This is what a rigged system looks like

Daniel Greenfield at FrontPage Magazine:

In May, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed a lawsuit by the families of the victims of Benghazi against Hillary Clinton. Judge Jackson decided that the families couldn’t sue Hillary either for wrongful death or for defamation. That isn’t too surprising as Jackson is a former Clinton donor who had been appointed by Obama. And a Clinton donor should never have been ruling on a Clinton case.

But now Judge Jackson will be presiding over the Paul Manafort case.

Presiding over Manafort’s indictment is Judge Deborah A. Robinson. Judge Robinson’s most prominent previous case was the Berger trial. Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s former National Security Adviser, stole classified documents about the terror failures of the Clinton administration, hid documents under a construction trailer, lied about taking them and destroyed some of them.

People have gone to jail for doing a whole lot less with classified documents. But not Clinton associates.

READ MORE

Plenary Power: Should Judges Control U.S. Immigration Policy?

Federal policy on immigration has been founded on the “plenary power doctrine,” which holds that the political branches — the legislative and the executive — have sole power to regulate all aspects of immigration as a basic attribute of sovereignty. But despite the fact that the courts have affirmed the plenary power doctrine countless times since the 19th century, there is a movement underway to erode political-branch control over immigration in favor of a judge-administered system based on the implicit idea that foreigners have a “right” to immigrate. This Backgrounder examines the history of the doctrine, the challenges to it launched by supporters of mass immigration, and some possible responses.

READ MORE

There is a national crisis of federal employees engaged in the child porn industry and a related epidemic at the state level.

FORBES:

Money drives the crime. It is estimated that a criminal willing to molest a child in front of a live webcam can earn $1,000 a night...

With so many police, judges, clergy, state and federal employees across America involved in the child porn industry Americans should be able to turn to the IRS’s Whistleblower program.

READ MORE

The $43 Trillion Dollar Heist

UPDATE: The following article was used to try and intimidate Orly Taitz, Esq. from continuing her legal challenges to the legitimacy of Barack Obama's presidency!

Cases filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

1. Judd v Obama

2. Farrar v Obama

3. Taitz v Sebelius

4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial

5. Taitz v Astrue

6. Mississippi Filed Complaint

7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas

Videos

Video: Orly before NH Election Committee

|        |         |

"Most judges in this land have already been bought..."

Remember, if the grim view presented here reflects reality, we’re dealing with the best-trained assassins in the world, psychopathic professionals who are not likely to incriminate themselves or their masters. Remember too that the men who order such assassinations possess a license to kill. At least as far back as the Civil War, they have always been getting away with the murders of our best and brightest while we stood aside and looked (to paraphrase the late Bob Marley). So although we can’t be absolutely sure that the invisible government butchered Lucia and Leo, we can say that such butchery fits a historical pattern of state executions, and therefore that this pattern probably applies to these children as well. Given this pattern, given my background as a natural scientist and a frequent traveler to the land of statistical levels of significance, I’d place that the probability that the execution of Lucia and Leo was an act of state at about 90% (assuming of course that the basic facts in our possession are accurate and that this lawsuit and murders are not a COINTELPRO smokescreen.) That is, a priori, and without any detailed detective work, I feel there is roughly a 9 in 10 chance that Lucia and Leo have been murdered by rogue elements of the United States government.

Who Killed Lucia and Leo Krim?

The role of judges under our constitution

Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the role of the Judicial Branch in America. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer testified, answering the Senators’ questions for over two hours. You can see the entire hearing HERE.

American heroes:Leslie C. Dutton and Richard I. Fine

THE POST & EMAIL

These are the kind of heroes that will be the only reason our great Republic survives--if it does.

The degree of personal sacrifice in this situation, in order to root out the worst kind of political-judicial corruption, goes WAY beyond the call of duty...well, not really beyond the call of duty but certainly beyond the willingness of many of us to endure what appeared to be a permanent sentence of solitary confinement (and denial of medical treatment) for a 70-year-old Ph.D. of International Law and practicing attorney.

FULL DISCLOSURE:

Full Disclosure covered attorney Richard I. Fine's arrest on March 4, 2009 for Civil contempt of Court. He attempted to disqualify the Judge for accepting illegal payments from a party to the case. He claims Senate Bill SBX2 11 acknowledged the payments as criminal by giving Judges and officials retroactive immunity from prosecution. Fine remains in solitary "coercive confinement" in County jail.

Since this was first published, Dr. Fine has been released. Without protracted sacrifice from Leslie C. Dutton and volunteers, he would have remained in custody.

This is an AMAZING story of corruption that goes way beyond what we all imagine might be going on in California--and as it turns out, around our country! It is in the process of becoming a book and, most probably, a movie. You can find out more here:

Leslie C. Dutton
FULL DISCOLSURE NETWORK
A non-profit tax exempt educational production
337 Washington Blvd., #1
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
(310) 822-4449
http://www.fulldisclosure.net/

I heard Leslie speak at a Women's Federated meeting today in Chatsworth. It was very difficult to hear how an educated man with a distinguished law practice would be put in solitary confinement by a crooked judge and denied medical treatment at 70 years of age and, as retaliation for exposing corruption, be disbarred and lose his Beverly Hills law practice--and almost his home--just because a bunch of judges are getting millions in kickbacks from local politians! This is what you hear goes on in China and other countries that are serial abusers of human rights--IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!

How George Soros has hijacked the American justice system

The American Justice Partnership explained that 39 states now have some form of judicial elections that provide judges be held accountable to the people they serve. However, Soros' goal has been to convert the procedures into various "merit" selection processes – which mostly have a special panel, often appointed and frequently political – to choose a slate of candidates from which someone, such as a governor, would appoint a judge.

Read the whole thing

The Left is issuing death threats based on outdated and incorrect information!

Typical.

Much of the sensational reporting on Feldman’s investments was based on outdated information. The Judge was blasted for owning stock in Transocean, Ltd and Halliburton, two of the major companies involved in the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Feldman owned those stocks in 2008; however, he sold those shares long before issuing his ruling this week. In fact, this updated information will be released in the next report on his stock holdings.

Judge Faces Death Threats After BP Gulf Oil Drilling Moratorium Ruling

From PIECE OF WORK IN PROGRESS: Big Oil Maneuvering and Vestiture, or The Unified Theory of Obama Fail

H/T: InstaPundit

Principles to Consider When Evaluating a Supreme Court Nominee

From TEA PARTY PATRIOTS:

As the Supreme Court nomination of Elena Kagan is upon us, Tea Party Patriots has adopted the following set of principles to consider when evaluating any Supreme Court nominee. We encourage the Senate to use these principles as Senators are making decisions regarding the current and future Supreme Court nominees.

1. Judges must interpret the Constitution of the United States as written and not attempt to modify it, either by inventing new rights or by ignoring or diluting rights already there. The Constitution already provides an amendment process that gives that power to the people and their elected officials.
2. Judges must not use their positions to replace the text of the law and Constitution of the United States with their own personal feelings or agenda or "life experiences." Nor should they allow empathy, political favor, or political identification to affect their legal decisions. To do so is to engage in judicial activism.
3. Judges must understand that the Federal government has no power if the Constitution does not explicitly provide it. The Founders did this to maximize personal and economic liberty. The Constitution reserves all other rights to the states and to the people.
4. Judges must respect the delicate checks and balances and the separation of powers among the branches of government, refusing to become a tool of either the Legislative or Executive branches, and they must be prepared to invalidate efforts of either branch to overstep its constitutionally delegated powers.
5. The Constitution is an American document, and declares that it shall be "the supreme Law of the Land." Foreign law has no place as precedent or authority in the interpretation of the Constitution.

Newt Gingrich: "We're going to have to isolate and crush the secular socialist left."