimulating the Palestinian economy through sustainable economic development, job creation and training, and attracting foreign investment in the West Bank.” Key leaders of USPP include Ziad Asali and former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. The Agent Orange in Vietnam Program, supported by the Ford Foundation, endeavors “to raise awareness of the long-term effects” of the toxic defoliant used by U.S. troops in Southeast Asia during the 1960s. The Council of Women World Leaders is a network of current and former female presidents and prime ministers who strive to “mobilize the highest-level women leaders globally for collective action on issues of critical importance to women,” and to increase “the number, effectiveness, and visibility of women who lead at the highest levels in their countries.” The Global Initiative on Culture and Society “promotes the increasing recognition of the power of artistic and cultural expression to enrich human lives by provoking reflection, stimulating creative solutions to societal challenges, sustaining livelihoods, and illuminating the conditions necessary for social change.” The Congressional Program, professing political neutrality, “provides lawmakers with a stronger grasp of critical public policy issues” via high-level conferences that bring legislators together with academics and experts to explore various policy alternatives in such areas as energy security, U.S. relations with the Muslim world, nuclear proliferation, and education reform. In 2011, this program was bankrolled by the Asia Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Henry Luce Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. AI has numerous noteworthy connections to the billionaire philanthropist George Soros. For example, in August 2004 Soros and other wealthy Democrats gathered at the Institute to brainstorm ways in which they could use their fortunes to engineer the defeat of George W. Bush in the upcoming presidential election. That same year, Soros spoke at an AI seminar (which also featured an appearance by Al Gore) titled “America’s Role in the Fight Against Global Poverty.” In 2006 Aspen sponsored a Soros talk where the billionaire promoted his book The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror. Jim Spiegelman, Aspen’s director of communications, formerly worked as a “special assistant” to Soros. And Arjun Gupta, who serves on Aspen’s board of overseers, is a vice president with the Chatterjee Group which advises Soros and the Soros Fund Management Group. Soros's Open Society Institute (OSI) has awarded the Aspen Institute numerous large grants over the years, including $50,000 in 2004, another $50,000 in 2005, $195,000 in 2008, and $125,000 in 2009. The latter grant was earmarked for “international human rights and international humanitarian law and their application in American jurisprudence.” In 2011, OSI funded AI's publication of a report blaming the overrepresentation of blacks and Latinos in U.S. prison populations on “the failure of so many of our society’s institutions.”  Soon after the inauguration of President Barack Obama in 2009, AI developed a close working relationship with the U.S. State Department. Said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that year: “We can’t imagine a better partner than the Aspen Institute.” For additional information on the Aspen Institute, click here.

The real data on illegal immigrants and U.S. jobs

If you like charts and graphs, there are some good ones here:

Immigrant Gains and Native Losses In the Job Market, 2000 to 2013

BTW, Loretta Lynch is just saying that, although she is up for the top law enforcement job in America, she doesn't intend to enforce the laws. That would only entitle you to a position in Obama's world, but not the United States of America as founded.

It isn’t looking bright for Attorney General Eric Holder, even if Obama can manage a victory in November

GOP Report Blames Five ATF Officials for Fast and Furious

The next Sarah Palin?

Will Pam Bondi Be The Next Vice President Of The United States?

8 Reasons Why It Might Actually Happen

Eric Holder is now the first U.S. attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress in the history of the United States

Legal Insurrection:

The House voted on two separate items:

• 1: Whether to hold Holder in contempt and then refer him to the DOJ
• 2: Authorization to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to sue the DOJ in federal court [TK]

READ MORE

“The White House decision to invoke executive privilege implies that White House officials were either involved in the ‘Fast and Furious’ operation or the cover-up that followed."

Is 'Fast & Furious' Watergate II?

Shades of Nixon...it's ALWAYS the coverup that gets 'em!

READ MORE

Another scandal in the Justice Department

WND: Holder faces corruption scandal, too...

I've lost track of the scandals attached to the Obama administration such as Solyndra, Fast & Furious, the New Black Panther's voter intimidation and many more...and now

Holder, who is under pressure by Congress members investigating the Fast & Furious gun-running scandal to resign, allegedly aims to protect a high-profile international bank client of his former law firm and shield Democratic Party operatives implicated in the scheme...

If this were a Republican administration the press would have been all over these--no one would have gotten out alive!

As it is, Breitbart reports NBC Nightly News Devotes Mere Seconds to First-Ever Mention of Fast and Furious

Fast & Furious: "You need to know that Eric Holder, now nominated to become Attorney General, played a key role in covering up the torture-murder of my brother, Kenneth Michael Trentadue"

"This is not just my shocking opinion. It is also the opinion of many Americans. More importantly, it is supported by the Justice Department’s records and actions that came to light as a result of my family’s efforts to obtain a certain measure of justice for my brother’s murder."

While Eric Holder is getting a lot of media attention these days related to his involvement in the controversial ATF gun-running program known as Operation Fast and Furious, Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue said he “was way ahead of the curve” when it came to pointing out the attorney general’s many flaws — and skeletons. He points to a scathing 4-page letter (PDF) he sent to Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Dec. 19, 2008, as proof.

‘Fast & Furious’ Not Eric Holder’s First Controversy Involving the Murder of an American Citizen

How long are the American people going to tolerate the willful defiance of U.S. laws by our current administration and government officials?

The president of the union that represents officers of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chris Crane, testified before members of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration that ICE officers have been ordered not arrest any illegals that have been previously arrested, deported and then re-enter the US illegally again, even though that constitutes a federal felony. Furthermore, they have been instructed to not arrest any illegal that is a fugitive from court ordered deportation if they have no other prior criminal convictions.

What is the difference between this and a police officer being told not to arrest someone for committing a felony if they had no prior conviction? Or what about a police officer who was told to ignore a judge’s order to detain someone just because they had no priors? If this was the case, anyone with a clean record could commit any crime they wanted and not be arrested for it because they had a clean record to begin with. It wouldn’t take long for the crime rates to shoot through the ceiling.

Additionally, since when does any person, especially a government official, have any right to decide for themselves what laws they are going to enforce and what ones they won’t?

Immigration Agents Ordered to Defy Court Orders

California Attorney General Jerry Brown denied the San Francisco sheriff's petition to opt out of a new federal program under which the fingerprints of all those arrested for any crime would be shared with federal immigration authorities

It's amazing what happens to a person when they are running for office!

The San Francisco Bay Guardian explains:

The Board of Supervisors is urging San Francisco officials not to participate in Secure Communities, a controversial federal-local fingerprinting collaboration set to be activated June 1. But opting out of a program that threatens to make debates over "sanctuary city" protections of immigrants irrelevant may not be easy.

Insecure Sanctuary

According to a Heritage Foundation Memo on Homeland Security on 1/6/10:

Prior to the Secure Communities program, criminal aliens were all too often returned to the streets in a practice of “catch and release” because local law enforcement did not have the resources to detain or investigate them. Now, ICE is able to commit to a response time of less than four hours to retrieve criminal aliens from state and local jails.

While the Secure Communities program is a great example of how immigration enforcement can be used effectively to help state and local law enforcement decrease illegal immigration and maintain public safety, the Obama Administration has rolled back or attempted to roll back several key immigration enforcement efforts, including the following...287(g)...Social Security No-Match...Real ID...

Secure Communities: A Model for Obama’s 2010 Immigration Enforcement Strategy

But, according to the Bay City News on 5/25/10, gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown has destroyed San Francisco's chances to opt-out: Jerry Brown Turns Down SF's Attempt To Duck Automatic Sharing Of Arrestee Fingerprints

"Because I think this program serves both public safety and the interest of justice, I am declining your request," Brown wrote in his letter today to Hennessey.

"Using fingerprints is faster, race neutral and results in accurate information and identification," Brown said.

"In these matters, statewide uniformity makes sense," Brown wrote. "This is not simply a local issue. Many of the people booked in local jails end up in state prison or go on to commit crimes in other counties or states."

Oh well.

Gosh, wonder what Obama thinks!

Jerry should watch out or Obama might not invite him to any of his big parties at the White House...

Oklahoma Attorney General Nominee Vows to Sue U.S. Over Illegal Immigration

Former state Sen. Scott Pruitt -- a candidate for Oklahoma attorney general -- plans to announce on Thursday that, if elected, he will sue the federal government for all expenses his state incurs as a result of illegal immigration, Fox News has learned.

Read more

Who is lying???

And why??? As the attorney general claims it has “no government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made by Dr. Fukino in regard to vital records which pertain to Barack Hussein Obama II,” then either the attorney general is lying and breaking the law, or Dr. Fukino and Janice Okubo are.

AGs filing lawsuits around the country must see some prospects for victory in court action

In an exclusive interview with Hot Air, Van Hollen explains how he plans to proceed once authorized to act, whether that happens now or after the next election in November:...The AGs filing lawsuits around the country must see some prospects for victory in court action; Van Hollen explains why they believe it. The key: Van Hollen thinks that the courts may be looking for a case that will allow them to curtail Congress’ increasingly expansive treatment of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Be sure to watch the entire interview.

Exclusive: Interview with Wisconsin AG on ObamaCare lawsuit

ARIZONA: Suing the Federal Government to overturn individual mandate to purchase insurance

The Governor of Arizona will call a special session of the Arizona State Legislature to pass a bill allowing the Governor to sue to overturn the mandate to purchase health insurance. The Governor was unable to convince Che' Goddard (AZ Attorney General Terry Goddard) to file the suit on behalf of the State of Arizona. After conferring with attorneys and counting votes, Governor Brewer will issue the Call to Special Session. This should be a quick special session, but your calls to the less-conservative Republicans couldn't hurt.

Find contact information at www.azleg.gov

The recording of Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli puts him on a growing list of elected leaders, members of Congress and state officials who have addressed concerns over Obama's eligibility to occupy the White House...

A newly unearthed recording reveals a state attorney general explaining how the president's eligibility could be tested in the courts by a lawyer defending a client against an accusation brought under legislation signed by Obama.

The recording of Virginia Attorney General puts him on a growing list of elected leaders, members of Congress and state officials who have addressed concerns over Obama's eligibility to occupy the White House.

Read more

ARCHIVE

OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth

[title corrected by author]

DOCUMENT CONFIRMS INVESTIGATORS’ SUSPICIONS, EXPOSES DOH AS LYING

...and more:

HI Attorney General’s office refuses to corroborate Obama’s HI Birth

HAT TIP: CitizenWells

Obots must be patroling John Charlton's post since his site is suddenly unavailable...so here's an alternate link for the first story...

Breaking: Rahm Emanuel investigation

Jane Hamsher of the liberal group blog Firedoglake.com and Grover Norquist (Americans for Tax Reform) have issued a joint letter demanding the resignation of Rahm Emanuel, and an investigation into Emanuel's activities at Freddie Mac before the statute of limitations runs out...