Testimony at the Senate Intelligence Committee hearings on Russian interference in the election once again raised the central paradox of the Russia conspiracy theory. If Russian interference in the election represented the crisis that we are told it did, why did Obama fail to take any meaningful action?READ MORE
The White House’s own cybersecurity people wanted an aggressive response before being told to stand down. Obama issued a bloodless warning to Russia while his people deliberately crippled our offense.
Democrats and the media blamed the Russian hacking on Trump. But it was Susan Rice who had told the cybersecurity team to “knock it off” and Obama’s people who hadn’t wanted him to be “boxed in” and forced to respond to Russian actions. Was this just the usual appeasement or was there more to it?
Why didn’t Obama and his team want to stop Russian hacking? Because they needed the Russians.
Showing posts with label Russians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russians. Show all posts
Monday, June 25, 2018
"The 2016 election is really the story of two deep state intelligence operations that dovetailed neatly with each other."
Daniel Greenfield:
Monday, February 19, 2018
WHERE ARE THE INDICTMENTS OF OBAMA’S FOREIGN COLLUDERS?
Daniel Greenfield, FRONTPAGE MAG:
The Clinton campaign employed a British foreign agent who used Russian intelligence sources to put together opposition research meant to interfere with the results of a United States election. Collusion between the Clinton campaign, Steele and the Russians doesn’t require an endless fishing expedition.READ MORE
Foreigners interfering in United States elections are not a new phenomenon. Muslims in Gaza famously ran a phone bank for Obama. A Hamas political adviser had declared that he hoped Obama would win.
There was no investigation. Nor did anyone indict the Gazans running the phone bank.
Labels:
Donald Trump,
elections,
Gaza,
Hamas,
Hillary Clinton,
Muslims,
Obama,
President,
Russians,
scandal
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Constitutional, criminal, and civil rights attorney: "The indictment raises serious issues under the free speech clause of the First Amendment and due process rights under the Fifth Amendment."
Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?
by Robert Barnes | 8:02 am, February 17th, 2018
Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted foreign citizens for trying to influence the American public about an election because those citizens did not register as a foreign agent nor record their financial expenditures to the Federal Elections Commission. By that theory, when will Mueller indict Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, PerkinsCoie, the DNC and the Clinton Campaign? Mueller’s indictment against 13 Russian trolls claimed their social media political activity was criminal because: they were foreign citizens; they tried to influence an election; and they neither registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act nor reported their funding to the Federal Elections Commission.
READ MORE
Labels:
2016,
Christopher Steele,
Donald Trump,
election,
FBI,
Hillary Clinton,
indictment,
President,
Robert Mueller,
Russians,
scandal
Thursday, February 08, 2018
The Hill’s John Solomon reports the Uranium-One Informant, Douglas Campbell, broke his silence on a Russia plot to steer millions of dollars to the U.S. in an effort to benefit the Clinton Foundation.
An FBI informant connected to the Uranium One controversy told three congressional committees in written testimony that Moscow routed millions of dollars to America with the expectation it would be used to benefit Bill Clinton‘s charitable efforts while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quarterbacked a “reset” in US-Russian relations.READ MORE
The informant, Douglas Campbell, said in the testimony obtained by The Hill that he was told by Russian nuclear executives that Moscow had hired the American lobbying firm APCO Worldwide specifically because it was in position to influence the Obama administration, and more specifically Hillary Clinton. […]
Campbell said Russian nuclear officials “told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton’s Global Initiative,” he added in the testimony.
“The contract called for four payments of $750,000 over twelve months. APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the U.S.-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement.“
Labels:
Bill Clinton,
Clinton Foundation,
FBI,
Hillary Clinton,
money laundering,
Russians,
scandals,
uranium
Friday, November 01, 2013
November 7th
There is a history for "November 7th" ... do these Russians know something that we don't...yet?
Russians: “These Dumb Americans Will Find Out How Dumb They Are on November 7th.”
Russians: “These Dumb Americans Will Find Out How Dumb They Are on November 7th.”
3 caucasian men appearing to be of Russian descent from the language used to converse between them, were spotted at a bar by a fellow patron. The unidentified man relayed to the John Moore show that after eavesdropping on the conversation of the men, he was able to translate that they were speaking about the intelligence of Americans, describing them as “stupid and dumb”. The unidentified caller to the show alleges that the men were discussing the citizens finding out their intelligence deficit on November 7th, but he failed to identify any specific threat from the group.
The November 7th date is a significant day in American history...
Friday, July 05, 2013
Russian Troops in USA: Just What Does the Obama Administration Have Planned?
Earlier this week, CA reported on a topic the Obama administration is quietly implementing, using Russian troops to enforce U.S. events. Below, is an editorial from Western Journalism that covers some very good, albeit provocative, points that may get you thinking about preparing yourself for what is to come next from this administration.
READ MOREWestern Journalism reports: We’ve known that Russian troops have been in America for some time, allegedly being trained by American troops. Now it appears that FEMA has entered into an agreement with the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry. The reason is ostensibly to “provide security at mass events in the United States.”Remember all those articles on the Obama Administration questioning whether or not military commanders would be willing to use live ammunition to fire on American citizens on American soil? You also probably remember the articles about Sheriffs throughout the United States who have publicly stated that they would not support any laws they believe are unconstitutional, especially where the 2nd Amendment is concerned. This places them in direct opposition to the federal government.What we are now hearing about may well be the Obama Administration’s response to these issues. . .
Labels:
FEMA,
martial law,
military,
Obama,
President,
Russians,
U.S. military
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Russians blackmailing Obama?
James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy retired Admiral, was commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations:
Are We Being Compromised by Barack Obama's Murky Past?
Are We Being Compromised by Barack Obama's Murky Past?
Monday, December 27, 2010
Thursday, December 23, 2010
U.S. Naval Institute: Obama was outmaneuvered by Russians on START
Vice Admiral Gerald E. Miller (Ret.)
U.S. Naval Institute - December 23, 2010
U.S. Naval Institute - December 23, 2010
President Barack Obama was outmaneuvered by the Russians and should have abandoned the New START negotiations instead of seeking a political victory, says former nuclear plans monitor Vice Admiral Jerry Miller, USN (Ret).Read more
“The Obama administration is continuing a dated policy in which we cannot even unilaterally reduce our own inventory of weapons and delivery systems without being on parity with the Russians,” Miller told the U.S. Naval Institute in Annapolis, Md. “We could give up plenty of deployed delivery systems and not adversely affect our national security one bit, but New START prohibits such action - so we are now stuck with some outmoded and useless elements in our nuke force...”
Miller, who helped prepare the National Strategic Target List and Single Integrated Operational Plan for waging nuclear war and later participated in arms control meetings with the Soviet government, expressed concern that START could leave the United States vulnerable to other emerging threats.
Saturday, July 17, 2010
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
