CORRUPTION AT STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS BY OBAMA SUPPORTERS

May 1, 2012: Orly Taitz, Esq.:

Other web sites reprinted my pleadings and docket in my cases. Nouri of very popular “Anti-Mullah” web site did a great job of going through the latest pleadings and highlighting important parts. I do not know, who Nouri is, never met him or her, but thank you for spreading the word.

VERY IMPORTANT!
CORRUPTION AT STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS BY OBAMA SUPPORTERS
This is a Draft (& Dr. Orly Taitz may have already re-written with corrections)
Bill Z

The beginning of the end: Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama

Presidential Candidate Files Writ of Quo Warranto to Oust Obama And/Or Prevent Obama Ballot Access

Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama pursuant to District of Columbia Code, Division II, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Title 16, Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 35, §§ 3501-3503

THE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

"Quo Warranto For Interested Persons" - Leo Donofrio

CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, ie POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.

I will more thoroughly address the issue of statutory construction in the days ahead. (Since the state of Georgia will be hearing this issue on Jan. 26, 2012, I have decided to come forward with everything I have now, rather than waiting to publish my book.

The McCreery v. Somerville Funeral – Maskell And Gray To Attend – Minor v. Happersett To Preside.

Update on 6 legal actions against Obama

Posted on | December 27, 2011

1. Taitz v Fuddy January 6,  First Circuit court, Honolulu HI (Attorney Orly Taitz v Director of Health of HI, Loretta Fuddy). Subpoena for production of documents was served on the director of Health Fuddy.  I am asking my supporters to come to court to this hearing.

2. Farrar, Lax, Judy, Mac Leran, Roth v Obama, Brian Kemp, secretary of state of GA and Georgia Democrat Party ( Orly Taitz, attorney for Plaintiffs)- Trial January 26, Atlanta GA. I am asking my supporters to come to court to this hearing.

3. Keyes, Barnett et al v Obama et al (Attorney Orly Taitz representing former UN ambassador and presidential Candidate Alan Keyes, 10 state representatives and 30 members of the military) Petition for hear En Banc will be filed shortly in the 9th Circuit court of Appeals,

4. Taitz v Astrue (Attorney Orly Taitz FOIA against Commissioner of SS Michel Astrue) in the District of Columbia Circuit, no date for the hearing yet.

5.  Taitz v Ruemmler (Attorney Orly Taitz v White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler) in the DC circuit, not date yet.

6. Taitz et al v Gardner et al (Attorney Orly Taitz is joined by 5 State Representatives of NH and 4 Presidential candidates). I just talked to a clerk from the Supreme Court of NH. According to rule 11 Supreme Court of NH can assume original jurisdiction when the actions of the agency are outside of  what represents normal conduct of the agency. I argued that in a number of prior cases Ballot Law commission and the Secretary of State removed individuals from the ballot for not being qualified, not being eligible. I brought examples of individuals who were not natural born citizens. In Obama’s case members of the commission defrauded the petitioners and the public by claiming that they have jurisdiction to only  check, if Obama filled out the form correctly and paid the $1,000 fee. According to the clerk of the court Supreme Court of New Hampshire simply declined to assume original jurisdiction. I do not have the actual order yet. I suspected that, as 4 out of 5 judges of the Supreme court of  NH, including the Chief Judge are appointees of the Democrat governors (Jeanne Shaheen and John Lynch). As I stated previously, I will be filing with the Supreme Court of the United States  a petition for stay of counting of Obama’s votes pending decision on certiorari petition. As NH is in the first circuit, it will go to Justice Breyer. If he denies, I will refile with one of the conservative justices. At any rate, the case is no longer in NH, it goes to the Supreme Court of the United States. There is no need to do outreach, e-mails and phone calls  in NH, as the case is no longer there,  but donations towards legal work, costs and travel  to prosecute these 6 cases will be greatly appreciated.

OrlyTaitzEsq.com

List of current legal actions against Obama

OrlyTaitzEsq.com

List of my legal actions going on now, challenging Obama

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire
Posted on | December 11, 2011 | No Comments

1. HI Taitz v Fuddy hearing scheduled Jan 6, 2012

2. GA Farrar, Lax, Judy MacLeran v Obama, Executive Committee of the Democrat Party of GA, Brian Kemp, Secretary of State of GA- filed on behalf of a registered voter in GA and 3 Presidential candidates Pretrial order issued.Standing is great, as 2 of the presidential candidates are Democrats, running directly against Obama now in the primary election. First amended complaint and response to the Pretrial order sent. Trial set tenatively between January 9-16 Attorney for the Plaintiffs is Orly Taitz, Obama is represented by 2 private GA attorneys

3. Petition to the Supreme Court of NH Taitz, State Representativeds of NH Rappaport, Accornero, Via, Villenueva, Vita; Presidential Candidates Lax (D), Judy (D), MacLeran (R)- no date yet

4 District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals Taitz v Ruemmler (White House Counsel) no date yet

5. District of Columbia Circuit court of Appeals Taitz v Astrue (commissioner of Social Security ) no date yet

6. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al. This case was filed on inauguration day January 21, 2009 by attorney Orly Taitz. Her clients in this case are 40 plaintiffs, among them 2008 Presidential candidate from the American Independent party, former UN ambassador Alan Keyes, 10 State Representatives from around the country, 30 officers of the US military. 9th Circuit heard the oral argument on May 2, 2011. No decision yet. Taitz filed several supplemental brief and Petition for emergency Writ of Mandamus, no answer yet.

SCARY DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL FILMMAKERS

SINS OF COMMISSION, an award winning documentary film by Southern California filmmaker Richard Oshen, is facing legal action by the California Coastal Commission, which has in fact just served Mr. Oshen with a subpoena in order to obtain a copy of the film.

The revealing expose follows ordinary citizens who have come up against the unelected Commission’s autocratic actions wielded, surprisingly, without accountability or oversight.

The California Coastal Commission may try to silence the film because it reveals strong links between California’s increasingly catastrophic wildfires and the Coastal Commission’s prohibition of critical brush clearance.

-Richard Oshen,writer, director, SINS OF COMMISSION

Read more