Trump’s Era of Judicial Excellence

Excerpt: Most media pundits have given up trying to make the case that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian tyrant. Now they must grudgingly admit how much he’s done to bolster the rule of law.

Mr. Trump’s appointments to the federal judiciary are remarkable for both their quality and their quantity. By the numbers, Ed Whelan at National Review notes on Wednesday afternoon that Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his Senate colleagues have just confirmed the President’s 50th addition to the federal appellate courts, Lawrence VanDyke.

Gary Martin at the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that 50 is “a record for a president this early in a term, said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond School of Law professor and former founding faculty of UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-era-of-judicial-excellence-11576107296

Plenary Power: Should Judges Control U.S. Immigration Policy?

Federal policy on immigration has been founded on the “plenary power doctrine,” which holds that the political branches — the legislative and the executive — have sole power to regulate all aspects of immigration as a basic attribute of sovereignty. But despite the fact that the courts have affirmed the plenary power doctrine countless times since the 19th century, there is a movement underway to erode political-branch control over immigration in favor of a judge-administered system based on the implicit idea that foreigners have a “right” to immigrate. This Backgrounder examines the history of the doctrine, the challenges to it launched by supporters of mass immigration, and some possible responses.

READ MORE

The $43 Trillion Dollar Heist

UPDATE: The following article was used to try and intimidate Orly Taitz, Esq. from continuing her legal challenges to the legitimacy of Barack Obama's presidency!

Cases filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

1. Judd v Obama

2. Farrar v Obama

3. Taitz v Sebelius

4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial

5. Taitz v Astrue

6. Mississippi Filed Complaint

7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas

Videos

Video: Orly before NH Election Committee

|        |         |

"Most judges in this land have already been bought..."

Remember, if the grim view presented here reflects reality, we’re dealing with the best-trained assassins in the world, psychopathic professionals who are not likely to incriminate themselves or their masters. Remember too that the men who order such assassinations possess a license to kill. At least as far back as the Civil War, they have always been getting away with the murders of our best and brightest while we stood aside and looked (to paraphrase the late Bob Marley). So although we can’t be absolutely sure that the invisible government butchered Lucia and Leo, we can say that such butchery fits a historical pattern of state executions, and therefore that this pattern probably applies to these children as well. Given this pattern, given my background as a natural scientist and a frequent traveler to the land of statistical levels of significance, I’d place that the probability that the execution of Lucia and Leo was an act of state at about 90% (assuming of course that the basic facts in our possession are accurate and that this lawsuit and murders are not a COINTELPRO smokescreen.) That is, a priori, and without any detailed detective work, I feel there is roughly a 9 in 10 chance that Lucia and Leo have been murdered by rogue elements of the United States government.

Who Killed Lucia and Leo Krim?

The role of judges under our constitution

Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the role of the Judicial Branch in America. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer testified, answering the Senators’ questions for over two hours. You can see the entire hearing HERE.

Mexican government pulls strings in U.S. border patrol officer trial and conviction

GatewayPundit: Where’s the Outrage?… Border Patrol Officer Jailed For Pulling Illegal Alien’s Handcuffs and Not Disclosing It?

YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN (OBAMA'S) AMERICA!!!

Obviously, Mr. President, you know not the role of the judiciary!

Mr. President, you are absolutely, unequivocally, 100 percent wrong on the role of the judiciary, and your blindness as to what should be the blindness of justice could very well haunt this nation for generations to come.