FCC Commissioner on Internet Oversight Switch: ‘If You Cherish Free Expression,’ ‘You Should Be Worried,’ This Is ‘Irreversible’

On Wednesday’s “Sean Hannity Show,” FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai (R) stated that the plan to “essentially give up the US oversight role…of the Internet” to ICANN is something that should worry anyone who cherishes “free expression, and free speech rights generally,” and could potentially cede oversight of the Internet to “foreign governments who might not share our values.” He further stated that such a move is “irreversible.”

Pai said, “This proposal is to essentially give up the US oversight role that it’s had for the last 20 years, basically for the entire commercial lifespan of the Internet to a company called ICANN, which is an international organization, which includes a number of foreign countries. And, it’s an unprecedented move, and one that, as Mr. DeMint pointed out, is irreversible. Once we give up this oversight role, we can’t get it back.”

READ MORE

CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

BALTIMORE GAZETTE:

Earlier last week an NBC intern was seen hand delivering a package to Clinton’s campaign headquarters, according to sources. The package was not given to secretarial staff, as would normally happen, but the intern was instead ushered into the personal office of Clinton campaign manager Robert Mook. Members of the Clinton press corps from several media organizations were in attendance at the time, and a reporter from Fox News recognized the intern, but said he was initially confused because the NBC intern was dressed like a Fed Ex employee.

The reporter from Fox questioned campaign staff about the intern, but campaign staff at first claimed ignorance and then claimed that it was just a Fed Ex employee who had already left. No reporters present who had seen the intern dressed as a Fed Ex employee go into Mook’s office saw him leave by the same front entrance. The Fox reporter who recognized the intern also immediately looked outside of the campaign headquarters and noted that there were no Fed Ex vehicles parked outside.

READ MORE

Former Reagan Director of the Office of Management and Budget David Stockman on last night's presidential debate

Starting next week David Stockman (former businessman and U.S. politician who served as a Republican U.S. Representative from the state of Michigan and as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan) will be charging for his newsletter...right now, it's free:

Excerpt:
To wit, can anyone not drinking the Wall Street Cool-Aid believe that John Stumpf and his patron, St, Warren Buffet, were actually running a bank?

In fact, the C-suites of corporate America have been turned into stock gambling dens, and corporate balance sheets have been strip-mined to fund the greatest financial engineering ponzi schemes every conceived.

The truth is, Janet Yellen is a paint-by-the-numbers academic fool who has no clue about the havoc she and her posse have unleashed on the American economy. Yet she gets away with it exactly owing to the “Fed independence” cover story so mendaciously peddled by the likes of Appelbaum, Liesman and Hilsenrath.

Thank heavens for the Donald. He knows a rigged job when he sees it, and, at least last night, was undomesticated enough to let 100 million voters hear the truth.

READ MORE

Watch the video in another post-debate analysis with Stockman on Neil Cavuto's show:

David Stockman’s Post-Debate Interview: Lester Holt Was In The Tank For Hillary

Cruz’s entire career has been a calculation

ALLAHPUNDIT - HOT AIR:

Cruz’s entire career has been a calculation, and I say that as someone who voted for him this spring. He became a populist outsider running against Washington only after his attempt to join the establishment failed. He staged his ObamaCare filibuster in 2013 with no hope of stopping the law from being implemented but knowing that it would be great for his insurrectionist brand in the 2016 primaries. During the Gang of Eight debate, he offered an amendment that would have expanded guest workers while removing the path to citizenship knowing that that would let him argue the amendment both ways during his presidential run. During the GOP primaries, he’d claim it was a poison pill to sink the bill; during the general election, had he made it that far, he’d be pointing to the guest-workers part as proof that he’s not a radical restrictionist. Cruz dodged questions on legalizing illegals literally for years, in fact, until pressure from Trump finally forced him to rule it out late last year.

His “bromance” with Trump was itself a giant calculation designed to build goodwill among Trump’s populist voters in hopes that Cruz would inherit them once Trump collapsed. Then he made his boldest calculation yet at the convention, betting that a non-endorsement would make him look good after Trump inevitably melted down on the trail this fall and ended up being crushed by Clinton. Now that that hasn’t panned out, he’s re-calculating and reluctantly endorsing him so as not to be blamed for a narrow Trump defeat (or frozen out by the White House next year if Trump pulls off the upset). All he does is calculate, and his calculations are always to his personal political advantage. That’s why it was easy to predict that he’d cave to Trump eventually. The moment standing on principle began to hurt rather than help his presidential aspirations, principle went out the window. That’s Cruz.

READ MORE

THE TURNING OF THE TIDES

THE TURNING OF THE TIDES connects all the dots between what was and is being done in education in order to change society now... including tearing down the family, and womens' roles, in order to make the children wards of the state. It even talks about the UN's perpetual war under the guise of peace, and why and how the country will be bankrupted in order to finally give it up to the totalitarian one-world system.

You may read The Long House, Inc. Publishers 1962 .pdf here: DOWNLOAD .PDF

THE TURNING OF THE TIDES

The text of this volume has been divided into four parts. The first three describe a movement-how it started, what became its objectives, and to what extent those objectives were reached . These three parts are entitled : Currents, Tides, and-The Flood. The fourth part tells of the rising waters of a more recent stream, whose mounting effect gives the title to the book . Parts I, III and IV are by John Howland Snow . Part II is by the Hon . Paul W . Shafer of Michigan, Member of Congress from 1937 until his death in 1954 . The original text was delivered in the House of Representatives on March 21, 1952. Approximately two years were required for the preparation and publication.

PART I - CURRENTS - The Early Movement

On the 12th of September 1905 a group of young men met together in lower Manhattan, New York . Conditions in America were not ideal . These young men had an ideal. Consciously or not, it had been borrowed from the social structures of the Old World . The meeting took place in a loft above Peck's Restaurant, at 140 Fulton Street. Among the group were some who in later years were to become widely known for views which at that time were the catalyst bringing them together . On that day nearly sixty years ago was organized the Intercollegiate Socialist Society.

Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs

ORLY TAITZ:

My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs

Posted on | September 16, 2016 | 

Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.

All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.

Here is the response that I gave.

Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.

See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs

At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of  cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.

My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times   all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.

I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.

I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.

1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.

Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number?

I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.

2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?

3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?

4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia.

    

5.  Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate

6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording  eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?

7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.

8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? 

When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.

For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later.

By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

(named by the media, the Birther Queen)

09.16.16

Media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama's use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs

ORLY TAITZ:

My interviews given to the media today. The media should ask Obama, not Trump about Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs

Posted on | September 16, 2016 | 

Today I was interviewed by the Elise Foley from Huffington Post (see article below), Stephen Nelson from US News and World Report, Alex Seitz-Wald from NBC, Reid Epstein from Wall Street Journal and other media representatives.

All of them asked if I am angry with Donald Trump in regards to Trump’s statement today.

Here is the response that I gave.

Donald Trump does not have an obligation to prosecute Barack Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and his use of fabricated IDs.

See the evidence hereEvidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs

At this point in time Trump has only one obligation: as a Republican nominee he has to do whatever he possibly can to win the election. I told all of the above mentioned members of the media that I am a Trump supporter and will vote for him. Trump is hands down the best candidate to bring jobs back to America, to end the outsourcing of American jobs and in-sourcing of  cheap, illegal foreign labor, to build the wall, to limit illegal immigration, to clean up the mess created by Obama, to start paying off 9 trillion debt incurred by Obama. Trump is an American patriot, Hillary Clinton is a globalist puppet and for that reason in my opinion everyone should vote for Trump.

My concern is with Attorneys General of the US, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder, who had at all times   all of the evidence in this file Evidence of forgery, fraud, fabrication in Obama’s IDs, who placed their personal friendship with Obama above the well-being of this nation and who refused to file criminal charges against Barack Obama in spite of the undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and fabricated IDs.

I revealed to these members of the US media that I recently did a documentary for one of the largest European news networks, it will come out soon. In this documentary I compared the US media to controlled media in the former Soviet Union. In my opinion, a this point, the main stream media in the US is more controlled and corrupt than even the media in the Soviet Union.

I questioned all of the media representatives, who called, why didn’t they ask Barack Obama simple questions.

1. For example, the attached link shows that in 2010 Obama posted his tax returns on line and originally made a mistake of not flattening the PDF file, which showed that Obama is using a CT Social Security number. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut. Later, this number was traced to Harrison J Bounel, born in 1890, immigrated to US in 1912.

Why the media never asked Obama, why is he using a Connecticut Social Security number, considering that he never was a resident of Connecticut, why doesn’t he has a Hawaiian Social Security number?

I asked all of the reporters, all media representatives, whether they would be willing to arrange an interview with Barack Obama and ask him this question.

2. I asked the media, why didn’t they confront Obama and AG Lynch with obviously fabricated Selective Service registration, which bears a fabricated US cancellation postal stamp. In all documents, on all letters in the US, all postal stamps have a 4 digit year, Obama’s has a 2 digit year “80”. Sheriff Arpaio did a press conference stating that this is a forgery. Why the media is not confronting Obama with this evidence?

3. Obama claims that he studied at Columbia university for 2 years, however the official records show that he was there only for 9 months. Why isn’t the media asking Obama, why is he lying about the time he allegedly studied at Columbia and where was he from May of 1981 till September of 1982, the time he claimed to study at Columbia, but didn’t?

4. Why isn’t media asking Obama about his fraud committed upon the Illinois Attorneys Bar. On his application he was asked whether he used any other names. He defrauded the bar by claiming that he did not use any other names, even though he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s passport and under the last name Soetoro in his school records in Indonesia.

    

5.  Why is Obama using a fabricated birth certificate which has letters of all different fonts and sizes and which opens in multiple layers. Sheriff Arpaio confirmed that there is probable cause of forgery in this birth certificate

6. I asked the media reps to interview Brian Schatz, former president of the Democratic party of Hawaii, why did he sign a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination). All other certificates stated that the candidate is eligible for office under the US constitution. Obama’s 2008 certificate was falsified and this wording was replaced with wording  eligible according to the rules and regulations of the Democratic party. Schatz was rewarding handsomely for this in a typical Chicago pay for play scheme, he was appointed to be the US senator from HI when the prior senator passed away. Why isn’t the media questioning Schatz and most importantly AG Lynch, why wasn’t Schatz criminally prosecuted?

7. I asked about another pay for play. NBC reporter, Savanna Guthry, claimed that she saw a raised seal on the flagrant forgery that Obama claims to be his birth certificate. Experts show that there was never any raised seal. Just as Schatz, Guthry was rewarded for her act of misinformation and possibly criminal conspiracy to treason by getting a multi-million dollar contract to be the morning anchor on NBC.

8. Why is the media calling this movement racist when my client and the most prominent birther is is the most prominent African -American, former US ambassador to the UN economic commission, Dr. Allen Keyes? 

When media is corrupt, when the Department of Justice is corrupt, the country becomes a banana republic or even worse, a tyranny.

For now, let’s concentrate on the election, let’s help Trump get elected, we’ll renew this conversation later.

By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

(named by the media, the Birther Queen)

09.16.16

UNDOING OBAMA’S DAMAGE TO AMERICA

Fifteen years ago this Sunday [9/11/2001], nearly 3,000 Americans were killed in the deadliest attack on the U.S. homeland in our history. A decade and a half later, we remain at war with Islamic terrorists. Winning this war will require an effort of greater scale and commitment than anything we have seen since World War II, calling on every element of our national power.

Defeating our enemies has been made significantly more difficult by the policies of Barack Obama. No American president has done more to weaken the U.S., hobble our defenses or aid our adversaries.

President Obama has been more dedicated to reducing America’s power than to defeating our enemies. He has enhanced the abilities, reach and finances of our adversaries, including the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, at the expense of our allies and our own national security. He has overseen a decline of our own military capabilities as our adversaries strength has grown.

Our Air Force today is the oldest and smallest it has ever been. In January 2015, then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno testified that the Army was as unready as it had been at any other time in its history. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert testified similarly that, “Navy readiness is at its lowest point in many years.”

Nearly half of the Marine Corp’s non-deployed units, the ones that respond to unforeseen contingencies are suffering shortfalls, according to the commandant of the Corps, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. For the first time in decades, American supremacy in key areas can no longer be assured.

The president who came into office promising to end wars has made war more likely by diminishing America’s strength and deterrence ability.

He doesn’t seem to understand that the credible threat of military force gives substance and meaning to our diplomacy. By reducing the size and strength of our forces, he has ensured that future wars will be longer, and put more American lives at risk.

Meanwhile, the threat from global terrorist organizations has grown. Nicholas Rasmussen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told the House Homeland Security Committee in July that, “As we approach 15 years since 9/11, the array of terrorist actors around the globe is broader, wider and deeper than it has been at any time since that day.”

Despite Mr. Obama’s claim that ISIS has been diminished, John Brennan, Mr. Obama’s CIA director, told the Senate Intelligence Committee in June that, “Our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability or global reach.”

The president’s policies have contributed to our enemies’ advance. In his first days in office, Mr. Obama moved to take the nation off a war footing and return to the failed policies of the 1990s when terrorism was treated as a law-enforcement matter.

It didn’t matter that the Enhanced Interrogation Program produced information that prevented attacks, saved American lives and, we now know, contributed to the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden. Mr. Obama ended the program, publicly revealed its techniques, and failed to put any effective terrorist-interrogation program in its place.

We are no longer interrogating terrorists in part because we are no longer capturing terrorists.

Since taking office, the president has recklessly pursued his objective of closing the detention facility at Guantanamo by releasing current detainees — regardless of the likelihood they will return to the field of battle against us. Until recently, the head of recruitment for ISIS in Afghanistan and Pakistan was a former Guantanamo detainee, as is one of al Qaeda’s most senior leaders in the Arabian Peninsula.

As he released terrorists to return to the field of battle, Mr. Obama was simultaneously withdrawing American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mr. Obama calls this policy “ending wars.” Most reasonable people recognize this approach as losing wars.

When Mr. Obama took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2009, Iraq was stable. Following the surge ordered by President Bush, al Qaeda in Iraq had largely been defeated, as had the Shiite militias. The situation was so good that Vice President Joe Biden predicted, “Iraq will be one of the great achievements of this administration.”

Today, Iraq’s border with Syria has been erased by the most successful and dangerous terrorist organization in history. ISIS has established its “caliphate” across a large swath of territory in the heart of Syria and Iraq, from which it trains, recruits, plots and launches attacks.

On Aug. 20, 2012, Mr. Obama drew a red line making clear he would take military action if Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons. A year later, Mr. Assad launched a sarin-gas attack on his own people in the suburbs of Damascus.

Mr. Obama did nothing, a failure that destroyed America’s credibility and strengthened the hand of our adversaries.

We now know that the president’s refusal to act came as the Iranians and the U.S. were engaged in secret talks about Iran’s nuclear program. In his new book, The Iran Wars, Wall Street Journal correspondent Jay Solomon writes that according to Iranian sources, “Tehran made it clear to the American delegation that the nuclear negotiations would be halted if the U.S. went ahead with its attack on Assad.”

The Iranians were now in the driver’s seat, not just regarding their own policy in the Middle East, but in determining America’s.

President Obama and Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were so concerned with pleasing Iran’s ruling mullahs that they were willing to overlook the American blood on Iranian hands and decades of Iran’s activities as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. In pursuit of the nuclear deal, they made concession after dangerous concession.

Every promise made to the American people about the Obama nuclear agreement has been broken. We were promised a “world-class” verification process. Instead, the Iranians are allowed in key instances to verify themselves.

We were promised the agreement would “block every pathway” to an Iranian nuclear weapon. Instead, the Obama-Clinton agreement virtually guarantees an Iranian nuclear weapon, gives them access to the latest in centrifuge technology and will likely usher in a nuclear arms race across the Middle East.

We were promised that non-nuclear sanctions, including those that block Iran’s access to hard currency and our financial systems, would remain in place. Instead, the Obama administration has paid the mullahs at least $1.7 billion in cash, which includes at least $1.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer money, the first installment of which was ransom for the release of American hostages.

In case there is any doubt that the regime will use these funds to support terror, Iran’s parliament recently passed Article 22 of its 2016-2017 budget, mandating that all such funds be transferred directly to the Iranian military.

Fifteen years after 3,000 Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists, America’s commander in chief has become the money launderer in chief for the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.

Iran isn’t the only adversary benefiting from the age of Obama. Russia is threatening NATO, invading sovereign territory, selling air-defense systems to the Iranians, using its military to defend the Assad regime, bombing American-backed rebels in Syria, and playing a larger role in the Middle East than at any time since Anwar Sadat expelled his Soviet advisers from Egypt in 1972.

Across the region, nations that previously were strong American allies are making different calculations. Russia is seen as a reliable ally standing with Mr. Assad, while the U.S. walks away from its friends. The steady stream of visitors from the Middle East to Moscow, including most recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is evidence of Moscow’s growing role in the region.

Neither Russia nor Vladmir Putin share America’s interests.

China is also ascendant, threatening freedom of navigation through the South China Sea and developing weapons systems that directly threaten American military superiority. North Korea represents a growing nuclear threat to the U.S. homeland. Mr. Obama’s announced pivot to Asia turned out to be hollow, further alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies in the region.

Undoing this damage will require an effort of historic proportions.

Our next president must abandon Mr. Obama’s fantasy that unilaterally disarming, retreating and abandoning our allies will bring peace and security.

We must begin at once to rebuild our military. This means ending sequestration and returning to a Defense Department budget built around defeating the threats to our nation.

We must remedy readiness shortfalls, modernize and upgrade our nuclear arsenal, develop and build a robust missile-defense system, and invest in technologies necessary to maintain our military superiority, particularly against advances by adversaries like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

Among the most important lessons of 9/11 was that terrorists must be denied safe havens from which to plan and launch attacks against us. On President Obama’s watch, terrorist safe havens have expanded around the globe.

Our next president must recognize that Islamic terrorists pose an existential threat to the U.S., and must instruct the military to provide plans necessary to defeat them and deny them safe havens. These should include expanding the pace of our air campaign against ISIS, removing the onerous rules of engagement, and dedicating additional special operators and other American forces as necessary to defeat our enemies.

Winning the war against Islamic terrorists will also require that we rebuild our intelligence capabilities. Our next president should reinstate the Enhanced Interrogation Program, ensure that Guantanamo remains open so we have a facility to hold enemy combatants, and increase our intelligence activities so we can identify and disrupt plots before they are carried out.

We must make clear that we will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon or become nuclear capable.

Our next president should renounce the Obama-Clinton nuclear agreement, develop a strategy in consultation with our allies in the region to address Iran’s state sponsorship of terror, and make clear that all options are on the table where Iran’s nuclear program is concerned.

We must also rebuild our relationships with allies across the globe so that we can build the coalitions necessary to defeat Islamic terrorism and restore our strength and power. This includes reinvigorating NATO and affirming America’s unshakable commitment to the most effective military alliance in history.

Generations before have met and defeated grave threats to our nation. American strength, leadership and ideals were crucial to the Allied victory in World War II and the defeat of Soviet Communism during the Cold War. It will be up to today’s generation to restore American pre-eminence so that we can defend our freedom and defeat Islamic terror.

Since World War II, America has been freedom’s defender — for ourselves and for millions around the world. We do this because our security depends upon it and because there is no other nation that can.

As Americans calculate the costs of leadership, we must remember that the costs of failing to lead, or of inaction are much higher.

Imagine a world where Russia, Iran, China and North Korea set the rules; where militant Islam spreads its evil ideology unchallenged across the globe; where parts of Europe are once again enslaved by Russia, our NATO alliance impotent; and where China achieves military superiority over the U.S. and dominates Asia and beyond.

Finally, imagine a world where the terrorists and their leading state sponsor have nuclear weapons. Fifteen years after 9/11, we can say with certainty that this is the world that will be created by withdrawal and retreat by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s policies if we don’t reverse course.

Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney

[This essay by former Vice-President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney, Republican candidate for the Wyoming Congressional seat, was published in the Wall Street Journal on Friday, September 9.  We are republishing it in full as a public service.]

http://www.tothepointnews.com/2016/09/undoing-obamas-damage-to-america/

THE MUSLIM POPULATION TIMELINE

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in Bangladesh — Muslim 83%, Egypt — Muslim 90%, Gaza — Muslim 98.7%, Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%, Iran — Muslim 98%, Iraq — Muslim 97%, Jordan — Muslim 92%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in: Afghanistan — Muslim 100%, Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%, SomaliaMuslim 100%, Yemen ---Muslim 100%.

9/11 anniversary -- 15 years of strategic defeat, dishonesty and humiliation

Newt Gingrich:

“I will begin by saying what everybody would like to ignore or forget but which must nevertheless be stated, namely, that we have sustained a total and unmitigated defeat.” -- That was Winston Churchill’s description of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's surrender to Hitler in the Munich Agreement of 1938.

Yet Churchill's words also apply to where the United States is today.

READ MORE

CLINTON SCANDAL: The Takeaways...The Players...The Timeline.

The Clearest (No Spin) Summary of FBI Report on Hillary Clinton Email by Sharyl Attkisson:

Since this article refers to both President and Mrs. Clinton, they are sometimes referred to by their first names for clarity.

Most of the information is from the FBI report. Some contextual facts and dates have been added.

The Takeaways. The Players. The Timeline

Now THIS is how it feels to be an AMERICAN!!!

A government in exile...

Somewhere along the way the Clinton White House had become a permanent institution. It could change shape, but it wouldn’t go away. It could morph into the Clinton Foundation and wear a number of disguises before it was ready to shed its chrysalis and become the Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign.

And yet they’re all the same thing.

After leaving the White House, the Clintons became a government in exile. Like the warlords or former kings living in Brussels or London, they maintained the structure of the old government. They sought out supporters who would help finance their return to power in exchange for future favors.

The Clinton Foundation is something alien to Americans, but quite familiar in certain settings. The Clintons and those around them treated term limits as a temporary setback to be overcome. And then the restoration of the Clinton Empire could commence. At the center were two corrupt, but not particularly bright royals, surrounded by a bevy of courtiers with extremely dubious agendas.

Some only wanted money. Others, like Huma Abedin, had more complex loyalties.

What all this amounted to was a coup. The Clintons were determined to become a perverse monarchy. And they were willing to take money from anyone and promise them anything to make it happen.

READ MORE

Blackmail...coercion...what difference does it make?

KC Kerrie - YOU Move!! #YOUMove