Showing posts with label campaign finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label campaign finance. Show all posts

Thursday, February 04, 2016

Ted Cruz: Will amended reports reflect violations of federal campaign finance laws?

The “accidental omission” is not necessarily the problem. The irreconcilable consequences from an accurate filing are the larger issue.

They can correct the missing information and file amended reports. However, if the Cruz campaign corrects the record based on the explanations to the media, the amended reports will reflect their violations of federal campaign finance laws.
READ MORE

Thursday, January 26, 2012

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

To Judge Michael Malihi, presiding judge of the Obama GA ballot challenge, members of congress, presidential candidates and other interested Americans. This multi part series on facts regarding Obama refusing Federal Matching Funds in 2008 will raise reasonable doubts about Barack Obama’s Natural Born Citizen status.
CITIZEN WELLS

PART 1 - Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?
Summary: Documented that Barack Obama opted out of Federal Matching Funds after a pledge to receive them and repeatedly spoke about campaign finance reform.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 1

PART 2 - Robert Bauer, et al help Obama keep his records hidden.
Summary: Deals with the legal posturing involving Obama, Robert Bauer, et al with the FEC and the first lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility and Natural Born Citizen status initiated by Philip J. Berg.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records

PART 3 - Citizen Wells FEC FOIA request reveals FEC bias?
Summary: Had [Philip] Berg challenged the earlier ruling by the FEC which kept open the option for Obama receiving matching funds, perhaps the outcome would have been different. However, to be revealed in part 4, the Obama camp and the DNC did their best to quash the effectiveness of the FEC over several years.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 3, Citizen Wells FEC FOIA, FEC bias?

PART 4 - Obama, attorneys and Democrats control FEC
Summary: The devil himself could not have come up with a more devious plan.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 4, Obama attorneys Democrats control FEC

PART 5 - FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement
Summary: That there are eligibility requirements for receiving presidential matching funds and that the FEC is charged with administering these funds. It is clear that the FEC should always require proof of eligibility. It should have done so in 2007. We know there was inherent bias in 2007 (see Part 4 of this series).
Obama GA ballot challenge, FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 5, Fec US Constitution presidential eligibility

PART 6 - Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen
Summary: Obama is not a natural born citizen regardless of his birthplace because he did not have 2 US Citizen parents. We know this from the context of the times and language of the US Constitution and court cases. We have affirmation of this in Senate Resolution 511, that Obama signed, which declared that John McCain was a natural born citizen and that he had 2 US Citizen parents.

Not only do we have direct evidence that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen...we also have strong Circumstantial Evidence that he is ineligible and hiding more than just his eligibility deficiencies.
Obama GA ballot challenge, Circumstantial Evidence convicts Obama, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 6, Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen

Sunday, February 21, 2010

How to Get the Corporate Money Out of Politics Once and for All

"While well intentioned people want to know how to get business out of politics, the answer is quite simple. It begins with getting politicians out of business...the more liberals champion regulation, the more corporate money will control politics-- and they will only have themselves to blame for it."
Corporate money plays a big role in politics. And that is the way it will always be until we change the reason why it plays such a big role. Because the problem has been misidentified. The problem is not corporate money. The problem is government...
Read the whole thing

Thursday, January 28, 2010

New York Times corrects Obama's Supreme Court error

...Justice Alito shook his head as if to rebut the president’s characterization of the Citizens United decision, and seemed to mouth the words “not true.” Indeed, Mr. Obama’s description of the holding of the case was imprecise. He said the court had “reversed a century of law.”

The law that Congress enacted in the populist days of the early 20th century prohibited direct corporate contributions to political campaigns. That law was not at issue in the Citizens United case, and is still on the books. Rather, the court struck down a more complicated statute that barred corporations and unions from spending money directly from their treasuries — as opposed to their political action committees — on television advertising to urge a vote for or against a federal candidate in the period immediately before the election...
Justice Alito’s Reaction