Tuesday, January 31, 2012

WHITE HOUSE PANIC

Gruesome 2012 Economic Forecast Could Doom Obama

"Who's On First?" (Obama style)

Remember the famous "Who's On First? routine by Abbott & Costello?

Well, here's a modern version (don't tell Obama--he doesn't tolerate anything that contradicts what he tells us):
There’s an old adage that numbers don’t lie, but if Abbott & Costello were alive today, it would sound something like this...
COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America.

ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's 9%.

COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?

ABBOTT: No, that's 17%

COSTELLO: You just said 9%.

ABBOTT: 9% Unemployed.

COSTELLO: Right 9% out of work.

ABBOTT: No, that's 17%.

COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 17% unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, that's 9%...

COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 9% or 17%?

ABBOTT: 9% are unemployed. 17% are out of work.

COSTELLO: If you are out of work are you unemployed?

ABBOTT: No, you can't count the "Out of Work" as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.

COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!!

ABBOTT: No, you miss my point.

COSTELLO: What point?

ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work, can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.

COSTELLO: To who?

ABBOTT: The unemployed.

COSTELLO: But they are ALL out of work.

ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work... Those who are out of work stopped looking. They gave up. And, if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.

COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment roles, that would count as less unemployment?

ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!

COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work?

ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That's how you get to 9%. Otherwise it would be 17%.

You don't want to read about 17% unemployment do ya?

COSTELLO: That would be frightening

ABBOTT: Absolutely.

COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number?

ABBOTT: Two ways is correct. .

COSTELLO Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?

ABBOTT: Correct.

COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?

ABBOTT: Bingo.

COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to just stop looking for work.

ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like an economist.

COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said!

Monday, January 30, 2012

The most polarizing president EVER

Washington Post: OBAMA.

What white liberals get wrong about Islam

Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
SUN TV's Michael Coren was just on FOX News with Megan Kelly, frankly discussing the religious slaughter, honor killings. The segment is, in my opinion, unprecedented. Never before has this subject matter been discussed so boldly, so forthrightly, so fully, so accurately and so honestly on cable or broadcast news. I have been a frequent guest on Coren's show. He is on the front lines in the defense of freedom.

Send this around. Make it go viral. It's that good.
SUN TV's Michael Coren was just on FOX News with Megan Kelly, frankly discussing the religious slaughter, honor killings.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

WARNING: We may be headed for a Mini Ice Age!

Children just aren't going to know what sun is..>

...if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again.

Is Barack Obama resigning?

During the early afternoon hours on Friday, Obama went to Cambridge, MD and was scheduled to return to the White House at 3:00 p.m. for a 3:30 meeting with Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. The meeting was closed to the press.

What was the purpose of Obama’s trip? None of his stops appears to have been a campaign event. What was achieved as a result of his travels at great taxpayer expense?

There is nothing posted on Obama’s schedule for next week, either...
Why Did Obama Not Attend Thursday’s Hearing in Atlanta?

Saturday, January 28, 2012

THE REAL REASON GLENN BECK LEFT FOX NEWS

Find out here.

What Does Twitter’s Country-by-Country Takedown System Mean for Freedom of Expression?

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION:
Twitter has not yet blocked a tweet using this new system, but when it does, that tweet will not simply disappear—there will be a message informing you that content has been blocked due to your geographical location. Fortunately, your geographical location is easy to change on the Internet. You can use a proxy or a Tor exit node located in another country. Read Write Web also suggests that you can circumvent per-country censorship by simply changing the country listed in your profile.
What Does Twitter’s Country-by-Country Takedown System Mean for Freedom of Expression?

Friday, January 27, 2012

In Gov. We Trust



Thursday, January 26, 2012

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

To Judge Michael Malihi, presiding judge of the Obama GA ballot challenge, members of congress, presidential candidates and other interested Americans. This multi part series on facts regarding Obama refusing Federal Matching Funds in 2008 will raise reasonable doubts about Barack Obama’s Natural Born Citizen status.
CITIZEN WELLS

PART 1 - Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?
Summary: Documented that Barack Obama opted out of Federal Matching Funds after a pledge to receive them and repeatedly spoke about campaign finance reform.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 1

PART 2 - Robert Bauer, et al help Obama keep his records hidden.
Summary: Deals with the legal posturing involving Obama, Robert Bauer, et al with the FEC and the first lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility and Natural Born Citizen status initiated by Philip J. Berg.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records

PART 3 - Citizen Wells FEC FOIA request reveals FEC bias?
Summary: Had [Philip] Berg challenged the earlier ruling by the FEC which kept open the option for Obama receiving matching funds, perhaps the outcome would have been different. However, to be revealed in part 4, the Obama camp and the DNC did their best to quash the effectiveness of the FEC over several years.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 3, Citizen Wells FEC FOIA, FEC bias?

PART 4 - Obama, attorneys and Democrats control FEC
Summary: The devil himself could not have come up with a more devious plan.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 4, Obama attorneys Democrats control FEC

PART 5 - FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement
Summary: That there are eligibility requirements for receiving presidential matching funds and that the FEC is charged with administering these funds. It is clear that the FEC should always require proof of eligibility. It should have done so in 2007. We know there was inherent bias in 2007 (see Part 4 of this series).
Obama GA ballot challenge, FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 5, Fec US Constitution presidential eligibility

PART 6 - Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen
Summary: Obama is not a natural born citizen regardless of his birthplace because he did not have 2 US Citizen parents. We know this from the context of the times and language of the US Constitution and court cases. We have affirmation of this in Senate Resolution 511, that Obama signed, which declared that John McCain was a natural born citizen and that he had 2 US Citizen parents.

Not only do we have direct evidence that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen...we also have strong Circumstantial Evidence that he is ineligible and hiding more than just his eligibility deficiencies.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Circumstantial Evidence convicts Obama, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 6, Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen

Mitt Romney’s chief political mentor was a steadfast progressive who credited Saul Alinsky, met with him, and recommended his work

A syllogism:

A. Mitt Romney has stated his chief political mentor was his father, George Romney.

B.
George Romney, a steadfast progressive, credited Saul Alinsky, met with him, and recommended his work.

A+B = Mitt Romney’s chief political mentor was a steadfast progressive who credited Saul Alinsky, met with him, and recommended his work.
Mitt Romney’s Mentor, his Father, a Fan of Saul Alinsky

Huh? Republican candidates using "egregious signals" and "dog whistles"

Remember the "beer summit" and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.? He founded "The Root" -- "news and commentary from an African-American perspective" -- in 2008.

Listen to what the venerable professor thinks about our Republican candidates: Colorblind Racism: The New Norm
Colorblind racism is the new normal in American conservative political thought. Well after the election of the nation's first African-American president, in 2012 Republican candidates are using egregious signals and dog whistles to incite racial divisiveness as an effective tool for political gain. But when confronted about the nature of their offensive rhetoric, the answer is either an innocuous denial or dismissive retort.
Not like President Obama has EVER used "racial divisiveness" for political gain..oh wait, that's what he's been doing ever since he got elected!
It is curious that people bold enough to make outlandish racial claims never admit guilt or receive a proverbial trial and conviction by the greater populace.
Why, yes, it is, President Obama:
Allen West to Obama: MLK would be ‘devastated’

And, finally, Gates can't resist this one:
Last week's Fox News debate prior to the South Carolina Republican primary was an excellent example of the hubris inherent in today's racially charged, conservative environment

All the more offensive was the fact that this debate took place on the national holiday celebrating Martin Luther King Jr.
Desperate...or just ignorant?

O’Reilly: Dems, outraged over GOP debate on MLK Day, held own debate on previous MLK Day

THE HYPOCRISY IS ASTOUNDING!!!

Democrats have had one political strategy since Obama was elected: accuse ANYONE who disagrees with him of racism. This is a very convenient way to completely avoid discussing real issues for which they obviously have either no answers or the wrong answers judging from the REAL State of the Union.

Obama above the law?

1/25/12: Hon. Brian P. Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, responds to President Barack Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski of Atlanta: “If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the …proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

Hey, even Nixon wasn't above the law (remember Watergate)?

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS: JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET


TEA PARTY VIDEO INVITATION TO GEORGIA
January 26, 2012 Eligibility Trial

You will enjoy this, promise.

ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE

 GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE
FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON
 JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET


     THE LIVE STREAM CAN BE SEEN HERE

January 23, 2012 (TPATH) - Atlanta - Local news coverage of the court hearings on Thursday of this week have erroneously described them as "challenging Obama's citizenship". This appears to be their tactic in discrediting the lawsuits. They all have been informed, many times over, that it is Obama's status as a "natural born citizen" which is at issue, not his citizenship.

Several anchors have reported that other suits such as this have all been dismissed on "merit". This of course is more dis-information. The truth is, each and every other lawsuit has been dismissed by liberal judges on the grounds of "standing", and had nothing to do with facts or merit.

The standing defense has long been used by politicians and government officials to obscure the truth and deny the citizens access to justice.

As the mainstream media continue to report these cases, without the context of fact, it is clear that they understand the precarious position the President is in and they believe that they can obscure the real issue by false reporting. They actually believe they are still the only source for news.

While it is very unlikely that either Obama or his attorney will show up for these hearings, (they can't because for the first time they will have to defend themselves on fact not standing) it is important that as many people as possible take the time to link to the live feed of the proceedings on Thursday.

But more important than the live streaming is getting as many patriots to the courthouse as possible. If you are anywhere near Atlanta or you have the time and means to get there, all those that are doing this work and protecting our Constitution will be inspired by your support.

Fulton County Justice Center
Courtroom 3E
185 Central Ave.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

For more information contact Kim Beal at:
kbeal@osah.ga.gov

SHARIA FINANCE FOR DUMMIES (and boy, are they dumb!)

On Sharia Finance, Blankies and Axe Body Spray
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - January 21, AD 2012 10:46 PM MST
Writing about Sharia finance is oddly refreshing. Why? Because it is a chance to point out the abject stupidity – and guys, we’re talking full-on drooling imbecility here – of islam without anyone getting their head sawed off with a dull Ginsu-II or a child getting raped. Sharia finance is so monumentally stupid that it is actually hysterically funny. Have a few beers around a campfire and I could get you laughing so hard your ribs would ache.

Sharia finance CLAIMS to be lending without interest, because everyone knows that interest is all a sinister plot hatched by the JOOOOOOZ to keep down the white man. Wait. Keep down the black man. Wait, no. I’m getting so confused. Um, it definitely has something to do with the JOOOOOOZ, and I know this because all of the Ron Paul supporters tell me so. They also tell me that the World Trade Center was brought down by cold fusion-powered government tractor beams. They also tell me that the earthquake we had here in Colorado last year was actually the government (or was it the JOOOOOOOZ?) destroying the secret underground mega-city west of Trinidad, CO (Middle Earth is REALZ, yo!) with nuclear weapons, and that Ron Paul actually is the best friend and savior of the JOOOOOOOZ and if I weren’t such a Jew-loving, Zionist c*** I would see that. My email box is proof that truth is stranger than fiction, and that you really, truly can not make this stuff up. But I digress.

So the entire premise of Sharia finance is that there is NO INTEREST. If you borrow money, it is at zero percent, because the paying of interest is “haram”, which means “forbidden”, according to Sharia law. Got it? Good. Now, let me walk you through the reality of Sharia finance, and I warn you, don’t drink while you’re reading this, because if you do, you stand a good chance of spewing your Dr. Pepper out your nose, and I won’t be responsible for that.

Let’s say a person buys a $150,000 home on a 15 year mortgage at 5%. Purely for the sake of simplicity, let’s just say zero down. The amortization table shows that over those 15 years, or 180 months, at 5% interest, the monthly payment would be $1186.19 and that the total interest expense paid over the life of the mortgage would be $63,514.28. So, principal plus interest would be $213,514.28 for the $150,000 property.

Now here is an “interest-free” Sharia loan scenario. And bear in mind that I am dead serious here. I’m not making this up.

A musloid walks in to a Sharia-compliant lender and tells them that they want to buy a $150,000 property on a 15 year term. The Sharia-compliant lender then looks up what the going INTEREST RATE is. (Uh, Houston, we have a problem.) In our example, it is 5% on a 15 year mortgage. He then calculates the amortization table on a 15 year loan on $150,000 at 5%. (Uh, Houston, we've had some sort of major malfunction here.) He sees that the total interest expense would be $63,514.28. So, the Sharia-compliant lender then offers to buy the property at $150,000 and immediately sell it to the customer for . . . $213,514.28. The customer then sets up a note to repay the $213,514.28 in 180 equal monthly payments of $1186.19 at “zero percent”, because $213,514.28 divided by 180 is $1186.19. Voila! Zero interest!

That’s it. I’m not kidding. I’m not making this up. If I was going to make something up, I would make something up that wasn’t totally, completely, laughably stupid.

Um, soooooo, tell me Mister Musloid, what EXACTLY is the $63,514.28 markup? Uh, isn’t that . . . interest? How was that amount calculated? Uh, didn’t you ping the interest rate market to come up with that number? Yes.

Aren’t you paying the lender for the use of his money over the 15 year term? Yes.

Wouldn’t TRUE zero-interest lending mean that you paid a total of $150,000 for the property, and that your monthly payment would therefore be $150,000 divided by 180 months, or $833.33 per month? Yes.

And if you did a 30 year loan at true zero interest, your monthly payment would be $150,000 divided by 360, or $416.66 per month? Yes. THAT would be zero interest. Sharia finance is “zero interest” about as much as I am a bottle of 1964 Chateau Latour.

Over the Christmas holiday, I had the occasion to be around a two year old while traveling. There was a blanket nearby, and we inevitably fell into the old game of “hide under the blanket”. The toddler would pull the blanket over their head right in front of me, and then I would say, “Hey, where did she go? She was here just a minute ago. She just disappeared!” And then the toddler would pull the blanket off of her head and yell “HERE I AM!” and I would act like I had just witnessed some sort of miraculous manipulation of the fabric of space-time – probably having to do with a secret government cold fusion-powered tractor beam. You know the game. And you also know that toddlers at between the ages of three and four become self-aware, and possess enough cognitive sophistication to be able to perceive and extrapolate how OTHERS perceive THEM. And as soon as that intellectual benchmark is reached, the “hide under the blanket game” no longer works, because the child KNOWS YOU CAN SEE THEM.

This is pretty much the dynamic we are dealing with vis-à-vis the musloids. These people are intellectually and cognitively stunted due to 1400 years of inbreeding. As a result of this, they actually think that this Sharia finance “work around” is somehow valid or legit - AND THAT WE CAN'T SEE IT. They think that we non-musloids look at this and say, “My goodness! Yes . . . yes. That truly is a zero interest mortgage! Why didn’t we think of that?!”

The sad thing is that the politically correct morons who infest our culture think that it is somehow “tolerant” or “promoting diversity” to go along with the musloids and their intellectual retardation. And so, all of the megabanks are furiously scrambling to set up “Sharia-compliant” financial products, when the only appropriate response to such absurdity would be something along the lines of, “DO YOU THINK THAT I’M STUPID? GET THE HELL OUT OF MY OFFICE, AND TAKE YOUR BRAIN-DAMAGED NONSENSE WITH YOU. NOW. I’M BUSY.”

Finally, just a word about this in terms of the faux-religious con of islam. Have you noticed that musloids are constantly trying to cheat, deceive, and concoct “work-arounds” of ol’ allah? Sharia finance is merely trying to come up with a childish legalistic way to claim that they aren’t paying interest – but they obviously are. Islam also teaches that men can sin and do whatever they please on Mondays and Thursdays, because these are the two days of the week that allah is “inventorying the deeds of men”, and thus allah “is busy and isn’t watching you.”

I’m telling you, the stupid is STRONG with these people. What the hell kind of religion is built upon screwing over the diety? Oh, yeah - a “religion” that isn’t a religion at all, but a stupid, evil totalitarian political cult that uses faux-religious myths and motifs to control its cognitively damaged slaves. THAT kind of “religion”.

Guys, it is one thing to play “hide under the blankie” with a two year old. It is quite another to play that game with a 50 year old man wanting to buy real estate who smells of goat and Axe Body Spray, and also wants to kill you and take over your country.
>

Monday, January 23, 2012

"THE MOVE" (in real life)

Remember "The Move" from The Fusili Jerry (107th episode--Seinfeld's 6th season--originally aired on April 27, 1995)?

Well...ya GOTTA see this one!!

Ministry of Boobies: Traffic Cam Edition

(Boy, is he in trouble.)

Government Fights to Perpetuate Artificial Bone Marrow Shortage By Banning Donor Compensation

CARPE DIEM:

Find out why...

Sunday, January 22, 2012

THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court Historical Society:
Professor Arkes discussed the Four Horsemen, four conservative justices on the Court during the 1930s who tried to block many of President Roosevelt's New Deal programs. He examined many of the Supreme Court cases from the Roosevelt era.
C-SPAN VIDEO

"Spread your legs, baby, I'm comin' home. . ."

No, this is NOT what Mitt Romney said to his wife when they went to bed last night!

(And it's really none of Chris Wallace's beeswax.)

Chris Wallace to Mitt Romney: “What Did You Say to Your Wife When You Went to Bed?” (Video)

REPORT: Increase in anti-Semitism in the Middle East since "Arab Spring"

Why did so many of us "non-Experts" know this would happen, and why did so many of the Left simply make fun of us for predicting this?

The answer happens to be the primary reason that The Left is so dangerous when it is in charge of our foreign policy.

Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs Minister Yuli Edelstein