The Monday podcast episode will be the first time O’Reilly has spoken publicly since he was ousted from Fox News.

O’Reilly’s “No Spin News” podcast is only available to premium members of his website who pay $4.95 per month to access exclusive content. The Monday episode will be the first time O’Reilly has spoken publicly since he was ousted from Fox News.

O’Reilly will also have a new Twitter account after moving previous tweets and followers from his “Factor” account to a personal Bill O’Reilly handle.

READ MORE

Wait—We’re Supposed To Accept Muslim Refugees Now?! - UPDATE

BILL O'REILLY INTERVIEW WITH DONALD TRUMP LAST NIGHT (9/8/15):

O'Reilly: “Do you object to migrants coming to the USA?”

Trump: “I hate the concept of it but on a humanitarian basis you have to."

THE DANA SHOW...
READ MORE

UPDATE:

Trump reverses himself on Syrian refugee question, says we have too many problems of our own!

PolitiFact to Obama: You lie!

During his Super Bowl pregame interview with Bill O’Reilly, President Obama flatly declared that he has not raised taxes as president.

PolitiFact flatly declares that statement to be false.

What?!?

President Obama LIED to Bill O'Reilly?

I'm shocked, I tell you, just shocked!

Hollywood Insider reveals: Obama has no U.S. birth certificate!

Hmmm...wonder what it was that Bill O'Reilly said he saw then???

UPDATE: Jack Cashill, American Thinker, January 25: Friend says Abercrombie told him, 'There is no birth certificate!' (updated)

Joseph Farah challenges Bill O'Reilly...still no answer!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A challenge to Bill O’Reilly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: July 30, 2009
1:00 am Eastern

www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105366

© 2010

I have a challenge to my old buddy Bill O’Reilly – put up or shut up!

You told your viewers this week that challenges to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility are “bogus.”

You claimed you and your news organization examined Obama’s birth certificate last year and found it to be in order.

Can I ask a question, Bill? Why don’t you simply reveal to your viewers exactly what you saw and what you found?

Fox News Channel’s slogan is, “We report, you decide.” Why don’t you try actually reporting the story, rather than deciding for us?

Send Obama a birthday surprise! FedEx your personalized letter to the president demanding that he prove his eligibility by producing his birth certificate. Only 4 days left!

Here’s the story, Bill, whether you recognize it or not: Tens of millions of Americans have serious doubts about Obama’s right to be in office. They are concerned that the system broke down and did not require proof of his constitutional qualifications. They don’t want double talk like they’ve been getting from politicians and the media elite. They don’t want more platitudinous assertions. They don’t expect to have their well-informed suspicions be ridiculed by the likes of you, Shepherd Smith, Chris Matthews, the New York Times, the Associated Press and the rest of the media monopoly singing in harmony.

The American people have figured out what you apparently are unable or unwilling to discern: Obama’s hiding something. One of the somethings he is undoubtedly hiding is his birth certificate.

I will go also out on a limb, Bill, and proclaim that you were, shall we say, disingenuous when you claimed to have inspected Obama’s birth certificate. If you got your hands on it, why didn’t you show it to your viewers? If your goal is, as you state, to put an end to a bogus story, the obvious way would have been to share with your audience what you saw.

I don’t think you saw anything, Bill.

I think maybe you saw the same thing all of us have seen, “ad nauseam,” to quote Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. I think you saw the certification of live birth – a totally meaningless document with regard to proving presidential eligibility.

Why is it meaningless with regard to proving constitutional eligibility as a “natural born citizen”? Simple. There were numerous easy ways to obtain one without being born in Hawaii!

What about the other heavyweight evidence cited as conclusive by people convinced that “birthers” are just a bunch of fruit loops? Those would be the two newspaper birth announcements appearing contemporaneously in two Hawaii dailies. Surely that settles the matter? No, it doesn’t. In fact, the newspaper ads were less meaningful than the certification of live birth because they were automatically generated by the issuance of that document.

So far, after listening very carefully to the case for Obama’s Hawaiian birth, that is the totality of evidence I have heard. Do you have anything else, Bill? What did your crack research team find? The people have a right to know.

Knowing what I have just told you, how is it possible you can be 100 percent convinced Obama was born in Hawaii? And, even if you are, what’s wrong with Obama springing for $10 and getting a copy of the original long-form birth certificate for the rest of us?

I’ll go further, Bill.

I think you liked taking a cheap shot at your worthy and honorable competitor at CNN, Lou Dobbs. Dobbs has showed great courage and independence in taking on a story against the public wishes of his network brass and bucking the tide of his entire industry.

You ought to admire that, Bill.

You ought to emulate it.

Furthermore, I think you chose the easy road on this story because you are sucking up to Obama in hopes of another one of those ratings-generating exclusive interviews in which the American people learn nothing. That’s not good journalism, Bill. Journalism is comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable. Journalism is serving as a watchdog on government and other powerful institutions.

Where’s the fairness, Bill? Where’s the balance your network promises?

Where are the articulate voices who have a question for which there is no answer forthcoming: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

You have chosen to join the state-run media pack and mock the genuinely civic-minded concerns of the people. For that there is no excuse. Bloviating, to use one of your favorite words, is no substitute for honest reporting.

You can’t see that Obama is hiding something – hiding lots of things? His birth certificate, his school records, his college records, his law school writings, his selective service records, his travel records, his adoption records, his finances.

Come on, Bill?

Is it worth it?

Where is the integrity? What do you know that I don’t know? My news organization has devoted far more time, effort, resources, manpower and sweat in investigating this story than your very wealthy media conglomerate. What do you think you know that I don’t know? Why are you aiding in one of the biggest propaganda cover-ups in American history?

The American people had high hopes for the Fox News Channel and shows like yours. But they have failed us in telling this most important story.

Our country is being transformed rapidly by an administration that is of highly questionable legality.

This is no joking matter.

From a New York Correspondent re: LTC Lakin's pending court martial

May 8,2010
Fox News
New York City, New York
Att: Bill O'Reilly and Megyn Kelly

Dear Bill and Megyn:

THE TRIAL OF LT.COLONEL TERRENCE LAKIN

I have termed this article a "trial" because I, and many others felt that when you aired this segment a short while ago your viewers were going to receive a dialogue on LTC Lakin's upcoming court-martial. Instead, we saw and heard a two-headed monologue denigrating every aspect of LTC Lakin's defense of conduct. I would like to respond to the most serious of your comments (recorded), trusting my words may induce you to rectify your unfair and unbalanced presentation.

Bill: "You can't have military saying 'I'll obey the orders I like'"

Response: LTC Lakin never said or implied such a thing. He obeyed all orders for 18 years, not just one's he 'liked'. Only when he began to realize that Obama may not have been eligible to seek the Presidency did he ask, in good conscience, for confirmation of Obama's authority.After waiting one year unsucessfully for a responsible clarification he, on his own, stood up for Our Constitution. For that, you would knock him down!

Bill: "Why doesn't LTC Lakin just resign?

Response: Resigning would have been the safest way out but one doesn't receive a Bronze Star for "playing it safe". Also, by risking his career through a court-martial he may have considered this as the most viable manner of forcing Obama to satisfy this issue for everyone by producing the original Hawaiian Dept.of Health Birth Certificate, not the document he put on a website to pacify those questioning his eligibility.

Bill: "I think Lakin was trying to make a political point."

Response: LTC Lakin has given 18 years of service to the Army. Were his medals and promotions "political points"? NO.They were for defending Our Constitution and our Country. You dishonored the man with your comment.

Bill: "The 'birther' movement hasn't gathered any traction."

Response: Bill, the "Constitutional Defenders", who you so casually link together as "birthers", consists of thousands of participants(seen at rallies throughout the U.S.) protesting against Constitutional violations of all kinds. Traction? Their feet are solidly on the ground and they are moving forward relentlessly. Millions are witnessing this. I hope that you are not using the Major Media for information on this issue.

Megyn: "Lakin didn't go with any of the other lawyers who represented other "birthers".

Response: You may think that LTC Lakin would have been best served by a lawyer previously involved in a similar lawsuit but your future is not the one at stake. Also, you referred to LTC Lakin as a "birther". He is a "Constitutional Defender", challenging Obama's eligibility whether through his birth certificate, passport, school records,etc. Does that also make him a "Passporter"?

Megyn: "Some said Bush was illegitimate-their argument wasn't allowed".

Response: Presuming you were speaking about Florida's voting issue your comparison is not legitimate. Bush's eligibility to seek the Presidency was never an issue in question....Obama's eligibility was and is.

Bill(to Megyn): "Do you know how we proved Obama was born in USA? We got birth announcements in two papers-that's impossible (to falsify ?) because someone would have to know that they were going to fake Obama's birth because someday he's going to be President."

Response: That is a false statement. You did not not prove Obama was born in the USA. You never saw his original Hawaiian birth certificate , which he refused to release to anyone. It seems two newspaper birth announcements became "Gospel" to you, when, in fact, birth announcements are simply public announcements that a baby was born. They do not provide any information about the child's citizenship, cannot be authenticated and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument.Also, your sarcasm (implying Constitutional Defenders believe Obama's family faked a birth certificate in anticipation of his someday becoming President) is not worthy of you. Securing an American "naturalized" citizenship status for one's child would be highly prized for it bestows many benefits on the child with one major exception....only a "natural-born" status allows one to seek the Presidency of the U.S. (Constitution-article 2, Sec.1) Why have you not questioned why Obama, a Constitutional scholar, would pay over $2 million dollars in legal fees to prevent anyone from viewing the Hawaiian original birth certificate and deliberately post a "Certification of Live Birth(which is what you saw) on a website, passing it off as a supposed valid document establishing his Presidential eligibility?. Please do not insult me by saying that he did all this to distract Republicans from other issues.

Bill: "The papers only print birth announcements when the baby is born. You call them & tell them 'hey, the baby was born'. (Continuing) "He was born in the USA-
you can't fake that."'

Response: Obviously, you are pinning your entire defense of Obama's eligibility on the newspapers.If my responses above cannot cause you to re-think your words I can only suggest prayer.

Megyn: "Maybe there were two Barack Obamas"

Response: Illogical sarcasm about such a grave issue does not become you, Megyn, and cheapens dialogue.

Megyn: "Hawaiian Health officials said 'we've seen it''' (referring to the birth certificate)

Response: They acknowledged seeing a birth certificate but did not define it as a true "Certificate of Live Birth", showing the Hospital,Doctor,and witnesses names, certificate number,etc. Transparency by Obama could have well put this issue to rest yet he refuses to allow anyone (including Fox) to view the hospital copy. Clearly, the meaning of the word "transparency" is not seen by him.

THE SILENT SIDE OF YOUR 'DEBATE'

Obama never offered to produce a "Certificate of Live Birth", which could have saved many lawsuits. In particular, he ignored the pending military action (since withdrawn) against Major Stefan Cook and the now-pending Court-Martial being prepared against LTC Lakin. Imagine, a Commander-in-Chief of our military refusing to assure them and others by providing a document which no one else in our Military has ever refused to provide.

Why didn't either of you mention Obama's refusal to release school records,etc. or which country issued a passport to him to go to Pakistan in 1981 or the active cases presently being heard in various courts on the eligibility issues?

Republicans know that any request by them ,of Obama, to satisfy LTC Lakin's request would be futile, but where was the voice of any Democrat?

Bill, you did not present a "fair and balanced" analysis. Both of you spent all your time criticizing or ridiculing LTC Lakin. Many people contacted me to voice their displeasure with your unfair treatment. Why not have him come on your show like you have done with so many others through the years?

Obama once said that the "Certification of Live Birth" which he posted on a website was a copy of the one which the Hawaiian Health Dept had. If true, that statement would mean he was never eligibile to seek the Presidency....and that he knew it. If, on the other hand, the Hawaiian copy was a true Certificate of Live Birth it could prove Obama eligible, leaving one unanswered question. Why did he spend over $2 million dollars to keep this a secret!

CONCLUSION

LTC Lakin is going to be court-martialed and Obama, who holds a "keep out of jail free" card refuses to produce it. Secrecy over Support. How inspiring this must be to our men and women in Service!

Very truly yours,
R.Quinn
New York
bquinn @ pngusa.net

CC: Every member of The Supreme Court.
Everyone else I know

ALL RECIPIENTS OF THIS LETTER ARE FREE TO PASS IT ON TO ANY AND ALL WITHOUT SECURING MY PERMISSION.

Death to Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly!

3/26/10: Liberal radio talk show host calls for their deaths:



H/T: TheJawaReport

DEEP CORRUPTION

Here is the truth about Blagojevich, Obama and their crime buddies...

Floyd Brown: Disturbed by Beck, O'Reilly and Breitbart

I believe that one of the best reasons to impeach Obama is his failure to produce a long-form birth certificate. He may not be constitutionally qualified to serve as President. I have released an opinion column on why some conservative media are ignoring the issue. I would like to hear your comments so I have reprinted it here:

Disturbed by Beck, O'Reilly and Breitbart

The 800 Pound Gorilla Media Blitz starts Monday

Wanna make RIGHT-wing media stars start talking about Obama's eligibility issue? Get details here!

Earl Scruggs: strummin' on the old banjo with Joan

Check out the dog on the rug when the camera pulls back!

PS to Bill O'Reilly (this will make you happy!)

Joan Baez was one of the very few, maybe only, "artists" who supported the Communists during the war but called for protests against them afterwards.

Watch the video!

Why it's dangerous to be a liberal today

It staggers the mind to know that liberals repeatedly attack Bill O'Reilly for advice that, if followed, would have most likely prevented the following two tragedies (see below) which are horrendous.

The advice? Well, I'm paraphrasing here, but he basically pleads over and over again with people not to let themselves get involved in illegal and/or dangerous activities--and that definitely includes all the drugs listed in the stories below.

The logic? You will set yourself up to be vulnerable to death, disease, and physical harm from others. Not that you are a bad person (he always lets the Deity sort that out), but that bad things will happen to you. And guess what, folks...they do!

Now, I absolutely cannot figure out how Mr. O'Reilly, who gives out the kind of advice that used to be given out by parents, can be faulted for this or for any of his magnificent efforts at getting Jessica's Law passed in many states and for his work trying to protect vulnerable children from pedophiles.

This is why I believe that it is dangerous to be a liberal today: They will not make judgments and they will not protect people from harm (or let anyone else do it either). If you don't believe this, just watch Bill O'Reilly for awhile and you'll see that it is true...liberals attack HIM and ignore the vicious perpetrators of these crimes.

Trial testimony revealed Ritcheson and Gus Sons, whom he'd befriended at an alternative school for students with disciplinary problems, met up with Tuck and Turner at a crawfish festival in Spring the night of the attack. From there, they went to Sons' house, where they drank vodka, smoked marijuana and used cocaine and Xanax, an anti-anxiety drug.

Sons testified that Tuck and Turner attacked Ritcheson because they believed he stole some drugs and tried to kiss Sons' 12-year-old sister.

Tuck and Turner dragged Ritcheson, who was Hispanic, into the backyard, where they taunted him with racial slurs, punched and kicked him in the head and burned him 17 times with cigarettes. They tried to carve a swastika into his chest.

His attackers poured bleach on his face and body and left him for dead. No one called for an ambulance until well after daybreak.

The former Klein Collins High School running back and freshman homecoming prince spent three months and eight days in the hospital and endured more than 30 surgeries.

Teen victim of Spring pipe attack dies after apparent jump from ship

And this:

He was also becoming increasingly paranoid and deluded due to a lethal mix of steroids, pain killers, anti-depressants and the medication he was taking for his blood pressure brought on by decades of steroid abuse.

Benoit wrestle hold killed son

Monsters in our midst

Police rescued 31 children, some of them only a few months old.



The [pedophile] ring was traced to an Internet chat room called "Kids the Light of Our Lives" that featured images of children being subjected to horrific sexual abuse—including streaming live videos.



Police Smash Global Pedophile Ring



I really have to wonder what motivates people to berate Bill O'Reilly who's done so much to protect kids and to get tougher laws passed against child predators:



Bill's thoughts on Jessica's Law

Ex-Mouseketeer sells S and M

You know the old adage: Sex Sells.

Well, I think it's changing -- as in Culture Warrior -- to Painful Sex Sells!

New Low for Christina Aguilera

Christina Aguilera is following the Madonna formula.

Like the material girl, Aguilera consistently uses shock value to peddle her albums and promote her career.

In her upcoming “Back to Basics Tour,” though, the former Mouseketeer will reportedly push the envelope even further.

Mixed in with Aguilera’s already unseemly lineup will be a sadomasochistic act.

As reported by the TMZ Web site, visual assists will include suggestive clothing, whips, and a burning wheel. A male member of the audience will purportedly participate.

Teens idolize celebrities, and the messages being sent to our young people by stars like Aguilera are growing increasingly perverse.

The Left Coast Report fears that the slippery slope may now lead to a bottomless pit.

Left Coast Report