Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts

Friday, October 02, 2015

Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database

NEW YORK POST:
Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.

The first black president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by racial data that will outlast his administration.
READ MORE

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Monday, November 25, 2013

DARKNET IS 5,000 TIMES LARGER THAN THE "SURFACE" - UPDATE

UPDATE: Being in a hurry to post this I originally misspelled "Darknet" in the title and left out a paragraph that summarizes what this is!
the "darknet” – the vast, murky portion of the internet that cannot be indexed by standard search engines. Estimated to be 5,000 times larger that the "surface" web, it’s in these recesses where you’ll find human-trafficking rings, black market drug markets and terrorist networks.
THRILLING: The internet mystery that has the world baffled...

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

The most secretive president in history

President Obama has declared many times that his administration is the most transparent in American history. So, why has a new analysis by AP found that the federal government is rejecting more and more public requests for information? The AP report states that in 2012 “the government cited national security to withhold information at least 5,223 times — a jump over 4,243 such cases in 2011 and 3,805 cases in Obama’s first year in office.”
Why Is ‘The Most Transparent Administration in History’ Keeping More and More Information Secret? Judge Napolitano Weighs In

Thursday, October 25, 2012

SPECIAL OPS: OPSEC

STOP THE POLITICIANS, PRESIDENT OBAMA AND OTHERS, FROM POLITICALLY CAPITALIZING ON U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY OPERATIONS AND SECRETS!

Special Operations OPSEC needs your help today to spread the word about the unpatriotic leaking of sensitive national security information by the Obama Administration for personal political gain. Please use these links to take immediate action.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

CBS: OBAMA SHOULD RELEASE HIS COLLEGE TRANSCRIPTS

What we don’t know – and can only assume is extreme doubt – is what is so sacredly hidden in Obama’s unreleased files.

What could possibly be in Obama’s college transcripts that could hurt his image – or more?
READ MORE

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Obama betrays missile defense secrets

Investor's Business Daily:
We recently suggested that Obama's disregard for the Constitution in making recess appointments might be grounds for impeachment.

His proposed betrayal of American security to appease Moscow is strike two.
READ MORE

Saturday, September 03, 2011

JSOC: TOP SECRET

The CIA’s armed drones and paramilitary forces have killed dozens of al-Qaeda leaders and thousands of its foot soldiers. But there is another mysterious organization that has killed even more of America’s enemies in the decade since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. CIA operatives have imprisoned and interrogated nearly 100 suspected terrorists in their former secret prisons around the world, but troops from this other secret organization have imprisoned and interrogated 10 times as many, holding them in jails that it alone controls in Iraq and Afghanistan.
‘Top Secret America’: A look at the military’s Joint Special Operations Command

Hugh Hewitt Show, Saturday, September 03, 2011:
General Jerry Boykin on Kiloton Threat, and disgraceful action at the Washington Post, releasing Special Operations secrets
HH: Now while that story unfolds, attention is going to be on a new book, and a new series in the Washington Post, Top Secret America: The Rise Of The New American Security State, by Dana Priest and a name I’m sure is familiar to you, William Arkin.

JB: Yeah.

HH: And it reveals operational secrets, General. What do you think of this? And what do you think of Arkin?

JB: Well, you know, I’ve had a lot of experience with Arkin. Arkin came after me, and Dana Priest has a record very similar to Arkin’s of exposing things that are very sensitive. Arkin, remember, he wrote the book Code Words. It exposed the code words of many, many very sensitive programs in our government, not just the Department of Defense. Arkin is not just anti-American, I mean anti-military, but he is very much anti-American. I think the guy is, frankly, I think he’s a hard-core Marxist. And if it was 1960, I think he’d be a leader in the Weather Underground. And Dana Priest has done similar kinds of things in exposing very sensitive programs. I can’t tell you what their agenda is other than they are very anti-American.

HH: Now I referred to Arkin earlier today as scum, because his record of attacking the military as mercenaries, and other attacks, not just on you, but I mean generally, he’s so anti-military and so anti-American, the Institute For Policy Studies, Greenpeace, he’s got this long lefty pedigree. What is the Washington Post doing, General, publishing this stuff. It’s not…there will be nutters and left wing extremists like Arkin out there. But why is the Washington Post aiding and abetting them?

JB: Well, I certainly can’t answer for the leadership of the Washington Post, but the Washington Post has a history of doing this, particularly with Dana Priest, who has been working with the Washington Post for a very long time. And I must tell you, I think this is an example of how the 1st Amendment was never intended to have an open press without some check and balance, without some accountability for what they do. And this is another example of how that can be very damaging to the nation.

HH: When a newspaper publishes the nicknames and the code names for some of the Special Operators, like Task Force Green, secret army in Northern Virginia, Task Force 11, Task Force 121, when they talk very specifically about where the new headquarters is, what the new operational command is, does that help the enemy?

JB: Of course it helps the enemy, and it also discourages the brave, young Americans that are playing by the rules, and taking some very high risks, and making a lot of sacrifices. It’s very discouraging to them, but it also encourages the enemy very much, because they see themselves being on the winning side, and they’re using our civil liberties against us. And it concerns me a great deal.

HH: Should we have released as much information as we did about the bin Laden mission?

JB: No, and it’s interesting. I was just talking to someone two days ago about that, and I will tell you that that was all a political ploy. You’re going to see a movie about it come out the 1st of October. The producers and so forth have been integrated into a number of things now with the administration. And I must tell you, this whole thing is political. It is trying to build the credibility of this president as the commander-in-chief, and as a substantial leader. And I think that it is disgraceful, because you never heard who got Saddam Hussein. You heard the 4th Infantry Division. Well, I happen to know that embedded in there, the people that really got him, was a Special Operations element. But nobody talked about who that was. There was no fanfare on that. But that wasn’t used for political purposes.

HH: I will be right back. One more segment with General, retired General William G. Jerry Boykin.

Friday, February 04, 2011

Monday, November 22, 2010

The more we learn about President Obama's childhood, the scarier he becomes.

Ben Shapiro:
Obama's childhood shows us that he was comfortable with militant homosexuals, black racists and communists/socialists, along with radical Islamists. That's an odd combination for a child, but Obama had an odd childhood. And that conglomeration of interests -- gay rights militants, black racists, socialists and radical Muslims -- now form the core of Obama's idealistic base.
Barack Obama's Secret History

Thursday, May 06, 2010

There are encoded messages in Google maps from a language of our enemies and no one in the government cared...

It was just released that Al Qaeda in Pakistan was going to hit us and at the same time people are now finding secret messages in Google maps? How strange is that?...

We found these images in many states across the country and don’t know if they represent correspondence or some kind of communication among the bad guys, or are they coordinates?

It is just breathtaking that the Feds ask us to look out for things that look strange and then blow you off when you find something. What could be more strange then finding Islamic messages in rural areas of America encoded in Google maps? Hello?
A FORM OF SECRET COMMUNICATION AMONG TERRORISTS?

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Transparency: Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passes Health Care Amendment written in invisible ink!

President Obama has promised a "new era of transparency" in Washington, so perhaps he should talk to the Senate about getting with his program. On July 15, six weeks ago, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passed an amended $1 trillion health-care bill, with acting Chairman Chris Dodd calling it a "historic achievement." Too bad the committee won't reveal this history even to other Senators, much less to the public.

Three weeks ago Republicans on the committee wrote Mr. Dodd "to reiterate our request for a full copy of the bill as amended, in the four-week mark-up." Mr. Dodd has refused to comply. The Senate bill that is available on the committee Web site is 790 pages long. While that is some 300 pages shorter than the House health bill, that's in part because it doesn't include nearly 200 amendments that passed when the committee redrafted the bill. Amended sections of the bill might as well be written in invisible ink.
Health-Care Secrets