Showing posts with label firearms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label firearms. Show all posts
Saturday, December 17, 2022
Friday, August 25, 2017
Video—Men and Guns of the Battle of the Bulge, Part 1
In this, our first segment on the Battle of the Bulge, we go to the actual battlefield and we cover in depth two of the guns used in the largest land battle ever fought by the U.S. Army, the M1 Garand rifle and German MP44, or Sturmgewehr. To learn more, watch this feature video from a recent episode of American Rifleman TV, and for more ARTV segments, please visit americanrifleman.org/artv.Video—Men and Guns of the Battle of the Bulge, Part 1
Labels:
America,
Battle of the Bulge,
firearms,
guns,
United States,
war,
WWII
Sunday, April 12, 2015
9 Things You Didn’t Know About the Second Amendment
1. The Second Amendment codifies a pre-existing rightREAD MORE
2. The Second Amendment protects individual, not collective rights
3. Every citizen is the militia
4. Personal self-defense is the primary purpose of the Second Amendment
5. There is no interest-balancing approach to the Second Amendment
6. The Second Amendment exists to prevent tyranny
7. The Second Amendment was also meant as a provision to repel a foreign army invasion
8. The Second Amendment protects weapons “in common use at the time”
9. The Second Amendment might require full-blown military arms to fulfill the original intent
Sunday, January 04, 2015
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
5 THINGS YOU MUST DO AFTER A SHOOTING
“The four or five minutes after a shooting may determine where you get to live for the next 20 years.”
1. Point out Perpetrator to Police
2. Tell Police you will “Sign the Complaint”
3. Point out the Evidence to Police
4. Point out Witnesses to Police
5. Will give Full Cooperation in 24 hours After speaking with Attorney
1. Point out Perpetrator to Police
2. Tell Police you will “Sign the Complaint”
3. Point out the Evidence to Police
4. Point out Witnesses to Police
5. Will give Full Cooperation in 24 hours After speaking with Attorney
Thursday, November 21, 2013
WHO KNEW? RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS PRECEDED U.S. CONSTITUTION
Professor Malcolm's book shows that the right to Keep and Bear Arms was a right recognized under the English Common Law, the fundament of our legal system.
BREITBART:
READ MORE
Labels:
firearms,
guns,
Second Amendment,
U.S. constitution,
weapons
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
No semi-auto rifle, regardless of outward appearance, is an "assault" anything.
From a former firearms instructor in the Army:
Yesterday, Larry Elder, a man I respect greatly, was explaining the difference between a true assault rifle, e.g., an M-16, and a semi-auto AR-15. But, he misused the term "assault weapon" in referring to the AR, as I recall. So, as conscientious as he is, he was a bit inaccurate.
"Assault weapon" has no actual definition in military or firearms usage. It was coined by Josh Sugarman, of Violence Policy Center, or whatever they call it lately, to demonize a class of firearms. He previously created the term, "Saturday Night Special." But, he was successful in getting the terms, one at a time, memorialized in law, resulting in bans of certain firearms. (One step at a time--divide and conquer.)
The VPC, and the Brady bunch, are the two principle "gun control" organizations, each consisting of about a half dozen nitwits. They are heavily funded by the Joyce Foundation, of which our esteemed CiC was a director for several years. He also, as part of Joyce, lectured law professors that the 2nd Amendment only protected the collective right of militias to bear arms.
No semi-auto rifle, regardless of outward appearance, is an "assault" anything. It is just a rifle or carbine, and is semi-auto.
The military designates a short rifle (carbine,) of medium power, that is selective fire (an essential quality), so that it can be selected by the shooter to fire full auto, or semi-auto, depending on circumstances, AS AN "ASSAULT RIFLE." No currently manufactured full automatic (OR SELECTIVE FIRE) firearms are available to sell to civilians.
~~Robert
Yesterday, Larry Elder, a man I respect greatly, was explaining the difference between a true assault rifle, e.g., an M-16, and a semi-auto AR-15. But, he misused the term "assault weapon" in referring to the AR, as I recall. So, as conscientious as he is, he was a bit inaccurate.
"Assault weapon" has no actual definition in military or firearms usage. It was coined by Josh Sugarman, of Violence Policy Center, or whatever they call it lately, to demonize a class of firearms. He previously created the term, "Saturday Night Special." But, he was successful in getting the terms, one at a time, memorialized in law, resulting in bans of certain firearms. (One step at a time--divide and conquer.)
The VPC, and the Brady bunch, are the two principle "gun control" organizations, each consisting of about a half dozen nitwits. They are heavily funded by the Joyce Foundation, of which our esteemed CiC was a director for several years. He also, as part of Joyce, lectured law professors that the 2nd Amendment only protected the collective right of militias to bear arms.
No semi-auto rifle, regardless of outward appearance, is an "assault" anything. It is just a rifle or carbine, and is semi-auto.
The military designates a short rifle (carbine,) of medium power, that is selective fire (an essential quality), so that it can be selected by the shooter to fire full auto, or semi-auto, depending on circumstances, AS AN "ASSAULT RIFLE." No currently manufactured full automatic (OR SELECTIVE FIRE) firearms are available to sell to civilians.
~~Robert
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Thursday, July 04, 2013
WARNING: FALSE FLAG OPERATION
|
WARNING! A False Flag Group Launches Today
The American Rifle and Pistol Association (ARPA) is a FRAUD!
Do you remember the phoney "American Hunters and Shooters Association" that pretended to support gun rights ... but actually advocated more gun control and endorsed (surprise, surprise) Barack Obama?
Well, now with the 2014 elections gearing up, another fake gun group has popped up claiming to support "sane" gun ownership.
They're called the American Rifle and Pistol Association and they're officially launching today, July 4. But don't be fooled by all the firearm photos on their Facebook page or all the Second Amendment talk on their colorful website.
Well, now with the 2014 elections gearing up, another fake gun group has popped up claiming to support "sane" gun ownership.
They're called the American Rifle and Pistol Association and they're officially launching today, July 4. But don't be fooled by all the firearm photos on their Facebook page or all the Second Amendment talk on their colorful website.
Here are direct quotes from their statement of principles:
R+P exists to promote SANE gun ownership and SANE firearms management. SANE stands for: Safety, Advocacy, Networking, and Education.
R+P believes that it is each state's right to determine for benefit of its citizens anyprerequisites, qualifications, documentation, training, and levels of demonstrated proficiency, if any, deemed necessary for lawful use of differing types of weapon systems. The establishment of any such requirements are not the prerogative of the federal government.
R+P seeks to work with state and local governments to help establish effective training and licensing programs designed to increase public safety while protecting eligible citizens' rights to keep and bear arms.
Got that? "Sane" gun ownership. Demonstrated proficiency. Licensing programs. Protecting "eligible" citizens' rights.
Exactly where in the Second Amendment does it say any of this? Who determines what is or is not sane? Since when do we need to demonstrate anything to exercise a right? Why do we need more licensing? And who exactly are the oh-so-lucky "eligible" citizens among us who will be granted protection from this bogus group of sham artists?
No, we don't want "insane" people to have guns. And yes, we think training is great. But we don't need more restrictions. We've been fighting for years to remove restrictions that do nothing to improve public safety and are designed merely to infringe on our rights as American citizens.
Spread the word about the counterfeit American Rifle and Pistol Association. Not only are they frauds, they're purposely insulting all gun owners by launching their pretend group on Independence Day.
Those of us with Buckeye Firearms Association, and thousands of other good Americans around the country, work countless hours week after week, year after year, volunteering our time to defend and advance our rights.
We don't hide who we are or what we stand for. What you see it what you get. If you disagree with us, fine. Stand up and be heard. But don't put on a mask and lie about your true intentions. That we cannot tolerate.
Click here to comment on their Facebook page and let them know you're not fooled by their charade.
Exactly where in the Second Amendment does it say any of this? Who determines what is or is not sane? Since when do we need to demonstrate anything to exercise a right? Why do we need more licensing? And who exactly are the oh-so-lucky "eligible" citizens among us who will be granted protection from this bogus group of sham artists?
No, we don't want "insane" people to have guns. And yes, we think training is great. But we don't need more restrictions. We've been fighting for years to remove restrictions that do nothing to improve public safety and are designed merely to infringe on our rights as American citizens.
Spread the word about the counterfeit American Rifle and Pistol Association. Not only are they frauds, they're purposely insulting all gun owners by launching their pretend group on Independence Day.
Those of us with Buckeye Firearms Association, and thousands of other good Americans around the country, work countless hours week after week, year after year, volunteering our time to defend and advance our rights.
We don't hide who we are or what we stand for. What you see it what you get. If you disagree with us, fine. Stand up and be heard. But don't put on a mask and lie about your true intentions. That we cannot tolerate.
Click here to comment on their Facebook page and let them know you're not fooled by their charade.
Warn fellow gun owners on forums. Give a heads up to your buddies at the range. Don't let these fakers take our hard earned money or collect our addresses to further their anti-gun agenda.
If you want to read more about these charlatans, here are a couple links that have already started to expose this insincere farce:
New gun group just like an old gun group?
The Birth of A False Flag Operation: American Rifle and Pistol Association
If you want to read more about these charlatans, here are a couple links that have already started to expose this insincere farce:
New gun group just like an old gun group?
The Birth of A False Flag Operation: American Rifle and Pistol Association
Labels:
false flag,
firearms,
gun control,
gun owners,
guns
Saturday, March 16, 2013
S. 374 represents a direct blow to Americans’ right to keep and bear arms without excessive government interference
Schumer’s Transfer Tyranny
The bill holds that any “transfer” of a firearm must be conducted via a middleman (in practice, a law-enforcement officer or the holder of a Federal Firearms License) and that a transferee is obliged to submit to a check under the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System. There are good-faith arguments in favor of and against this provision. But Chuck Schumer has narrowed the definition of “transfer” so strictly as to make his proposition absurd. If, for example, a gun owner leaves his home for more than seven days — leaving his firearms with his roommate, or gay partner, or landlord — he’ll be committing a felony that carries a five-year prison term. And while married couples are exempted from falling afoul of that provision, the family exemptions apply only to recorded “gifts” and not to “temporary transfers.” In order to avoid making felons of millions of couples, the government would, at the very least, need to spell out clearly what constitutes “gifting” a gun within a family and what constitutes a “temporary transfer,” thus regulating an area that has hitherto largely been left alone.READ MORE
What else would change?
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
CLASS ACTION SUIT FOR VETERANS DEPRIVED OF THEIR FIREARMS
OrlyTaitzEsq.com
Posted on | February 22, 2013
Posted on | February 22, 2013
A number of veterans got letters from the department of veterans affairs [U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs] advising them that the government intends to make a determination, whether they are allowed to carry guns. If the government arbitrarily decides that they are not fit, the veterans will be deprived from exercising their second amendment rights and will be punished if caught caring guns.
See actual wording below:
“A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”Veterans are a group that represents the biggest threat to the Inonesian/Kenyan usurper Obama, who is currently hard at work destroying the U.S. economy and the civil rights of the U.S. citizens, so the Department of Veterans Affairs is launching an assault on veterans by stripping them of their rights.
Please: write to me in this thread if you would like to be a part of this legal action, please, provide me your contact info.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Fabulous gun show photos
Just click here and be sure to scroll down.
Obama's started a war with the citizens of this country.
Who do you think will win?
Obama's started a war with the citizens of this country.
Who do you think will win?
Labels:
firearms,
gun owners,
gun show,
guns,
Obama,
President,
Second Amendment
Thursday, January 24, 2013
BREAKING NEWS: Obama Moves To Ban All Guns!
SOURCE
Here we go folks. The Dictator Obama has begun his full blown assault on America to disarm and dominate and Diane Feinstein, one of his useful but expendable idiots, is leading the charge. Here is more about what is at stake including a list of weapons that will be deemed illegal. Please share this story if you believe in Freedom. We must stop these idiots!Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.
Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of opportunity. It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They've made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states' rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):
Rifles (or copies or duplicates): M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR; AR70, Calico Liberty , Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC, Hi-Point20Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1, Thompson 1927 Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with detachable magazine, SLG 95, SLR 95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ). Pistols (or copies or duplicates): Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA, TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, Uzi. Shotguns (or copies or duplicates): Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs): A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has: (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud. Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles). A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has: (i) a second pistol grip, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a barrel shroud or (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds. A semiautomatic shotgun with: (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a pistol grip (see definition below), (iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and (iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits. Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General."
Note that Obama's pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event." In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.
The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose -- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.
Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
Forward or send to every gun owner you know... Watch This, If You Want More Proof: YouTube - CNN- Obama To BAN Guns SPREAD THIS FOLKS, PLZ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv3p2lLmjGk
A partial list of gun rights groups:
Gun Owners of America http://gunowners.org/
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership http://www.jpfo.org/
FREEDOM=GUNS http://www.tcsn.net/doncicci/freedom.htm
National Rifle Association http://www.nra.org/
Second Amendment Committee http://www.libertygunrights.com/
Second Amendment Foundation http://www.saf.org/
Second Amendment Sisters http://www.2asisters.org/
Women Against Gun Control http://www.wagc.com/
Thursday, January 03, 2013
Monday, December 31, 2012
Firearms Refresher Course
1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither." ~ John Adams
3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.
5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.
6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.
7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.
8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.
11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.
13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.
14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?
15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.
16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.
17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.
"I love this country, it's the government I'm afraid of."
2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither." ~ John Adams
3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.
5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.
6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.
7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.
8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.
11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.
13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.
14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?
15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.
16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.
17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.
"I love this country, it's the government I'm afraid of."
Sunday, December 23, 2012
Monday, July 23, 2012
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
When members of our military and law enforcement start taking these things seriously, so do I.
A former CA Highway Patrol officer forwarded to me the following email he received:
He says this:
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
A former CA Highway Patrol officer forwarded to me the following email he received:
"When I first started watching this video I thought it was BS, then at 7 minutes into the clip I became curious,and concerned.So then I forwarded it to a former Army combat infantry Veteran who has current direct connections = Association linked closely with active duty combat infantry units both Germany & U.S.
Thought I would forward this for your take."
Semper Fi,
Bill
He says this:
"I can not say with certainty that the item here is totally legit.Just in case you're interested, here's the article (which has the video) they were discussing:
However, what I can say with some confidence is that at least some of the active duty infantry folks with whom I am close have told me they have been assigned to attend more than one session involving control of civilian populations, including how to disarm, etc. These classes have taken place over the past 90-120 days.
When the active duty folks have asked why they are being assigned to attend this specific training, they are simply told it is basic continuing education. But there is talk among the ranks on this topic.
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.So what do you think?
Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”
Labels:
Americans,
arms-control,
firearms,
gun control,
guns,
martial law,
Second Amendment,
treaty,
U.S. military,
United Nations
Friday, July 20, 2012
HOW TO PREPARE FOR AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION
Dennis
Kennedy, TWAW [The Well Armed Woman] fan and Director of Training for Counter Terrorism
Institute of America wrote an article on preparing for an active shooter
situation. This article has been widely distributed and published you
all are free to share with his blessing.
http://combat-terror.com/ library/ Active_Shooter_Training.pdf
Active Shooter
Training for Citizens
By Dennis
Kennedy
The recent shootings at Trolley
Square, Virginia Tech and the Omaha Mall remind us that violence can
strike at any time and in any place. These types of events are not unusual. They occur
everywhere. They happen in churches, malls, schools and workplaces. They will happen
again. Have a plan.
Whether you carry a gun or not,
these are some precautions that everyone can take to be better prepared if it
happens to you.
Family Emergency
Plan -
BEFORE any emergency occurs, develop a Family Emergency Plan. This plan may be
used for any emergency. Keep it simple, such as developing a rendezvous point in
the event you are separated. Have an alternative plan. No matter where you are, a simple
plan is better than no plan.
Situational
Awareness -
Be AWARE of your surroundings and situation. NOT paranoid, just aware. Keeping the cell
phone jammed in your ear 24/7 is not being AWARE. Even if you see something that does
not seem right, leave and call police.
Find an EXIT - When out in
public, look for and know how to get to the nearest TWO exits. Don’t concern yourself
that they may be marked EMERGENCY, EMPLOYEE ONLY or ALARMED. You are going to
use them anyway in an emergency.
Breakage - If you are
trapped in an active shooter situation and there are no door exits but windows are available, BREAK
THEM! Use whatever is available up to and including your firearm to break
glass doors or windows to escape the threat!
Move - If you hear
gunfire or see the shooter, immediately go to the nearest exit and AWAY from the shooter. The
farther away you get, the safer you will be.
Lock It - If you are
trapped in a location that has no exit, lock yourself and others inside. Use belts, electrical cords, rope
or whatever is quickly available to secure the door. Barricade the door with
furniture, desks or store displays. Be quiet and stay away from the doors. Do NOT open the doors
for others once you are secured. Shooters have been known to pound on the doors
pretending to be victims, begging for entry.
Stay put until the police break in to rescue you.
Fight Back! If you are
trapped, cannot escape and the shooter makes entry into your location, FIGHT BACK! Immediately
ATTACK with chairs, tables, fire extinguishers, books or whatever you have on
hand. Everyone in the room must ATTACK, tackle him, bite, claw, stab or choke. If you
do not fight back, savagely and with overwhelming force he will methodically kill
everyone.
Armed Citizens - If you are
armed with a firearm at the scene of an active shooter, your FIRST responsibility is to get
your family to safety. Help others along the way if you can but immediately MOVE your own
family out of the area first.
Call 911 - ASAP, get on
the phone and give 911 the shooters description, location and type of weapon, if known. Give
the dispatcher YOUR location and description. Make certain to tell the dispatcher
that YOU ARE ARMED. The dispatcher may try and get you to put your weapon away.
REFUSE and tell dispatch you will remain armed as long as the threat is active.
Take Cover - Place yourself
between the shooter and others that may be with you. Have someone else talk on the phone.
Your focus needs to be on the shooter.
Police
Confrontations-If
you are confronted by the police, keep your weapon muzzle pointed down. Raise your
non-shooting hand up near your face in the SURRENDER position. Yell loudly at the
officer “I am NOT the shooter”! Do EXACTLY and IMMEDIATELY whatever the officer
orders you to do. Expect to be taken down at gunpoint and treated like the bad
guy. Be thankful they didn’t shoot you. Don’t take it personal. What actions you took
can be sorted out afterwards. If an officer asks you to help, comply and do as you’re
told.
Additional thoughts:
1. Carry a good small flashlight
whether you carry your gun or not.
2. Carry enough ammo.
3. Carry a working cell phone
4. Know trauma care. That is to
say, know how to treat gun shot wounds and other injuries with whatever is on the
scene. The police are trained to go straight to the shooter. They will NOT stop to
help until after the shooter is stopped. You will be left to help yourself and others.
5. Be a good witness. Be prepared
to give a coherent statement to the police about the incident.
6. Keep your mouth
shut if you were forced to use deadly force. Only give a generic statement such as “he
tried to kill me/us and I was forced to defend myself/us”. Stick to the 5th Amendment
until you have a lawyer by your side. Remember, there will most certainly be a
civil lawsuit coming. Keep your mouth shut. Protect your own civil rights. If you
need to discuss it with someone, tell your lawyer or your clergy. Those are protected
communications.
7. When you write
your statement look up Utah law [substitute your own location] regarding use of force and include the exact same words
that match what action you were forced to take. “I reasonably believed the force
was necessary because...”
6. You have the RIGHT
to keep and bear arms. You have a RESPONSIBILITY to train and become
proficient with your firearm.
USE
OF FORCE [research the law in your location]
76-2-402 Utah Code Annotated
Force in defense of person
Reasonably believes force is necessary to prevent death or serious
bodily injury:
1. Actions must be reasonable.
2. Force must be necessary.
3. Must show a significant threat of death or serious bodily
injury.
A person is not justified:
(a) If he initially provokes the use of force.
(b) Is attempting or committing a crime.
(c) Was the aggressor.
These events happen.
They happen in churches, malls, schools and work places. They will happen again. If
you are going to carry a firearm, be responsible and BE PREPARED.
About
the author-Dennis Kennedy is Director of Training for the Counterterrorism Institute
of America, LLC. Dennis is a 25 year veteran law enforcement Instructor and military
special operations weapons NCO. He is a Utah POST certified Firearms Instructor
as well as NRA Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor and Utah BCI Concealed
Firearms Permit Instructor. He can be contacted via his company web site at:
www.combat-terror.com
Friday, April 27, 2012
SO, YOU WANT TO OWN A GUN?
Read PART ONE:
PJ Media actually hit me with a pretty tall order with what appeared to be a simple suggestion for an article: a step-by-step process for those who know absolutely nada about guns yet want to arm themselves.Read PART TWO
My immediate response — “Sure, I’ll get right on it” — was tempered roughly .00093 nanoseconds later by the realization of the task ahead of me.
Getting a gun — especially the first one — is a pretty big deal. . .
With our initial installment, we discussed how people come about wanting to own their own firearm, and the pivotal question for all first-time purchasers: “What do you want to be able to do with your gun?”HAT TIP: InstaPundit
The answers are as varied as the people considering gun ownership. You may want to be able to protect yourself and others in an insecure world; you may be nurturing a desire to master the skill of marksmanship. Possibly, the competitor in you desires to push yourself and to excel in one of many shooting sports. Or maybe, it’s just: “That looks fun and I want to do it.” You know what? That’s perfect. As long as you want to do it safely. Whatever your specific interest, there are several ways to ease yourself into the world of shooting if this is your first experience with firearms. . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



