"The 2016 election is really the story of two deep state intelligence operations that dovetailed neatly with each other."

Daniel Greenfield:

Testimony at the Senate Intelligence Committee hearings on Russian interference in the election once again raised the central paradox of the Russia conspiracy theory. If Russian interference in the election represented the crisis that we are told it did, why did Obama fail to take any meaningful action?

The White House’s own cybersecurity people wanted an aggressive response before being told to stand down. Obama issued a bloodless warning to Russia while his people deliberately crippled our offense.

Democrats and the media blamed the Russian hacking on Trump. But it was Susan Rice who had told the cybersecurity team to “knock it off” and Obama’s people who hadn’t wanted him to be “boxed in” and forced to respond to Russian actions. Was this just the usual appeasement or was there more to it?

Why didn’t Obama and his team want to stop Russian hacking? Because they needed the Russians.

READ MORE

Yes, this IS is like Watergate...on steroids!!

The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations. Not criminal investigations, not intelligence investigations. Remember that.

READ MORE

BREAKING! Benghazi Bombshell: Valerie Jarrett, Commander in Chief

Many of us already know that Valerie Jarrett has always called the shots in this White House (long history) so this is no surprise.


Doug Ross @ Journal also has some great coverage and hat-tipped DaTechGuy who has more...


Move along, nothing to see here...or is there?


Hey, this must be a War on from Women!

How Susan Rice Covered Up the Kenya Embassy Bombings 14 Years Before Benghazigate!

What, you didn’t think they sent out Susan Rice at random to lie about Benghazigate? It helps to have prior experience lying to the American people and covering up administration malfeasance.

READ MORE

Susan Rice is confused about international law and North Korea!

It's strange enough that the Obama Administration is hyping last week's toothless statement by the United Nations Security Council condemning North Korea's recent rocket launch. Even more amazing, it says the U.N. move is "legally binding" on member states.

Those were the words used by Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., and repeated by a State Department spokesman. Ms. Rice is badly misinformed. As she ought to know, a "presidential statement" issued by the Security Council is legally binding on no one.

Read more