Showing posts with label leaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leaks. Show all posts

Friday, August 04, 2017

NSC = leakers. Can't exist in a functioning republic. Full stop.

Lt. Col. "Buzz" Patterson (FB): "For those who don't know, I was one of President Clinton's Military Aides (the Air Force guy) from 1996-1998 and facilitated many phone calls/communications between our president and other world leaders."
"People are discussing the insane leaks coming out of the Trump White House. Let me shine some light on how that process actually works. For those who don't know, I was one of President Clinton's Military Aides (the Air Force guy) from 1996-1998 and facilitated many phone calls/communications between our president and other world leaders.

So, the phone call is requested and placed through the White House switchboard. The coordinating party, could be an NSC staffer, the Military Aide or a member of another office, let's say Press Secretary. The NSC facilitates the call between all parties and world leaders. Once all of the "principals" are connected, there are White House staffers (normally NSC) assigned to listen, monitor and develop transcripts. In my time in the Clinton White House, I occasionally did that but there were ALWAYS NSC staffers listening and providing transcription.

Bottom Line: the leaks of confidential conversations are coming directly from the NSC. No possible way otherwise. Who runs the NSC? General McMaster. In the military, when people down the chain of command break the law, the fault lies at the top. Something's going on in the NSC designed to end the Trump presidency. The leaks are coming from the NSC. Do the math.

NSC = leakers. Can't exist in a functioning republic. Full stop."

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

ZeroHedge: SMOKING GUN? Obama Defense Deputy Slips Up On Live TV - Reveals Spying On Trump Team And Leaking Of Intel

To sum up:
  • The White House surveilled the Trump campaign and then leaked information to anti-Trump allies in congress (also known as "The Hill").
  • The Russian hacking claim hinges on a CrowdStrike Report from Dimitri Alperovitch.
  • Alperovitch was forced to retract statements in a report blaming Russia for hacking Ukrainian military equipment - a failed attempt to smear Putin.
  • Alperovitch, along with White House Leaker Evelyn Farkas and Ukrainian Oligarch Victor Pinchuk, are all senior fellows on the Atlantic Council - which is vehemently anti-Russia.

READ MORE

Monday, August 08, 2011

SEAL TEAM 6 - INVESTIGATE THE WHITE HOUSE

The United West
DEMAND A SPECIAL CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION!


Sound begins about 00:15


Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Should the WikiLeaks staff be prosecuted?

While US state department restricts employee access to secret files... you can be sure that the WikiLeaks' staff is busy poring through an unimaginable glut of our secret documents (I understand it's documents that are all recent and not years old).

The need to sort through it all was clarified by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assage: "To have impact, it needs to be easy for people to dive in and search it and get something out of it."

And it's not just U.S. documents as the Jerusalem Post has noted:
Assange noted that Wikileaks also has material on Russian companies and politicians, pharamceutical companies, industrial espionage by the US, the energy industry, environmental issues, and finance.
Staff problems have exacerbated the ongoing analysis of all this data including the defection of some staffers who objected, on moral grounds, to the previous revelations concerning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Patriot Ledger in Massachusetts has put up a poll: Should WikiLeaks staff be prosecuted for releasing documents? [LINK CORRECTED]

Some people are quite sympathetic to these "hundreds of Volunteers all over the globe..."

Talk about staff overload, Assange has apparently been sitting on "a full five gigabyte of documents" concerning his next target but this time it's a bank:

Is Bank Of America WikiLeaks’ Next Target?

Makes you wonder what might have happened had Julian Assange put all his efforts into creating a business or inventing a life-saving medical device or heading up an international relief agency instead of creating a sort of tabloid newpaper on steroids.

UPDATE: Now he's calling for the resignation of Hillary Clinton...

I just wish he and George Soros would mind their own ******* business.

UPDATE #2: "We Have Not Seen Anything Yet": [UK] Guardian Editor Says Most Startling WikiLeaks Cables Still To Be Released

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

The challenge now for Obama is to get up off of his lazy ass and make a decision. The time for waffling is over.

Yes. Short answer. The leak to the Washington Post of the assessment by General McChrystal, the officer in charge of the war in Afghanistan, is quintessential Washington power politics and a major “go screw yourself Barack” by the person or persons who passed the paper to Bob Woodward. You do not get leaks when there is a policy consensus on an issue. There are several reasons classified or sensitive information is leaked–a policy disagreement, a desire to embarrass a principle official or a whistleblower.

Here’s how Woodward started his story:
Will Obama Surrender Afghanistan to the Mullahs?