Carnac knows...

...that Obama's speech on Thursday, which the Wall Street Journal says will contain "no new policy," is just a way to justify a very hefty bribe (using our tax money, of course) to buy off the Middle East so that he [Obama] doesn't have to dump Israel until after the 2012 presidential election.

And Obama thinks he's fooling everybody.

O-BAM-A, O-BAM-A, O-BAM-A.

The dead infant and the birth-certificate mystery

WND: Researcher who suspects forgery finds possible reason for Obama registration number

The Mother of All Jihadist Jokes

Two Middle Eastern mothers are sitting in a café chatting over a plate of tabouli and a pint of goat’s milk.

The older one pulls out photos of her children and shows them to the younger one.

“This is my oldest son, Mujibar. He would have been 24 years old. He’s a martyr now.”

The other says, “Yes, I remember when he was young, so sorry for your loss”.

“And this is my second son, Khalid. He would have been 21” says the older mom.

“Oh yes, he had curly hair, I remember him” says the other mom.

“He’s a martyr now too”.

“Oh, so sad dear” says the younger mom.

“And this is my third son, my baby, my beautiful Ahmed. He would have 18.”

“Yes, I remember when he started school” says the younger one.

The older mom, with tears in her eyes, says, “He is a martyr now too.”

The younger one looks wistfully at the photographs and sighs deeply, searching for just the right comforting words, and says, “They blow up so fast, don’t they?”

Study finds Americans (Obama) spent almost a trillian dollars to destroy more than half a million jobs!

Way to go, Democrats.

So the American people borrowed and spent close to a trillion dollars to destroy a net of more than one-half million jobs. Does President Obama understand this? I very much doubt it. When he expressed puzzlement at the idea that the stimulus money may not have been well-spent, and said that "spending equals stimulus," he betrayed a shocking level of economic ignorance.

A Verdict on Obama's "Stimulus" Plan

“It’s the economy, Stupid.”

You might ask, why would anyone believe that anyone can beat the president? The killing of America’s most wanted terrorist three weekends ago produced the predictable spike in the polls. But, for Mr. Obama, predictability is the problem. We have all been that way before. George H.W. Bush won an entire war and saw his numbers go to nearly unanimous approval levels. Yet he lost the next election to a candidate running on the unofficial slogan of “It’s the economy, Stupid.”

"Republican Pros Handicap 2012 Presidential Race" by Clark Judge

Now we know where Obama got that long-form birth certificate!

Military Times: “It’s my feeling that the administration has aimed a spotlight into one of the darkest corners of our national security apparatus without regard for the damage it might do to its ongoing operations.”

Navy SEALS to Piehole of the United States: Why Don’t You Shut up?

“Operation POTUS Piehole?”

Defense secretary Robert Gates:

“Frankly, a week ago Sunday, in the Situation Room, we all agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to take out bin Laden. That all fell apart on Monday, the next day.”

OHIO: Mom Guilty of Killing Baby In Microwave

Paris Talley, Arnold’s 28-year-old infant, died after being placed in a microwave on Aug. 30, 2005. Prosecutors said Arnold cooked her baby at her home at 415 Hall Ave. in the since-demolished Parkside Homes complex.

Glenn Beck often wonders "who are we and who are we becoming?"

I think he has very good reason to wonder, don't you?

Crystal McGhee said she did not believe her niece could get a fair trial in Dayton because of the publicity.

“She was a good mother,” McGhee said. “I watched her raise her children.”

Jurors find mom guilty of killing baby in microwave oven

Reality Show: It's Over

The president is about to order companies that do business with the federal government to disclose their political donations.

I've come to realize that we are in the middle of a live coup d'état, a reality show that's been in pre-production for many, many years, but which is now achieving super-sonic dimensions that may, simply, overcome our beloved country like a Japense tsunami.

Akira Suto, a 55-year-old construction worker, said he can't forget the wall of icy ocean water as it pitched him head over heels, breaking his grip on his 82-year-old mother as the pair ran from their home, trying to flee.

"It's over,"

his mother gasped, before she was dragged away by the waves, he said. Her body still hasn't been recovered.

Fateful Choice on a Day of Disaster

If Obama is re-elected in 2012, "It's over."

And it's not just me saying that, either. Mark Levin, and others, have said that more than once.

On Friday, May 6th we learned that

President Obama has officially kicked off his 2012 re-election campaign, and don't Republicans know it. The president is expected any day now to sign an executive order that routs 70 years of efforts to get politics out of official federal business.

Obama's Gangster Politics"

...the order amounts to the White House brazenly directing the power of government against its political opponents...

It's chilling to watch the graphics of two parallel dimensions as they play out in real time...the one where Obama's adoring and obviously uninformed devotees worship and cheer him on and the other where serious news outlets are reporting the same heart-rending news of a megalomaniac gone wild in the most powerful position on earth:

Obama's Gangster Politics

Supporters are bragging the campaign may break the $1 billion threshold, money that will go even further if the White House can simultaneously use its executive order to dry up Republican donations.

David Limbaugh, in his extraordinarily detailed

Crimes Against Liberty

followed Obama through the fall of 2010, but, as the warmly-embraced White House in-house communist Van Jones once said: "Don't stop there! Don't stop there!"

And, he didn't.

Our transformational terminator hasn't stopped for a minute. Like a swarm of termites, the Obama regime might leave the shell of our homeland standing for awhile after they've gutted the insides...but not for long.

The campaign (as in a war) is meant to take him over the goal-line when, in 2014, Obamacare has finally kicked in for good.

...the individual mandate is not the only provision in Obamacare that violates the Constitution. It also violates the Tenth Amendment and limits on Congressional power under the Constitution’s Spending Clause...Regardless of whether it is constitutional, Obamacare is also harmful to the economy, medical innovation, and the health care system. Earlier, I discussed some of the bad effects of Obamacare on patients, employers, consumers, and the insurance market.

CEI Files Another Amicus Brief Challenging Obamacare

Obama doesn't "govern" in the tradition of American presidents, he careens between "transforming" the United States of America and campaigning to get re-elected in 2012.

The 2011 Pulitzer Prize-winning Chicago Sun-Times:

There’s one more bit of potential White House politicking worth noting. The president is considering issuing an executive order requiring federal contractors to find out and report the political contributions of its directors and officers. The White House says the issue is transparency, but clearly such an order carries the potential for mischief. Image if, a couple of years ago, President Bush had demanded that private companies doing business with the federal government report political donations? Liberals would have accused him of trying to compile an enemies list.

Obama’s idea raises red flags even among Democrats. The No. 2 Democrat in the House, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland (home to many federal contractors), sees “some serious questions as to what implications there are if somehow we consider political contributions in the context of awarding contracts.”

Obama jumping gun on 2012 politicking

THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA

"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America"

This is the “transformation” Obama promised — the Hope and Change on offer from a Good Man who, by force of executive order and imperial overreach, is working to turn each and every one of us into clients of a massive centralized government managed by endless bureaucratic rules and regulations whose reach covers everything from puddles to dust to human exhalation to light bulbs to toilets to mandating what we purchase (and, as a result, mandating all sort of other things in the future, from what we need eat to maintain our “free” health care to where unions demand we open our businesses to the “social justice” agenda of the left that requires banks to “lend” money to those who can’t pay that money back as a condition of doing business).

Totalitarianism is here

Fifty-seven percent of Americans favor repealing the health care reform law – up 10 points since last week

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters now at least somewhat favor repeal of the law.

Rasmussen Reports

Democrat politicians believe that millions of foreigners have every right to enter our home -- our sovereign republic...that immigration laws aren't laws at all

These temporary politicians -- these useless Democrats hacks -- no longer represent the people. They represent illegal aliens, who are trespassing in our country; who are entering our land without any background checks or vetting procedures; who are driving up unemployment among citizens; who often come for free health care services or schooling or more nefarious reasons; who do not understand the history or traditions of this country; and whose presence here will ultimately Balkanize this country in ways no one can possibly foresee.

What Democrats Believe

We need to know where Obama was on November 4, 1999

Good question...

How can God be all-powerful and still allow evil?

If God is all-powerful, aren’t we all just little chess men being moved around on a chess board?

First, we have to pin down the concept of free will. Because God LOVES His creation, most especially sentient beings, He gave all sentient beings FREE WILL. He didn’t want us to be his “toys”, because toys are mere objects. Instead, He created us as SUBJECTS. He wants to interact with us and have a dynamic relationship with us. The way He did this was to bestow upon us individual sovereignity – or free will. We can choose. We can, through our decisions and actions, alter the timeline. In fact, every decision and action we take does just that. As we travel through linear time, we are constantly shaping and directing how the timeline unfolds.

Now a quick point about these “sentient beings” that God created. There are two populations within that set. The first is human beings, who are spirits joined to a body. We are BODY-PERSONS. The other population is referred to as “angels”. Yes, angels are very real, as Our Lord makes SPECIFIC reference to them in the Gospels numerous times. Angels are PURE SPIRIT. They do not have physical bodies. They have, on occasion, made themselves manifest to people by taking on the appearance of a body, but that is just an illusion for our benefit. They are pure spirit. Satan is in this population, along with what we call “demons”. These are pure spirits who chose to rebel against God. Why did they rebel? Angels exist, like God, outside of time. They saw that it was God’s will, one way or another, to take on Human Flesh so that He could love us AS one of us. A certain percentage of the angels were repulsed by this – repulsed at the idea of bowing down and worshiping a mere Man, even if that Man was God, and so they rebelled. Since God made them free sovereigns, they were permitted to do this. Think about it. If God just started snuffing beings out of existence when they made a choice that wasn’t in accord with His will, wouldn’t that cheapen all life and existence to the point of meaninglessness? Wouldn’t all beings just be mere object-playthings at that point? Yep. Love means putting up with the periodic horseshit behavior of the beloved. Most ESPECIALLY for God.

So that explains how evil entered into the world and is allowed to persist. Now a little recreational physics. I have always LOVED physics, even though my math education was horrible. When I was in the 8th grade, my grandmother bought Steven Hawking’s “A Brief History of Time” for me with her senior discount card at Waldenbooks. I was in heaven. One of the concepts that Hawking explained was the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In a nutshell, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that we can never know the exact position AND velocity of any particle, because in order to observe a particle, you have to bounce a photon off of it – which then alters its position and velocity. Now, you might think that is no big deal, but it is a HUGE deal. You’re just going to have to take my word for this for the moment, but what this means is that when a particle travels from point A to point B, it traverses EVERY POSSIBLE PATH SIMULTANEOUSLY. I’m not kidding. This is experimentally proven.

What does this have to do with God and free will? God in His omniscience knows and sees not only the Real Timeline, which is the result of all of our individual decisions, but he also knows and sees all of the “Heisenberg Timelines” which are constantly and infinitely shooting and branching off from the Real Timeline. In other words, the Heisenberg Timelines are the timelines that WOULD have happened IF we had made a different choice. When we say that God is INFINITE and ALL-KNOWING, we really don’t comprehend the real scope of what we are saying. Infinite means infinite – not limited in any way. Hence, the infinite number of Heisenberg Timelines fit very easily into that set.

What God does is constantly reset His Perfect Will after every decision every person makes. He always has a clearly defined Will, which is always for the perfect good, given the timeline up to that point. Let’s say that right now in this moment His will is for Ann to do action Y, which is in accord with His Perfect Will, but I instead choose to do action Z. After I choose and execute action Z, He adjusts His Perfect Will to a new set given action Z. If action Z was a sin, His new Perfect Will now includes that I confess and repent of that sin, but the timeline continues given the reality of Action Z, which I freely chose. If I choose action Y, no adjustment is made on His part, because I have acted in accordance with His Perfect Will, and the timeline likewise continues. I cannot emphasize enough the infinite love, patience and condescension we are talking about here. There just aren’t words.

So what we see is that God is in an unending dance of love manifested in freedom with all of us. His Will is always for perfect good, but in His love for us, He allows us to act freely, and then in His Mercy, He resets according to our choices. He allows us to, in a sense, cooperate with Him in authoring reality. This is why wonderful things tend to come out of bad situations. Think of all of the husbands and wives who have met and fallen in love . . . because of a war. How many times have you heard a person recall a terrible childhood, or a terrible accident, and then say, “. . . .but I wouldn’t change a thing.” Now you know why. Does God ever enter into the timeline and “nudge” events? Oh, yes. Many times these “nudges” are barely perceptible and exist almost entirely within the conscious or sub-conscious mind. But He does also on occasion physically enter into spacetime to nudge the timeline, and those instances are called “miracles”.

And yes, He is managing to do all this while driving 1.659 novemdecillion fusion reactions per second.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts: nor your ways My ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are exalted above the earth, so are My ways exalted above your ways, and My thoughts above your thoughts.” Isaiah 55:8-9

Reader Theological Question: God & Evil
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - April 18, AD 2011 10:43 PM MST
http://barnhardt.biz

Bin Laden Has Been Dead for Years

We have compiled a partial list of several problems with the official story of Osama Bin Laden's recent death. There are several other theories and observations that can be made, but we feel the below is a great start to expose this fraud that is being sold to the American people and the world. Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years.

Wake Up 1776

Summary of discussion points:

No Body...

No Photo...

Faked Photo...

Obama Watched Raid - Yet there Was a Commo Black Out...

DNA Testing Confusion and Impossibility...

Bin Laden's Wife Misidentified...

We Think We Found Bin Laden...

Official Said in 2002 that Bin Laden Was on Ice and Already Dead...

Staged Vigils...

Emotion...

Dialysis Machine...

Fox News Report that Bin Laden Died of Disease in 2001...

CIA Admits to Faking Bin Laden Tapes...

Multiple Photos, Evidence, and Witnesses like when Saddam Hussein was killed missing...

Timing...

BLIND POST: China’s Barbaric Cruelty to Animals

This troubling and shocking article has been written as an exclusive for VFR. It could be subtitled: A Dog’s View of Multicultural Relativism.

China’s Cruelty by Spencer Warren.

I'm sorry: I can't read it. I'm posting it as a public service, but I haven't read it. Just can't.

There have been some things I've read in the past about animals that have left me completely dysfunctional for days/weeks. I hate to even bring it up because whatever it is that I've "been through" was NOTHING compared to the real suffering of the animals.

BTW, I also feel this way about cruelty to children...and cruelty, period. But there is something about the helplessness and dependency of animals and children that makes it even worse.

HAT TIP: China Confidential: China's Horrific Cruelty to Animals

The Fair Tax Act versus A Personal Accounts Plan (for Laymen)

by Dick McDonald
Ownership Society Institute
www.RiseUpAmerica.us

Rather than get into too many complicated inter-related issues, I am writing this to make crystal clear the main (but not all) of the differences between the highly touted Fair Tax plan and the less understood personal account plan I am supporting and writing about in my book “Make the Poor Rich.”

The Fair Tax Plan

The Fair Tax Plan is very attractive. It scraps all Federal taxes and replaces them with a 23% consumption tax. It eliminates the IRS. It eliminates the need to file income, estate, gift, excise and payroll tax returns. The Fair Tax abolishes them all. Your yearly trek to your tax accountant is eliminated and H&R Block evaporates. No need for copious tax receipts and support; all that is eliminated. Tax cheats who failed to pay their taxes in order to buy more stuff get caught in buying that stuff because the Fair Tax is a consumption tax.

The Fair Tax is based on the assumption that it is fairer to tax consumption than net taxable income which is based on ability to pay. The richer you are the more you pay in our 93-year old system. The Fair Tax doesn’t care how rich or poor you are it just imposes the tax on the new products you buy. It rebates (called a pre-bate) the 23% tax on the necessities the poor buy and exempts them completely from tax as the payroll tax will have been abolished. This is a good thing for the poor, but hardly a bonanza as they are prone to consume every dollar they get.

Under the Fair Tax the rich guy pays nothing except the 23% tax on that which he personally consumes. As he has most everything already, the portion of his income and wealth spent on taxable consumables will only be a fraction of the percentage the poor and middle class spend on taxable consumables. Granted the rich man will invest in the market and create jobs and economic activity which will up overall consumption. That is a good thing but I’m afraid the ordinary taxpayer will complain that the rich get richer under such a plan and the poor and middle class stand still and pay the freight.

The Personal Account Plan

This tax reform ”personal account” plan eliminates all payroll taxes going to the government and diverts them (the 15% which is already withheld) into a taxpayer’s own personal investment account to grow over his 40-year working life by compounding into a sizeable nest egg. As compared to the Fair Tax, the account cannot be reached until retirement as the plan calls for the transfer of the funding of retirement from the government to the individual and the government doesn’t want to have people be irresponsible and spend all their savings and come back as a ward of the state. The nest egg is sufficient in size that just the income off the nest egg will provide the retiree with an affluent retirement. At death, his sizeable estate can be passed on to his children. No other taxes are repealed. However with the repeal of the payroll tax, half of the national budget is eliminated and the need for half the taxes. As those taxes are invested in the economy a substantial increase in economic activity is anticipated.

Comparison of Some of the Features:

• Simplicity
  
  Nothing beats the Fair Tax for simplicity. It eliminates and abolishes all Federal taxes and replaces them with one simple consumption tax. It eliminates the need for a sizeable IRS. It reduces the need for complicated accounting and supporting documents. It eliminates the need for tax returns and the complicated determination of taxable income. Nothing could be simpler than the Fair Tax.
  
  By comparison there would be more complications with a personal account as all taxes stay the same and payroll taxes still have to be determined and paid into an individual’s personal account. In the present Social Security system the government takes care of funding retirement and old-age medical needs. Under personal accounts this responsibility falls on an individual’s shoulders.

  Advantage: Fair Tax

• Limiting the Size of Government
  
  The Fair Tax would substantially reduce the Government’s need to administer so many taxes but HR 25, its empowering legislation, makes this “consumption tax” revenue neutral. In laymen’s terms that means that if the government collected $2.8 Trillion in Federal taxes in 2006, the Fair Tax would be designed to tax the “consumables” subject to this Fair Tax so as to collect $2.8 Trillion in 2006. Therefore it doesn’t limit the size of government to any significant extent. Politicians would still retain the right to allocate that $2.8 trillion of tax receipts at their whim.
  
  The personal account plan would cut the Federal government in half. The Federal budget would fall from $2.8 Trillion to $1.4 Trillion overnight. As the government would no longer be charged with the responsibility of funding retirement and old-age medical needs, it no longer would be in the entitlement business. It would no longer be playing nanny to its citizens.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Tax Cuts
  
  As the Fair Tax is revenue neutral, its imposition would not cut the nation’s tax burden. It would merely shift that burden among the various classes of taxpayers. The poor would be exempt from all taxes and the wealthy exempt from income, dividend and capital gains from which most of their wealth presently flows. Those whose income is spent on consumption over the poverty line would be hardest hit. However, as the Fair Tax is not designed to cut taxes, it is not a vehicle for tax cuts.
  
  As far as tax cuts are concerned, the imposition of full-blown personal account legislation would result in the biggest tax cut in the history of the planet. Eliminating the need for government to fund retirement and old-age medical costs would result in a $1.4 Trillion tax cut.. Unfortunately for those who want to spend their tax cuts now, that money will be put away for them to grow into millions over the years and will not be immediately available. They will be able to direct their investment into pre-designed indexed funds but that is all. Still it is a massive tax cut.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Cost and Logistics of Transition and Implementation
  
  The cost and logistics of transitioning to the Fair Tax would be daunting logistically but not too costly. As the plan is revenue neutral, the federal government would still be raking in the same dough; they would just be in a scramble as to whose ox is gored changing job descriptions and desks.
  
  The transition to a full-blown personal account modality would be painful to those who look at the problem linearly. Today the payroll tax receipts are used to pay retirees. Upon implementation of personal accounts that source of funding disappears as those funds will be placed in personal accounts. The question then becomes how do we fund the benefits of those in the system now and those whose accounts won’t have sufficient time to mature into sufficiently large nest eggs.
  
  In my book, “Make the Poor Rich,” I have at least eight methods to easily accomplish this. None may be needed, however, if history repeats itself. In the 1980s when Reagan cut the tax rate from 70% to 28% the result was that government “income” tax revenues doubled because of increased economic activity. If that happens again and there is good reason to believe it will as the stimulus of personal accounts will pale to insignificance the tax cut of the 1980s then such increase in revenues will be more than enough to pay for the smooth transition to personal accounts.

  Advantage: Fair Tax

• Unfunded Debt Reduction
  
  The Fair Tax hopes to generate sufficient activity to make a big dent in the $13.2 Trillion unfunded Social Security debt. It makes no provision for the looming $30 to $50 Trillion of Medicare liabilities. I personally am unconvinced that it adequately addresses the Social Security problem as the Fair Tax is revenue neutral and present revenues are not adequate to pay the ever-increasing unfunded liability much less reduce the existing liability. It would be necessary to run enormous surpluses under the Fair Tax to even begin to address these unfunded entitlements. Under Fair tax these liabilities remain a severe problem.
  
  The personal account plan abolishes both the Social Security and Medicare unfunded liabilities on the date of the plan’s passage. They are written off the books with the stroke of a pen. Congress is not obligated to fulfill those promises and they have proven that in the Supreme Court. They have no contractual obligation to retirees. They can repeal any laws without consequence.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Retirement Funding
  
  The Fair Tax makes no provision for retirement funding. Taxes presently collected to pay retirees will remain the same and substantial benefit cuts or an increase in the 23% consumption tax will be needed to keep those programs afloat. I don’t see any significant change in the dynamics of a revenue neutral consumption tax that would in any way ameliorate the problem.
  
  The personal account plan has been devised to make the poor rich and able to afford upon retirement an affluent lifestyle and the best medical coverage money can buy just off the income from their nest egg. Your $60,000 a year truck driver retires with a $4.8 Million nest egg and a $40,000 a month retirement check (2006 dollars) without invading his nest egg. He can afford a magnificent lifestyle and buy the best medical care money can buy.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Crime, Discontent and the Pursuit of Happiness
  
  The Fair Tax and its abolition of all the taxes and the bother they create will do wonders for the people. It is a step up in the pursuit of happiness. I question, however, its effect on crime and discontentment. I think it will only marginally improve either of the latter. Its revenue neutrality bespeaks of its failure to lift all boats.
  
  Personal accounts have been designed to make the poor rich; even those who by circumstance or environment can’t compete for the big bucks. It carries them into a paradigm in which they can achieve the American Dream by merely working to survive. As most crime is driven by the lack of money, personal accounts will do wonders in reducing crime. As a disincentive for bad behavior for those who commit crimes for money we will subtract their incarceration costs from their personal accounts when jailed. As the poor get wealthier, both the tenor of life and its crisis will tone down and hopefully mute. Personal accounts and the security they provide should be the ultimate reward in the pursuit of happiness.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Private Sector Retirement Funding
  
  The Fair Tax abolishes the payroll tax and provides Social Security and Medicare coverage assumedly at the same level presently paid. As those amounts are insufficient to provide just enough to avoid starvation and homelessness, I don’t see the Fair Tax helping the private sector fund retirement. As it presently stands business is abandoning fixed retirement benefit plans for 401(k)s which have no mortality pool (not payable until death). The Fair Tax should provide a cushion for corporations to provide retirement plans but I doubt they will do so considering the cost that must be added to their products and services.
  
  Personal accounts are designed to provide in one place all the retirement funding an American needs. He won’t need funding from his employer or employers. He can scrap his 401(k), his IRA. There will be no need with the nest egg he will accumulate under the personal account plan.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Wealth Creation
  
  The Fair Tax is not designed to create wealth. It is revenue neutral and neither cuts overall taxes nor provides for an increase in the capital pool (here we assume the rich will be freer to invest but it should be offset by a reduction from other classes who pick up the shortfall in tax collections).
  
  Personal accounts have been devised to create enormous personal wealth for American citizens; even the poor and uncompetitive will become wealthy. . Under this plan the overall wealth of America will geometrically rise to supply the world with the capital it needs to improve the overall standard of living of the oppressed and unfortunate of underdeveloped nations. Advantage: Personal Accounts FairnessIf by fairness one wants to rid themselves of bothersome details, the Fair Tax is your number. However, as between classes of taxpayers I have concluded the Fair Tax is anything but “fair”. Were it not revenue neutral and created huge surpluses with which to liquidate our unfunded debt. I would feel differently. As it is, it loses my vote. This is of course predictable as it is my passion to implement personal accounts at 15% of income and wages and I am exceedingly biased. I leave it to the Fair Tax crowd to challenge my findings and my conclusions. I doubt they will be sitting on their hands.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts

• Legislative Potential
  
  Neither Fair Tax nor Personal Accounts legislation will go down without a massive battle with the establishment as both are designed to free the individual from the yolk of government. The forces of government are massive and impressive. Fortunately they already have personal accounts which I will use like a rapier to impugn their character and honesty with the American people. I predict they won’t get away so easily this time;. George W. Bush won’t be running interference.

  Advantage: Personal Accounts.

Obama: illegitimate child; illegitimate president

Pamela Geller:

Talk about your proverbial can of worms. Clearly, Barack Hussein Obama's Immigration file was the impetus for President Obama to release his "long form" last week. If he thought that would put the matter to rest, it has had the opposite effect. It has all raised more questions than it answered, as does the release of shocking revelations in BHO I's immigration file.

An Illegitimate Child, An Illegitimate President: Despite Multiple Attempts, "No Comment" from the White House

How HEZBOLLAH is infiltrating the United States

SAN DIEGO -- A terrorist organization whose home base is in the Middle East has established another home base across the border in Mexico.

"They are recognized by many experts as the 'A' team of Muslim terrorist organizations," a former U.S. intelligence agent told 10News.

The former agent, referring to Shi'a Muslim terrorist group Hezbollah, added, "They certainly have had successes in big-ticket bombings."

Terrorist Group Setting Up Operations Near Border: Hezbollah Considered To Be More Advanced Than Al-Qaida

Palin Bumper Sticker Sparks "Terrible" Response

Adrienne Ross

Pro-GOD, Pro-LIFE, Pro-FAMILY, Pro-COUNTRY: I agree with Adrienne. Since when did these become "terrible" things? And HOW did they become terrible things?