Showing posts with label Orly Taitz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orly Taitz. Show all posts
Friday, September 16, 2016
Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs
ORLY TAITZ:
Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.
All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.
Here is the response that I gave.
Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.
See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs
At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.
My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.
I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.
I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.
1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.
Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number? I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.
2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?
3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?
4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia. 5. Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate
6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?
7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.
8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.
For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later. By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ (named by the media, the Birther Queen) 09.16.16
Posted on | September 16, 2016 |
Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs
ORLY TAITZ:
Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.
All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today. Here is the response that I gave.
Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.
See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs
At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.
My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.
I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.
I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.
1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.
Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number? I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.
2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?
3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?
4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia. 5. Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate
6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?
7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.
8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.
For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later. By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ (named by the media, the Birther Queen) 09.16.16
My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs
Posted on | September 16, 2016 |
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Why Mark Thiessen and other FOX pundits are wrong on Syria
By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQWhy Mark Thiessen and other FOX pundits are wrong on Syria
Yesterday a new detente ensured between GOP front-runner, Donald Trump, and FOX. Or did it?Clearly, detente is better than war for both parties, however lopsided coverage of Trump continues, particularly on Kelly File and one of the main Trump hounds is Mark Thiessen.On Monday, October 29th, Trump has announced his economic and tax policy plan. This plan provides financial relief for many, including lower tax burden for most of the poor and the middle class, reduction of the maximum tax to 25% from 39%, abolishment of the death tax, which bankrupted families of farmers and small business owners, and serious proposals to repatriate trillions of dollars which corporations keep abroad. The plan also will cut federal spending by estimated 20% and most importantly it would rescind and renegotiate disastrous free trade agreements which are bankrupting this nation and robbed Americans of some 30 million jobs.Megyn Kelly chose not to mention any of these most important points. She chose to zero in on Trump’s proposal to allow Russia help Syrian government in destroying ISIS.Trump’s position is that US, Europe and the rest of the world will benefit from US allowing Russia spend it’s money and use it’s soldiers in fighting ISIS in Syria. Kelly brought the main Trump hound dog, Mark Thiessen to attack Trump.Thiessen stated that this is a terrible idea because Russia will never get out from Syria. Second of all, he stated that Syria is connected to Iran and allowing Russia to intervene will aid Iran. He claimed that Trump simply does not understand foreign policy.
First, I hope that Trump will be a bigger person and will appear on Kelly file and respond to constant attacks by Thiessen or at the very minimum, if Trump does not want to be interviewed by Megyn Kelly, he can at least keep the door open during this time slot by giving interviews to Kelly’s replacements, such as Martha McCallum or Shannon Bream, who host Kelly file in her absence. At the moment, explaining the policies to American viewers is the most important thing and supersedes the tag of war with FOX. Winning the nomination and presidency is more important than winning the war with FOX.Now, let’s go to the substance of the discussion.1. Thiessen is wrong in his assumption that if Russia goes in, it will never leave Syria. We’ve seen multiple examples of Russia leaving specific countries. After all, the Soviet Union consisted of 15 countries and Russia left 14. Additionally Russia left Afghanistan.2. Occupation of Syria by Russia will not be easy. Muslim population in the Middle East dislikes westerners, dislikes Christians. For them Americans, British or Russians are all invaders and Chrusaders, so for Russia, war in Syria will not be a walk in the park.3. Russia’s bet in Syria, Bashir al Assad is a member of the Alawite minority and it is always tough to keep a regime of a minority.4. Assad’s father, Hafez al Assad ruled Syria for some 40 years and people in Syria are fed up with Assad family.5. Syria might end up being a second Afghanistan for Russia. Russia believed that Afghanistan will be a Blitzkrieg, a fast and decisive action. At the end, it was a protractive war, which cost Russia trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, undermined economy and was one of the major contributing factors in the fall of the Warsaw block and the Soviet Union.6. Aside from Syria, a number of other countries represent hunting grounds for extremists sponsored by Iran. We have seen an upheaval in Yemen and descendence of Yemen into the civil war. Following Thiessen’s logic, if we have to send US troops to every region, where there are forces sponsored by Iran, we would have to send our boys to lose lives and limbs in Yemeni civil war as well. What about Tunisia? Libya? Where does it end? After 14 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with estimated 4,000 Americans killed,some 40,000 wounded or disabled, 1-2 trillion spent, this nation does not have the stomach to descend in yet another war in the Middle East. So, doesn’t it make more sense for Russia to spend trillions of dollars and send their troops to fight ISIS versus US doing this?7. Even if we wanted to go into war in Syria, we are not ready militarily or financially. The next president will have to clean up the results of disastrous economic policies of Obama, who incurred more debt than 43 president in some 230 years before him. Trump will have to rebuild the US military, pass balanced budget amendment, pay of the debt, create jobs for 94 million, who are not in work force.When you are flying, the stewardess will tell you: put your own oxygen mask first, then help others. US needs economic oxygen, needs to heal it’s economy before helping Syria and entering in yet another conflict.I hope Trump goes on Kelly File with either Kelly or one of her replacements to explain all of the above points to the voters.
Labels:
Fox News,
Mark Thiessen,
Megyn Kelly,
Orly Taitz,
Russia,
Syria,
Vladimir Putin
Saturday, October 25, 2014
10/25/14: Letter from Orly Taitz
From Orly Taitz
I would like to thank everyone who supported me over the years. It is a very tough battle. Some critics attacked me in the past, saying that I might have not done enough in the case of Obama’s lack of eligibility and his use of bogus IDs. I know that if for some reason Judge Hanen would not rule in my favor on Wednesday in regards to Ebola ban, some jerks will attack me saying that I did not do enough.
However, I would like to bring a couple of examples to illustrate that there is an enormous pressure on judges to rule for the regime and it is extremely hard to get a ruling against the regime.
Firstly, 46 attorneys and hundreds of prose litigants filed legal actions challenging Obama’s legitimacy and bringing forward undeniable evidence that he is using bogus IDs. None of these cases were heard on the merits. So, it was not the fact that Attorney Taitz did not do enough, it is our rulling oligarchy pushing the strings to dismiss all cases against their puppet, regardless of how good the attorneys are and how good the argument is.
Secondly, recently DC judge Reggie Walton dismissed most of the complaints against the IRS filed by Tea party groups. These cases were filed by Cleta Mitchell and I believe someone working with the judicial watch. Cleta Mitchell is 64 years old, she’s been around for a while, she is experienced. I had nothing to do with these cases. I never filed any cases against the IRS, and even jerks criticizing me, cannot state that a negative decision in my case somehow influenced these cases, yet it was a major loss for the citizens of this country and a major win or major lawlessness triumph for the ruling oligarchy . In my opinion the decision by Judge Walton was totally unconscionable and he is paving the way to persecution of dissidents and opponents of the regime. He claimed that because IRS granted these Tea Party groups non-profit status 4 years late, after these groups lost donations for 4 years, it was somehow ok and nobody at IRS should be penalized. There was a clear case of the deprivation of civil rights of the members of these Tea party groups, there was clearly a violation of equal protection. Lois Lerner granted a non-profit status to Obama’s half brother in Africa only 2-3 weeks after he filed a request, even though he did not even have a proper mailing address for his group, yet Lerner harassed Tea party groups for 4 years and dragged her feet in not granting the Tax Exempt status. Judge Walton thought it was ok.
I brought these examples to illustrate, how hard it is to fight the regime and a few jerks, who attack me misrepresenting these attacks, as if they came from others, need to get a life and do something productive with their lives instead of being a pest.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Ebola crisis: Epidemiologist advises ban on flights, quarantine
Press release: Examiner and other publications report on the affidavit by epidemiologist in Taitz case, on recommended ban on travel from Ebola affected nations. Nearly 900 websites link to WWW.OrlyTaitzESQ.comREAD MORE
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
OBAMA FRAUD: EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO TEXAS FEDERAL COURT
LIST OF EXHIBITS Submitted to COURT:
1. Barack Obama’s tax return for 2009 posted on April 15 2010, showing him Illegally using SS# 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel
2. Authentication affidavit of Linda Jordan and E-Verify report showing that 042-68-4425 was NEVER assigned to Obama,
AND WITH THE SUBMITTED Numbers “Records DO NOT verify”
3. SSNVS report showing that Barack Obama failed SSNVS check
and authentication of report by Colonel Greg Hollister
4. Affidavit of Albert Hendershot and Merlins
information systems report showing that Obama is Illegally using the Social Security number of Harry J Bounel !!
5. Affidavit by Licensed Investigator Susan Daniels showing Obama IS using invalid Social Security numbers
6. Affidavit by a senior Deportation officer John Sampson,
attesting that there is no legal basis for Obama to be using a Connecticut Social Security number.
7. Affidavit by Chief Investigator of special Investigations unit of
the US coast Guard stating that Obama’s alleged Selective Service Registration is a FORGERY with a fabricated postal stamp attached to it.
8. Stanley Ann Dunham’s (Obama’s mother’s) passport records showing Obama listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport.
9. Affidavit of Honolulu county Senior Elections Clerk that no birth certificate for Barack Obama wasfound in any hospital in Hawaii
10 Statement by the James Orenga,minister of Lands of Kenya
relating to Obama ‘s birth in Kenya.
11. Obama’s biography submitted by Obama to his literary agent in 1991, stating that he was born in Kenya.
12. Affidavit of IT-expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a 100% Forgery.
13. Affidavit of Scanning and copying machine expert Douglas Vogt
attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate.
14. An article typesetting and printing expert Paul Irey
attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate.
15 Affidavit if typesetting and typing machines expert Charles Coombs attesting to Proven forgery in Obama’s alleged birth certificate.
16. Affidavit by Sheriff Arpaio regarding forgeries in Obama’s IDs.
HAVE WE LET A Terrorist and enemy of the state in the White House?
?NOW According to school records from Indonesia, whorebama Soebarkah is a muslim, which explains why he traded top 5 muslim terrorists for a deserter,–Traitor, and muslim convert Bergdahl, while refusing to do the same for Christian Foley and Jewish Sotloff and threatening prosecution of Foley and Sotloff families if they pay ransom.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Table-of-evidence-06.09.2013-fof-forgery-and-fraud-1.pdf
1. Barack Obama’s tax return for 2009 posted on April 15 2010, showing him Illegally using SS# 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel
2. Authentication affidavit of Linda Jordan and E-Verify report showing that 042-68-4425 was NEVER assigned to Obama,
AND WITH THE SUBMITTED Numbers “Records DO NOT verify”
3. SSNVS report showing that Barack Obama failed SSNVS check
and authentication of report by Colonel Greg Hollister
4. Affidavit of Albert Hendershot and Merlins
information systems report showing that Obama is Illegally using the Social Security number of Harry J Bounel !!
5. Affidavit by Licensed Investigator Susan Daniels showing Obama IS using invalid Social Security numbers
6. Affidavit by a senior Deportation officer John Sampson,
attesting that there is no legal basis for Obama to be using a Connecticut Social Security number.
7. Affidavit by Chief Investigator of special Investigations unit of
the US coast Guard stating that Obama’s alleged Selective Service Registration is a FORGERY with a fabricated postal stamp attached to it.
8. Stanley Ann Dunham’s (Obama’s mother’s) passport records showing Obama listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport.
9. Affidavit of Honolulu county Senior Elections Clerk that no birth certificate for Barack Obama wasfound in any hospital in Hawaii
10 Statement by the James Orenga,minister of Lands of Kenya
relating to Obama ‘s birth in Kenya.
11. Obama’s biography submitted by Obama to his literary agent in 1991, stating that he was born in Kenya.
12. Affidavit of IT-expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a 100% Forgery.
13. Affidavit of Scanning and copying machine expert Douglas Vogt
attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate.
14. An article typesetting and printing expert Paul Irey
attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate.
15 Affidavit if typesetting and typing machines expert Charles Coombs attesting to Proven forgery in Obama’s alleged birth certificate.
16. Affidavit by Sheriff Arpaio regarding forgeries in Obama’s IDs.
HAVE WE LET A Terrorist and enemy of the state in the White House?
?NOW According to school records from Indonesia, whorebama Soebarkah is a muslim, which explains why he traded top 5 muslim terrorists for a deserter,–Traitor, and muslim convert Bergdahl, while refusing to do the same for Christian Foley and Jewish Sotloff and threatening prosecution of Foley and Sotloff families if they pay ransom.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Table-of-evidence-06.09.2013-fof-forgery-and-fraud-1.pdf
Monday, August 04, 2014
TX Fed judge gives Obama 10 days to respond
EXAMINER:
The plaintiff in the case is Dr. Orly Taitz, and defendants are Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services; US President, Barack Obama; U.S. Border Patrol, Rio Grande Valley Section, Brownsville Station.TX Federal judge issues Order To Show Cause; Response due in 10 days
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Citizens fight back against dumping of illegals in our country
Press Release: Law offices of Orly Taitz
The public can make a difference.
We have seen an earthquake in DC when the House Majority leader went down in flames for his support of amnesty. Time for the public to act. Corrupt Obama regime created a crisis in banning deportation of children through an unconstitutional executive order, which goes against the US immigration laws and against the best interests of this nation. This ban on deportation of illegals became a magnet for hundreds of thousands of illegals. Now Obama is seeking 2 billion dollars for their accommodation.accommodation. After incurring 7 trillion dollars of additional debt, Obama is seeking more money to pay for his anti-American policies. The public can make a difference and stop Obama’s destruction of this nation.
The public can make a difference.
We have seen an earthquake in DC when the House Majority leader went down in flames for his support of amnesty. Time for the public to act. Corrupt Obama regime created a crisis in banning deportation of children through an unconstitutional executive order, which goes against the US immigration laws and against the best interests of this nation. This ban on deportation of illegals became a magnet for hundreds of thousands of illegals. Now Obama is seeking 2 billion dollars for their accommodation.accommodation. After incurring 7 trillion dollars of additional debt, Obama is seeking more money to pay for his anti-American policies. The public can make a difference and stop Obama’s destruction of this nation.
- Public is urged to call every congressman and demand “NO” on any funding for accommodation of illegals. Congress has to pass a resolution seeking immediate deportation of all illegals and sanctions against the nations of origin for the full cost of deportation of their citizens. US assessed sanctions against Russia, which is half a world away. US can issue sanctions against Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and Venezuella and stop issuing any and all visas for citizens of these countries, stop importation of all products from these countries an freeze the bank account of their leaders until they pay for the deportation and repatriation of their citizens who invaded the US.
- The public is urged to contact the governors and Attorney Generals of every state and demand immediate deployment of the National guard of every state to stop the invasion of illegals and demand an immediate legal action against Barack Obama and Obama regime, seeking repayment of the cost of apprehension of illegals and the cost of up-keeping of illegals, as well as Ex Relator status from the court to step in the shoes of the Federal Government, which is derelict in its duties and assume the function of deportation of illegals. Anti-American policies of Obama cost US jobs and bankrupted the Social Services of multiple states.
- Demand criminal investigation of individuals who are complicit and aiding and abetting violation of the US immigration laws, such as the owner of face-book Mark Zuckerberg and stock trader George Soros.
- If members of the public would like to be a part of a civil RICO challenging Obama, contact attorney Orly Taitz at orly.taitz@hushmail.com. Taitz is working pro bono. Donations can be given by pay-pal at www.OrlyTaitzESQ.com or www.TaitzReport.com or by mail at 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Did Breitbart Purposely Ignore Evidence of Obama’s Eligibility?
From Orly Taitz, Esq
From D.C. Clothesline
Something's got to break somewhere or else the biggest heist in the history of the world will continue. It certainly looks like all hope resides with Orly and her cases, but they depend on honest judges and have been hobbled by dishonest media, not to mention the part the Democratic Party has played!
We need a big-time break in the dam.
G-d help us.
From D.C. Clothesline
Something's got to break somewhere or else the biggest heist in the history of the world will continue. It certainly looks like all hope resides with Orly and her cases, but they depend on honest judges and have been hobbled by dishonest media, not to mention the part the Democratic Party has played!
We need a big-time break in the dam.
G-d help us.
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Orly Taitz Back in Court 10-23-13 Santa Ana, CA
For more information and directions, click here.
Orly has requested that supporters please support her by showing up if you can!
Orly has requested that supporters please support her by showing up if you can!
Labels:
California,
election fraud,
lawsuits,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President
Wednesday, June 05, 2013
A judge can deny the motion based on law and fact, but he has no right not to docket it
Judge Lamberth is the same judge who approved the secret subpoena to obtain e-mails of FOX reporter James Rosen and even of Rosen’s parents based on a subpoena signed by Attorney General Holder. Lamberth gave this approval after two judges refused to give such an approval. Later, when redacted subpoena was declassified, it was kept hidden from the public for 18 months. Recently Judge Lamberth issued a public apology claiming that it was a clerks’ fault, that clerks in his court did not do their job and did not post the subpoena in the electronic docket. . .READ MORE
Apparently the clerks of the court are not willing to be thrown under the bus and now they provided a recorded statement that in Taitz’ case the documents are not placed on the public docket not because of the actions of the clerks, but by the order of Judge Lamberth.
Labels:
attorney,
coverup,
fraud,
Judge,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President,
Royce Lamberth
Sunday, May 19, 2013
IMPORTANT: If you are/were a donor to Sheriff Joe Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ
From Attorney Orly Taitz, Esq. May 19, 2013:
Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama?
I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the donors for sheriff Arpaio and citizens of Maricopa county, AZ.
Why so? Because Arpaio already announced that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, however he is not willing to file a criminal complaint, as he is supposed to as the chief law enforcement officer of the Maricopa County.
WND, which is a big backer for Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman is talking about an appeal in the Supreme court of AL. first, as WND had a 50/50 split of donations with Kreep there is a high probability that WND and possibly Western journalism connected to WND and possibly PPSimmons got financial compensation from arpaio or his team, either got payment for advertising and fundraising or an outright percentage of donations received. If this is the case, their reporting is highly biased.
Now, as i said before, I really hope that the Supreme Court of AL will rule for the plaintiffs, however even if this appeal is granted in half a year or so, it will not make any difference, as the plaintiffs asked the Secretary of State of Al to ask the Department of Health of HI for a certified copy of Obama’s BC. All HI will do, is certify another copy of the same forgery, of the same computer generated forgery and you are in square one.
On the other hand there is a way to proceed immediately with the criminal complaint.
As I said, for nearly 3 years Arpaio and Zullo were making press conferences saying that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now after 3 years of raising money for their alleged criminal instigation they are refusing to file a criminal complaint, saying that they do not have jurisdiction to file, even though they have 100% proof that Obama’s BC is a forgery.
So, we are seeing the same passing the buck, same kicking the can.
What can be done? People who donated to Arpaio have now all the power and all the leverage. They can demand that Arpaio file his findings or they will file a legal action against Arpaio and seek 2 things:
1. An injunction, an order of specific performance, a writ of mandamus from the court ordering Arpaio to file this criminal complaint with proper prosecutors.
2. refund of all the donations due to lack of performance and due to solicitation of donations under false pretenses.
What is happening now is that Arpaio is afraid of Obama, just like judges are afraid when they claim that they have no jurisdiction, however in this situation Arpaio will be afraid of the donors more than he will be afraid of Obama.
Why so?
Normally law enforcement officer has a prosecutorial discretion, however the discretion is whether there is enough evidence to convict. When Arpaio stated that Obama’s BC ia a 100% forgery, then it is beyond discretion.
In this situation Obama does not have any any cards in his deck, however the people hold all the aces.
Obama will not be a defendant in this case and he will not be able to bring his attorneys to challenge on his behalf. This will be a private action, so Arpaio will have to respond personally. This will give a lot of publicity to the issue of Obama’s forged IDs and Obama will not be able to do anything about it.
I know that Arpaio is afraid that Obama will retaliate against him, however what can Obama do?
1. If Arpaio thinks that Obama might refile his law suit against Arpaio for violation of civil rights of Hispanics this will not happen, as it will be a very obvious retaliation. The feds dismissed their case against Arpaio last August saying that there was not enough evidence. So what will the feds say? Will they say that they had an understanding that they will dismiss their case against Arpaio and Arpaio will never file his criminal complaint against Obama? They can’t say that, they will have to stay quiet.
2. I don’t know if Arpaio received any financial considertion not to file a criminal complaint against Obama, to say that he has no jurisdiction after nearly 3 years of criminal investigation and after receiving millions in donations for this criminal investigation I hope that there was no financial consideration. But if arguendo, one were to believe that there was some type of a consideration, what will Obama do? Do you think he file file a law suit saying “I want my money back?” He can’t.
3. Obama is now weakened and his henchmen in IRS and DOJ are weakened by scandals. We are getting stronger.
So, please, if you are a donor to Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ, demand a meeting and demand that he stop the nonsense. He is a chief law enforcement officer of his county. People turned to him as a law enforcement officer. You do not enforce the law by doing press conferences and just talking to people. You enforce the law by filing a criminal complaint. Please, keep up the pressure and tell Arpaio that after he stated that Obama’s BC is a 100%forgery, he, as a chief law enforcement officer, has a duty to file a criminal complaint that fraud was committed and that Obama ran for office in his jurisdiction using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a proof of his identity. Anybody else would be in prison for that and so should Obama. Tell Arpaio that if he does not file a criminal complaint and show a copy of the signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint, donors will file a complaint against Arpaio for:
1. soliciting and accepting donations under the false pretenses
2. misappropriation of donations.
3. violation of oath of office
4. denial of honest services under the color of authority
5. deprivation of civil right to a lawful law enforcement, redress of grievances, egual protection under the color of authority.
Demand that Arpaio and Zullo file the criminal complaint ASAP. You have the most leverage: use it or lose.
Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama?
I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the donors for sheriff Arpaio and citizens of Maricopa county, AZ.
Why so? Because Arpaio already announced that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, however he is not willing to file a criminal complaint, as he is supposed to as the chief law enforcement officer of the Maricopa County.
WND, which is a big backer for Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman is talking about an appeal in the Supreme court of AL. first, as WND had a 50/50 split of donations with Kreep there is a high probability that WND and possibly Western journalism connected to WND and possibly PPSimmons got financial compensation from arpaio or his team, either got payment for advertising and fundraising or an outright percentage of donations received. If this is the case, their reporting is highly biased.
Now, as i said before, I really hope that the Supreme Court of AL will rule for the plaintiffs, however even if this appeal is granted in half a year or so, it will not make any difference, as the plaintiffs asked the Secretary of State of Al to ask the Department of Health of HI for a certified copy of Obama’s BC. All HI will do, is certify another copy of the same forgery, of the same computer generated forgery and you are in square one.
On the other hand there is a way to proceed immediately with the criminal complaint.
As I said, for nearly 3 years Arpaio and Zullo were making press conferences saying that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now after 3 years of raising money for their alleged criminal instigation they are refusing to file a criminal complaint, saying that they do not have jurisdiction to file, even though they have 100% proof that Obama’s BC is a forgery.
So, we are seeing the same passing the buck, same kicking the can.
What can be done? People who donated to Arpaio have now all the power and all the leverage. They can demand that Arpaio file his findings or they will file a legal action against Arpaio and seek 2 things:
1. An injunction, an order of specific performance, a writ of mandamus from the court ordering Arpaio to file this criminal complaint with proper prosecutors.
2. refund of all the donations due to lack of performance and due to solicitation of donations under false pretenses.
What is happening now is that Arpaio is afraid of Obama, just like judges are afraid when they claim that they have no jurisdiction, however in this situation Arpaio will be afraid of the donors more than he will be afraid of Obama.
Why so?
Normally law enforcement officer has a prosecutorial discretion, however the discretion is whether there is enough evidence to convict. When Arpaio stated that Obama’s BC ia a 100% forgery, then it is beyond discretion.
In this situation Obama does not have any any cards in his deck, however the people hold all the aces.
Obama will not be a defendant in this case and he will not be able to bring his attorneys to challenge on his behalf. This will be a private action, so Arpaio will have to respond personally. This will give a lot of publicity to the issue of Obama’s forged IDs and Obama will not be able to do anything about it.
I know that Arpaio is afraid that Obama will retaliate against him, however what can Obama do?
1. If Arpaio thinks that Obama might refile his law suit against Arpaio for violation of civil rights of Hispanics this will not happen, as it will be a very obvious retaliation. The feds dismissed their case against Arpaio last August saying that there was not enough evidence. So what will the feds say? Will they say that they had an understanding that they will dismiss their case against Arpaio and Arpaio will never file his criminal complaint against Obama? They can’t say that, they will have to stay quiet.
2. I don’t know if Arpaio received any financial considertion not to file a criminal complaint against Obama, to say that he has no jurisdiction after nearly 3 years of criminal investigation and after receiving millions in donations for this criminal investigation I hope that there was no financial consideration. But if arguendo, one were to believe that there was some type of a consideration, what will Obama do? Do you think he file file a law suit saying “I want my money back?” He can’t.
3. Obama is now weakened and his henchmen in IRS and DOJ are weakened by scandals. We are getting stronger.
So, please, if you are a donor to Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ, demand a meeting and demand that he stop the nonsense. He is a chief law enforcement officer of his county. People turned to him as a law enforcement officer. You do not enforce the law by doing press conferences and just talking to people. You enforce the law by filing a criminal complaint. Please, keep up the pressure and tell Arpaio that after he stated that Obama’s BC is a 100%forgery, he, as a chief law enforcement officer, has a duty to file a criminal complaint that fraud was committed and that Obama ran for office in his jurisdiction using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a proof of his identity. Anybody else would be in prison for that and so should Obama. Tell Arpaio that if he does not file a criminal complaint and show a copy of the signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint, donors will file a complaint against Arpaio for:
1. soliciting and accepting donations under the false pretenses
2. misappropriation of donations.
3. violation of oath of office
4. denial of honest services under the color of authority
5. deprivation of civil right to a lawful law enforcement, redress of grievances, egual protection under the color of authority.
Demand that Arpaio and Zullo file the criminal complaint ASAP. You have the most leverage: use it or lose.
Monday, May 13, 2013
IRS attorney posted threats that if attorney Taitz discloses her identity “men in black will pay her a visit and this visit will not be friendly and will not be pleasant”.
I, Orly Taitz, am a licensed attorney and President of Defend Our Freedoms not for profit CA Corporation dedicated to exposing corruption in the government and judiciary and educating the public about their constitutional freedoms and ways to fight lawlessness and corruption in the government. I attest that following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:READ MORE
Labels:
attorney,
intimidation,
IRS,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President,
threats
Wednesday, May 01, 2013
So far, not one single case challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president was heard on the merits
Press Release: Appellant’s opening brief filed in Taitz v Obama, Feinstein and Emken:
Second part of the case provides over 100 pages of sworn affidavits of top law enforcement officials and official records, showing that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Soebarkah committed fraud and ran for the position of the U.S. President and established his eligibility for the position of the U.S. President based on all forged and fraudulently obtained IDs: E-verify and SSNVS records showed that Obama used a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which was never assigned to him, forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service certificate, last name not legally his and Indonesian citizenship. Not only Obama never had any valid IDs to show him as a natural born citizen, as required based on Article 2, section1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, all of the evidence showed that he never had any IDs to show any citizenship and any legal status for him. While the evidence against Obama and evidence of elections fraud was gradually developed and it evolved during the past 4 years, one thing remained constant: desire of courts to use any and all excuses to cover up elections fraud and cover up Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs.
There were multiple challenges filed all over the country by some 45 licensed attorneys and hundreds of pro se litigants. So far not one single case was heard on the merits. Obama consistently refused to comply with any and all subpoenas by all the attorneys and litigants and so far not one single judge held Obama accountable, not one single judge issued an order to compel production of the original wet ink vital records of Obama while all of the copies released to the public were deemed by dozens of experts to be crude laughable forgeries.
In general we are seeing a vicious cycle and all three branches of the government not acting as independent branches that are supposed to provide a system of checks and balances. We are seeing reports of FBI and CIA agents and informers working as aids for congressmen, editors of major papers and as staff attorneys and attorney-law clerks for highly positioned judges. This provides an unprecedented level of censorship which was exacerbated by 9/11.
This system leaves the U.S. citizens effectively deprived of their First Amendment right for Redress of Grievances, and often elections fraud cases, particularly ones dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Obama, are being dismissed on technicalities, excuses. There were instances of retaliation by members of the judiciary against members of the U.S. military and civil rights leaders and attorneys seeking to end elections fraud and seeking an adjudication on the merits in relation to Obama’s forged IDs.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Congress circumvented by DOJ
SyndicatedNews.net
...the Department of Justice went behind the backs of U.S. Members of Congress - never gave them any pleadings or documents and did not act as an attorney for the U.S. Congress, but instead, acted as private criminal defense attorneys for President Barack Obama. This is not only illegal, but also violates established laws governing the matter on both state and federal levels.READ MORE
Labels:
Congress,
courts,
CPAC,
Department of Justice,
DOJ,
Eric Holder,
House Judiciary Committee,
Orly Taitz
Friday, February 22, 2013
CLASS ACTION SUIT FOR VETERANS DEPRIVED OF THEIR FIREARMS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
Posted on | February 22, 2013
Posted on | February 22, 2013
A number of veterans got letters from the department of veterans affairs [U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs] advising them that the government intends to make a determination, whether they are allowed to carry guns. If the government arbitrarily decides that they are not fit, the veterans will be deprived from exercising their second amendment rights and will be punished if caught caring guns.
See actual wording below:
“A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”Veterans are a group that represents the biggest threat to the Inonesian/Kenyan usurper Obama, who is currently hard at work destroying the U.S. economy and the civil rights of the U.S. citizens, so the Department of Veterans Affairs is launching an assault on veterans by stripping them of their rights.
Please: write to me in this thread if you would like to be a part of this legal action, please, provide me your contact info.
Friday, January 25, 2013
Did the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration aid and abet Obama?
One of the SSNs linked to Obama in National databases found by investigators Sankey and Daniels belongs to Lucille Ballantyne, the mother of the Chief Actuary of SSA Harry C. Ballantyne, resident of CT. Did he aid and abet Obama?
Comment posted by John Smallberries | January 24th, 2013 @ 9:01 am
Comment posted by John Smallberries | January 24th, 2013 @ 9:01 am
Neil Sankey is a private investigator in Los Angeles who sent prominent civil rights attorney Orly Taitz a list of various names, some with supposed social security numbers (read here) that he located. How did he find these names and social security numbers? Sankey explains in an affidavit for one of Orly Taitz’s lawsuits:“During the course of the work that I was doing in the latter part of 2008, regarding the activities and qualifications of Mr. Obama, I have compiled a record of all of the addresses in regards to which I have seen the use of his name. The records and databases which I use are many and varied having been accumulated for many different reasons but all are Public Record and the documents I have used are available to the General Public with, or without the payment of fees.”What are these public records? Orly Taitz names them in another lawsuit:Exhibit 3 is an affidavit from a licensed investigator and retired Scotland Yard elite anti organized crime officer Mr. Neil Sankey, who has compiled from the most reputable National databases: Lexis Nexis and Choice Point a list of multiple addresses under the names of Barack Obama and Barry Obama, those addresses are connected to 39 different social security numbers, none of which were issued in the state of HI.
Labels:
2008,
2012,
citizenship,
election fraud,
eligibility,
fraud,
ID theft,
Neil Sankey,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President,
social security
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
FEBRUARY 15, 2013
Labels:
2008,
2012,
election fraud,
Identity Theft,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President,
Supreme Court
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Mystery in Newtown, Connecticut: Who is Harry Bounel? - UPDATE
Excerpts:
Another weird coincidence. We see [Harry] Bounel residing in CT in 1910. The Social Security was issued in 1977 in CT. He was 87 at that time. There was a hospital next to Newtown. It was a Newtown psychiatric hospital, where some elderly without family resided their last days. The hospital later was renamed to Fairfield state hospital. This is where the bodies of the Sandy Hook victims were taken for autopsy. [lgstarr.blogspot.com/2012/12/what-was-dhs-doing-in-sandy-hook-ct.html] What is interesting, is that the hospital contained not only death records, it also for some reason contained immigration and deportation records. My guess is, that most of the info was scrubbed, however these people are sloppy. They did not flatten the PDF file and we got direct connection between Obama and this CT SSN 042-68-4425 straight from the horses mouth, from the Squatter in Chief Obama. They are nervous and making mistakes. . .
Harry Bounel, born in 1890, resided in NY. We have his name used in connection to Obama’s address in Chicago . I need your help
Here is a letter I got:I’m in my 60′s and grew up in Bridgeport CT until 1961. When I was a kid in the 50′s, we used to joke that if you’re bad you’ll be sent to the “Newtown nut house”, a psychiatric hospital in Newtown that was just next to Danbury. In the 1940′s and 1950′s, Newtown had a tiny population of under 4000. When I heard of the massacre in Newtown, my first reaction was to blurt out the “Newtown nut house”. I was curious and did a search on Google for Newtown and was surprised to see that the population has grown to over 27,000.
Now for the punchline: I see Newtown is right next to DANBURY (where you had placed the switched identities of Obama and his Connecticut Social Security number). You had surmised that the identity was taken from someone at a local Danbury NURSING HOME. The official name of the “Newtown nut house” was the FAIRFIELD STATE HOSPITAL (renamed Fairfield Hills Hospital). Mentally ill patients who had died were buried on site. Carefully read the following website:
A majority of the staff and utility buildings, along with all of the patient buildings were connected by a series of concrete tunnels. These tunnels were mostly used to move patients and equipment between the buildings, especially during the winter months and on bad weather days. Doctors, nurses, and other various workers also used the tunnels, and when required, even corpses were transported through them to the on-campus morgue.
- Medical Staff Records, 1937-1974 records of birth and deportation, autopsies, and medical examiner cases.
What we found out that in 1976-1977, when new SSN laws were adopted, when this CT SNN 042-68-4425 was issued either in Danbury or in Stamford CT Social Security office (both near the hospital) elderly individuals needed to get a SSN in order to get medicare benefits. When people were elderly or patients in the psychiatric hospital, the applications were filled out by the hospital employees. (I saw patients in an advanced Alzheimer’s facility in CA voting in each and every election. I wonder, how are they voting?)
So, if elderly Bounel was in this facility, his SSN application was filled out by the hospital personal and signed by the hospital administrator. Please, hurry, everything is being scrubbed as we speak!!!
UPDATE:
Labels:
2008,
2012,
Connecticut,
conspiracy theories,
election fraud,
Harry Bounel,
Newtown,
Obama,
Orly Taitz,
President,
social security,
video
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
