Showing posts with label Clark Baker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clark Baker. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

The untold story of the HIV retrovirus

My name is Clark Baker and I'm an investigator by profession (LAPD 1980-2000 and PI 1997-current). It's a long story, but I was hired in 2008 to investigate claims against UC Berkeley Prof. Peter Duesberg, who was admitted into the National Academy of Sciences after mapping the retrovirus genome during the 1970s. (HIV is a retrovirus) You can look up the allegations, but I distilled my inquiry into this one question: WHEN, WHERE, WHY, WHAT, and WHO proved that HIV 1) attacks cells and 2) causes AIDS? When I didn't get a straight answer from the NIH and CDC, I set out to compel answers.

By 2009, 38 states had laws that made it a crime to expose victims to HIV without informing them. Hundreds of Americans have been criminally charged and several are serving life sentences. As new defendants were charged, they provided me with a venue to compel infectious disease (ID) experts to testify under oath about the issues that the NIH and CDC refused to discuss.

I formed a team that included an MD, an attorney (w/5 years of post-doctoral human biology), and two pharmaceutical chemists - including the patent holder of the viral load test.

When I examined medical records, it became clear that none of the MDs had ever diagnosed their patients properly. Patients were typically asymptomatic and the docs relied entirely on HIV tests that admittedly (in the package insert) do not detect HIV. During cross-examinations, top ID experts admitted in trial and depositions that they knew little about the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV. 

After we prevailed in several dozen cases, we began to use the electron microscopy (EM) lab at U. Mass to see if HIV could be seen in blood samples. Despite high "viral load" counts, we found NOTHING with EM. When Walter Reed Army Hospital (which partners with Big Pharma) declared that HIV cannot be seen in human blood, I drew 20ml from my arm and spiked it with cultured HIV from the NIH. According to the head of the EM lab, he'd photographed HIV hundreds of times since the 1980s but this was the first time he actually observed HIV in human blood. Walter Reed got pissed and accused me of using EM for "diagnostic purposes". I countered that, as a licensed private investigator, I am permitted to use any optical devices of my choosing to establish whether evidence (including retroviruses) is present or not.

With that, Walter Reed falsely claimed that I was using a non-accredited lab (I'm allowed to) to "diagnose" our criminal defendants. The prosecutor used their affidavit to threaten U. Mass with a criminal investigation and the potential loss of the $150 million that U. Mass receives annually in NIH funding. With that, prosecutors successfully threatened and silenced our EM expert. We won that case anyway.

We eventually won a landmark case US v. Gutierrez and changed the definition of assault with a deadly weapon with regard to HIV, which began the end of all criminal HIV cases across the US.

After this nine-year investigation, my partner and I tried to get EM labs to assist us with additional virology investigations. EVERY university lab across the US refused. We eventually set up labs at incubators in California and NC, but before we could start our operations, the landlords evicted us with no explanation.

It is now my belief that much of virology is a complete scam - a pseudoscientific pretext to support the billion vaccine and AIDS, HPV and HCV industries. With the use of EM, I expect to prove that scary pathogens like Ebola and HPV are non-pathogenic pretexts that cannot stand up to Koch's postulates - which is why documents that prove that bugs like HPV and HCV are harmless. All of this may seem academic, except when you consider that innocent men and women continue to serve time for a disease they never had, and millions of people around the world are being unnecessarily vaccinated and treated for diseases they never had.

Based on our work, I commissioned my former partner, Nancy Banks MD to write a book about our discoveries related to cancer and immune-deficiency diseases. 


https://www.amazon.com/SLOW-DEATH-AIDS.../dp/1524544221 

So you must understand that your industry has been lying for decades about much of what you think you know. Virology and infectious disease is largely an ideology, and the practitioners are too busy and invested in the ideology to share the intellectual curiosity that influenced my investigation and success, which conflicts directly with the enforced "scientific consensus" that your industry relies on.


“(T)he work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus… There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
- Michael Crichton MD

I was tasked to investigate the controversy between Duesberg and the medical establishment. Eight years later (2015) I had confirmed all of Duesberg's skepticism and refuted virtually ALL of the establishment's position.

Duesberg's book is probably still the best indictment of HIV. I simply added to his position by forcing government experts to testify and winning 50+ criminal, civil, and military cases proving it. 

https://www.amazon.com/Inventing-AIDS-Virus.../dp/1522676341

--Clark Baker








Thursday, March 15, 2018

CLARK BAKER (LAPD) & THE WAR ON DRUGS

I was part of the failed "War on Drugs" and made 2500+ arrests during the 1980s that saved taxpayers ~$160 million in potential property losses and law enforcement. Despite that, I knew that its prosecution was folly.

To fix this requires a completely different strategy that is based on two FACTS:

1) Most crime is drug-related and;

2) Rehabilitation requires a sincere desire to change. (Most addicts don't want to.)

I recommend a state-run program that sends bonafide criminal-addicts to secure rehabilitation centers (closed military bases are great venues). These centers would offer two specific services:

* The “rehab” wing would offer the best rehabilitation techniques and services known in the Western World, along with out-patient support, job training, and counseling. If an addict completes the program and pisses clean for nine months he/she can be released.

* The "addict" wing would offer pharmaceutical doses of the drug of choice - cocaine, meth, alcohol, cannabis, opiates, mushrooms, LSD etc. - under the care of medical practitioners. In this environment, prostitutes won’t turn tricks and burglars and robbers won’t steal to score adulterated street drugs. Addicts in that wing could stay indefinitely and be released to the Rehab-wing for treatment upon request.

In this way, street drug sales would plummet. After all, why would anyone buy adulterated street drugs when they could acquire pharmaceutical doses of their favorite drug in a secure environment? With most drug-addicted criminals no longer committing crime to score drugs, crime would plummet across the cities and states that utilized the program. And while the initial costs would be high, those costs would be gradually offset as drug-related prisoners transferred from jails and prisons to these rehab centers. As the addict-population rises, the jail populations would shrink.

I also support the idea that anyone can grow and consume any illicit drug they produce personally, but that any commercial sale of their products would result in incarceration and asset forfeiture. Drug-related crime like DUI and manslaughter would result in a prison sentence, followed by the program.

The biggest benefit is that these centers would segregate drug users from the rest of society at the discretion of the addicts themselves - a moral and constitutional solution. I pitched this to Congress years ago. I suspect that law enforcement and prison unions don’t want to jeopardize the status quo. BTW... If you wonder how I calculated my personal $160 million contribution to the LA economy, here it is:

Between 1985-1989, I averaged 4.5 §11550 H&S arrests a day, 22 each week, or 900 addicts a year (assuming 40 weeks a year on the street). During that 48-month period, I made 2,500+ §11550 arrests.

The typical drug addict commits at least five property crimes each day to support their addictions. Their crimes (burglary, robbery, shoplift, B/TFMV, and 484) are not dollar for dollar: That is, the replacement cost for a watch, TV, purse, computer, or cell phone usually costs more than fees paid by a fence or insurance settlement. Addicts might get $100 for a $2000 watch. For computational ease, let’s assume that each crime CONSERVATIVELY represents an average $50 loss to victims. Addicts who commit five crimes a day represent a minimum property loss of $250 (five crimes X $50).

I didn’t include the repair costs of a broken door or window, or the health costs from being attacked by robbers, the injuries, hospitalization, lost work, psychological trauma, and so forth, nor will I include the costs for addict "rehabilitation", incarceration, or international drug interdiction efforts.

By applying these numbers we can accept that by arresting one addict who spends 180 days in jail, I effectively prevented 900 crimes (five crimes X 180 days) and the property loss of $45,000 ($50 X 900 crimes).

If we assume a minimum replacement cost of $50 per stolen item (it is far greater), we can estimate another $45,000, bringing the total cost savings to victims (and their insurers) at $90,000 during 180 days of incarceration.

Back then, taxpayers spent at least $300 for police to investigate these crimes, which includes fuel, vehicle maintenance, uniform and equipment wear and tear; administrative costs, training, and follow-up investigations and prosecution. Not every crime is reported to police, so if we assume that 200 of those 900 crimes are reported, the LAPD spent $60,000 to investigate those 200 crimes.

This means that if one addict is sentenced to 180 days in jail, LA residents and taxpayers will save at least $210,000 in property loss and investigative costs.

If we apply these numbers to the 2500+ addicts I arrested, we can roughly estimate that my efforts alone saved LA residents and taxpayers at least $200 MILLION in lost property and tax revenues. I wasn't alone - most patrol divisions deployed hype cars.

I typically released arrestees without bail on their "own recognizance" (OR) who provided urine samples and good ID (most did). I couldn't order them to provide a urine sample, so I offered the OR if they provided good ID and urine that would 1) confirm their identity and 2) obtain urine that would prove the crime.

They almost never appeared in court and the judge often issued a high-bail warrant for their arrest ($50-$100K) so they couldn't bail out. As a result, patrol officers who observed the suspect but didn't have enough evidence or probable cause to arrest was relieved to learn that they could arrest the suspect on outstanding warrants. At that time, sentencing guidelines prevented judges and sheriffs from releasing the suspects in less than 180 days.

Unfortunately, §11550 is no longer enforced because Marxist judges and legislators view property crime as a form of "wealth redistribution" under the pretext of compassion - that these are "non-violent crimes" that are perpetrated by the poor and sick who deserve our help and compassion.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Have you heard about the government's War On Health?

FIRST DOCUMENTARY DETAILING AND CHALLENGING THE FDA's AGENDA
5 Jul - In the near future, American medical practice may change dramatically for the worse. No longer will maximal dose natural supplements—vitamins, natural compounds, and scientifically proven medicinal herbs—be available over the counter in local health and grocery stores. Holistic practice, which relies upon non-prescription natural treatments instead of Big Pharma drugs prescribed for the length of person’s life, will diminish. American healthcare will be imprisoned as patients will be forced to abide by a single medical paradigm defined by corporate drug and food executives and dictated by a government enforcement agency, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This is the bleak scenario if the FDA succeeds in limiting Americans’ options to prevent and treat diseases.

Gary Null’s War on Health is the first documentary detailing and challenging the FDA’s agenda and its allegiance with the international Codex Alimentarius, which hopes to establish a monolithic food and health regime.  Betraying its founding mandate to assure drug, food and chemical safety in the interests of public health, the FDA today is a repressive bureaucracy serving pharmaceutical and agricultural greed and profits.
READ MORE

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Sunday, May 31, 2009

AIDS / HIV / pharmaceutical industry fraud scandal unraveling day by day

Several critical updates on the unraveling of the AIDS / HIV industry scandal are presented by investigator/researcher Clark Baker:
After a group of international scientists demanded the retraction of Robert Gallo’s unproven reports (1, 2, 3, 4) on HIV and AIDS last December, it appears that the editors of Science are as timid as they were when they accepted Dr. Gallo’s reports without the customary requisite peer review and proof of concept.

As harmless as Science’s charity to Dr. Gallo may seem, his unproven opinions have since become the basis for all of AIDS policy in the US and around the world at a cost that approaches $1 trillion in US taxpayer dollars since 1981. The fact that Dr. Gallo’s Institute of Human Virology still receives millions of research dollars annually despite having been found guilty of scientific misconduct in 1992 is equally troubling. But like Bernie Madoff’s pyramid scheme, Gallo’s initial fraud gave birth to a trillion dollar fraud scheme that is now simply too big to fail – and in light of this explosive new film that exposes the confusion between the scientific mullahs that oversee AIDS theology, it appears that the rats are beginning to leave Gallo’s sinking ship.
Robert Gallo Feels The Heat
The New York Post reports that investigative reporter Celia Farber has filed suit this week against Atlanta physician James Murtagh MD, former medical student Kevin Kuritzky, and Richard Jefferys for libel and defamation:

Farber's lawyers filed a 21-page libel complaint this week in Manhattan Supreme Court accusing Richard Jefferys, of the Treatment Action Group, of orchestrating a campaign against her last May when she was given the Semmelweis Clean Hands Award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism for an article she wrote in Harper's in 2006, "AIDS and the Corruption of Medical Science."

The Harpers article gave credence to the work of Peter Duesberg, who believes HIV is a harmless "passenger" virus and not the cause of AIDS, and questioned the value of expensive antiretroviral drugs. Jefferys and his team blitzed the Semmelweis Society with e-mails claiming Farber had altered quotes and falsely misrepresented scientific papers.


The Semmelweis Society, in turn, launched its own investigation and concluded the AIDS industry itself has all the characteristics of a multibillion-dollar criminal enterprise that desperately needed whistleblowers.
Investigative Reporter Files Lawsuit
...when the physicians and nurses at Semmelweis Society International (SSI) asked me to investigate allegations that UC Professor Peter Duesberg had killed millions in Africa, I expected to complete my task within days. With almost thirty years of investigative experience, I figured that a few Google searches would resolve the questions, one way or the other.

Little did I know that the allegations issued by James Murtagh MD, Kevin Kuritzky, and Richard Jefferys would consume thousands of hours of my time or expose me to the ugly underbelly of the pharmaceutical industry and its chicken-ranch relationship with America’s most prestigious universities.

While the evidence I discovered now suggests that millions may have been poisoned and murdered, I’ve found that Dr. Duesberg more closely resembles Moshe the Beadle than his pharmaceutically-funded accusers – who now appear to have far more in common with Phillip Morris than Louis Pasteur.

Since the release of my preliminary report (PDF) in July 2008, filmmaker Brent Leung completed his documentary and investigative reporter Celia Farber, who was also targeted, has filed suit against her accusers in the New York Supreme Court.

Has Sustiva Solved an HIV Mystery?
As I begin the second year of my investigation into the AIDS scam, I am still amazed by each day’s revelations. Unlike the predators I’ve driven from the street, Robert Gallo and his goons at the Institute of Human Virology (IHV) are now behaving as if they want to get caught. After decades of acquiescent oversight, NIAID Director Tony Fauci looks more like Tony Soprano than a medical doctor.

Last week I reported that the HIV drug Sustiva is not only being smoked like crack cocaine by thousands, but that abstinence from the drug compromises immune function in the same way that clinicians associate with AIDS. Marketed as a “non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor,” Bristol-Myers Squibb provides no warning of the drug’s highly addictive hypnotic properties or it’s terrifying and potentially deadly affects of withdrawal.
Doctors Without Boundaries