Friday, September 16, 2016

Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs


My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs

Posted on | September 16, 2016 | 

Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.

All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.
Here is the response that I gave.

Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.

See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs

At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of  cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.

My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times   all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.

I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.

I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.

1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.

Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number?
I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.

2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?

3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?

4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia.
5.  Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate

6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording  eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?

7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.

8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? 
When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.

For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later.
By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
(named by the media, the Birther Queen)

No comments: