Prophetic

Leo Donofrio, Esq. 2009:

I continue to press this issue for fear that it will continue to erode the chain of command. The brave men and women of our military deserve to know for certain that their Commander is Constitutionally eligible to lead them.

SCOTUS ought to revisit Cort Wrotnowski’s case if they truly care about the future of this nation and the health of our republic… which is being torn apart by this issue as we speak.

I personally don’t care who the President is anymore. I’ll never care again. Both McCain and Obama have damaged the office and this nation severely by their willingness to put us through this. It doesn’t matter who the President is. We’ll still be at war. We will still have poverty, hatred, racism, fascism, sarcasm, nukes, etc… the new boss is the same as the old boss. We do get fooled again. Everytime. But if we let this sit and the chain of command erodes… Goodbye Ms. American Pie.

READ MORE

Blood Brothers

From Leo Donofrio, Esq.:

After long consideration and discussion with my family, I am saying goodbye to this blog and the law. I am retiring my law license and will be concentrating on making films, and writing music.

There is no lawyer, politician or judge who will change the world into what God intended it to be – one family, one love. Angels are real. It’s gonna be a full on landing soon.

Some are in the video at the following link. . .

Ingrid Michaelson joined by PS 22 Chorus for take on 'Blood Brothers' -- EXCLUSIVE VIDEO

New Hampshire lawmakers question Obama’s citizenship

CONCORD, N.H. — President Obama is on the Democratic ballot for New Hampshire’s primary on Tuesday, despite the efforts of some Republican state legislators who argue the president doesn’t qualify as a “natural-born citizen.” “I don’t know where he was born, and I really don’t care,” said state Rep. Larry Rappaport of Colebrook, N.H., “but I think fraud is being perpetrated on the citizens of New Hampshire.” Mr. Rappaport and several GOP colleagues have been trying to get the New Hampshire secretary of state to remove Mr. Obama from the ballot. Their argument isn’t focused on the old question of the president’s birthplace, but on a clause in the U.S. Constitution that requires a candidate to be a “natural-born citizen.”

READ MORE

The most complete and authoritative discussion of the "natural born citizen" issue can be found on the Natural Born Citizen blog maintained by attorney Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.

The beginning of the end: Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama

Presidential Candidate Files Writ of Quo Warranto to Oust Obama And/Or Prevent Obama Ballot Access

Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama pursuant to District of Columbia Code, Division II, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Title 16, Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 35, §§ 3501-3503

THE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

"Quo Warranto For Interested Persons" - Leo Donofrio

CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, ie POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.

I will more thoroughly address the issue of statutory construction in the days ahead. (Since the state of Georgia will be hearing this issue on Jan. 26, 2012, I have decided to come forward with everything I have now, rather than waiting to publish my book.

The McCreery v. Somerville Funeral – Maskell And Gray To Attend – Minor v. Happersett To Preside.

JustiaGate

AMERICAN THINKER: Another Orwellian phenomenon surrounding the "birther" controversy was recently discovered

Tim Stanley is now in the very scary position of holding the evidence capable of putting Obama’s administration in true jeopardy...

Quo Warranto is not the only possible option on the table any longer...Impeachment is now in play.

THE JUSTIA CONSPIRACY - UPDATED

Justia swapped their tampered versions of the cases for the actual Supreme Court opinions and then pawned them off as if the tampered versions contained the "Full Text" of the Supreme Court's opinions.

Minor v. Happersett defined the one specific term which Barack Obama could not overcome with “Hope and Change” though he could ‘hope’ someone would ‘change’ the cases which help define the term “Natural Born Citizen,”. This case, if it had been sufficiently known to the public and media, and sufficiently documented by supporting citations, might have eliminated the possibility of Obama's nomination and/or election. Either Obama got lucky in this regard, or the “constitutional law professor” and former editor of the Harvard Law Review had some hand in directing the efforts to erase the very citations in law which define him as a citizen, and at the same time rule him out as a constitutional candidate for President of the United States.

UPDATE

CERTIFIGATE: Online Supreme Court opinions scrubbed in 2008 election runup - 1875 court definition of eligibility deleted from 25 cases at Justia.com

UPDATE #2:
10/29/11 - Conspiracies, Lies, and Justiagate

10/31/11 - JustiaGate: The Cover-Up Continues

Supreme Court: Proof that Obama is not eligible to be president

Multiple Instances Of Historical Scholarship Conclusively Establish The Supreme Court’s Holding In Minor v. Happersett As Standing Precedent On Citizenship – Obama Not Eligible.

US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT

New from Attorney Leo Donofrio:

The title of this article is correct. After having completed a more thorough review of the relevant US Supreme Court cases discussing the Constitution’s natural-born citizen clause, I have discovered precedent which states that a natural-born citizen is a person born in the jurisdiction of the US to parents who are citizens. Read that again. I said precedent, not dicta. The precedent holds that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States.

Up until the publication of this report today, all discussion of the natural-born citizen issue (from both sides of the argument) agreed there had never been a precedent established by the US Supreme Court, and that the various cases which mentioned the clause did so in “dicta”.

Read more

Obama admits: not a "natural born citizen"

From Leo Donofrio at Natural Born Citizen:

Obama’s own web site, Fight The Smears, which states – at this moment in time –

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”

“Governed”…he was governed by the UK at birth… his choice of words… one is governed by that which one owes allegiance to, in his case, the Monarchy of the UK, and this was a matter of both UK and US law. Furthermore, this argument has also been thoroughly discussed and debunked at this blog on multiple occasions…read the following

The State Department Has “Always” Recognized And Abided By Foreign Laws Concerning US Citizens Born With Dual Nationality.

The Jay Treaty Strongly Indicates That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President.

Furthermore, read the following historical discussions on the issue from main stream media sources:

New York Tribune 1896: Those born of non-citizen parents may not be eligible for POTUS.

The Boston Globe: “native born” does not equal “natural born” for Presidential eligibility.

An attorney discovers the real truth about Obama's long-form birth certificate

While I have always believed Obama was born in Hawaii, this document recently offered is an obvious forgery on many different fronts. Proper credit to those who spotted other anomalies, but Miss Tickly has done something others have failed to do. She’s really proved it’s a fake and she deserves serious credit for ingenuity of analysis. Her discussion of the boxes marked for “twins” nails this fraud down beyond question.

Miss Tickly Proves Obama’s New Document Is A Fraud ==> ==> ==>
link re-routed due to Chicago politics:
MISS TICKLY PROVES OBAMA's NEW DOCUMENT IS A FRAUD

["Miss Tickly" is the pseudonym of a professional graphic artist.]

Q: How can a person whose birth status was governed by the United Kingdom be considered a natural born citizen of the United States?

A: It's not possible.

How IRLI (Immigration Reform Law Institute) is tricking the U.S. Supreme Court

Leo Donofrio accidentally finds out about a serious issue for our country:

Something is very shady about this situation. The misquote combined with the compact emits a dangerous radiation. This radiation is covering our nation and it’s a symptom of disease. The country is dying. It is being killed from within. If IRLI is not part of the disease, they should come forward and make both issues right.

If we accept that a person born with dual allegiance can be President, we are opening the White House to the potential children of despots who hate this nation. Preventing this kind of foreign influence was the “strong check” John Jay warned George Washington of all those years ago when he introduced the “natural born citizen” requirement for POTUS.

Read the whole thing

The Jay Treaty Strongly Indicates That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President.

The Jay Treaty sought to grant the highest form of citizenship rights to those British subjects and US citizens affected by Article IX. Both countries agreed upon the one word they knew would – according to the law of nations – serve the purpose. That word was “natives”. Both states could have agreed that “British subjects” were to receive the same rights as “US citizens” and vice versa, but they didn’t.

They specifically chose the word “natives” because that word had a definitive meaning in the law of nations.

In 1984, the US Supreme Court – in TWA v. Franklin Mint Corp. – stated:

The great object of an international agreement is to define the common ground between sovereign nations. Given the gulfs of language, culture, and values that separate nations, it is essential in international agreements for the parties to make explicit their common ground on the most rudimentary of matters. The frame of reference in interpreting treaties is naturally international, and not domestic. Accordingly, the language of the law of nations is always to be consulted in the interpretation of treaties.

The law of nations is “always” to be consulted in the interpretation of treaties. You all know where this is going now, right?

Consider this to be just the introduction. In part 2 of this report, I will go into much greater detail.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.
Pidgeon & Donofrio GP
Old Federal Building
3002 Colby Avenue, Suite 306
Everett, Washington 98201

READ THE WHOLE THING

Jeffrey Toobin, alleged to be a “CNN Senior Legal Analyst”, gave a clearly false description of Vattel’s definition of “natural born citizen”.

Jeffrey Toobin Issued False Legal Statements to Anderson Cooper Regarding Vattel and the 14th Amendment.

Well whaddya expect from someone who has an "anal fixation"! (Not that there's anything wrong with that...)

Shoddy Reporting Concerning Closed Chrysler Dealers:What the TARP Inspector General Report Does NOT Say.

From Leo Donofrio:

The TARP Inspector General’s office, SIGTARP, recently released a report entitled, “Factors Effecting The Decision of General Motors and Chrysler To Reduce Their Dealership Networks“. This report set off a firestorm of shoddy reporting, which, if left unchecked, will confuse those familiar with the Chrysler Dealers’ pending litigation on appeal in federal district court. This blog posting has been designed to educate the public as to the truth of the SIGTARP Report.

Read more

Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”…

From Leo Donofrio: History, what a concept...

"Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace”.

MUST READ: Leo Donofrio explains his new commentary on the World Net Daily exclusive!

QUO WARRANTO

http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2009/11/quo-warranto-to-remove-obama.html

Closer and closer: the removal of a sitting President

Quo Warranto in D.C. brought by Chrysler Dealerships: If that filing proves successful, it will result in the removal of a sitting President!

This is the first of two cases that Donofrio and Pidgeon have planned publicly to file. This first filing is certainly indicative that the second does indeed exist, and is forthcoming. The second case will be filed in Washington D.C. in the District court, and this is the Quo Warranto case being brought by the Chrysler Dealerships, which will directly challenge Barack Obama’s qualifications for the office he holds. If that filing proves successful, it will result in the removal of a sitting President.

Read the whole thing